ICO projects with very good rating

[patz22]

Rating may give us a quick backround of the project but it doesn't mean that it is really good. I totally agree with most statements in here that mostly those who reviewed it are paid. We don't have any evidences though but it is still better if you will do your own research about it. Again, reviews MAY help but no guaranteed.

[acoin2000]

Forget this rating websites, focus on IEO, all rating website is untrusted and list high rating according to project payment.

[coinswebid]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

as i knew a lot of ICO rating websites is a paid services (correct me if i'm wrong)
so, if a project want to get a good rating, the project must pay for this
because, even the project have a good rating, there is no guarantee if the project will be success my friend

[nanaimogold]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Good observation. Well some of us know they are paid ratings. Although you can take a decent opinion from ICOdrops. They seems to have dominated the reviews space because of the fact that over 60 percent projects featured there do raise huge money at ICO. Nevertheless, the onus remains on you to make your researches before any investment. Only you can protect yourself

[Iyeman]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

If that was already created by a crap icorating website and it must not be trusted, it's better for you to stay away from there. What already used by that exchange to determine the rating based on how much money already paid by the project. Not all of the projects are doing shit like this but almost all of the project paid the crap icorating website to give a fake rating.

[Perfect35]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Paying attention to ICO rating sites can be misleading. At a point, I thought people were no more following ICO listing sites and that they do not trust then again. Once they get paid, so many factors are left out. So get more they are paid, the higher the rating.

[ringgo96]

Please do not base your ico investment decisions on ico rating websites, you need to do your own thorough research and analysis about each project you are looking to invest and make your own decision to invest if it satisfies your due diligence in all the aspects.

The research we have to do is indeed in its own way. Rating on some of these websites should not be made as a benchmark for us to be brave in investing. because that isn't right either. the most certain is when we invest in research that we have done ourselves. use the rating website as a preference

[lobat999]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Paying attention to ICO rating sites can be misleading. At a point, I thought people were no more following ICO listing sites and that they do not trust then again. Once they get paid, so many factors are left out. So get more they are paid, the higher the rating.

Why don't we just instead rate these projects ourselves? I think it would be ideal if assess them ourselves in order to get to know the project's fundamentals first hand and not just rely on some scrappy rating sites that has been conning us ever since. I've list some criteria in my previous post in order to guide us on this process as quoted below:

Here are some of my questions which could serve as a checklist in determining whether an ICO is right for investment or not or whether its a scam or not?:

1. Does it have a sound business plan and original and not a copy paste idea?
2. Does it already have an MVP?
3. Does it have a Github repository already?
4. Do the development team are capable in delivering the product?
5. Does the team's identities verifiable or have been verified?
6. Does it have a realistic roadmap?
7. Does the team give utmost importance to their promises and perform deliverables?
8. Does the project exercise more transparency on project related matters?
9. Does the project's have excellent and justifiable tokenomics?
10. Does the project have positive peer reviews among trustworthy members of the community?

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144508.msg51103208#msg51103208

[Twinkledoe]

Please do not base your ico investment decisions on ico rating websites, you need to do your own thorough research and analysis about each project you are looking to invest and make your own decision to invest if it satisfies your due diligence in all the aspects.

The research we have to do is indeed in its own way. Rating on some of these websites should not be made as a benchmark for us to be brave in investing. because that isn't right either. the most certain is when we invest in research that we have done ourselves. use the rating website as a preference

As everyone is saying, don't rely on those ratings. Most of them are paid ones. If you are serious in investing your money to some of them, you should do your own research. Don't just rely on higher ratings. Check the feasibility of their project and when will they deliver their goals. Sometimes the timeframe is very important in considering a specific project.

[Aabcde]

Everything can be tricked. Yes one of them by paying enough money to the rating site. Don't trust the site too much. Because 2 years ago that's what I did, I trusted the web review and rating provider to take the ICO, and in the end the coins were not as good as what was written on the site. Finally, only losses that hit me. It's better to review for yourself what projects you are interested in.

[glendall]

Everything can be tricked. Yes one of them by paying enough money to the rating site. Don't trust the site too much. Because 2 years ago that's what I did, I trusted the web review and rating provider to take the ICO, and in the end the coins were not as good as what was written on the site. Finally, only losses that hit me. It's better to review for yourself what projects you are interested in.

yes, indeed there have been a lot of cheating by paying on ICO rating service providers, as a result the projects that are not of high quality have high ratings, and the ones who suffer losses are investors,
the lack of explanation on ICO rating service providers is also a problem in my opinion, this should be published and given an explanation in detail what are the reasons for getting high ratings.

[barabarian1]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

in my opinion it's better to do your own research seriously. 3 things that must be investigated before participating in the ICO project are the manager, the development team and the whitepaper. you should do your own research don't rely on rating sites because they are paid by developers to rate good projects with a rating of 5. but actually it's not a good project that's fraud.

[asus09]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

How many score trusted on ICO rating is not become guarantee for ICO will success at the future with sold out and have higher price after listing, many ICO have higher trusted rating on ICO website but they failed after lsiting on exchange market, depend how developer want to listed their coin with big exchange market, without want to try listing on big exchange ICOs coin will failed.

[Aabcde]

Everything can be tricked. Yes one of them by paying enough money to the rating site. Don't trust the site too much. Because 2 years ago that's what I did, I trusted the web review and rating provider to take the ICO, and in the end the coins were not as good as what was written on the site. Finally, only losses that hit me. It's better to review for yourself what projects you are interested in.

yes, indeed there have been a lot of cheating by paying on ICO rating service providers, as a result the projects that are not of high quality have high ratings, and the ones who suffer losses are investors,
the lack of explanation on ICO rating service providers is also a problem in my opinion, this should be published and given an explanation in detail what are the reasons for getting high ratings.

Yes indeed, I think also still not enough to give reasons for each of these ratings. For reasons that could have been made up, but when they were executed, they were too slow and ignore the roadmap for various reasons. In the end, investors are the victims of all this. The rating provider doesn't care anything when it's paid.

[NathanJB]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Because there is no factor most of the time other than the amount of money that changes hands. That is the truth with ICO rating. There was a time when the ratings that are released by these ICO rating websites are more or less reflecting the real deal of the projects. But then it gradually transformed into a money-making machine that will allow ICOs to bid for the number of stars, the highest spot, or the highest grade.

[taufik123]

Ratings on the ICO website do not have much effect on the success of the ICO. Sometimes the rating can be manipulated very easily by the project developer, to make the project visible

[arwin100]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Because there is no factor most of the time other than the amount of money that changes hands. That is the truth with ICO rating. There was a time when the ratings that are released by these ICO rating websites are more or less reflecting the real deal of the projects. But then it gradually transformed into a money-making machine that will allow ICOs to bid for the number of stars, the highest spot, or the highest grade.

For me personally I will not look on the ratings given by any ICO rating sites since they can be paid just to give a high ratings to certain ICO company who want to list.

And there are so many scams before even by now who get a high ratings so best to check the whole transparency of the project before going on it or much better not to look on them anymore since they are all the same and we cannot pick on which of them is best right now.

[HabiebRiziq]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Choosing an ICO project based on ratings and making it into consideration is not wrong, but you need to be careful because some sites give fake ratings. So in my opinion, don't just judge an ICO project based on its rating, you can start by looking at how the team and the products they bring, to avoid or minimize the risk of getting a scam, the activeness of the team behind it is something to consider.

[NathanJB]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Because there is no factor most of the time other than the amount of money that changes hands. That is the truth with ICO rating. There was a time when the ratings that are released by these ICO rating websites are more or less reflecting the real deal of the projects. But then it gradually transformed into a money-making machine that will allow ICOs to bid for the number of stars, the highest spot, or the highest grade.

For me personally I will not look on the ratings given by any ICO rating sites since they can be paid just to give a high ratings to certain ICO company who want to list.

And there are so many scams before even by now who get a high ratings so best to check the whole transparency of the project before going on it or much better not to look on them anymore since they are all the same and we cannot pick on which of them is best right now.

Honestly, the ICO rating sites are now becoming the same scams as the projects they are giving high ratings to. No need to bring in the ratings ICO projects got from these sites into your decision factors. It will not help you kept away from possibly investing into a scam project.

If possible, do not invest in ICOs anymore. It seems the best crypto projects out there do not have to undergo this fund raising scheme anymore. 

[tenakha]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

As I have seen in a few, there are several experts on the site, and they are the ones that votes ICOs. They are also often not known people by community. I doubt they are reliable, because a few times I have seen that they have listed scam projects and rated well. I think this is enough evidence to avoid following these sites. Right? Do your own research and never trust anyone else.