ICO projects with very good rating

[pgbit]

One of the most valuable lessons I learnt about crypto is to DYOR and if you are deoending centralised ICO rating websites door your research, then you are not fit to invest. It is advisable to check the team, check their level of seriousness and decide for yourself if you want to invest in the project.

[lobat999]

One of the most valuable lessons I learnt about crypto is to DYOR ...

This is the most ideal course of action that every investor or supporter would do before putting their resources into the project. Additionally, we must know the signs, check every aspect of the project, inquire anything about the project that needs further clarifications! In this way, we could be likely put out of harm's way if we conduct due diligence and not follow our guts instinctively.

[Redemption59]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

There are several ico project out there with very good ratings from these ico rating websites and the truth about it all is that these ico website will never mention the specific criteria upon which they rate these ico projects which makes it more evidently clear that some project pay to be rated higher to attract more investors and traders which is a bad character on part of the ico rating website to deceive the mass out there.

[swivel1983@gmail.com]

I don't trust different ratings because it doesn't mean anything at all. In addition, it is such an indicator that you can draw whatever you want, if you pay money. I believe that a good project can be found without rating sites.

[SamboNZ]

ICO rating websites provides shitty and biased reviews. You are likely to lose money if you rely on their paid reviews. Yes, paid by the ICO that they are promoting its better to do your own research before investing.

[pamsugas]

do not trust the ICO web rating too much, there are many ICOs I see with high ratings in the end when entering the market the price falls below the iCO. the possibility of ICO Web rating being paid big by the ICO project in order to raise their ICO rating.

[reality18]

It appears the era of ICOs is fading away gradually as IEO is taking over with its well structured way of performing token sales. Most of the ICOs could buy their ratings from these ICO rating sites which made most of the scam/fake projects joined. This is why in 2018, most of the highly rated ICOs still ended up failing.

[Christinebeauty]

Even if the ratings are not paid but genuine ratings, it still adds no significant impact on the success of the project when it is finally launched. Successful token sales doesn't guarantee promising project because i know many projects that were close to their hardcap but still not doing any better on the market due to low value of their tokens.

[JeffBrad12]

Even if the ratings are not paid but genuine ratings, it still adds no significant impact on the success of the project when it is finally launched. Successful token sales doesn't guarantee promising project because i know many projects that were close to their hardcap but still not doing any better on the market due to low value of their tokens.

most of the ratings are biased anyway how can a project have a good rating even before the ICO being held, maybe the ratings site considered the developers and many factors but it's all not the deciding factor as to whether the project will turns out to be a good project or not. These ratings means literally nothing in crypto world. there are plenty of exit scam there that initially having a 5 star rate ICO. People should just make their own analyzation regarding the project and find if there is any suspicion themselves rather than blatantly trusting such sites which usually could be paid by someone.

[efxtrader]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

It is common knowledge that ratings can be bought. Some time ago there was news about investment about a rating website that received payment from a new project so that the project has a good rating and in my opinion it illustrates that there are still prone to new projects for scams

[cotton ball]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Because there is no factor most of the time other than the amount of money that changes hands. That is the truth with ICO rating. There was a time when the ratings that are released by these ICO rating websites are more or less reflecting the real deal of the projects. But then it gradually transformed into a money-making machine that will allow ICOs to bid for the number of stars, the highest spot, or the highest grade.

For me personally I will not look on the ratings given by any ICO rating sites since they can be paid just to give a high ratings to certain ICO company who want to list.

And there are so many scams before even by now who get a high ratings so best to check the whole transparency of the project before going on it or much better not to look on them anymore since they are all the same and we cannot pick on which of them is best right now.

Honestly, the ICO rating sites are now becoming the same scams as the projects they are giving high ratings to. No need to bring in the ratings ICO projects got from these sites into your decision factors. It will not help you kept away from possibly investing into a scam project.

If possible, do not invest in ICOs anymore. It seems the best crypto projects out there do not have to undergo this fund raising scheme anymore. 

Do not trust with ICO project rating, may possible if ICO have higher rating score on some website, maybe they have working together make ICO website have higher rating score, after investing and listing on exchange market price lower and we lost trusted with ICO rating site, just check how many investor participated before and how much coins sold to public as ICO running.

[Google+]

if you are looking for an ICO that has a good rating then you can try to see websites that can provide ratings on existing ICO, you can look at ICORating, ICOBench and others who have a platform to provide ratings on the ongoing ICO.

[llecrf]

ICO's ranking is good for giving confidence to new investors, but I prefer to do personal research on new projects that are implementing ICO and IEO.
There are many ICO rating websites and until now I only looked at ICO ratings just to get information about how many tokens they want to sell and the targets they want to achieve

[huu78]

Usually, they are only in the value of the project Whitepaper, roadmap and the Team. Although their project is good not necessarily their ICO bestselling.
Because currently the ICO is no longer in demand for investors because of his many scams and chooses to switch to IEO that is safer than risk.

[trauchot]

You should not look at the ratings of cryptocurrency companies, because in almost all cases these ratings are too high due to the fact that cryptocurrency companies pay money to get these high ratings, so it's better to study all the cryptocurrency companies in which you want to invest by yourself and in no case do not trust the ratings.

[Fredomago]

You should not look at the ratings of cryptocurrency companies, because in almost all cases these ratings are too high due to the fact that cryptocurrency companies pay money to get these high ratings, so it's better to study all the cryptocurrency companies in which you want to invest by yourself and in no case do not trust the ratings.

Be aware of this kind of trap, ICO developers mostly releasing funds paying the ratings sites, they wanted to be look so good and to attract investors to support the project. It's always a must to read and research at your and pay attentions to whatever the new project have to offer in terms of good addition to this market.

This Industry already have a lots of common types of projects, most are imitated the deeper you research the higher chance you'll get into the right project to invest.

[arifteguhr]

Indeed, we can see that nowadays there are many websites that give positive ratings on ICO even though we don't know what makes them do so many say that they are all manipulations that they deliberately do to get good ratings..of course this is tantamount to fraud

[Wysi]

Usually, they are only in the value of the project Whitepaper, roadmap and the Team. Although their project is good not necessarily their ICO bestselling.
Because currently the ICO is no longer in demand for investors because of his many scams and chooses to switch to IEO that is safer than risk.

IEO is the next big thing literally taking over ICO due to ICO's nature of scams and shady principles and it will be a smart move to choose IEO over ICO. As far as the ratings are concerned don't blindly believe it as it's easily tampered and I have heard some of the ranking sites take bribe in order to give higher ratings and I have been part of projects like Chynge, Timebox which had relatively higher ratings but they turned out to be a fead project as it's yet to be launched and just wasted time of investors and bounty hunters.

[letyouearn]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Every ICO rating website usually has their own parameters which they use when trying to evaluate the project. They don't really explain how this works its just their own opinion.