Forum and Satoshi

[pishite]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

[pooya87]

this was already discussed a million times (use search). Satoshi's account here is locked and besides posting on that account does NOT prove anything as bitcointalk database is not the safest thing in the world compared to a digital signature from a bitcoin private key!

[Mandoy]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

It was discussed for more than 10 times already that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto. Even in the news and articles he is called the faketoshi. Though he presented some documents in his claims to be Satoshi but in the end some documents were edited documents to look original. Even if Craig Wright does have an access to this forum and he can use the satoshi account to tell the world he is satoshi he will still fail to prove himself. The last thing he can do to prove himself as Satoshi is if he can move satoshis stash of bitcoin from one wallet to another wallet.

[teosanru]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

Simply because of the fact that he is not Satoshi. A real Satoshi would never try to propogate his existence and nor will he try to prove that in court. A simple forum post would do wonders. But I think if satoshi would have ever decided to reveal his identity there were a lot of chances on which he would have revealed this but I think he would never ever do it now.

[ChrisPop]

Craig Wright could have proven in many ways that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but he is NOT. For example he could just simply send a signed message from his addresses that has BTC not moved for years. Craig Wright is just a fraudster who just wants to reap rewards and free publicity from media who still gives him attention just because some public still believes he could be the real one.

[CryptoBry]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

The answer to that is that Craig Wright is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto and he is a proven liar by the court. That is why he never logged into this forum and he never will. I am not sure though if Craig Wright made a claim that he is also the owner of the account we ascribed here to its founder Satoshi Nakamoto. Anyway, this man has been a big joke and the only person who believes that he is serious and very credible is himself and the surrounding people who got benefited with his generosity. Well, why don't we invite the man to have an account here and answer directly our many insinuations and allegations...it would have been an open-for-all circus.

[xiboothrezi]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

Although this has often been discussed, it is still fun reading various responses from members.
Well, for this case, why does he (Craig Wright) try so hard to convince many people that he is Satoshi Nakamoto? it is the very opposite of his elegance and intelligence that makes this "crazy" innovation. Or what about the motive after hiding his identity and now disclosed?
I think it's just to get a sensation by confessing.

[Eclipse26]

A lot of threads were already made here in the forum. Craig Wright has been claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto. If he's the real one, he should've proved it already a long time ago. 'Cause if you're the real one, you have a lot of backups and proof to give the public if you want them to believe in your claim. But why he can't do it? Because he's not the real Satoshi Nakamoto. But if you want to believe he's the real Satoshi, you're free to do so.

[pakhitheboss]

I still do not understand, why we are still having the same discussion day in and day out?

As a community member this I s my opinion

If some wants to remain anonymous, let him be, respect his/her decision.

If someone wants to prove that he/she is the real Satoshi then use the Private key.

There is nothing else to discuss after that.

[Astvile]

Theres a reason why he is not posting here or not even a part of this forum, and it is because he is fake!

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

It was discussed for more than 10 times already that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto. Even in the news and articles he is called the faketoshi. Though he presented some documents in his claims to be Satoshi but in the end some documents were edited documents to look original. Even if Craig Wright does have an access to this forum and he can use the satoshi account to tell the world he is satoshi he will still fail to prove himself. The last thing he can do to prove himself as Satoshi is if he can move satoshis stash of bitcoin from one wallet to another wallet.

Craig Wright is a dumbass lier. Will do anything just to take over and be known as the real creator of bitcoin but keeps on showing false evidences. This man deserves to be imprisoned to be real.

[SaShiRaJaVu]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

The forum has been hacked several times and he will not have access to his account, no one need to go to court to prove that he is Satoshi, all he has to do is to sign a message and that ends the speculation, if CW has the time to fight in court but does not have the time to simply sign a message which takes a few minutes is fishy and he will get his account back in this forum as theymos has locked his account to prevent abuse from what i understand.
Thousand of topics regarding the same has being discussed here, so it is better to have a little search before creating a topic.

[logfiles]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

I am still quite surprised that you are a full member who joined this forum 2 years ago and still somehow think Craig wright could be Satoshi Nakamoto. This topic has been discussed countless times and no one has been able to sign a message from Satoshi's Alleged Bitcoin address.

That's one of the best ways to prove that he indeed is Satoshi. Besides Craig Wright looks to be a very greedy fella. He would have moved those bitcoins in Satoshi's bitcoin address to shill his Shitcoin cash by now if he was the one with the private keys 

[Bitcoin_bullish]

Perhaps he is Satoshi and at some point had a stroke that totally changed his brain behaviour. Who knows?
In all seriousness, Satoshi always valued privacy in his writtings. He hid his private information quite well and perhaps there are clues of who he is from his abilities alone, which Craig doesn't possess.
He disappeared the moment the herd started coming, which was needed to convince everyone that Bitcoin was ready, decentralized and on it's own.
So Satoshi, as the Craig Wright persona, he somehow re-evaluated his stance and gave up on his ideals, and suddenly wanted to become famous once Bitcoin suceeded. I don't think this is convincing at all.

[Baby Dragon]

Theres a reason why he is not posting here or not even a part of this forum, and it is because he is fake!

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

It was discussed for more than 10 times already that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto. Even in the news and articles he is called the faketoshi. Though he presented some documents in his claims to be Satoshi but in the end some documents were edited documents to look original. Even if Craig Wright does have an access to this forum and he can use the satoshi account to tell the world he is satoshi he will still fail to prove himself. The last thing he can do to prove himself as Satoshi is if he can move satoshis stash of bitcoin from one wallet to another wallet.

Craig Wright is a dumbass lier. Will do anything just to take over and be known as the real creator of bitcoin but keeps on showing false evidences. This man deserves to be imprisoned to be real.

Indeed, he need to suffer the consequences of his actions and learn from it. He's a fraud, who makes people believe that he is someone else when he's definitely not! he keeps on deceiving people up until now and I don't see a single reason why we should trust him. Of course he will do anything because he wanted to get the attention and the benefits, why would Satoshi reveal himself after all those years? what is the specific reason why he choose to hide his real identity before? it doesn't make any sense and for that reason we should be aware and cautious because scammers have different faces and they will hide it with their real intentions.

[YuginKadoya]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

I think you are not seeing the big picture here Because Craig Wright is just lying, And seeing him in court that he is Satoshi Nakamoto doesn't really prove anything, I guess this topic is already tackled here in the forum you just need to use the search button, And I think you are just believing anything that you see in the internet because not  all is true you should have your own perception of things and you should research first, because there is not a single 1% proof taken that Craig Wright really is Satoshi.

[bhabygrim]

this was already discussed a million times (use search). Satoshi's account here is locked and besides posting on that account does NOT prove anything as bitcointalk database is not the safest thing in the world compared to a digital signature from a bitcoin private key!

Yes the forum account wouldn't change anything unless Theymos confirm it .
And it is the best way to prove show us that he could use or have an access to Satoshi's BTC wallet.
But of course we already know that it would be impossible since it has been said so many times and have been proven that Craig is a fraud and he couldn't really give out a clear proof that he is indeed the real creator.

[airdnasxela]

We've tackled this a lot in the forum and almost everyone agrees that Satoshi is not Craig Wright. So we don't have to argue about cause almost everyone think the same. Well unless you really want to fight that he's the real Satoshi.
Why would someone who decided to hide his identity in the very beginning, suddenly reveals himself? He obviously just want some attention! Well, Satoshi doesn't want attention that's why he hide his identity.

[pishite]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

I am still quite surprised that you are a full member who joined this forum 2 years ago and still somehow think Craig wright could be Satoshi Nakamoto. This topic has been discussed countless times and no one has been able to sign a message from Satoshi's Alleged Bitcoin address.

That's one of the best ways to prove that he indeed is Satoshi. Besides Craig Wright looks to be a very greedy fella. He would have moved those bitcoins in Satoshi's bitcoin address to shill his Shitcoin cash by now if he was the one with the private keys  

I know he's a liar, but I didn't know Satoshi's account was blocked. Now I understand why he couldn't reply from his account if he wanted to.

[pilot1970]

The subject of Satoshi Nakamoto is full of considerable controversy and it seems that there are many bitcoins involved, which represents a millionaire amount and the delicate issue. Maybe one day the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto is known, the characters that have been mentioned if they had connection with Bitcoin in their beginnings.

[nasipadang]

Now fashionable to call themselves Satoshi Nakamoto and to prove that he real in court as Craig Wright, but why if he indeed real he not writes nothing on bitcointalk, on forum where he first time uploaded information about its coin bitcoin? What do you think?

That's because the satoshi account in this forum is locked, don't you know that. I even more agree that satoshi remains anonymous, everyone comes by claiming that he is satoshi, they don't bring other good things. If it continues like that then anonymous is better, unless satoshi comes up with better technology development.