Fee-less cryptocurrencies...Are they the future?

[gaston castano]

of course it is a progress we know that BTC has a very large transaction every day that's why sometimes it takes more time to send it, and also the blocks that are generated after mining have been a lot since the first time it was released.
I think a coin with a low fee if you already have a lot of transactions in the future will have a heavy burden as well as a rather long delivery time, because many ALTs are still running 1 or 2 years so that their transactions are relatively small.

[1714505937]

1714505937

[Rhaizan]

You have to give something to gain something back in return, developers have to earn back for the service they provide users wordwide so nothing is for free in this world, if a project is doing free work go back and recheck very well because that is impossible, and of they do free services like zero fee the project won't last long

agree that right word to use use is less-fee there many crypto now that more cheaper in terms of transaction fee . eth and xrp as less fee compared to btc.

[asus09]

I like if have currency without fee at the next years where we can use some currency for sending our assets to other wallet without paying fees, but we need faster transaction although sending without use fee because is most important way how to increase of bitcoin and altcoin advantage of next year, using EOS without fee I think best solution of you want sent your bitcoin and convert first become EOS balance and then sent to other wallet do you want.

[Perfect35]

Users will at all time prefer to use fee less crypt I currencies, no minding how it affects other. Also, those who designed it know where and how to get their remuneration. So there is nothing to worry about. Also, they already know why they made it fee less. In which one of the reasons should be to attract more users. If that is the case, then it is better.

[confreslamp]

I cannot believe that such a scheme can last long, first of all, everything needs funding, especially crypto related projects and we all know that without enough funds, no project can survive on such a hard and competitive market.

[ongkok87]

I cannot believe that such a scheme can last long, first of all, everything needs funding, especially crypto related projects and we all know that without enough funds, no project can survive on such a hard and competitive market.

The fee intended here is for delivery, is it really possible that in the future it will be free. because until now every time we send Crypto must be burdened on shipping costs. no problem projeck requires large or small funds. but if making a project, of course, must have a large fund

[Aabcde]

I think it might be possible. But not about the fee-less, but how the coin technology was built and its implementation. If you only rely on fee-less, it will not bring the best coins. But if fee-less can occur, I think there will be a time to raise fees for various reasons later.

[Red-Apple]

i think they are mostly a short term hyped up topics specially when bitcoin transaction fees rise up a little bit. the main problem is the attack surfaces that these "fee-less" cryptocurrencies can open up. for example anybody with the smallest amount of that coin could easily spam the network with millions of transactions per second without any cost whatsoever.
those with a blockchain will experience a huge bloat because of this, i have seen some mitigate that but they still can not do anything about the DOS attack which this type of spam can cause in a network.

[febriyana]

I think less or no fee cryptocurrency like short term project.
We can see for example exchanges who give no fee, less than 2 year will get down nowhere. Also in business no fee or less fee also a problem for maintenance project.
So for me no future for that. Bitcoin is always increase their fees, because i know basicly they respect the miner who hardwork with difficulty increased.
If no fee or less fee, people prefer spamming transaction, that is like Bitcoin in first time where blockchain get overload. Maybe less / no fee cryptocurrency is temporary rules, they also will increase the fee, if not please take caution.

[Kyraishi]

Could be possible, but it'll be a lot of weird work for the miners since they'd only be getting block rewards. What would happen if limited supply runs out? Miners just die then?

If it wouldn't be a limited supply it'll be a lot worse then just paying some small fees to be honest.

It'll be convenient, and revolutionary for the fiat and crypto industry, let's see if we see some in the future.

[Zeke_23]

Personally, I have found out that fee-less cryptocurrencies are extremely convenient for sending micropayments worldwide. Most of them are blazing-fast in transaction confirmation times, making them an attractive choice on top of Bitcoin or Ethereum. Cryptocurrencies such as EOS, Steem, and Nano have no fees at all, becoming a favorite among several crypto enthusiasts (like me).

However, it's yet to be seen whenever a fee-lees structure is a viable solution for the crypto economy. I mean, if there are no fees on the Blockchain, then how would delegates maintain their loyalty to fee-less cryptocurrencies? I believe that in order to maintain long-term stability, there needs to be an incentive via the collection of fees among the network's users.

Nonetheless, do you think that fee-less cryptocurrencies are the future of the crypto industry? Or are they simply a niche?

Fee less crypto is not the only factor that will attract investors to invest. But the transaction speed and the security of the coins is also major factors that make a coin is much more valuable.
I think there are also many fee less coin such as LTC, i usually use it for transfering between exchange and the fee is really low

It will be just a dream to think of a fee less cryptocurrency transactions. Fees have been collected by miners to process block. If fees less transaction will be implemented, miners will be out of the field and transactions in block will be doomed. Transaction fees are already included since then, there will be a lot of changes and everything will be hard to process if fee less crypto transaction will happen.

[JCviggen]

I think it might be possible. But not about the fee-less, but how the coin technology was built and its implementation. If you only rely on fee-less, it will not bring the best coins. But if fee-less can occur, I think there will be a time to raise fees for various reasons later.

the lack of commissions in coins is normal, but not for everyone. you need to understand that the tokens that are created, for example for internal use to pay for services inside any platform, should not take a commission for payment

[crypoco]

Nothing is free, you can't find crypto with free fees, crypto is kind of transfer data, and any transfer data need a cost, in addition of mining of the crypto, ll this should make a cost

[Pearls Before Swine]

Personally, I have found out that fee-less cryptocurrencies are extremely convenient for sending micropayments worldwide. Most of them are blazing-fast in transaction confirmation times, making them an attractive choice on top of Bitcoin or Ethereum.

Yes!!!  I understand the passion people have for bitcoin, I truly do.  But when it comes to a discussion about its problems, everyone just seems to fall silent.  And those problems are the fees, especially when the network is congested and confirmation times.  Most altcoins have much lower fees and much faster confirmations and thus they function better as money (if you wanted to spend them and if anybody accepted them as payment).  It is nice to hear an honest opinion about this.

Zero fee cryptos would be ideal, but I am more than happy with, say, dogecoin's fee which is usually 1 doge to send any amount.  That is more than reasonable, especially compared to bitcoin when its price is at or above a mark like $10,000.  At that point it starts getting very expensive and especially for small amounts.

[coin-investor]

Personally, I have found out that fee-less cryptocurrencies are extremely convenient for sending micropayments worldwide. Most of them are blazing-fast in transaction confirmation times, making them an attractive choice on top of Bitcoin or Ethereum. Cryptocurrencies such as EOS, Steem, and Nano have no fees at all, becoming a favorite among several crypto enthusiasts (like me).

However, it's yet to be seen whenever a fee-lees structure is a viable solution for the crypto economy. I mean, if there are no fees on the Blockchain, then how would delegates maintain their loyalty to fee-less cryptocurrencies? I believe that in order to maintain long-term stability, there needs to be an incentive via the collection of fees among the network's users.

Nonetheless, do you think that fee-less cryptocurrencies are the future of the crypto industry? Or are they simply a niche?

Nothing of such will prosper in crypto space, exchanges and new projects have to gain profits to sustain and push the project up to new steps to achieve success, i wonder how a project with zero fee will work, its impossible and if any project offers such its scam project

How can you say that NANO https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/nano/ is in the 49th place, Eos and Steem had a huge market and volume and no one here says that they are a scam, only you posted that, you should go back and school yourself on the various and different algo, so your ignorance will not be exposed, we are in Cryptocurrency and developers are creating a better technology that offers a lot of option to the community.

[pooh95]

The cryptocurrency will not be able to survive without commissions, they are no longer large compared to bank ones, it will also be impossible to add new coins without a reward, the cryptocurrency market will not survive without a commission

[justdimin]

Fee-less will never work, the technology needs to be increased insanely high, think about it if there are enough people using it that means we are pressuring the blockchain to move faster and bigger each and every day, eventually it will crack and that is what we do not want because blockchain needs to be able to handle everything smoothly without a problem and if possible quite fast as well.

Right now, we have bitcoin which is both slow (compared to a credit card payment for example) and also expensive (well again for credit card payment) so we need to get better for sure and the future will be better with higher tech but that doesn't mean it will be free, it will take some time and even after years it will never be zero, it is just not sustainable to make it free.

[radjie]

if there are no costs incurred when making a transaction, there will be no exchange able to benefit from the person making the withdrawal. it is likely that the project will not last long because various exchanges will surely benefit from fees charged to users to make withdrawals. would make sense if the costs incurred were cheaper than other types of tokens

[xiboothrezi]

snip---
Nonetheless, do you think that fee-less cryptocurrencies are the future of the crypto industry? Or are they simply a niche?

Of course. In the cryptocurrency market, low fees are one aspect that is highlighted to attract investors and traders. And this can be a potential niche. With a cheaper fee, but still able to maintain the quality, safety, and speed of delivery will certainly increase interest.

if there are no costs incurred when making a transaction, there will be no exchange able to benefit from the person making the withdrawal. it is likely that the project will not
last long because various exchanges will surely benefit from fees charged to users to make withdrawals. would make sense if the costs incurred were cheaper than other types of tokens

Cheaper fees, not without fees. We all know that the fees charged by an exchange are costs that we use because we have used the exchange service yeah a kind of symbiotic mutualism.

[Abiky]

Yes!!!  I understand the passion people have for bitcoin, I truly do.  But when it comes to a discussion about its problems, everyone just seems to fall silent.  And those problems are the fees, especially when the network is congested and confirmation times.  Most altcoins have much lower fees and much faster confirmations and thus they function better as money (if you wanted to spend them and if anybody accepted them as payment).  It is nice to hear an honest opinion about this.

Zero fee cryptos would be ideal, but I am more than happy with, say, dogecoin's fee which is usually 1 doge to send any amount.  That is more than reasonable, especially compared to bitcoin when its price is at or above a mark like $10,000.  At that point it starts getting very expensive and especially for small amounts.

I guess that fee-less cryptocurrencies would somehow contribute towards the decentralized economy. But they might prove to be a lesser attractive option to miners or delegates, than other cryptocurencies which charge a fee per each transaction performed on the Blockchain. Sometimes I wonder if EOS, Steem, Nano, IOTA, and other fee-less cryptocurrencies will survive for a long time because of the lack of additional incentives via fees. Dogecoin may be a cryptocurrency which charges fees per transaction (like most cryptos out there on the market), but it's inexpensive and highly accessible to everyone. While the fees earned by miners might not be that much in terms of USD, they surely accumulate over time.

Despite this, I believe that there's still a future for fee-less cryptocurrencies if they manage to retain miners or delegates to support their Blockchain networks for a long time. In a world where fast transactions and low costs are a priority, fee-less cryptocurrencies seem to be the ideal solution for micropayments. Time will tell us what will be the fate of these cryptocurrencies as more people join the space. Just my thoughts