List of banned participants in the Cryptotalk Campaign

[yahoo62278]

I have two questions towards Sony.UK

1. How can you explain the short span between applications in the same campaigns between the two accounts? Do you live together with your father? Here is a third example, 1min between the two: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4509006.msg42102411#msg42102411

In my experience accounts who have applied together in more than one campaign within a super short timeframe are, in 100% of the cases, alt accounts of each other.

2. Do you still believe Veleor is an alt account of lapongetiasuu (tagged for extortion) and 2girls (tagged for being a sold account)...these are some serious accusations? Let me quote you:

now everyone will be aware that UMERIDREES, lapongetiasuu, Veleor and 2girls are alt accounts. Talking to you as there is a sayings "If you throw stones at sewage, it's your dress that will get spoiled". I hope you understand that you will not get even a single penny from me out of your 20 ETH demand so just get back and start blackmailing other users like you had been doing to earn a living. I feel pity on you and your job.

It looks like ajqjjj appears in every SMAS list available

my ignore list: topic spammers
[SMAS] My list of users banned from sig. campaigns
My list of users banned from signature campaigns + Submit your own spammers
[SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (working title, a beta effort)

quoted by eaLiTy in Wall of fame / shame. Shit posts so bad that they are actually funny:

The current market is little like to forward so it is looks like a last year bull run because April and May it will move forward slowly so we expect some good profit in this moon. But 2017 uptrend is really interesting to achieve the good hype in crypto market. I think still bear market was continue in next week because still peoples are believe the Bitcoin and it will continue in upcoming months.

I believe this is the real owner of ajqjjj account:

https://twitter.com/ajqjjj/status/1053323975969988609

Lots of previous posts about Monero, GPU mining etc.

1: Yes, I am staying with my family due to weekend, today I am out.
For your alt account case I have explained the reason in that old thread and other discussion as well bro.

2: Bro I personally work myself stay clean in this forum, I never go to dig the other's business. It is purely based on the other's mindset.


Thinking and personal conclusion about anything will not be stopped. For example, If stopped thinking till computer we might not see laptop, mobile phone or other gadgets. I love your thinking but wanna tell you one thing. No try to personal profile and bitcointalk(anonymous) easily. Max no one is doing that here.

Users have used the it was my brother, sister, aunt, uncle, or brothers sisters cousins mother excuse for awhile now and noone ever takes them seriously. Whether true or not, you and your father did apply to be in the same campaigns. To me that is cheating due to the fact that there is no way to prove otherwise. We have to look at the evidence and that is the same btc address is connected to both accounts and used when applying to campaigns.

I have to go with the evidence posted, not with your story. You can grab any random guy or even family member and say hop in a skype convo with me and it would prove nothing. Even though you may have been accepted into a campaign and the other account was not, it is still attempted cheating.

[1715145383]

1715145383

[1715145383]

1715145383

[eaLiTy]

2: Bro I personally work myself stay clean in this forum, I never go to dig the other's business. It is purely based on the other's mindset.

For clarification i am posting here, i never target any user and dig unless i find spam or funny vocabulary while strolling the forum .

Thinking and personal conclusion about anything will not be stopped. For example, If stopped thinking till computer we might not see laptop, mobile phone or other gadgets. I love your thinking but wanna tell you one thing. No try to personal profile and bitcointalk(anonymous) easily. Max no one is doing that here.

ajqjjj This user has the same vocabulary as yours. I am not arguing that you are the same person, but it looks funny to me and hence i quoted here. This is not a personal insult, just said what i felt.

[YOSHIE]

See what is done by the @liuqi account.
@Thanasis, @liuqi, was a participant in the Cryptotalk campaign.
The account named @ankit10 has been blocked

Because @liuqi, careless in putting the profile, so @liuqi put his own Alt account profile.

Whether he was drunk or very thorough.
Note the quote profile @liuqi.

305365 profile: (Thanasis),
816537 profile: (ankit10),
113294 profile trust: (trust @liuqi).

1. Thanasis
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=305365

2. ankit10
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=816537  (Archived)

3. liuqi
3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=113294

Btctalk name : liuqi
Link to profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=305365
Rank : Sr member
Current post count : 1495
Rocketpot username : liuqi
Rocketpot deposit address : 3E1EwUKstGRxnPkC6GqwEntREQPZf1q5Gu
Wear appropriate signature : yes
Wear avatar : yes

( archive )

Link: http://archive.is/rupf2

Looking to participate in this good signature campaign. please accept me...

Btctalk name: liuqi
Btctalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=816537
Rank: Sr Member
Current post count: 1420
Swc Username : liuqisuperman

( archive )

Link: http://archive.is/64nT9
Link: http://archive.is/ryhJ5

I would like to join in this signature campaign. Please let me know about acceptance.

Btctalk name: liuqi
Btctalk url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=113294
Rank: Sr member
Current post count: 564
BTC Address: 1MsSegu175os53nvnV96EWNmp4aJtZsmqA
Wear appropriate signature: Yes
Wear avatar: Yes

( archive )

Link: http://archive.is/LBHxz
Miscellaneous:
Name: Thanasis

Name: liuqi

[Sony.UK]

2: Bro I personally work myself stay clean in this forum, I never go to dig the other's business. It is purely based on the other's mindset.

For clarification i am posting here, i never target any user and dig unless i find spam or funny vocabulary while strolling the forum .

Thinking and personal conclusion about anything will not be stopped. For example, If stopped thinking till computer we might not see laptop, mobile phone or other gadgets. I love your thinking but wanna tell you one thing. No try to personal profile and bitcointalk(anonymous) easily. Max no one is doing that here.

ajqjjj This user has the same vocabulary as yours. I am not arguing that you are the same person, but it looks funny to me and hence i quoted here. This is not a personal insult, just said what i felt.

English is one the language world to connect the world. So everyone is learning. Hope everyone try to improvize it. I hope there is no problem on it.

Thanks for your soft words but again I want to tell the language is to connect. I have friends with European and Candian interns, they are not seeing proper grammatical replies from anyone. If you feel like that you can compare such vocabulary with 10k people more in this forum itself.

[tmfp]

A real shit poster.

[JollyGood]

A real shit poster.

It seems he was regularly active until May 2019 posting in Indonesian language, then was silent for 4 months and only just waking up in time to join the cryptotalk campaign and making 154 posts or so showing the cryptotalk signature.

Though his posts are not entirely incoherent they seem to be made with the intention of posting for the sake of posting to increase post count thus getting more free signature money. And since he not posting one line trash he will probably not be banned by the campaign manager. I commend yahoo62278 for working very hard to clean up the spammers and trash posters by banning them, it is a time consuming process so credit to him. If the user you mentioned catches his eye I am sure he will appropriate action.

[Sony.UK]

@yahoo sir.

Dropping application itself comes under the cheating in the campaign or working with the campaign?

I am sure you are one of the campaign who stood of the participants many times when they have small mistakes(NOT A KNOWN SCAM). I have seen that you have added my father's account name in banned list. I am not here to request to accept me back.

What will be solution for these psychologically not good people while hitting others.(Narcissist)
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-truisms-wellness/201611/the-five-types-people-you-need-get-out-your-life

If the bitcointalk forum entertains such people more, then we will face a drastic fall in user strength.


THEN WANT TO ASK YOU, IF AGAIN ANY PEOPLE COMING TO REFERRING THIS IS SCAM MEANS WHAT WILL YOU DO? WILL YOU SAY THEY GOT PUNISHED IN OTHER CAMPAIGN ALREADY OR YOU WILL REMOVE THE ACCOUNT FROM THE CAMPAIGN?

[Veleor]

Curious typo

<...> I have seen that you have added my father's account name in banned list. I am not here to request to accept me back. <...>

[KTChampions]

Hi, yahoo62278!

Sancho18 is cheating your campaign:

be.open       Hero Member
Sancho18    Sr. Member

 

02/07/2017 17:37:39   Sancho18    Jr. Member   54   0xf73b910A78B7808C2FB755668ca4C4F8138a13b5   Accepted

#126 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VN61OS92gyZSHlYorDMfVVf90n3jl-HKTGbhBXVthNE/edit#gid=1565214583

be.open   Full   0xf73b910A78B7808C2FB755668ca4C4F8138a13b5

#103 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tIMKx80RdDwydtReNwsZzuUO0KYHUqaMnWWar45EAak/htmlview

Cheating  [BOUNTY]🔶Crowd Genie🔶 campaign

Twitter
Your number on the spreadsheet: #13
Twitter Link: https://twitter.com/Sancho_1_8
Ether Address: 0x5aEDa141CeB7323825fB57F8C0faE9a0A97a1674

WEEK: 1
Likes & retweets
1. (11/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/939056810874478592
2. (11/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/938254087925239808
3. (13/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/940432140717604866
4. (14/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/941137287517151235
5. (16/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/937995477764771840

Link to your tweets:
1. (14/12) https://twitter.com/Sancho_1_8/status/941168826200281088
2. (16/12) https://twitter.com/Sancho_1_8/status/941907459744129024
3. (18/12) https://twitter.com/Sancho_1_8/status/942473368330219520

WEEK: 2
Likes & retweets

Link to your tweets:

http://archive.md/1ixLV

Twitter
Your number on the spreadsheet (If you are not on "-"): #17
Twitter Link: https://twitter.com/bitubuntu
Ether Address: 0xf73b910A78B7808C2FB755668ca4C4F8138a13b5

WEEK: 1
Link to your tweets:
1- (13/12): https://twitter.com/bitubuntu/status/940780386883424257
2- (14/12): https://twitter.com/bitubuntu/status/941168161692569600
3- (16/12): https://twitter.com/bitubuntu/status/941898186389643264

Link to your likes and retweets:
1- (11/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/939056810874478592
2- (11/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/938254087925239808
3- (11/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/937995477764771840
4- (12/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/937534380557271040
5- (12/12): https://twitter.com/Genie_ICO/status/940432140717604866

http://archive.md/4qwN0

Connection through merit: Favorite profiles to send sMerit to for Sancho18 is be.open (top-1) - 8 merits sent, 1 merit returned.

Connection through wallets: great amount of tokens from both wallets were sent to
0xf47f85001beb74eaa57a1bd37a38bb9a5de02a46

[JollyGood]

Battareus: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=133978

What do you think about this one? Seems like an alt-account to me: "This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=133978

His last post was made on: 24th May 2016 then suddenly woke up on 28th September 2019 and started showing the cryptotalk signature.

He has made around 70 posts since coming back from his almost 3 year and 4 month hibernation.

[yahoo62278]

Battareus: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=133978

What do you think about this one? Seems like an alt-account to me: "This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=133978

His last post was made on: 24th May 2016 then suddenly woke up on 28th September 2019 and started showing the cryptotalk signature.

He has made around 70 posts since coming back from his almost 3 year and 4 month hibernation.

There is nothing in the rules of the campaign against users "waking up after a long period of inactivity" so reporting those users is no good unless they're burstposting, necrobumping, or have neg trust.

@yahoo sir.

Dropping application itself comes under the cheating in the campaign or working with the campaign?

I am sure you are one of the campaign who stood of the participants many times when they have small mistakes(NOT A KNOWN SCAM). I have seen that you have added my father's account name in banned list. I am not here to request to accept me back.

There is no reason for both accounts to apply for a campaign period. What if a manager accepted both of you? I'd almost guarantee neither of you would leave the campaign. You should only apply with an alt if your main account was rejected period.

[Sancho18]

yahoo62278, I am honored to participate in the campaign under your management. It’s annoying that this ended for me when some ridiculous sin from a long forgotten past surfaced. I am glad that you did not find any more compelling reasons to ban me, because I really tried to meet the highest quality standards and I am not ashamed of any of the more than 200 messages that I wrote as part of this campaign. I will not ask for a second chance, because it is not in your principles. Thank you, for me it was a good experience to test the limit of my performance. Good luck!

[Sony.UK]

Battareus: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=133978

What do you think about this one? Seems like an alt-account to me: "This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=133978

His last post was made on: 24th May 2016 then suddenly woke up on 28th September 2019 and started showing the cryptotalk signature.

He has made around 70 posts since coming back from his almost 3 year and 4 month hibernation.

There is nothing in the rules of the campaign against users "waking up after a long period of inactivity" so reporting those users is no good unless they're burstposting, necrobumping, or have neg trust.

@yahoo sir.

Dropping application itself comes under the cheating in the campaign or working with the campaign?

I am sure you are one of the campaign who stood of the participants many times when they have small mistakes(NOT A KNOWN SCAM). I have seen that you have added my father's account name in banned list. I am not here to request to accept me back.

There is no reason for both accounts to apply for a campaign period. What if a manager accepted both of you? I'd almost guarantee neither of you would leave the campaign. You should only apply with an alt if your main account was rejected period.

@Yahoo Thanks for the information. I will follow it hereafter.

@ALLNAMESEEKERS @GREENTRUSTSEEKERSFORCOMPLAININGOTHERS  I HOPE NO ONE WILL REFER THE SAME(MOONIX CAMPAIGN) FOR ANY OF THE FUTURE CAMPAIGNS WHILE I AM APPLYING OR PARTICIPATING!!!

[FIFA worldcup]

yahoo62278, I am honored to participate in the campaign under your management. It’s annoying that this ended for me when some ridiculous sin from a long forgotten past surfaced. I am glad that you did not find any more compelling reasons to ban me, because I really tried to meet the highest quality standards and I am not ashamed of any of the more than 200 messages that I wrote as part of this campaign. I will not ask for a second chance, because it is not in your principles. Thank you, for me it was a good experience to test the limit of my performance. Good luck!

Leave apart the reason of you being removed, Just seeing your screenshots, i wonder if you ever try to understand what yahoo have told from time to time. I think you need to focus on the below statement by yahoo.  After being removed from campaign, you have started following the suggestion and made only 2 posts.  Why are you not making 15 - 20 posts today ?

With cryptotalk I have no control over the sections counted or not counted, so I cannot implement this sort of rule. I would suggest that most users in the campaign only look to make 5 or so posts per day. Worrying about making the max everyday and getting paid will only hurt you in the long run. Not only do you have to worry about me banning you in the campaign, you have to worry about losing the account. Just because the rules say you CAN do 20 per day, doesn't mean you should.

[JollyGood]

Does anybody know when the cryptotalk campaign will end? Is there a cut off date?

[coolcoinz]

Leave apart the reason of you being removed, Just seeing your screenshots, i wonder if you ever try to understand what yahoo have told from time to time. I think you need to focus on the below statement by yahoo.  After being removed from campaign, you have started following the suggestion and made only 2 posts.  Why are you not making 15 - 20 posts today ?

Sancho has got some posts with only 3 minutes between them. That's some fast typing skills. Someone could even go as far as calling it spamming. There's no way to read anything but the first posts in such a short time.

Does anybody know when the cryptotalk campaign will end? Is there a cut off date?

AFAIK there's no deadline. It will run as long as they find it profitable.

[MFahad]

Sancho has got some posts with only 3 minutes between them. That's some fast typing skills. Someone could even go as far as calling it spamming. There's no way to read anything but the first posts in such a short time.

There are many others who have fast typing skills. Here is one  taiwww who has done 19 posts in just 3 mins. 
Red trusts accounts are always in a hurry to get the posting done and credited before being removed from the campaign.

[YOSHIE]

@ yahoo62278, is this your campaign participant ...?

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=374619


2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=374619


But I don't see his name on the "ban" list.

3. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188200.0
added:

[MFahad]

@ yahoo62278, is this your campaign participant ...?

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=374619

I have already reported him in the post above yours and he will be banned once Yahoo will be online. Actually his last post was in Feb, 2019 and only today he come to post his 20 in just 3 mins with the hope to get the payment. Although rules does not allow otherwise such people should be given a forum wide ban.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And for the rest of the people, keep watching / refreshing this link http://loyce.club/active/1h.html and if you see abnormally high posting in 1hr (wearing a cryptotalk Signature), report him to Yahoo.

[hosseinimr93]

@ yahoo62278, is this your campaign participant ...?

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=374619

I have already reported him in the post above yours and he will be banned once Yahoo will be online. Actually his last post was in Feb, 2019 and only today he come to post his 20 in just 3 mins with the hope to get the payment. Although rules does not allow otherwise such people should be given a forum wide ban.

And for the rest of the people, keep watching / refreshing this link http://loyce.club/active/1h.html and if you see abnormally high posting in 1hr (wearing a cryptotalk Signature), report him to Yahoo.

19 posts only in 3 minutes!!!! I think this is bitcointalk burst-posting record which will never be broken. I archived his post history. We will never have such a user.
This user has made 1 post in every 9 seconds on average. Opening a random thread, click on reply button and writing a sentence should take at least 1 minute.
The ID of his first post is 52744350 and ID of 19th post is 52744398.
40% of all the posts created in bitcointalk in these three minutes have been made by this genius.