Is game-protect still trolling? I don't ignore people for trolling mostly, but he's one of very few people who convinced me it's a good feature to have on the forum. Even CH Incorporated hasn't gotten there, and likely never will.
basement-dwelling idiot no-life
Cryptohunter the true legend who has accomplished more than the entire DT crew combined ( a couple of exceptions) have or ever will, and of course would never wish to troll. The truth is far more satisfying than trolling when dealing with those that have shady histories here.
A per the board rules .. The willful and deliberate proliferation of FALSE, Incorrect and previously debunked information or statements = TROLLING. This is far more befitting to people like yourself direwolf who insists that observable instances that are fully verifiable and undeniable are " THE OPPOSITE OF FACTS". That per the board rules is TROLLING. WHY? because it misleads people and deceives people, it is net negative and damaging.
Cryptohunter challenged the entire board to debunk or demonstrate any of his central points were incorrect (all of his "trolling" specifically relates to observable instances on this forum) and NONE of you could find ANYTHING to present LOL
Coupled with the fact most of you are scammers or scammer supporters, have never achieved anything of note and are broke down bums ... whilst he can claim to have forced scams to offer the biggest compensation offer EVER in HISTORY on this forum, and claim to have been crucial/vital to ensuring BTC was never knocked from number1 spot on CMC, and helped many become millionaires. Then it should not be a shock that he is not "BANNED". More sensible to make him warden of this board. Someone that has the strength of character needed in this dark times to weed out the scum.
TROLLING is NOTHING compared to scamming and enforced double standards. That does 100X more damage to this community that any trolls have ever done. By community we refer to the entire forum not the twilight zone of scum bags in meta.
You can not ban people for TROLLING unless there is a clear set of criteria that you can match their behavior against. If telling inconvenient truths is trolling then put that in the rules so people know what sort of forum they are dealing with. Just say expressing the truth is going to get you banned if it is something the DT's or mods want to remain hidden. Put that in the rules in big red letters and then start banning the people you want to label as TROLLS.
I would actually say most DT members do meet the clear threshold for trolling. They are trying to label the truth as TROLLING. This is trolling, they are trying to mislead members to believe that those presenting observable instances that are independently verifiable are TROLLS. They are clearly trying to deter people from finding the truth and misleading them.
It is clear, that is what we call TROLLING TROLLING. It is all they can do to scream troll/trolling when they know they dare not tackle the central points because they will be crushed in public by the truth.
NO, we would say bans for trolling should still come way under bans for scamming, bans for trying to facilitate scamming and abusing the systems of control. These are far more damaging and dangerous for this community. That people like game=protect. (If it can be proven he is scammer we have not seen this proof that is different) then simply ignore or debunk his points.
If you can not debunk his central points or demonstrate he is incorrect then perhaps he is not trolling. If you have clearly debunked his central points and yet he continues to proliferate clearly debunked and false information .. then it would warrant a warning first to stop presenting that specific information as being true, only if he continues would be a clear case for an initial temp ban.
Trolling should be low on the list for bans compared to scamming and abuse of the systems of control. What good is banning these people they will simply return anyway, debunk their points and then link to post where these points were previously debunked. That is all you can really do. The reader can then have access to the truth and not be mislead.
Those screaming trolling with ZERO evidence of previously debunked points relating specifically to what they are trying to label as trolling should be warned first, and then banned also. That is equally as misleading and dangerous.Presentation of the truth should never be confused with trolling.
Worry more about real dangerous scammers and those abusing the system of control for their own ends than someone who wants to entangle themselves fighting "gambling" sites with no license.
