[Poll] How do you choose Trust List inclusions?

[DireWolfM14]

I'm curious about the forum consensus on this issue.  I'm only interested in your inclusions at the moment, therefor the poll is limited to who you might include and why.  If you would like to discuss your exclusions as well, feel free to do so.  No local rules, but I ask that we keep the discussion about the trust system in general, and not about any one individual.  Please stay on topic.

Obviously I have my criteria, which I recently illustrated in a post title My musings about the trust network.  I'm not asking for advice, and I likely wouldn't accept it anyway.  I'm just curious how most of the fine folks on this forum go about assembling their inclusion list.  There are no right or wrong answers, you won't be judged by me for your response, there's only my curiosity.

You can choose as many or as few options as you like, and you can even change your vote later if you wish.  Because I understand that even the most stubborn of us can have our minds changed if we're being honest with ourselves and rational in our approach.

Thanks for taking the time to satisfy my curiosity.

[suchmoon]

I think I've said it about 300 times already but I'm basically including (or excluding) people whose ratings I want to see (or not) in my trust network. If I had to choose from your list I think it would be mostly these reasons:

Someone who demonstrates good judgement of character
Someone who's historically demonstrated trustworthy behavior
Some who leaves accurate negative reviews (scam-buster)

I certainly don't consider campaign spam or merits or anything of the sort. I'm kinda worried how you even came up with some of those

[DireWolfM14]

I think I've said it about 300 times already but I'm basically including (or excluding) people whose ratings I want to see (or not) in my trust network. If I had to choose from your list I think it would be mostly these reasons:

Someone who demonstrates good judgement of character
Someone who's historically demonstrated trustworthy behavior
Some who leaves accurate negative reviews (scam-buster)

I'm in agreement with that.

I certainly don't consider campaign spam or merits or anything of the sort. I'm kinda worried how you even came up with some of those

Only to allow votes for something I would not consider, but I suspect others may.  Trying to cover all bases, so to speak.

I buggered up the poll in this thread, I reposted here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190116.0