To be fair to The-One-Above-All aka CryptoHunter, I will tell you the story from my point of view, and how it all went down.
I have to admit that he did make sense in the starting of his "war" against everyone, I remember last year when all he complained about was how some DT members use the trust system, I and some other members did agree to the points he made, because they were accurate , since we all know that DT members are not perfect and some of them use the trust in a terrible manner, that was the first discussion I had with CH and Suchmoon IIRC, and if you ever heard the following sentence " You can tag someone for using the word Lemon" it all started back then in that exact same thread CH started
At that time most members actually opposed marlboroza's negative feedback on CH , and marlboroza did remove the tag back then, at that point of time I guess CH used to like me since I was on his side against other members who thought it was okay to tag others for saying the word 'Lemon'
a while later he started another "war" against the merit system,unlike the first "war" , it was a meaningless one, CH made little to no sense from that point onward, I opposed his ideas and thoughts regarding that matter, and then he felt like he lost me to that "gang" and since then he thinks that I have joined the "gang" to gain strong position at the forum (not really sure what position he means)
My analysis on CH is that he is not mentally sick per se, but he takes the forum way too seriously , imagine you have to worry about every aspect of the forum every day and every night before you go to bed, it must be so tiresome, this sort of over caring about the forum made him an aggressive person, if you don't suck up to him, he will think that you are afraid of the "gang", I think CH suffers from "over-reliance on imagination" and that's it, I hope it gets better with time, I really wish him nothing but the best.
The reader should note that mikey is not as corrupt nor a direct scammer or scammer support like most of DT.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0The problem with the above post and with mikey in general, is that he does not grasp that MERIT is a far more dangerous problem than the TRUST system alone. I mean for example one should understand that pretty much that merit score is DT.
Cryptohunter clearly detailed the specific problems with the systems of control here, these were never debunked because they are simply an observable description of mechanisms upon which the systems of control operate.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0That was before it got WAY WORSE and merit was (against CH's advice in that thread) tied to DT. Making both systems in effect one and far easier to game.
'
Mikey does not clearly understand what everyone else pretty much on this thread understands...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190024.0That merit is subjective nonsense that if you want to give it to a 5 year old one word post then you can and it is not breaking any rules. If you want to give it to debunked garbage then you can, if you want to just give it for any reason and claim you considered it a good post then you can. Who can say you did not consider it a good post? that's the thing with subjectivity there is no definition, no criteria, no thresholds, no limits...haha
Now the concept is very simple but mikey still does not accept what of course ANY person would accept.
If you create a system that is so wide open to " abuse" ( in terms of giving it to objectively valuable posts) that it is impossible to prove it was abuse, AND THEN you give huge financial (and other) benefits for abusing it..... GUESS WHAT WILL HAPPEN.
I mean to claim this makes no sense is quite strange from any objective point of view.
The reader should probably note, that mikey probably DOES use the merit system to allocate merit to posts he considers high value, he likely also sees posts he makes that are high value receiving merit. This anecdotal experience is so powerful that he is unable to accept that ABUSE IS INEVITABLE and is totally observable and accepted by most when they start saying you can give merit to anything you want.
Mikey also has been reasonably fair to CH and to our good selves in the context of the other scammers and scammer supporters infesting DT. However to NOT act upon his observations that OTHER DT members totally abuse the trust system renders him open to criticism. DT will never work if the semi - good members sitting on it all sit around saying... " well yes I can see that some DT members are totally abusing the trust system and even red trusting people for whistle blowing etc.... but I will not do anything about it.
Also it can be annoying when he jumps in to seemingly protect proven scam facilitators from criticism with advice like " leave them alone please" but does not say to them, why not stop red trusting our account when there are ZERO instances of financially motivated wrong doing in their past. Unlike your own nutildah.
So although mikey can not see many things including why at times we are disappointed in his behavior we do not hold grudges against him. He has not scammed, he has not trust abused. He has his opinions, some of which we strongly disagree with and have clearly debunked.
@ every other dirt bag on this thread
What part of screaming TROLLING over and over and FAILING to produce any examples of our central points you term TROLLING have been debunked or even a semi successful attempt to debunk them are you not getting
They say he's trollin, they hatin..
DT's = Stop trolling us about... our past scamming and scammer supporting, trust abuse or any other points made about the systems of control.
TOAA = Present the trolling please so we can see what you mean
DT's = errrr stop trolling you errr hyper troll
TOAA = Present the trolling please
DT's = Ignore him everyone please he is a troll
TOAA = this is a fun
DT's = See how he is mentally ill
TOAA = No please present the clear evidence
DT's = He should be banned
TOAA = why should we
DT's = Trolling of course or rather hyper trolling
TOAA = But all we have done is present observable instances and described the undeniable implications of said instances that you can not debunk
DT's = Trolling again hey
hahaha
It is simple, your claims are bogus and are the satisfying anguished cries of scammers and scammer supporters that have been undeniably busted. Those observable instances can be presented and there is nothing you can do about it. ( I MEAN YOU CAN LIKE NUTILDAH TRY TO DELETE THE PAST IN TRUE SCAMMER FORM) but then you just look even more shady.
All you have is crying = trolling, trolling , hyper troll..... and then the embarrassment of NOT BEING ABLE TO PRESENT ANY EXAMPLES of our debunked central points at all
Screaming ban him, ban him please, just makes us smile. You can not ban the truth of observable instances in your pasts?? Any member could present them at any point and of course they will.
Theymos is maybe slack on you dirt bags, but to ban someone for presenting observable instances is going to look pretty bad isn't it? and what for? so others can start presenting the same observable instances?
The entire control systems are based upon CONFLICT to regulate them. Right now it is perhaps 50 vs 2or3. Those odds will improve over time. Perhaps theymos is waking up and looking into your past deeds and noticing you're ALL spamming highly paid sigs here and saying to himself " how did people with such dirty past histories manage to become the most " trusted" and highly paid posters here??? HMMMMMM perhaps that does need looking into after all.
Another fun part of it all is getting to boast about all the true legends past achievements, and demonstrating that none of you have ANY major achievements here after all this time.
You may ignore, but the readers are free to read the truth, which we intend to inject when ever and where ever this is on topic and relevant. Just accept it. I will simply appear to them as it appears to us. You have no answers or rebuttals to our points.
How silly do you all feel screaming hypertroll and then not being able to present any of our central points that you can debunk??? Pretty silly right? come on be honest for once.
