Shit Exchanges, an end to good projects.

[Tduty]

Yes, you are right my friend. Shit exchanges are killing good projects, this is a fault of the project owner! Many projects listed on a normal exchange first, when the community asked about it, they reply big exchange coming on the board! But day over day, the project goes to end badly! Recently people arising their voice against P2PB2B, Vindax, Latoken exchanges, which is very positive! People should stop using those shot exchange, and if any project goes for shit exchange, we should boycott both of them instantly!

[1715318138]

1715318138

[1715318138]

1715318138

[1715318138]

1715318138

[Bezobraznike]

Yes, you are right my friend. Shit exchanges are killing good projects, this is a fault of the project owner! Many projects listed on a normal exchange first, when the community asked about it, they reply big exchange coming on the board! But day over day, the project goes to end badly! Recently people arising their voice against P2PB2B, Vindax, Latoken exchanges, which is very positive! People should stop using those shot exchange, and if any project goes for shit exchange, we should boycott both of them instantly!

   One wrong move from the team behind a project can ruin everything. In many discussions on this forum about why projects fail one
thing is common, it's the team that made wrong move with choosing managers, their marketing, and after all choosing an exchange.
   I don't think that we can boycott them, we can unite all the people. There are old ones who don't care about that, they tried and
that didn't work, new ones don't believe in anything except how to make fast money.
   

[Onuohakk]

The main reason towards poor market price of a project is not only caused by shit exchanges but also from the project itself. How can a particular project has about 10billion circulating supply and expect a miracle from her investors. The supply is always much, whereby the demand is few. That's the main issue facing altcoin irrespective of the exchange

[TheClownSong]

The main reason towards poor market price of a project is not only caused by shit exchanges but also from the project itself. How can a particular project has about 10billion circulating supply and expect a miracle from her investors. The supply is always much, whereby the demand is few. That's the main issue facing altcoin irrespective of the exchange

In my opinion, supply is no longer an issue because if we look at TRX or XRP, their supply is the most but investors are still hunting because of liquidity. Listing in a large exchanger has an psychological effect on investors because in my opinion it is related to liquidity and this will affect investor interest

[setialovers]

The main reason towards poor market price of a project is not only caused by shit exchanges but also from the project itself. How can a particular project has about 10billion circulating supply and expect a miracle from her investors. The supply is always much, whereby the demand is few. That's the main issue facing altcoin irrespective of the exchange

I agree, the project itself plays an important role in gaining investor confidence. There are many projects that initially listed on large exchangers but because they look prospective and are supported by a large community, large exchangers glance and listings at no cost.

[Polar91]

This will be a very difficult decision for them to think of, in the first place, they have their road map where their project should be inclined into, second is the pressure from the people especially the investors and the bounty hunters. Their mindset could be like asking too many times when to be listed to an exchange, as a result, for the project to somehow prove their competency to the market, they rush and decides to list on an exchange even if it has a negative reputation, plus, many people contributes by dumping the price of the coin leading to another worthless token created.

[X-ray]

I think if what they develop can run optimally, then it is impossible for the project to just die. I see many projects there is no clarity of their goals. In fact, their website is only as where ICO was launched until now it has never changed. This means they don't see the fate of their project anymore. Just waiting for the dead domain.

There are many living proofs out there regarding a project that have finished which run optimally and already published to the masses but still failed. The main problem is the fact that they are lacking the users. They failed to market their product and as a result no one recognize their coin and even getting into popular exchange is really hard. A project could only success if the team could gather the attention of the masses.

[wack slacker]

I am wondering about the Shit exchange that you said.  A good project and a good exchange are two different issues.  Currently the market is very seriously manipulated exchange rates.  Even the volume of transactions they can fake, I think the value of the project can be fake.  I have observed the exchanges in 2018-2019 and I have commented the following: most of the trading volume is fake and the value of the tokens is pushed up and discounted abnormally with a difference of billions.  big price.  Projects that hold an IEO or after an ICO are listed on exchanges are severely discounted, with only a handful of tokens holding value.
Projects successfully hosted by an ICO or IEO (meaning completing a Softcap) are severely discounting.  This is the general status of all projects.  There are many reasons for the discount.  The majority of them follow market trends, in part because of projects that cheat their customers.  Look at the projects that have hosted IEO.  I can't believe hpj has organized projects to raise just $ 1 million back.  This is ridiculous because they will not be able to take the project with that small amount of money because after subtracting the cost of organizing IEO and listing on the trading platform the remaining amount is very small.

[Almasani]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

I think there is no point in us berating projects that release coins at the low exchange (you say shit exchange). I often see many projects whose aspirations register in large exchanges, eventually fleeing because of their inability to achieve their goals.

[universe_]

First there are no good projects to start with the good project developers are no longer interested in cryptocurrencies since the bitcoin and alts particularly ethereum price dropped enormously last 2018, which is why no good developers and team that invested in smart contracts are no longer interested. Now, IEO has become something bad developers have seen this opportunity to create a shitcoin in return for dumping it.

[bohr]

it cannot be denied that most projects are good and have quality products but ultimately end badly, especially for developers who register their projects in bad exchange. Well, there might be a number of reasons developers do that, but if so, surely a good project will not produce sweet fruit.

Of course it can be denied, most projects are either scams or just weak attempts to create something good, and the statistics are on my side when it comes to prove this, most projects fail because they are bad, it is not complicated, at the end it does not matter the exchange they selected those coins are going to disappear anyway no matter what they do, a good coin will survive being listed in a bad exchange and it will eventually be listed in a good one if their developers keep working on it.

[sangjoewara]

I think there is no point in us berating projects that release coins at the low exchange (you say shit exchange). I often see many projects whose aspirations register in large exchanges, eventually fleeing because of their inability to achieve their goals.

Yes, the project that registers their tokens on a low exchange is actually not a problem, it's just that at a low exchange the volume of coins or tokens is very slow to increase, so the team must always care about their tokens to always live trading and not easily die in exchange.

[ije07]

I think it depends on the project team and the developer, even we don't think that a good project ends with a bad exchange and vice versa. because every developer has his own way of promoting his project and bad exchange is not the main reason for ending a good project, there might be other reasons that we don't know about apart from the developer himself.

[thesmallgod]

do you know that some project dev lias with some exchange so as to benefit mutually, even if you are the kind of person that join and follow projects on the telegram you must have come across some so-called exchange platform representative that will alway message project dev in order to get their coin listed freely on the platform just because they want real traders and traffic on their website. I understand the act of not being patient also contributes to the reason why dev get their token listed on a bad exchange but also they are to blame most because if they understand the dangers involved in getting a solid project listed on a shit exchange, they will not try it. Many of them always rush to get listed on Latoken that has been regarded as been tagged the den of scam and dead token 

[Ss4sukE]

in many cases it is true that many good projects are listed on a low exchange, do not have high trading volumes and there are not many traders there. I think if a project developer registers on a large exchange like Binance, chances are that their coins will be widely used by traders or investors.

[Mulann2]

It is the fault of any good project that decides to settle for crapy and shit exchange just to cut a cost, if you know your project is worthy then don't allow cheap exchange to ruin it, do whatever it takes to list on a decent exchange for starters, but some project only just want short term thing, so they don't have a problem settling for less.

[Spider A4]

I don't think good projects choose some shitty exchanges, if a project chooses a shit exchanges well don't expect too much from it and I think some projects that choose good exchanges might scam the investors.

MB8 was largest project and early stage listed in good exchange for shutdown exchange now this coin listed shit exchange WhiteBit. Many good projects still listed in shit exchanges, Currently a lot of good projects ico's going on shit exchanges. Yet you say good projects never choose shit exchanges?    

Shitty exchanges ruined whole of the project. Who's don’t agree with me that's your personal opinion.         

[Sithara007]

I don't think good projects choose some shitty exchanges, if a project chooses a shit exchanges well don't expect too much from it and I think some projects that choose good exchanges might scam the investors.

MB8 was largest project and early stage listed in good exchange for shutdown exchange now this coin listed shit exchange WhiteBit. Many good projects still listed in shit exchanges, Currently a lot of good projects ico's going on shit exchanges. Yet you say good projects never choose shit exchanges?    

Shitty exchanges ruined whole of the project. Who's don’t agree with me that's your personal opinion.         

I still don't understand how the choice of exchange is going to matter. If a project is good, and the development timelines are being honored, then the prices will be stable irrespective of the exchange. And if the project is really promising, I don't think that too many users will think about selling the tokens as well. The issues occur when the promoters dump their tokens and ignore the timelines. At this point, the users will rush to dump those tokens they hold. But by that time, the prices would have crashed already.

[anjiitem]

If the project is good and the developer really wants to develop the project he has and wants to make the investors and the people who participate in it not feel disappointed they will certainly not be listed in the shit exchanges which of course it will greatly affect the projects they bring where there will be many people or investors who assume that developers only want to obtain their own benefits and use the money obtained for themselves personally and do not have the desire to develop their projects.

[pakhitheboss]

It is almost impossible to believe that after developing a good project which might likely succeed because of the product, some so-called developers and teams will still go ahead and list in a shit exchange all in the name of reducing the listing fund or all in the name of no fund to list in the big exchange, if you cannot afford good exchange, why not continue with the development of the project to be able to attract the right investors, why rush to a shit exchange. So many projects that could have succeeded have been buried by shit exchange, and if you care to know, you are the reason why we still have shit exchange because the owners of shit exchange knew that some daft developers and team will surely come and list their projects. Why will someone prepare a good meal and then decide to keep it in a cabinet full of cockroaches? Wake up.

What on earth has an exchange listing got to do with a good project ending?

I do not understand the relation here and It is always the fault of a team that causes that project to end. Exchanges are meant for trading and projects are listed to help investors earn from trading. A project's performance solely depends on the team's development efforts and strategy to sell or market it.

An investor looks into the product performance and not in its exchange performance for a project to get funding after listing.