|
Astargath (OP)
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 09:55:51 AM
Last edit: October 19, 2019, 11:03:38 AM by Astargath |
|
|
|
|
|
HatuSS
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 2
DAOmaker.com - Social Mining Tech | Tier 1 IEOs
|
|
October 19, 2019, 09:57:32 AM
Last edit: November 04, 2019, 07:23:10 AM by HatuSS |
|
Reserved - FAQ
Note: Neither I nor DAOmaker.com are affiliated with the project. I am here for relay information.
|
|
|
|
|
HatuSS
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 2
DAOmaker.com - Social Mining Tech | Tier 1 IEOs
|
|
October 19, 2019, 09:57:48 AM |
|
Reserved - Announcements
|
|
|
|
|
|
rocku12345
|
|
October 19, 2019, 01:11:01 PM |
|
I could not find expected token price in the project WP. Are there plans to predict it ?
Are you going to expand collaboration just with Asian and North America`s markets ?
|
|
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
|
October 19, 2019, 03:22:50 PM |
|
theres so many already established blockchain video platforms, how are you any different?
how will you compare to projects that have had years of development like LBRY?
you have some big names logos in your graphic, are you legally allowed to use DISNEYS logo? :O
that seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen unless you already have a partnership.... which you 99% chance dont as Disney has publicly spoken about wanting to make their OWN video platform
|
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool! |
|
|
|
|
HatuSS
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 2
DAOmaker.com - Social Mining Tech | Tier 1 IEOs
|
|
October 19, 2019, 08:47:41 PM
Last edit: October 29, 2019, 07:01:41 PM by mprep |
|
What breed of idiots are you? You've cited the legal section of the whitepaper, referencing clarity on "forward-looking statements." That's a standard legal section part of MANY whitepapers because it's created by lawyers and is required by legal jurisdictions to be exactly like that. Of course, I don't expect a two-bit moron to realize that. So consider my response a means of education, something you clearly lacked throughout your life.
theres so many already established blockchain video platforms, how are you any different?
how will you compare to projects that have had years of development like LBRY?
you have some big names logos in your graphic, are you legally allowed to use DISNEYS logo? :O
that seems like a lawsuit waiting to happen unless you already have a partnership.... which you 99% chance dont as Disney has publicly spoken about wanting to make their OWN video platform
You could launch a video platform with less than $5,000 in capital. None of the existing decentralized video platforms matter because: - They lack a network in the media sector - Have no realistic content strategy for user acquisition - Some don't even have a functioning product Does Bitmov address this? Yes. It's founded by the very guys that created Netflix's content strategy and kick-started Amazon Video. Business development capacity >>> tech, but for the matter of addressing technology, the platform is live and is in test-net, accessible for usage to all. There are several logos on the site, including Netflix and Pluto TV, but they are placed for comparison purposes in an infographic, which is the exact opposite of claiming an endorsement from these companies.
I could not find expected token price in the project WP. Are there plans to predict it ?
Are you going to expand collaboration just with Asian and North America`s markets ?
For the time being, it's for accredited investors, specifically strategic ones, only. The purpose of this thread is to drive attention towards test-net. |
|
|
|
|
|
ScamViruS
|
|
October 19, 2019, 08:59:13 PM |
|
What breed of idiots are you? You've cited the legal section of the whitepaper, referencing clarity on "forward-looking statements." That's a standard legal section part of MANY whitepapers because it's created by lawyers and is required by legal jurisdictions to be exactly like that. Of course, I don't expect a two-bit moron to realize that. So consider my response a means of education, something you clearly lacked throughout your life. Oh really? Your language implies your education level. And we understand your purpose. Do you know? Without evidence, the bark of the wolf is the work of a donkey! You prove your whitepaper original by providing sufficient evidence. I found palgiarism in your whitepaper. |
|
|
|
HatuSS
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 2
DAOmaker.com - Social Mining Tech | Tier 1 IEOs
|
|
October 19, 2019, 09:03:28 PM
Last edit: October 19, 2019, 09:20:34 PM by HatuSS |
|
What breed of idiots are you? You've cited the legal section of the whitepaper, referencing clarity on "forward-looking statements." That's a standard legal section part of MANY whitepapers because it's created by lawyers and is required by legal jurisdictions to be exactly like that. Of course, I don't expect a two-bit moron to realize that. So consider my response a means of education, something you clearly lacked throughout your life. Oh really? Your language implies your education level. And we understand your purpose. Do you know? Without evidence, the bark of the wolf is the work of a donkey! You prove your whitepaper original by providing sufficient evidence. I found palgiarism in your whitepaper. Can you not spam this thread with your ridiculous claims? You cited the LEGAL DISCLAIMER, which is meant to be similar across whitepapers. The project is not developing a legal disclaimer, it is developing technology and a business, which are original content of the whitepaper. Also, I don't care how many fancy quotes you Google. You have to be an absolute moron to think that a team generates its own legal disclaimer. The problem is you don't realize that you are citing the paper's legal disclaimer... |
|
|
|
|
|
ScamViruS
|
|
October 19, 2019, 09:25:10 PM |
|
What breed of idiots are you? You've cited the legal section of the whitepaper, referencing clarity on "forward-looking statements." That's a standard legal section part of MANY whitepapers because it's created by lawyers and is required by legal jurisdictions to be exactly like that. Of course, I don't expect a two-bit moron to realize that. So consider my response a means of education, something you clearly lacked throughout your life. Oh really? Your language implies your education level. And we understand your purpose. Do you know? Without evidence, the bark of the wolf is the work of a donkey! You prove your whitepaper original by providing sufficient evidence. I found palgiarism in your whitepaper. Can you not spam this thread with your ridiculous claims? You cited the LEGAL DISCLAIMER, which is meant to be similar across whitepapers. The project is not developing a legal disclaimer, it is developing technology and a business, which are original content of the whitepaper. Also, I don't care how many fancy quotes you Google. You have to be an absolute moron to think that a team generates its own legal disclaimer. The problem is you don't realize that you are citing the paper's legal disclaimer... Always give everyone such excuse when they got caught with fake content. This is nothing new. Do you know when to use bad language? When caught with fake content. Continue to give excuse. Excuse without evidence is not acceptable. |
|
|
|
HatuSS
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 2
DAOmaker.com - Social Mining Tech | Tier 1 IEOs
|
|
October 19, 2019, 09:40:36 PM |
|
What breed of idiots are you? You've cited the legal section of the whitepaper, referencing clarity on "forward-looking statements." That's a standard legal section part of MANY whitepapers because it's created by lawyers and is required by legal jurisdictions to be exactly like that. Of course, I don't expect a two-bit moron to realize that. So consider my response a means of education, something you clearly lacked throughout your life. Oh really? Your language implies your education level. And we understand your purpose. Do you know? Without evidence, the bark of the wolf is the work of a donkey! You prove your whitepaper original by providing sufficient evidence. I found palgiarism in your whitepaper. Can you not spam this thread with your ridiculous claims? You cited the LEGAL DISCLAIMER, which is meant to be similar across whitepapers. The project is not developing a legal disclaimer, it is developing technology and a business, which are original content of the whitepaper. Also, I don't care how many fancy quotes you Google. You have to be an absolute moron to think that a team generates its own legal disclaimer. The problem is you don't realize that you are citing the paper's legal disclaimer... Always give everyone such excuse when they got caught with fake content. This is nothing new. Do you know when to use bad language? When caught with fake content. Continue to give excuse. Excuse without evidence is not acceptable. I'm not giving you an excuse for your idiocy. I'm straight-up calling you a moron for not knowing that a "legal disclaimer" is created by lawyers, not project teams. I've tried explaining that to you twice but you're a combination of egotistic stupidity and ignorance and therefore won't admit that you are wrong. And this is the last time I will respond to you. And I'll also clarify one last time: the project's whitepaper, created by the team, starts at page 5; all information prior to that is a legal disclaimer created by lawyers. If you find any plagiarism in the TEAM'S CONTENT, please point it out as otherwise you have no case beside being too stupid to recognize what a legal disclaimer is. |
|
|
|
|
|
TimeTeller
|
|
October 19, 2019, 10:33:19 PM |
|
What breed of idiots are you? You've cited the legal section of the whitepaper, referencing clarity on "forward-looking statements." That's a standard legal section part of MANY whitepapers because it's created by lawyers and is required by legal jurisdictions to be exactly like that. Of course, I don't expect a two-bit moron to realize that. So consider my response a means of education, something you clearly lacked throughout your life. Oh really? Your language implies your education level. And we understand your purpose. Do you know? Without evidence, the bark of the wolf is the work of a donkey! You prove your whitepaper original by providing sufficient evidence. I found palgiarism in your whitepaper. Can you not spam this thread with your ridiculous claims? You cited the LEGAL DISCLAIMER, which is meant to be similar across whitepapers. The project is not developing a legal disclaimer, it is developing technology and a business, which are original content of the whitepaper. Also, I don't care how many fancy quotes you Google. You have to be an absolute moron to think that a team generates its own legal disclaimer. The problem is you don't realize that you are citing the paper's legal disclaimer... Always give everyone such excuse when they got caught with fake content. This is nothing new. Do you know when to use bad language? When caught with fake content. Continue to give excuse. Excuse without evidence is not acceptable. I'm not giving you an excuse for your idiocy. I'm straight-up calling you a moron for not knowing that a "legal disclaimer" is created by lawyers, not project teams. I've tried explaining that to you twice but you're a combination of egotistic stupidity and ignorance and therefore won't admit that you are wrong. And this is the last time I will respond to you. And I'll also clarify one last time: the project's whitepaper, created by the team, starts at page 5; all information prior to that is a legal disclaimer created by lawyers. If you find any plagiarism in the TEAM'S CONTENT, please point it out as otherwise you have no case beside being too stupid to recognize what a legal disclaimer is. I think I am with you here. Legal disclaimer section is almost similar to most projects. Sometimes they just change the name of a specific project. There's nothing wrong in that part. It will be upsetting if the body of your wp is highly plagiarized. I guess he feels that your approach to him is not so diplomatic, the reason why he's also upset? But anyway, we all have different personalities. I guess respect is all we need and be logical with reasoning. |
|
|
|
|
HatuSS
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 2
DAOmaker.com - Social Mining Tech | Tier 1 IEOs
|
|
October 20, 2019, 06:34:01 AM |
|
What breed of idiots are you? You've cited the legal section of the whitepaper, referencing clarity on "forward-looking statements." That's a standard legal section part of MANY whitepapers because it's created by lawyers and is required by legal jurisdictions to be exactly like that. Of course, I don't expect a two-bit moron to realize that. So consider my response a means of education, something you clearly lacked throughout your life. Oh really? Your language implies your education level. And we understand your purpose. Do you know? Without evidence, the bark of the wolf is the work of a donkey! You prove your whitepaper original by providing sufficient evidence. I found palgiarism in your whitepaper. Can you not spam this thread with your ridiculous claims? You cited the LEGAL DISCLAIMER, which is meant to be similar across whitepapers. The project is not developing a legal disclaimer, it is developing technology and a business, which are original content of the whitepaper. Also, I don't care how many fancy quotes you Google. You have to be an absolute moron to think that a team generates its own legal disclaimer. The problem is you don't realize that you are citing the paper's legal disclaimer... Always give everyone such excuse when they got caught with fake content. This is nothing new. Do you know when to use bad language? When caught with fake content. Continue to give excuse. Excuse without evidence is not acceptable. I'm not giving you an excuse for your idiocy. I'm straight-up calling you a moron for not knowing that a "legal disclaimer" is created by lawyers, not project teams. I've tried explaining that to you twice but you're a combination of egotistic stupidity and ignorance and therefore won't admit that you are wrong. And this is the last time I will respond to you. And I'll also clarify one last time: the project's whitepaper, created by the team, starts at page 5; all information prior to that is a legal disclaimer created by lawyers. If you find any plagiarism in the TEAM'S CONTENT, please point it out as otherwise you have no case beside being too stupid to recognize what a legal disclaimer is. I think I am with you here. Legal disclaimer section is almost similar to most projects. Sometimes they just change the name of a specific project. There's nothing wrong in that part. It will be upsetting if the body of your wp is highly plagiarized. I guess he feels that your approach to him is not so diplomatic, the reason why he's also upset? But anyway, we all have different personalities. I guess respect is all we need and be logical with reasoning. Had he/she been driven by curiosity and presented a question, I would have responded very differently. Instead, this person was driven by a false sense of pride over an accusation that is (ironically) completely wrong and just shows his/her lack of basic understandings, including the inability to separate a Legal Disclaimer from actual whitepaper content. Baseless, inflammatory false accusations deserve the kind of response I gave. |
|
|
|
|
Vectra
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 345
Merit: 4
|
|
October 21, 2019, 05:03:48 AM
Last edit: October 29, 2019, 07:03:45 PM by mprep |
|
Interesting. Working product on announcement is pretty rare to see in such projects.
I'm having problems uploading video though, it takes ages and is not getting uploaded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
barnes13
|
|
October 22, 2019, 05:52:06 PM |
|
Great concept with awesome features, I appreciate the birth of this project, but there is something I want to ask, about what you can provide to make you different from a project similar to this? And do you not have a Private Sale, ICO or IEO stage for your token (MoviBits) or Is that only obtained from earnings on your platform?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
barnes13
|
|
October 24, 2019, 09:35:09 AM
Last edit: October 24, 2019, 10:03:36 AM by barnes13 |
|
Thank you for the link you provided. But after I read through the link I did not find something I was looking for. I want to know more information about your token (MoviBits). I didn't find the question I asked, I hope you can provide the answer. And I also want to know about your strategy in increasing the value of your tokens after being hit by the bearish season and enough to drop the price of your tokens. |
|
|
|
|
Pricebrianer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 3
|
|
October 25, 2019, 09:47:24 PM |
|
Great to see your project here. I’ve come across it a few times, can’t remember what platform rn, but btt is the best platform for your project being a blockchain technology project. I have a similar question about your cryptocurrency. I see your project almost done, already in beta phase, does this mean you won’t be having a crowdfunding round, private or public? Secondly, where can I get your tokens other than the platform?
|
IOVO | INTERNET OF VALUE OMNILEDGER
# THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED HUMAN VALUE BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK |
|
|
unouresha
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 1
|
|
October 26, 2019, 03:34:18 PM |
|
Any info on where to acquire the tokens? Or if they aren't in circulation yet any estimate on when they will be?
|
|
|
|
|
ronaldo40
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
|
|
October 26, 2019, 06:47:42 PM |
|
Any info on where to acquire the tokens? Or if they aren't in circulation yet any estimate on when they will be?
you can earn the token itself by watching a video on their website with the total you can earn per day is 500 coins and 500 coins right now worth around 0.5$ based on their website |
|
|
|
|
