Further to that, and unlike what was written on media, nothing was transmitted in plain text [...]
I never claimed it was transmitted in plain text.
But you seem to miss the point here.
You (@Coinomi) made a statement regarding the vulnerability:
[...] We don't believe that any side claims that the seed was sent in plain text, the "victim" (aka blackmailer) has always claimed that his seed was sent encrypted to Google and then a Google employee used it to steal his funds. We have millions of users but only his funds was stolen - and stolen by Google. We expect people on this forum to be smarter than that. And yes, you can verify that everything was broadcasted over HTTPS, just ask the "researchers" who made a case out of it in the first place to send you a copy of the wallet executable, install it on a sandbox and run a packet sniffer to see for yourself.
I don't understand how you can expect people to believe you are competent when there are such statements, justifying themselves by saying ".. oh hey at least it was encrypted".
You obviously did not understand how severe that vulnerability was and that google is not the only actor who can abuse that vulnerability to steal funds.
The arrogance and incompetence paired with the fact that the wallet is closed source is a huge red flag.