This thread isn't really about the trust system at all but in fact about the recently given negative feedback to you, @marcotheminer IMO you shouldn't have covered that loan in the first place as DadyD already admitted that he is just doing that to "
increase his trust" and his original reason for the loan which is to "invest" isn't really true, he is just technically paying .0003 BTC just to get a positive trust rating. Aside from being a newbie he also lied with his first attempt to transact in BCT, you should have backed out from it when you saw that post already.
Who said he would get a positive rating? Yes, I left one as I always do. I backed out - you can ask DadyD.
Grey area when this happens, I don't just jump, send back funds, and bail. First things first, ensure no one has loaned, then I tip back as I did..
As for backing out before his 2nd loan demand - I gave the 1st loan because I saw it as a fair risk/reward. That's how you loan at the end of the day, what he does with funds is none of my business. Then the 2nd one came around with me as escrow, I didn't think anything bad of it until he posted what he did.
Can you give some directions and proposals on where to make the changes?
I am sure theymos is clueless in this.
OP got negative trust from marlboroza (not the first one so it doesn't even affect his score) and is now using this as an excuse to pad his Yobit post count. Might be something for yahoo62278 to look into.
Edit: never mind, already removed from the campaign.
I'm removed even though it doesn't affect my score.. @yahoo62278 I'm asking for reconsideration here.. None of these posts are counting don't worry people..
How'd the forum get so cynical? A shame if money did that.
Change up your trust system theymos, it goes to people's heads
Can you give some directions and proposals on where to make the changes?
I am sure theymos is clueless in this.
Vetted trust placers, through who people can report members/situations. These members need to be old forum people, with consistency and level headed (a 3rd party basically).
Everyone knows trust system are far from good, but currently it's least worst than other suggestion (depending on how you value pros/cons of each options).
Without suggestion which is overall better than current system, don't expect trust system will change.
So, do you have any better suggestion?
Of course it won't change, it used to be OK and then the doors were opened to most people and a couple random members.
