5 Things Successful ICOs Have in Common.

[mrdeposit]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

The product of the project, its relevance to reality and the strong team that can create it are important factors. Promising roadmap after they are applied, and at the end IEO in top exchange. I do not think ICOs have been effective lately. Projects should always pay attention to market demand for better sales, so IEOs are preferred.

[iamsange]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

Hype only make ICO success in sale, not means it is success in market. But for success in market, i think a project need something real. I mean something that really useful and make people use it. People use it, means more demands.

[desticy]

The main thing for any ICOs project is financing. No funding - no implementation.
Therefore, first of all, you should pay attention to partners and also whether the project has external investors who will provide initial capital for the start of the project.
Also, no harm will be familiar with how the project is going to distribute the funds, sometimes immediately clear financial strategy and whether it will be successful.

[bitgolden]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

You talked about 5 successful things that ICO have in common and yet you only listed 2 here, so you are leaving us with just two to talk on. Nevertheless, I think you are right about it, one thing they have in common that is destroying them is hype. I prefer a project to grow to the level where the hype will come by itself and not the one that people artificially create hype for it, which is why you see that they all fail along the line.

Hype fails them a lot because people will only be invited to take a look at what benefit the coin can give financially and not the product itself, if the hype was on the product, then they would have gotten people using the coin product itself than just investing to expect some sort of cash to come out of it without them asking how the product is generating fund exactly.

[Metall303]

The main thing for any ICOs project is financing. No funding - no implementation.
Therefore, first of all, you should pay attention to partners and also whether the project has external investors who will provide initial capital for the start of the project.
Also, no harm will be familiar with how the project is going to distribute the funds, sometimes immediately clear financial strategy and whether it will be successful.

How is it possible to know the information about external investors of the project? Have you ever tried to do such an analysis by yourself? I do not think this item can be checked.

[bigcash2011]

For me succesful ICOs are those that come up with unique idea that has real world use cases and acceptance, secondly real team with relevant experience is a must, thirdly some big names as advisors to hype up the ico works wonders, fourth the size of the community at major social media channels and the activity of the team at these channels is very important, lastly proactiveness of the team and developers both in regard to product development and investor or customer relations is important where issues like listing on exchanges etc are done in a timely manner.

[mdzahed134]

Having a professional and reliable team is the most important thing that every ICO / IEO project must have, because without a professional team, often the project Will fail and die. Furthermore, their mission and vision must be clear and logical without make doubt for us.

This is the hardest part.. Detecting the professional team itself, it's really hard since they can make fake linkedin and some of them talk like an experinced crypto person.
We need to approach them deeply to make sure they're know what they are doing

Yeah, this is too much difficult to find out which core teams are solid because they used fake social network with a lot of fake information to attract investors. But when you will do research with whitepaper and overall the project than many things you can be detect their lack of experience. Fake team and copy/paste whitepaper you can trace after your analysis. Also a lot of scam detector members in this forum. I think professional team is the big factor to success in any ICO.  

[tenakha]

For me succesful ICOs are those that come up with unique idea that has real world use cases and acceptance, secondly real team with relevant experience is a must, thirdly some big names as advisors to hype up the ico works wonders, fourth the size of the community at major social media channels and the activity of the team at these channels is very important, lastly proactiveness of the team and developers both in regard to product development and investor or customer relations is important where issues like listing on exchanges etc are done in a timely manner.

I also think having a rare idea is most necessary factor. Always the same products and promises shake the reliance as time goes by. Surely, only the rare product is not enough, a realistic roadmap and a experienced team that can implement it. IMO all of this could be enough for a successful project. But the big name advisors and the number of communities are unnecessary. Once the project is good, both the advisors and the community will increase by themselves.

[rodel caling]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

That is true successful ICO have exhibited common factpr like roadamp and whitepaper presentation of the project but be careful even fake project are using that way to hype their project to scam the investor's.

[Shasha80]

In my opinion, the things that make ICO successful is not enough to use their hype or detailed presentation of the company's roadmap. But it must have something unique and different from ICO in general, so with the uniqueness will attract people's attention. if people are interested, they will definitely join the ICO project And no less important is the financial strategy, because good projects must be able to fund the project itself without being dependent on investors. And finally marketing strategy, the success of projects depends marketing team to introduce its products well. In order to be well received too. Another reason servants do not only until the sale of TOKEN but until the coins enter the exchanges.

[leatutz]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

Everyday new projects is emerge by new idea. This all project has one traget, hardcap reached. Coinmarketcap listed in 200 but this project also did hype that this coin will listed in Binance exchange. Today I got a news from another coin, they are ready to launch website and then Binance exchange.

[tranduong123]

I don't know how many projects completed their roadmap but projects had these things in common.

1. Perfect Whitepaper

2. Solid Team

3. Roadmap

4. Working Product

5. Hype

In addition to what you have mentioned above, I think the project partners are also an extremely important factor. Investors also appreciate the good partners that the project has. In addition to the current IEO trend, the IEO on any exchange will determine the success of the project.

[Marble777]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

Theres probably a lot of things successful ICOs have in common. However, it should only be one thing that should set them apart, and that is PURPOSE. Any new ICOs or projects should be solving a real problem in the real world.

Without such, the ICO is not heading towards success or anything at all.

I think your statement is true that we often find hundreds of projects that have real concepts or goals, but in reality they don't match the information on their road map. team and dev are important roles in a project, but now the opposite, many teams and dev cheat in managing their project is not right.

[asus09]

Sold out is the most important with success ICO, without raised sold out on hard cap ICO can failed because they can't pay fee for listing on exchange market, other thing to success ICO is have good team and owner want to work hard for listing with big market, if success sold without listing with big market ICO will failed with lower price after listing, the last thing maybe have continue with the ICO coin how wver after listing team and to update and get new feature with their ICO coin.

[Cakalasia]

Successful ICO have good marketing plan in theres a fund to use in it pay vlogger have many news article even it is paid and of course has a legit company partner . unlike shit ICO that only want a free promotion land make only a bounty for there marketing .

[setialovers]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

From what I understand, most successful ICOs are projects that have good communication with their communities. New projects that are informative and also have a roadmap and whitepaper that are realistic are more attractive to investors because the community needs information about the progress of the project being worked on

[Fredomago]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

From what I understand, most successful ICOs are projects that have good communication with their communities. New projects that are informative and also have a roadmap and whitepaper that are realistic are more attractive to investors because the community needs information about the progress of the project being worked on

Investors are very important and presenting the potentials of the project to attract investors is the key to have a successful ICO's. The point of introducing your project with clear road plans and have a decency to keep updating the communities. It will bring prosperity and in the long process
more investors will follow the project and store the coin for much higher value.

In regards to hypes. It helps in the short run but nowadays investors is knowledgeable  they will not follow unless they see the positive prospects.

[Insomnia family]

The success of the project depends on the developer and also the project team, simply if the team and the developer cannot manage their project properly and cannot attract market investment, of course the project is difficult to develop. So, there are many important factors for the success of a project, especially the performance of the team and also the project developer.

[MCDev]

OP didn't bother to specify the 5 things successful ICO's have in common as per his thread title. Anyway, here is my list which I think are the characteristics successful ICO's have in common:

1. The project had an original idea and a sound business model.
2. The project had released a working product or may have already had an MVP right from the start.
3. The project had an active Github repository.
4. The development team are very capable in developing the product.
5. The team's identities are verifiable and publicly known.
6. The project have a realistic roadmap.
7. The team give utmost importance to their promises and perform deliverables in time.
8. The team are exercising enough transparency on project related matters.
9. The project's tokenomics are excellent and justifiable.
10. The project have positive peer reviews among trustworthy members of the community.

Very few ICo achieved such points, most ICOs at this time tried to advertise exaggeratedly to attract investors.
If there are any ICOs that meet these 10 criteria, I will not hesitate to invest in them.

[minersday]

We have noticed that a lot of successful ICOs have exhibited common factors. One of these is their use of hype. Another is a detailed presentation of the company's roadmap.

Looking at the crypto space now, hype does not really say that the ICO is gonna be successful. ICO projects that have the potential of becoming successful are projects that have workable products which act as the backbone of the project. These products must solve a particular challenge seen in either the financial ecosystem or crypto ecosystem. With such projects, investors will be willing to invest in. The success of an ICO project is when investors invest in it massively.