DireWolfM14 (OP)
Copper Member
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2254
Merit: 4313
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 02, 2019, 04:52:41 PM |
|
Facts:
1) CryptoSparks asked for 5 bitcoins, offering no collateral. 2) CryptoSparks claimed he would create an API for the 5 bitcoins through his service. 3) CryptoSparks claimed this API would give the lender as much control over the 5 bitcoins as a private key. 4) CryptoSparks repeated this lie numerous times.
Tecshare, you are really starting to sound like cryptohunter here. You're either unable or unwilling to see the difference between real facts and CryptoSpark's "truth."
No matter how hard you'd like to paint this issue as an example of "lynch mob" justice, it ain't working. The facts don't support your argument.
As I've gained influence on the trust system I've been very aware of my behavior and how it may be perceived. I've taken great pains to be thorough and fair. I pride myself in not jumping to conclusions, not only here as a DT member, but in my life as a whole. In general I require irrefutable, concrete facts and indisputable evidence before I take action.
Am I perfect? Far from it. Did I allow this cunt posing as a quant to get under my skin? Shamefully I concede, yes. Did I tag him because he's an incessantly annoying twerp? Emphatically; fuck no. I would never do that.
I tagged him because he's a ignorant fuck, posing a superior genius, phishing for an opportunity to scam. The facts I listed above are evidence of his deceitful claims, which can only stem from malicious intentions. They are out in the open, observable by anyone who takes the time to research them. If those facts aren't enough for you, then I'm sorry. You must be far less scrutinous and suspicious than I.
|