Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects.

[bangjoe]

You think its all about shiit exchange ?
I think the performance of the team project is very visible here how they are very confident to be listed on a very bad exchange if they are experienced I am sure they will not be serious to be registered there

I think it is clear, the problem of the lack of project funds available for listing in large markets, and pressure from investors to schedule listings in accordance with the roadmap that is always awaited by their communities. I think at this point the developers are very aware of their abilities and feel pressured, if they don't take fast steps then their coins will first circulate in forkdelta at a very chaotic price.

[1715173835]

1715173835

[1715173835]

1715173835

[1715173835]

1715173835

[1715173835]

1715173835

[1715173835]

1715173835

[Gheka]

You are absolutely right. A bad decision can destroy a project! Last year I saw many good projects got listed on P2PB2B exchange and those projects are dead now! Blockium was a very good project, but listing on a shit exchange ruined it! So, you are very right!

I think you just need to look at the results and the developer decision, it proves that the projects you mention are one of the bad projects, regardless of whether you complain about their decision, it's clear that these projects just deserve to be listed on bad exchanges, and projects that you have underestimated, even junk on the market, then it was listed on reputable exchanges. Where are the good projects? The exchange name it listed is the best proof, can't blame decisions, it's simply not good enough

[biddicoin]

You might not know but visit any of the telegram groups of projects whose token is not listed anywhere, most of the comments on a normal day with be about when exchange..? The investors of ico used to put allot of pressure to list the coin on an exchange.

Exchange is a thing that dev should list coin to, a project without exchange wouldnt grow.
I dont wonder if many people ask like that

But, it doesnt mean dev lists coin in shit exchange. dev still needs to list in good exchange
in this case we talk about successfull project, so money wont be matter.

IMO, dev wont list in good exchange bcz of shit dev. they just care about money not about the project itself.

[d3nz]

I don't think good projects choose some shitty exchanges, if a project chooses a shit exchanges well don't expect too much from it and I think some projects that choose good exchanges might scam the investors.

But sometimes I see some good projects but they are listed on an exchange that has a bad reputation, maybe because the list fees are expensive so they are forced to register there. But if they have enough funds I think they will not want to register a bad exchanges.

I agree, there are some good projects that are listed on exchanges that obviously milking the project developers of fees which is very bad and the impact could be bad since the developers may lack of funds for the updates of the project that will surely affect the investors and the volume.

But some of the projects are listed on exchanges that is really good even thou the listing fee is overprice.

[nomenclatur]

in fact, many projects are good that the listing in the shit exchange because the price for a listing is very cheap and made investors become quieter because the project they follow already enrolled in exchange they usually feel happy even project a nice listings in 2 exchange project team usually they are more concerned future to the project development.

[seleme]

in fact, many projects are good that the listing in the shit exchange because the price for a listing is very cheap and made investors become quieter because the project they follow already enrolled in exchange they usually feel happy even project a nice listings in 2 exchange project team usually they are more concerned future to the project development.

Indeed many new exchanges have a easy listing requirements compared to the hardness of the well-known exchanges that can ask up to 10 BTC. For the new project, they will please the majority of investors after sharing this news on the social media. The market is a bit higher than the the previous market rate but the halving expectations can change this. Future market performance doesn't depend on the reputation of listed exchange, IMHO.

[carlzec]

Too much Exchange. But the volumes need to examine how much of them. Exchange's values change by volume. Bitcoin has dominated the market. The Exchange's trying to extract their tokens. After the first IEO, some exchanges suffered enormous loss of prestige.

[oscarftw]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

Situation are different as project idea and types. This bear market can't help all projects to funds rise. After listed exchange some project start fund rise. I bought a coin which project can manage any exchange after more than 2 year. That project still in developing but people already forget about this coin.

[wxxyrqa]

There are many reasons that make developers put their coins / tokens on shit exchange, for investors to be calm because they have entered the market even though it is shit or small exchange. It could be that the exchange itself included it without first asking the developer for permission.
Or it could be that developers are getting frustrated by market conditions but continue to be urged by investors to immediately put them in exchange.

You gave a valid reason for developers deciding to list on shit exchange, but that does not change the fact that listing on a shit exchange cause more harm than good. The project should be able to budget rightly and develop the project well enough to attract good investors.

You are really right, but according to the logic of things, this situation should develop only with respect to professional developers who work on their project and do everything for the good prospects that only a rating exchange can give.  But in most cases, developers are only worried about their profits, and therefore constantly throw their coins out for bad exchanges.  In addition, it is worth paying attention that it has long been a practice that any new coins fall in price by at least 100% immediately after listing.  I believe that the developers themselves threw so many coins on the market to sell as much as possible and make money on it.

[salad daging]

in fact, many projects are good that the listing in the shit exchange because the price for a listing is very cheap and made investors become quieter because the project they follow already enrolled in exchange they usually feel happy even project a nice listings in 2 exchange project team usually they are more concerned future to the project development.

that's where the actual reputation of the project can be seen, if they mature, it won't take too long to calm investors and focus on the next plan, but what happens is that the developer is really panicking with the situation / indeed has planned to take an important part in selling most their own tokens on the exchange, indirectly clearly led to a bad stigma between developers and exchanges and ended with a negative reputation that continues to occur repeatedly.

[Jamalkm74]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

You are right, but my opinion is good project listed low volume exchange because of some time  problem about team fund-raising issue, so they have no way to listed good exchange.       

[koang]

But sometimes I see some good projects but they are listed on an exchange that has a bad reputation, maybe because the list fees are expensive so they are forced to register there. But if they have enough funds I think they will not want to register a bad exchanges.

Expensive listing fees are always a problem for projects that do not have enough funds, but that cannot be used as a reason to list
their tokens/coins on a bad exchanges
There are other ways can be taken by dev to be listed in a good exchange, one of which is through an Voting contest.
And if dev can manage its community well, I think this method (Voting) will be very effective.

[nakata121]

Now this fraudulent project has harmed many people, be it other project developers, investors, even bounty hunters affected, we can see now how one projects that was very serious team to develop their project, but in the end the project could not run because of the lack of investors to fund the project, and the reason investors are afraid that if the project is also a scam / fraud, I think in the future it will be very difficult for us to get a project that will truly have potential and success in their token sale.

[doctor877]

All good projects are careful of exchange they list on, everyone knows nothing good can come of a shit exchange so it won't be surprising if a seemingly good project lists on a shit exchange. This means its not worthy of being called a good project. Sometimes it's more than just listing on an exchange.

[bohr]

I don't think good projects choose some shitty exchanges, if a project chooses a shit exchanges well don't expect too much from it and I think some projects that choose good exchanges might scam the investors.

This is what I think as well, it is very easy to think that a good project is going to decide to be listed in a bad exchange and that is what it caused its ruin but the truth is that the project was not as good as you thought it was, good projects that actually have original ideas and that have a group of dedicated and motivated developers are going to eventually be listed in good exchanges without having to pay anything for the privilege, because the customers of those exchanges are going to ask the exchange to list that coin.

[semobo]

All good projects are careful of exchange they list on, everyone knows nothing good can come of a shit exchange so it won't be surprising if a seemingly good project lists on a shit exchange. This means its not worthy of being called a good project. Sometimes it's more than just listing on an exchange.

Project who has not intention of firther development will list them into shit exchanges and dump all their tokens to get more juice from their business plan.Never interested on new projects anymore.

We have already enough projects to survive for new century.

[Coltpython]

The big exchanges are greedy slobs. They only care about making money off project devs. I believe if a project is good and shows interest and potential demand, it won't matter where it lists, it will trade well with great volume on any exchange. CountingHouse (CHT) traded for several months on only etherdelta (or was it forkdelta?) and the price was steadily going up as well

[bohr]

All good projects are careful of exchange they list on, everyone knows nothing good can come of a shit exchange so it won't be surprising if a seemingly good project lists on a shit exchange. This means its not worthy of being called a good project. Sometimes it's more than just listing on an exchange.

Project who has not intention of firther development will list them into shit exchanges and dump all their tokens to get more juice from their business plan.Never interested on new projects anymore.

We have already enough projects to survive for new century.

Exactly, there are already thousands of projects in this market we do not need more projects unless they are really good and unless they are original, if anyone is thinking to invest in new projects those are the only two questions that they need to answer, if a project is good and original then you should invest in it and take the risk but if it is not and it is just a copy of another project or a fork then there is no need to invest in that project at all because it is not going to give profits in the future.

[diazepam666]

Many ICO companies do not know the correct person to choose as the perfect manager, exchange and Pro. If they pick the right person we were seeing the projects on the good exchanges.
Most of the people looking big exchanges and pick the incorrect person to list the tokens instead of going right place in website.

[lousie9]

it cannot be denied that most projects are good and have quality products but ultimately end badly, especially for developers who register their projects in bad exchange. Well, there might be a number of reasons developers do that, but if so, surely a good project will not produce sweet fruit.