suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
 |
September 26, 2019, 05:17:39 PM
Last edit: November 21, 2019, 07:47:40 PM by suchmoon Merited by Welsh (10), Foxpup (6), LoyceV (5), Alex_Sr (5), DdmrDdmr (3), The Sceptical Chymist (2), stompix (2), Halab (2), bob123 (2), khaled0111 (1), sujonali1819 (1), hosseinimr93 (1), bitmover (1), o_e_l_e_o (1), DireWolfM14 (1), bL4nkcode (1), Little Mouse (1), friends1980 (1), th3nolo (1), TalkStar (1) |
|
This data is based on URLs found in user signatures. Multiple users wearing a link to a specific site are likely getting paid for it (e.g. via a signature campaign) but I have not verified this against any spreadsheets or other "official" campaign information. For the purposes of this post a "campaign" is a "group of users having a link to the same site in their signatures". It's possible that e.g. some users wearing ref links to a certain site will end up included in this list while not being part of an organized signature campaign. Top 100 signatures by number of users. This covers a period of 1 year between November 1, 2018 - October 31, 2019. ---- Users ---- ------ Posts ------ ----- Deleted ----
# Site Days Last Day Avg Max Total Bans Ban% Total P/Day P/U/D Total Del% D/Day
1. cryptotalk.org 35 active 362 438 907 10 1.1 93138 2659 7.2 4727 5.1 135
2. yobit.net 5 2019-07-01 7 306 448 8 1.8 14099 1204 8.5 797 5.7 159
3. miracletele.com 76 2019-06-02 30 234 399 34 8.5 21202 267 2.8 452 2.1 6
4. minter.network 39 2019-10-10 67 246 397 6 1.5 20043 506 3.2 942 4.7 24
5. stake.com 174 2019-07-12 23 104 282 20 7.1 77806 441 9.8 1367 1.8 8
6. catex.io 93 2019-05-02 29 94 233 4 1.7 13521 142 2.6 270 2.0 3
7. ironx.io 77 2019-01-25 34 112 230 10 4.3 13402 171 2.8 334 2.5 4
8. bcnex.net 115 2019-07-17 22 113 227 14 6.2 15522 129 3.0 274 1.8 2
9. bitvest.io 362 active 29 53 226 16 7.1 67494 186 6.3 2900 4.3 8
10. temtum.com 89 2019-08-21 29 98 214 6 2.8 9712 108 2.8 1012 10.4 11
11. xcard.io 67 active 63 107 214 0 0.0 11863 177 2.8 781 6.6 12
12. bitwings.org 73 2019-10-01 32 98 212 10 4.7 8014 108 2.5 1453 18.1 20
13. bitbondsto.com 64 2019-07-12 41 124 211 9 4.3 16711 256 3.5 316 1.9 5
14. tokensale.moozicore.com 178 2019-06-07 28 75 207 8 3.9 22436 125 3.5 503 2.2 3
15. windice.io 234 active 40 63 206 14 6.8 38664 165 4.1 2395 6.2 10
16. eosex.com 60 2018-12-30 19 97 200 18 9.0 11458 178 3.0 249 2.2 4
17. curioinvest.com 32 2019-09-19 46 115 181 0 0.0 6412 198 2.7 719 11.2 22
18. wppenergy.io 62 2019-01-04 21 95 170 14 8.2 9103 143 2.8 204 2.2 3
19. eterbase.com 100 2019-08-11 20 54 167 7 4.2 11456 113 3.5 431 3.8 4
20. cryptomarketads.com 63 2019-07-11 14 90 167 2 1.2 7493 103 3.0 217 2.9 3
21. mycrojobs.io 283 2019-09-06 13 54 164 9 5.5 13395 47 3.3 1898 14.2 7
22. veil-project.com 91 2019-07-01 26 71 158 8 5.1 13052 142 3.5 198 1.5 2
23. deeponion.org 364 active 9 21 154 7 4.5 6264 17 1.8 174 2.8 0
24. ferrum.network 105 2019-08-09 29 77 153 13 8.5 12027 114 3.0 785 6.5 7
25. 1smart.fund 31 2019-09-24 12 80 148 1 0.7 3624 113 3.7 217 6.0 7
26. is.gd 264 2019-10-28 7 33 148 6 4.1 5945 22 2.9 720 12.1 3
27. harmony.one 53 2019-06-09 15 86 147 8 5.4 6313 114 2.8 49 0.8 1
28. vitex.net 33 2019-09-12 17 71 139 0 0.0 2697 80 2.6 454 16.8 14
29. 777coin.com 362 active 21 38 131 3 2.3 50364 139 6.4 2675 5.3 7
30. arround.io 18 2018-11-18 26 90 131 4 3.1 2998 162 2.9 126 4.2 7
31. aigopay.tech 72 2019-09-04 25 51 130 6 4.6 5709 79 2.7 1198 21.0 17
32. iovo.io 76 2019-05-30 15 57 123 7 5.7 8163 106 3.6 91 1.1 1
33. w12.io 53 2018-12-24 11 67 123 7 5.7 6157 111 3.0 285 4.6 5
34. hivenet.cloud 49 2019-10-30 29 56 119 0 0.0 4379 89 2.8 82 1.9 2
35. semux.org 333 2019-10-29 4 16 114 19 16.7 2520 8 1.8 247 9.8 1
36. athero.io 94 2019-02-05 15 52 112 2 1.8 6228 65 2.8 101 1.6 1
37. storichain.io 45 2019-08-20 15 64 109 0 0.0 3474 75 3.0 244 7.0 5
38. wolf.bet 94 active 18 42 105 1 1.0 11373 120 6.2 100 0.9 1
39. deex.exchange 93 2019-02-07 26 70 104 4 3.8 9180 98 2.8 87 0.9 1
40. hydrax.io 59 2019-07-17 18 60 104 1 1.0 4523 76 3.7 30 0.7 1
41. iconiqlab.com 40 2018-12-14 22 74 103 11 10.7 4632 114 3.7 87 1.9 2
42. icacoin.com 86 active 16 40 102 1 1.0 4383 51 2.9 239 5.5 3
43. haratoken.io 96 2019-04-12 36 78 101 4 4.0 13669 142 3.1 414 3.0 4
44. chipmixer.com 365 active 45 60 100 1 1.0 97788 268 5.9 342 0.3 1
45. alprockz.io 112 2019-04-01 19 41 99 1 1.0 7742 69 2.8 204 2.6 2
46. nupaymentalliance.com 122 2019-10-07 9 40 99 5 5.1 5305 41 3.1 40 0.8 0
47. stabledex.io 52 2019-10-05 11 43 98 1 1.0 2574 48 2.6 509 19.8 10
48. xcrypt.club 49 2019-06-23 7 51 96 8 8.3 4584 87 2.9 45 1.0 1
49. auditchain.com 100 2019-09-23 16 44 95 3 3.2 5991 58 2.8 1320 22.0 13
50. dbc.io 18 2018-11-29 7 63 95 1 1.1 1203 58 3.0 34 2.8 2
51. azbit.com 189 2019-07-01 7 28 93 8 8.6 4693 24 2.9 88 1.9 0
52. adabsolutions.com 164 2019-05-15 17 39 92 3 3.3 8525 52 2.8 181 2.1 1
53. gigzi.com 94 2019-02-10 15 41 90 5 5.6 6966 72 3.1 96 1.4 1
54. gold.storage 101 active 15 23 90 0 0.0 5029 50 3.2 73 1.5 1
55. tokpie.io 192 2019-10-30 6 28 87 6 6.9 4523 23 2.6 114 2.5 1
56. dabanking.io 45 2019-07-21 11 50 86 6 7.0 3187 69 3.0 48 1.5 1
57. bvo.trybravo.com 30 2018-11-30 14 41 85 4 4.7 2121 70 3.4 76 3.6 3
58. hawk.cool 73 active 19 28 85 0 0.0 3693 51 2.6 349 9.5 5
59. iotex.io 63 2019-05-20 14 44 84 6 7.1 4958 77 2.9 48 1.0 1
60. arawtoken.io 61 2019-01-21 7 49 83 6 7.2 4459 65 4.9 97 2.2 2
61. platio.io 47 2018-12-21 14 46 83 4 4.8 3330 69 2.9 53 1.6 1
62. populous.world 100 2019-10-15 4 38 83 1 1.2 2135 18 2.2 36 1.7 0
63. gigtricks.io 170 2019-09-02 6 33 82 9 11.0 4532 25 3.1 371 8.2 2
64. orbistransfer.com 220 2019-07-30 7 27 82 2 2.4 5655 25 2.7 65 1.1 0
65. bestmixer.io 56 2019-05-23 40 61 81 9 11.1 15618 278 6.0 98 0.6 2
66. bidooh.io 63 2019-01-03 19 47 80 5 6.3 5991 94 3.7 515 8.6 8
67. invech.io 85 2019-09-23 9 34 79 4 5.1 2479 29 2.4 177 7.1 2
68. colletrix.com 88 2019-09-05 10 32 79 2 2.5 3098 35 2.7 158 5.1 2
69. mintdice.com 75 active 24 43 76 0 0.0 9560 127 4.3 287 3.0 4
70. tokensale.cryptonity.io 83 2019-06-02 4 34 76 3 3.9 2185 23 2.7 51 2.3 1
71. ooobtc.com 66 2019-06-22 17 42 76 4 5.3 4340 65 2.7 31 0.7 0
72. lbx.com 45 2018-12-30 16 45 74 2 2.7 3445 75 3.2 62 1.8 1
73. usdq.platinum.fund 156 active 8 17 74 1 1.4 2560 16 2.0 82 3.2 1
74. playloteo.com 89 2019-09-05 10 41 74 2 2.7 4315 47 3.2 1260 29.2 14
75. daxico.com 48 2019-03-12 14 32 73 3 4.1 2267 47 2.7 109 4.8 2
76. bluenote.world 67 2019-02-20 13 44 72 1 1.4 3813 55 3.4 115 3.0 2
77. ammut.network 77 2019-06-18 13 38 71 4 5.6 3681 47 2.9 25 0.7 0
78. temco.io 59 2019-03-28 6 33 70 5 7.1 2938 48 3.5 57 1.9 1
79. gemera.io 49 2019-01-14 8 34 70 0 0.0 2348 45 3.6 81 3.4 2
80. agatechain.org 165 2019-05-08 8 43 69 4 5.8 7536 44 3.9 59 0.8 0
81. billcrypt.io 117 2019-10-30 14 31 68 3 4.4 4895 41 2.7 825 16.9 7
82. hubrisone.com 71 2019-04-20 7 25 68 0 0.0 2206 30 2.8 83 3.8 1
83. pointpay.io 139 2019-10-30 8 19 67 1 1.5 2874 21 2.6 189 6.6 1
84. republia.io 188 2019-09-04 5 26 67 9 13.4 4172 21 2.8 56 1.3 0
85. rocketpot.io 25 2019-09-30 10 25 66 0 0.0 1479 58 3.7 63 4.3 3
86. ico.diagon.io 10 active 23 32 65 1 1.5 718 72 2.9 3 0.4 0
87. mycryptobank.io 32 2018-12-14 8 44 65 2 3.1 2267 67 3.7 83 3.7 3
88. tlsgroup.io 29 2019-10-27 10 24 65 0 0.0 651 22 2.0 10 1.5 0
89. livecoin.net 163 2019-09-21 11 35 65 2 3.1 15358 93 6.8 166 1.1 1
90. dominium.me 32 2018-12-04 12 37 64 2 3.1 1698 53 3.5 48 2.8 2
91. imusify.com 194 2019-08-18 7 26 63 5 7.9 4754 24 2.5 235 4.9 1
92. terawattled.com 114 2019-03-08 12 28 63 2 3.2 3711 32 2.5 64 1.7 1
93. iskra-coin.io 77 2019-09-04 10 29 62 1 1.6 2945 38 2.6 380 12.9 5
94. icovo.co 37 2019-01-27 3 38 61 2 3.3 780 19 2.5 33 4.2 1
95. yamzu.io 39 2018-12-09 9 37 61 1 1.6 2247 55 3.0 30 1.3 1
96. codex.one 56 2019-04-12 17 36 60 3 5.0 4251 76 3.6 86 2.0 2
97. privcy.io 222 2019-10-26 2 7 60 6 10.0 686 3 1.8 75 10.9 0
98. sonata.ai 108 2019-04-12 6 26 60 1 1.7 2526 22 2.2 20 0.8 0
99. library.files.fm 195 2019-08-26 6 20 59 4 6.8 3479 18 2.8 43 1.2 0
100. orionix.io 118 active 14 24 59 1 1.7 4906 42 2.9 375 7.6 3 - Site - extracted from URLs (links) in user signatures.
- Days - number of days the campaign was active within the 1 year period. Active day is counted when 5% or more of total campaign users make posts. This excludes some stragglers who fail to remove signatures after the campaign has ended. Please note that there is no accurate information when users start or stop wearing certain signatures so this is based on scraped user profiles and archive sites.
- Last Day - last day of this campaign; "active" means the campaign was still active on September 30, 2019 (last day of the evaluated timeframe).
- Users - Avg - average number of posting campaign participants per day.
- Users - Max - largest number of posting campaign participants in a single day.
- Users - Total - number of campaign participants who posted at least once within the 1 year period.
- Bans - number of campaign participants who got permanently banned within the 1 year period. Likely underestimated because signatures get removed after permanent bans and the scraper may have not been able to determine whether the ban occurred while the user still had the signature.
- Ban% - percentage of banned users vs total users.
- Posts - Total - number of posts made within the 1 year period by campaign participants.
- Posts - P/Day - average number of posts per active day.
- Posts - P/U/D - average posts per user/day, which is the sum of the number of users who posted on each active day.
- Deleted - Total - number of moderator-deleted posts (from modlog). Please note that this counts posts that have been deleted while the user was wearing the corresponding signature but that doesn't mean the posts were made during that time (could have been older posts). In other words, it's not necessarily a symptom of spam or other issues within a campaign but a more general indication of the quality of participants.
- Deleted - Del% - percentage of deleted posts vs total posts.
- Deleted - D/Day - average number of deleted posts per active day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:18:00 PM
Last edit: November 21, 2019, 07:48:18 PM by suchmoon |
|
Recently active signatures: ---- Users ---- ------ Posts ------ ----- Deleted ----
# Site Days Last Day Avg Max Total Bans Ban% Total P/Day P/U/D Total Del% D/Day
1. cryptotalk.org 35 active 362 438 907 10 1.1 93138 2659 7.2 4727 5.1 135
2. bitvest.io 362 active 29 53 226 16 7.1 67494 186 6.3 2900 4.3 8
3. xcard.io 67 active 63 107 214 0 0.0 11863 177 2.8 781 6.6 12
4. windice.io 234 active 40 63 206 14 6.8 38664 165 4.1 2395 6.2 10
5. deeponion.org 364 active 9 21 154 7 4.5 6264 17 1.8 174 2.8 0
6. is.gd 264 2019-10-28 7 33 148 6 4.1 5945 22 2.9 720 12.1 3
7. 777coin.com 362 active 21 38 131 3 2.3 50364 139 6.4 2675 5.3 7
8. hivenet.cloud 49 2019-10-30 29 56 119 0 0.0 4379 89 2.8 82 1.9 2
9. semux.org 333 2019-10-29 4 16 114 19 16.7 2520 8 1.8 247 9.8 1
10. wolf.bet 94 active 18 42 105 1 1.0 11373 120 6.2 100 0.9 1
11. icacoin.com 86 active 16 40 102 1 1.0 4383 51 2.9 239 5.5 3
12. chipmixer.com 365 active 45 60 100 1 1.0 97788 268 5.9 342 0.3 1
13. gold.storage 101 active 15 23 90 0 0.0 5029 50 3.2 73 1.5 1
14. tokpie.io 192 2019-10-30 6 28 87 6 6.9 4523 23 2.6 114 2.5 1
15. hawk.cool 73 active 19 28 85 0 0.0 3693 51 2.6 349 9.5 5
16. mintdice.com 75 active 24 43 76 0 0.0 9560 127 4.3 287 3.0 4
17. usdq.platinum.fund 156 active 8 17 74 1 1.4 2560 16 2.0 82 3.2 1
18. billcrypt.io 117 2019-10-30 14 31 68 3 4.4 4895 41 2.7 825 16.9 7
19. pointpay.io 139 2019-10-30 8 19 67 1 1.5 2874 21 2.6 189 6.6 1
20. ico.diagon.io 10 active 23 32 65 1 1.5 718 72 2.9 3 0.4 0
21. tlsgroup.io 29 2019-10-27 10 24 65 0 0.0 651 22 2.0 10 1.5 0
22. privcy.io 222 2019-10-26 2 7 60 6 10.0 686 3 1.8 75 10.9 0
23. orionix.io 118 active 14 24 59 1 1.7 4906 42 2.9 375 7.6 3
24. freebitco.in 346 active 3 10 58 5 8.6 1894 5 1.9 29 1.5 0
25. e3t.co 11 active 16 38 57 0 0.0 379 34 2.0 9 2.4 1
26. bustadice.com 365 active 15 18 56 2 3.6 24080 66 4.4 790 3.3 2
27. drife.one 209 2019-10-28 6 20 46 4 8.7 3394 16 2.6 128 3.8 1
28. match365.com 18 active 16 25 45 0 0.0 1342 74 4.2 10 0.7 1
29. agareum.com 10 active 19 26 44 0 0.0 572 57 2.8 12 2.1 1
30. quarkchain.io 79 2019-10-26 5 18 44 1 2.3 1003 13 2.6 64 6.4 1
31. cryptomaniaslots.com 27 2019-10-29 13 19 43 0 0.0 1531 57 4.3 56 3.7 2
32. bitc2.org 293 active 3 20 42 4 9.5 2326 8 2.4 46 2.0 0
33. swapzilla.co 26 active 15 25 42 1 2.4 1266 49 3.0 12 0.9 0
34. yolodice.com 365 active 11 17 42 1 2.4 20959 57 5.3 474 2.3 1
35. bitsler.com 267 active 11 20 41 1 2.4 15708 59 5.2 345 2.2 1
36. localcoin.is 150 active 6 18 40 1 2.5 2488 17 2.8 48 1.9 0
37. pngme.com 52 active 13 24 38 0 0.0 1953 38 2.9 35 1.8 1
38. easyfeedbacktoken.io 96 active 5 13 37 2 5.4 940 10 1.9 4 0.4 0
39. achpay.org 29 active 9 18 35 0 0.0 710 24 2.5 1 0.1 0
40. bitcoin.org 313 active 3 10 31 0 0.0 2543 8 3.1 29 1.1 0
41. ieo.guider.travel 116 2019-10-25 7 17 29 0 0.0 2723 23 3.2 256 9.4 2
42. omnity.io 269 2019-10-28 3 12 29 2 6.9 2698 10 3.7 21 0.8 0
43. swcpoker.eu 240 2019-10-27 2 9 27 2 7.4 973 4 2.1 7 0.7 0
44. onehash.com 305 2019-10-30 3 17 27 0 0.0 6002 20 6.1 37 0.6 0
45. cannacor.io 15 active 7 14 26 0 0.0 237 16 2.2 0 0.0 0
46. ixinium.io 109 active 6 11 26 0 0.0 1553 14 2.4 144 9.3 1
47. vite.org 87 active 3 10 26 0 0.0 473 5 2.0 22 4.7 0
48. flipnpik.io 322 2019-10-30 4 14 25 2 8.0 4658 14 4.1 47 1.0 0
49. https: 168 2019-10-25 3 10 25 2 8.0 1516 9 2.8 22 1.5 0
50. snbtoken.io 83 active 4 10 25 0 0.0 1259 15 3.4 81 6.4 1
51. trueflip.io 262 active 2 9 25 0 0.0 875 3 2.0 26 3.0 0
52. playbetr.com 159 active 8 12 25 3 12.0 6627 42 5.0 397 6.0 2
53. blender.io 13 active 4 19 24 0 0.0 148 11 2.9 1 0.7 0
54. genesisnetwork.io 259 2019-10-29 2 13 24 1 4.2 871 3 1.5 20 2.3 0
55. lollypoptoken.com 28 active 6 10 24 0 0.0 765 27 4.8 3 0.4 0
56. wavesplatform.com 192 2019-10-25 2 6 24 1 4.2 540 3 1.8 17 3.1 0
57. p2psf.org 146 active 3 13 24 1 4.2 1198 8 3.0 13 1.1 0
58. bethash.io 199 active 4 14 23 0 0.0 2445 12 3.0 39 1.6 0
59. fortunejack.com 360 active 11 18 23 1 4.3 20600 57 5.1 132 0.6 0
60. discord.gg 312 active 2 5 22 0 0.0 1210 4 2.0 141 11.7 0
61. freelanex.io 41 active 5 12 22 1 4.5 592 14 2.6 46 7.8 1
62. crypto-games.net 365 active 6 12 21 1 4.8 10006 27 4.3 169 1.7 0
63. bitenny.io 128 2019-10-26 3 10 20 0 0.0 944 7 2.2 12 1.3 0
64. smartmixer.io 2 active 12 15 20 0 0.0 138 69 3.8 14 10.1 7
65. elad.network 124 active 3 6 20 1 5.0 1077 9 3.0 210 19.5 2
66. adsana.io 72 active 4 8 19 1 5.3 866 12 3.2 189 21.8 3
67. tycoon.io 106 active 3 6 17 1 5.9 956 9 3.1 95 9.9 1
68. refinemedium.com 172 active 3 7 16 2 12.5 1685 10 3.4 135 8.0 1
69. token-sale.fredenergy.org 51 2019-10-30 3 7 16 1 6.3 433 8 2.4 2 0.5 0
70. byteball.org 125 2019-10-28 1 4 15 5 33.3 191 2 1.2 4 2.1 0
71. erosiontoken.surge.sh 59 2019-10-29 3 9 15 0 0.0 445 8 2.3 21 4.7 0
72. trueplay.io 228 active 1 4 15 0 0.0 502 2 1.6 4 0.8 0
73. gigajoule.io 37 active 4 7 14 0 0.0 438 12 2.8 9 2.1 0
74. sportsbet.io 169 active 4 10 14 0 0.0 3188 19 5.0 27 0.8 0
75. thalertoken.com 21 2019-10-25 3 10 14 0 0.0 174 8 2.3 1 0.6 0
76. novatoken.io 49 active 2 6 13 0 0.0 125 3 1.7 6 4.8 0
77. vipgame.io 20 active 7 10 13 0 0.0 526 26 3.5 2 0.4 0
78. bitdice.me 365 active 8 11 13 0 0.0 13878 38 4.9 164 1.2 0
79. bitcasino.io 362 active 3 5 12 0 0.0 8907 25 8.1 63 0.7 0
80. hodium.com 15 active 4 11 12 0 0.0 265 18 3.8 0 0.0 0
81. quube.exchange 44 active 3 7 12 0 0.0 372 8 2.8 2 0.5 0
82. citios.io 59 active 2 4 12 0 0.0 447 8 3.9 2 0.4 0
83. vectorium.co 91 active 2 7 12 0 0.0 585 6 2.8 64 10.9 1
84. 2local.io 52 2019-10-30 3 6 11 0 0.0 346 7 2.5 5 1.4 0
85. heliosprotocol.io 148 active 1 3 11 0 0.0 269 2 1.4 4 1.5 0
86. luckygames.io 168 2019-10-30 1 4 11 0 0.0 453 3 2.0 23 5.1 0
87. nitrogensports.eu 353 active 1 4 11 0 0.0 909 3 1.9 2 0.2 0
88. amazix.com 226 2019-10-28 2 5 11 2 18.2 998 4 2.8 16 1.6 0
89. bitmex.com 279 active 2 5 11 0 0.0 2219 8 4.1 13 0.6 0
90. bit.diamonds 144 2019-10-26 1 4 10 0 0.0 281 2 1.4 7 2.5 0
91. tokensale.thebamboo.io 79 active 2 6 10 1 10.0 576 7 3.0 5 0.9 0
92. elitemininginc.com 184 2019-10-30 2 4 9 0 0.0 909 5 3.3 30 3.3 0
93. emjac.io 24 2019-10-27 2 7 9 0 0.0 103 4 1.9 2 1.9 0
94. exmarkets.com 103 active 2 3 9 1 11.1 520 5 2.8 3 0.6 0
95. lisk.io 117 active 1 2 9 0 0.0 217 2 1.7 13 6.0 0
96. stratisplatform.com 178 2019-10-26 1 3 9 1 11.1 500 3 2.3 0 0.0 0
97. savedroid.com 300 active 1 4 9 0 0.0 867 3 2.2 14 1.6 0
98. betking.io 69 2019-10-29 1 3 8 1 12.5 238 3 3.1 10 4.2 0
99. ico.rasputinmansion.com 22 2019-10-27 1 4 8 0 0.0 179 8 5.8 14 7.8 1
100. karbo.io 132 active 1 3 8 0 0.0 227 2 1.4 1 0.4 0 |
|
|
|
|
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:18:22 PM |
|
Reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3304
Merit: 16624
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:34:52 PM |
|
It's no surprise which campaign has the lowest percentage of deleted posts  I don't even recognize most of the campaigns with a high percentage of deleted posts. I guess because most of the spam happened on the Altcoin boards. How active is for instance deeponion's signature? Could it be abandoned, but many inactive accounts still wear the signature and a few of them made some posts in the last year? I haven't seen much of it anymore, while it was the worst spam-campaign at some point during it's peak. |
|
|
|
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:40:41 PM |
|
How active is for instance deeponion's signature? Could it be abandoned, but many inactive accounts still wear the signature and a few of them made some posts in the last year? I haven't seen much of it anymore, while it was the worst spam-campaign at some point during it's peak.
I think I still have some issues with stragglers. Stand by, the number of users in some of those campaigns will likely go down and the list will be reordered. |
|
|
|
|
bob123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2481
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:47:52 PM |
|
13. chipmixer.com 365 active 110 1 0.9 95613 2.4 327 0.3
Who is that one banned person ? Do you only count actual lasting bans or generally all bans happened ? What i mean is.. is the one person banned bill gator whose ban got changed to a sig ban ? Or is there someone else i am not aware of ? Edit: IIRC his ban got lifted completely, not turned into a sig ban. |
|
|
|
stompix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 6311
Blackjack.fun
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:49:47 PM |
|
10. bitmixer.io 220 active Well, I don't think so  Who is that one banned person ?
Cellard? Although it was also a temp ban! |
.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████
██████████████▀
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
█████████████████▄
░██████████████▀
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
DaveF
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3472
Merit: 6269
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:50:30 PM |
|
How active is for instance deeponion's signature? Could it be abandoned, but many inactive accounts still wear the signature and a few of them made some posts in the last year? I haven't seen much of it anymore, while it was the worst spam-campaign at some point during it's peak.
I think I still have some issues with stragglers. Stand by, the number of users in some of those campaigns will likely go down and the list will be reordered. I think there are a lot of stragglers or some formula you are using is borked. Mintdice only has ~40 people in it. windice is ~50 might want to check how you pulled the numbers. A few others I glanced at were also off by a large number. ETA Or what the last 3 posts above said.... -Dave |
|
|
|
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:51:28 PM |
|
13. chipmixer.com 365 active 110 1 0.9 95613 2.4 327 0.3
Who is that one banned person ? Do you only count actual lasting bans or generally all bans happened ? What i mean is.. is the one person banned bill gator whose ban got changed to a sig ban ? Or is there someone else i am not aware of ? cellard is the one banned user. bill gator was never permabanned and I count only permabans. Well, I don't think so I don't either. There is only 1 actually posting user and a bunch of inactive ones wearing the signature for whatever reason. I'll fix this. I think there are a lot of stragglers or some formula you are using is borked.
Mintdice only has ~40 people in it.
windice is ~50
The number will likely be higher than the current number of participants since I'm counting anyone who ever posted with that signature. Might even catch some applicants who didn't get accepted. I'm not too worried about that, it's the big discrepancies that I'll try to eliminate. |
|
|
|
|
bob123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2481
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:53:18 PM |
|
bill gator was never permabanned and I count only permabans.
I am pretty sure he was. Because of plagiarism. Later it turned out that it was not he who did the plagiarisms but the person he bought the account from. Edit: Alright.. he got banned for plagiarism, but it was just a temp ban instead of a perm ban.  Sorry for the inconvenience. |
|
|
|
DdmrDdmr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 10759
There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:56:09 PM |
|
I tried to make analyse signatures way back, but found that it was rather much a cul-de-sac to interpret (or at least it was for me).
The exercise is very interesting, although I do find the PPD rather low in general. For example Chipmixer has a PPD of 2.4, but going over the last two weeks of the spread sheet it is more in the 4.4 to 4.6 area (some random lower week tolled 3.87). It may be related to dividing by the 110 distinct participants over a 365 day period. If we do it by a rough 60 concurrent participants, we get a 4.4 PPD, which is in line with the spreadsheet. Ofcourse we know the number of cuncurrent users in Chipmixer, but not off-hand for all the other campaigns.
|
|
|
|
|
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
September 26, 2019, 05:57:58 PM
Last edit: September 26, 2019, 06:39:49 PM by suchmoon |
|
bill gator was never permabanned and I count only permabans.
I am pretty sure he was. Because of plagiarism. Later it turned out that it was not he who did the plagiarisms but the person he bought the account from. He was temp-banned and sig-banned and got it overturned. No permaban. Cellard? Although it was also a temp ban! cellard was first permabanned, then the ban was revised to temp+sig. That's why he counts and bill gator doesn't. It's just how modlog works. I tried to make analyse signatures way back, but found that it was rather much a cul-de-sac to interpret (or at least it was for me).
The exercise is very interesting, although I do find the PPD rather low in general. For example Chipmixer has a PPD of 2.4, but going over the last two weeks of the spread sheet it is more in the 4.4 to 4.6 area (some random lower week tolled 3.87). It may be related to dividing by the 110 distinct participants over a 365 day period. If we do it by a rough 60 concurrent participants, we get a 4.4 PPD, which is in line with the spreadsheet. Ofcourse we know the number of cuncurrent users in Chipmixer, but not off-hand for all the other campaigns.
I have max users per day as well as user count for each day. It's just too complicated to glue it all together as evidenced by the issues above.
I have updated the list. The number of users should now be closer to "who posted at least once within the 1 year period" as stated in the OP. Some no longer active campaigns have dropped off the list. Next I'll try to make the PPD more relevant. |
|
|
|
|
khaled0111
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 2861
Top Crypto Casino
|
|
September 26, 2019, 09:47:32 PM |
|
Excuse me suchmoon, but anyone who wants to jump to conclusions, must be sure he read the number of days for which the campaign have been running during the last year and if the campaign is still active or not.
Impressed by ChipMixer stats! (DS is doing a great job,)
|
|
|
|
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
September 26, 2019, 10:02:32 PM Merited by khaled0111 (1) |
|
Excuse me suchmoon, but anyone who wants to jump to conclusions, must be sure he read the number of days for which the campaign have been running during the last year and if the campaign is still active or not.
Sure, that's why there is a list of current campaigns in the second post for a more apples-to-apples comparison but even that is not quite fair. Recently started campaigns haven't had a chance to get as many bans or deleted posts as the older ones, although they are trying for sure... see minter: 14 days, 4 bans. Historic data can be quite interesting for other reasons, particularly since the totally-not-a-yobit campaign is making a comeback. I'm almost tempted to start taking bets on that one - will it be able to exceed the crappiness of the previous one before getting blacklisted. |
|
|
|
|
o_e_l_e_o
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18510
|
|
September 26, 2019, 10:18:56 PM |
|
Any chance of a "posts deleted divided by number of active days" column? I feel that might be a useful metric for both comparing campaigns and finding the worst offenders.
I've certainly noticed (and have been reporting) a flood of "Minter" spam over the last week. This makes more sense now that I see they have recruited 300 users. Their total number of deleted posts doesn't look that high, but when looking at posts deleted per day, they are currently coming in at 23.5, which is the highest of the top 10 recently active campaigns in your second post. I'd be interested to see how it compares against all campaigns.
I appreciate the limitation in what I'm asking for as it does not take in to account total number of posts made in the campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
hosseinimr93
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2394
Merit: 5235
|
|
September 26, 2019, 11:06:09 PM
Last edit: September 26, 2019, 11:17:01 PM by hosseinimr93 |
|
There is a big difference between bounties and bitcoin signature campaigns.
- In bounties, the acceptance of your application does not depend on your post history, merit, spamming, etc.
- In bitcoin signature campaigns, your post history is always reviewed by managers.
So, if the number of deleted posts of participants of campaign "A" is higher than "B", we cannot say the bounty manager of "A" is worse than "B". Almost all bounty managers accept any user unless the user has red trust.
In bitcoin signature campaigns, the quality of posts of participants depends on manager. The manager remove any one spamming and try to accept high quality posters. In these campaigns the quality of posts depends on the rates too. It's normal that the quality of posts made by Chipmixer's participants is higher than posts made by Bitvest participants.
|
.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████
██████████████▀
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
█████████████████▄
░██████████████▀
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
o_e_l_e_o
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18510
|
|
September 26, 2019, 11:40:18 PM |
|
There is a big difference between bounties and bitcoin signature campaigns. If you are talking about bounties in relation to Facebook, Twitter, Medium, etc., promotion, then this is irrelevant to these data, since they are "based on URLs found in user signatures". If you are talking about bounties in relation to signature campaigns which pay in a(n) token/altcoin, as opposed to signature campaigns which pay in bitcoin, then you are correct to say that bitcoin paying campaigns generally have much higher quality posts than token/altcoin paying campaigns. This, however, does not mean bounty managers have free reign to let their participants spam low quality trash across the forum. In fact, the vast majority of spam comes from campaigns which do not pay in bitcoin; since they can create their payment token out of nothing, it costs them nothing to "pay" for this advertising and so they don't have to be picky and look for high quality posters. Instead, the go for quantity over quality and recruit hundreds of spammers. If any of these campaigns is having excessive numbers of their posts deleted for spamming, then that bounty manager should either do their job properly, or the campaign should be banned. |
|
|
|
|
hosseinimr93
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2394
Merit: 5235
|
|
September 26, 2019, 11:59:35 PM |
|
If you are talking about bounties in relation to signature campaigns which pay in a(n) token/altcoin, as opposed to signature campaigns which pay in bitcoin, then you are correct to say that bitcoin paying campaigns generally have much higher quality posts than token/altcoin paying campaigns.
I was talking about signature campaigns that pay participants with altcoins. This, however, does not mean bounty managers have free reign to let their participants spam low quality trash across the forum. In fact, the vast majority of spam comes from campaigns which do not pay in bitcoin; since they can create their payment token out of nothing, it costs them nothing to "pay" for this advertising and so they don't have to be picky and look for high quality posters. Instead, the go for quantity over quality and recruit hundreds of spammers.
If any of these campaigns is having excessive numbers of their posts deleted for spamming, then that bounty manager should either do their job properly, or the campaign should be banned.
You are completely right. Unfortunately, managers of altcoins signature campaigns accept any user applies. Just check some of their spreadsheets. I just wanted to say that even if a campaign has lower number of deleted posts, it doesn't mean that its manager is doing his job properly. The lower number of deleted posts is only due to his luck. Because he has accepted all the applications. We cannot compare the quality of mangers work based on deleted posts. Because all of them are doing a same thing. They accept every one. If campaign "A" has less deleted posts than "B", it doesn't mean that the manager of campaign "A" is better than manager of campaign "B". Because both managers have accepted every one. Manager "A" is only more lucky than manager "B". Check the spreadsheets. Only some users with red trust are not accepted. It is same in almost all of altcoins signature campaigns. |
.
.BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████
██████████████▀
████████████
█████████████████
████████████████▄▄
░█████████████▀░▀▀
██████████████████
░██████████████
█████████████████▄
░██████████████▀
████████████
███████████████░██
██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO &
SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
███████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████████████████
█████████████████████
███████████████████
▀███████████████▀
███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
o_e_l_e_o
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18510
|
|
September 27, 2019, 12:07:14 AM |
|
Unfortunately, managers of altcoins signature campaigns accept any user applies. Just check some of their spreadsheets. I just wanted to say that even if a campaign has lower number of deleted posts, it doesn't mean that its manager is doing his job properly. The lower number of deleted posts is only due to his luck. Because he has accepted all the applications. Ahh, I misunderstood your tone. Such are the perils of communicating via a forum. I agree with your statement that pretty much all altcoin bounty managers are not doing the job they are supposed to be doing and are accepting any old trash to their campaigns, and as you say, number of posts deleted is not an absolute measure of quality. It is a useful indicator, though, and it is no surprise that in general the altcoin paying campaigns have many, many more posts deleted than the bitcoin paying campaigns. There are obvious a couple of exception to this, most notable the recently reactivated Yobit spam. |
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
September 27, 2019, 12:28:33 AM |
|
Yeah, now this is what I was talking about! I count only permabans.
Is this any good? What is the ban for spamming? Aren't straight permabans mostly for only plagiarism, ban evasion, and malicious links? Could you easily redo it to count all bans? If any of these campaigns is having excessive numbers of their posts deleted for spamming, then that bounty manager should either do their job properly, or the campaign should be banned.
I'd say ban the bounty/campaign manager a couple times before you go banning the signature URL.. If they have to replace the BM a couple times then maybe ban the URL, or if managed offsite then just ban the URL.. Then their will be risk to the companies if they agree to low quality with low quality managers, or risk for 1 strike and your out if they choose to manage offsite.. This will create incentive to hire quality managers and to not manage offsite for the companies.. I wanna see the bad BMs/CMs accounts get WREKT and push the companies to hire managers that do a good job and will only agree to do a good job.. So this would be good for the economy of the quality managers.. |
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
|
