marlboroza : trust abuser

[DadyD]

As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point?

Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?

and just to be fair in this situation...@marco Stop saying contradictory things ... I know you're panicked and you're trying to get out of it but believe me, I'm taking you in, I see you're digging your own pit ...Sorry for seing that but its the truth...your changing your version of facts..I hope everything goes well...

[yahoo62278]

As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point?

Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?

When I say 8 I was just going by what I see looking at his score.



Either way it's still not a big deal that needs to be addressed publicly. Personal messages are there for a reason, unless they have 1 another blocked. If that's the case then likely it wouldn't get the result he wanted anyways.

You spin it however you want to spin it man. I could care less.

[marlboroza]

Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?

How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...

[DadyD]

Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?

How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...

I'm using my brain...and before to accuse other to be alt, bring proof. Bring constructive messagges and constructive opinions otherwhise your just growing up your post count.

As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point?

Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?

When I say 8 I was just going by what I see looking at his score.

https://i.imgur.com/e2TKdOj.png

Either way it's still not a big deal that needs to be addressed publicly. Personal messages are there for a reason, unless they have 1 another blocked. If that's the case then likely it wouldn't get the result he wanted anyways.

You spin it however you want to spin it man. I could care less.

In spin in the "right" way....your counting numbers, i count constructive and truhtly feedback..Keep your work up, have a good one.

[suchmoon]

Am I the only one cringing at this newbie defending marco, even regarding marco's past transgressions?

How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...

Ok, I'm not the only one

[marlboroza]

I'm using my brain...and before to accuse other to be alt, bring proof.

No, you don't and no, I don't have to. You are certainly someone's alt.

Bring constructive messagges and constructive opinions otherwhise your just growing up your post count.

2. Posts [...] or under 100 characters will not be paid.

Oh fuck, I missed 5 characters. Quoted for record, brand new newbie account trust farmer knows something about signature post count. So, Mr Trust Farm where is abuse?

[DadyD]

Am I the only one cringing at this newbie defending marco, even regarding marco's past transgressions?

How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...

Ok, I'm not the only one

I'm defending him becouse its my fault (almost) if hes in this situation and i try to def him in hope that he will get a less punishment...And about hes past, i dont judge him, he was a nice person to me and i do same..Hard to understand that?
Guys, tell to some moderator to track my ip or do it by youraelf if your able and you'll see this is my only accounnt here.

I'm using my brain...and before to accuse other to be alt, bring proof.

No, you don't and no, I don't have to. You are certainly someone's alt.

Bring constructive messagges and constructive opinions otherwhise your just growing up your post count.

2. Posts [...] or under 100 characters will not be paid.

https://i.imgur.com/zoze89b.png

Oh fuck, I missed 5 characters. Quoted for record, brand new newbie account trust farmer knows something about signature post count. So, Mr Trust Farm where is abuse?

Keep you idea up ma friend...one day you'll accept that fact And just to be fair, i even mentioned the word "abuse" Have a good day, i'm going to work.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Who copies and pastes someone else's negative feedback after they change it to a neutral.

That isn't trust abuse by itself.  It could well be that marlboroza thought the neutral feedback should have remained a negative.  And as far as copying someone's feedback, I've seen that happen many times.  For instance, Lauda and I often have left the same feedback "Account sellers are not to be trusted".  Other members have left the same feedback as well--and as long as the sentiment is genuine, I don't have a problem with that. 

Lots of idiots around here have abused the trust system and continue to do so.  Marlboroza isn't one of them, though.

You are certainly someone's alt.

Of course he is.  I'd be willing to bet whose alt it is, too.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Guys, tell to some moderator to track my ip or do it by youraelf if your able and you'll see this is my only accounnt here.

You are sounding more and more like mdayonliner with each post.

[marcotheminer]

Ok we've veered off course .. I'll have to catch up.

Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..

[marlboroza]

Ok we've veered off course .. I'll have to catch up.

Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..

Good for you. What this has to do with this thread?

Now go and tell your buddy who btw logged in somewhere at the same time as you to answer me in lending thread, I have to go to bed.

[morvillz7z]

I don't know if it was discussed before (if so, apologies...i went through those few threads quickly) but i'd like to make a very small point about alexrossi and his involvement in all this.

DadyD's original loan request topic was posted a day earlier in the Italian local board, where alexrossi confirms that he will serve as an escrow/guarantee or whatever his position might be.

As i said, just a small detail, nothing more.

[marcotheminer]

Ok we've veered off course .. I'll have to catch up.

Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..

Good for you. What this has to do with this thread?

Now go and tell your buddy who btw logged in somewhere at the same time as you to answer me in lending thread, I have to go to bed.

> On this one page of this thread

How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...

How [...seeabove...] not newbie...

Ok, I'm not the only one
[/quote]

No, you don't and no, I don't have to. You are certainly someone's alt.

You are certainly someone's alt.

Of course he is.  I'd be willing to bet whose alt it is, too.

Guys, tell to some moderator to track my ip or do it by youraelf if your able and you'll see this is my only accounnt here.

You are sounding more and more like mdayonliner with each post.

All wasted characters, including your snide remarks/"funny" jokes. Not much point in being condescending that way Marlboroza.

Let's discuss what I created the thread for: you copied a trust feedback for the sake of maintaining the worst sentiment on my profile (The Pharmacist had a good point up there about that - regardless if it was "in my favor" or not). Sentiment is never clear headed, in many cases we see it coming from tainted/skewed outlooks/mindsets.

[marlboroza]

Let's discuss what I created the thread for: you copied a trust feedback for the sake of maintaining the worst sentiment on my profile (The Pharmacist had a good point up there about that - regardless if it was "in my favor" or not). Sentiment is never clear headed, in many cases we see it coming from tainted/skewed outlooks/mindsets.

Give me a second, I will change it.

[marcotheminer]

Hey, thanks for removing it.

[marlboroza]

Hey, thanks for removing it.

No problem.

May I kindly ask you to lock thread now, because feedback is no longer copied and pasted? (It seems this c/p was the only problem you had here, at least I am under that impression after reading topic)

Thanks.

[marcotheminer]

Hey, thanks for removing it.

No problem.

May I kindly ask you to lock thread now, because feedback is no longer copied and pasted? (It seems this c/p was the only problem you had here, at least I am under that impression after reading topic)

Thanks.

Now it's just invalid.. "Trust for dust business" well that's a new one at least I'll give you that. Anyway, a bit paranoid in the choice of words to describe this.

[bill gator]

Originally, your concern towards marlboroza was as follows :

copies and pastes someone else's negative feedback

Now you're disagreeing with the wording in other ways. You consistently move the goal-post, avoid actual concerns and try to play semantic games like a bad-linguist. "Trust for Dust" is in reference to the minuscule amount of BTC you were in-line to receive for helping a newbie farm trust illegitimately. There's nothing paranoid about that. As I said earlier, you may disagree, think it's exaggerated or uncalled for, but it is not abuse and they have every right to leave you whatever feedback they see appropriate. The reason we have our trust system is that people can either support a DT user's thought-process, exclude them or have no weight in that decision if they choose. You screeching that everyone rate, think and perceive things the way you'd like them to is only digging yourself further down this rabbit-hole.

We already have a few members around here that rant and rave about how everyone and their mother is against them. You're not going to talk your way out of this, they see you and this situation a certain way and it's unlikely that kicking and screaming will change that.

Additionally, you said you would respond to my other comments earlier in the thread and never did.

[marcotheminer]

Been busy - replying is in order, but anyway dead end here. One "side" sees things one way and the other sees things differently - neither will compromise (well actually DireWolf did somewhat understand my point of view). @Marlboroza will probably remain firm (stubborn?).

[marlboroza]

@Marlboroza will probably remain firm (stubborn?).

I am not sure, I am "unable to think for myself".