Will Initial Model Offering(IMO) replace Initial Exchange Offering(IEO)?

[Zionatin]

A new kind of fundraising again? I think it will not succeed just as IEO had before. IEOs successfully launched because there are many people who hate ICO tried to invest with IEO projects. They thought that it will change the aspects of fundraising yet it is not. The existence of IMO right now will not be popular because there are still people who have interest for both ieo and ico.

No one in this market is interested in ICO except bounty hunters. The ICO is completely dead and no investors are interested in it, and the IEO is currently replacing the ICO to fund new projects. But in my opinion, IEO will die in the next few months and IMO will replace it

I don't understand why you think only bounty hunters are interested in ico? why do you have that impression? because as far as i know ico's are design to raise funds where everyone is expected to participate, so how does this only affect bounty hunters! any project whether ico, ieo or self funding can decide to run a bounty to promote their project because as you can see it is a way of marketing, bounty hunters are interested in any campaign that they can earn a reward from, be it ico, imo, ieo or even btc paying campaign like the one you currently in, so i don't understand what you mean 

You said it. 100% ICO cannot be blamed. The method of raising funds is not what you should be judging a project on. There will always be investors in projects if the projects are good. I don't see why this user thinks the method of raising funds determines the outcome of the project. Bounty hunters are normally a bit dumb. IT is great to want to earn but you should be earning from a good project. The project should be so good that you don't dump because you believe it will increase in value.

[Katashi]

Any kind of token offering will replace IEO as long as the investors see good results or advantages. If IMO can provide a new good outcome regarding token sales then it is highly possible that it will boom and for sure that start-up projects will choose IMO to help them raise some funds.

[mdzahed134]

So anyone heard from IMO project. I once heard and saw them a lot of signature post about them and social posts but I dont like the way their promote it. It is somehow like an IEO but this one is like copying what's done already. For those who joined signature or campaign of it, can I ask news what happened to their progress?

Yeah, i am participating in their signature and social campaign also. It’s was only 4 weeks campaign i think so that a lot of hunters joined in this campaign. IMO is already developed own platform likes exchange and offering different coins those are still going in presale round such as IMO this one is exchange token than HCE,MDNS,XLA etc. Project right now strongly progressed.                 

[pant-79]

The ICO and IEO tokensale model thrived in their time because it gave investors returns on their capital so I can see the IMO tokensale model taking over IEOs because it has a much more compelling investment model, I personally haven't tried it but I have a couple of friends who has and they have nothing but good to say about it, let's see what the future holds.

[SolarWindMiningCompany]

A new kind of fundraising again? I think it will not succeed just as IEO had before. IEOs successfully launched because there are many people who hate ICO tried to invest with IEO projects. They thought that it will change the aspects of fundraising yet it is not. The existence of IMO right now will not be popular because there are still people who have interest for both ieo and ico.

You have a point. IEO has not totally failed and it ameliorated a lot of issues even till date so I don't really see any need to revamp IEO at the moment. Also I understand IMO locks 90 percent of investors token which is release over a period of 365 days; this, I don't think will impress and attract investors

[minersday]

Well this model of launching a crypto project is not bad as in a way you really see the dedication of the team in coming out with a product unlike ICOs and IEOs.  I hope to seeing some great projects coming with this model and not the numerous scam projects that infiltrated this industry for the past two years.

[starblocks]

You are right there was a big transition from Initial Coin Offering (ICO) to the Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) fund raising model which provides more assurances for investors by offering better quality and market liquidity, and this appears to be a similar model just to gradual token release in stages and it may catch on or may not we shall have to wait and see

[cassavachips]

I think this is a good update, because every year there are always developments and finally a new system is created which will certainly be more profitable for investors and projects. So I will wait for IMO to become popular next year

[Rodeo02]

So anyone heard from IMO project. I once heard and saw them a lot of signature post about them and social posts but I dont like the way their promote it. It is somehow like an IEO but this one is like copying what's done already. For those who joined signature or campaign of it, can I ask news what happened to their progress?

Yeah, i am participating in their signature and social campaign also. It’s was only 4 weeks campaign i think so that a lot of hunters joined in this campaign. IMO is already developed own platform likes exchange and offering different coins those are still going in presale round such as IMO this one is exchange token than HCE,MDNS,XLA etc. Project right now strongly progressed.                 

The only advantage is it takes only four weeks tofinish the presale , what is the other advantage of that kind of offering?
I mean for me they only change the name but nothings is new to offer things or solve any problem from IEO and ICO . If they cant change anything it will also end.

[Eugenar]

I think this is a good update, because every year there are always developments and finally a new system is created which will certainly be more profitable for investors and projects. So I will wait for IMO to become popular next year

Probably the reason why they are creating too many systems from time to time is to update the existing system yet, make a name for it so people could recognize it different from the way it is before. But in fact, it is their strategy to take ownership of a new trend in the market. But for me, for them to be successful in implementing IMO, is if it has really a good capabilities to offer for the people to benefit from it.

[No One]

Wow another way of raising funds, Initial Model Offering. From ICO to IEO, STO to IMO, the way of collecting funds to support a crypto project has gone through. I do not believe these ways of raising funds. What I believe is the honest and credible project. If a crypto project is honest, it can raise funds enough to support its idea regardless of ICO, IEO, STO or IMO.

[senin]

It's a good option. It solves some of the problems like early dumping of coin and the team taking all the money and going scam. Going scam is an intention and may not be easily avoided but when there is low supply, the price does not decreases sharply. One of the shortcome could be if not studied and placed according to the need, the team may face cash deficient as a fixed amount of money is only released. This could even be solved with the governance of coin, investors should be able to vote in order to release next batch of coins to the team or not.

These new ideas need to be tested in practice. However, it does not seem that the participants in the bounty campaigns will really like it if they are needed in this IMO. I don’t really want to participate in the same year or even more in one project.
However, I liked the idea that it will be possible to trade in the wallet itself, and transaction data will automatically be displayed on the exchange. I was expecting the appearance of something like this. This is quite convenient and, possibly, will increase the security of using our cryptocurrency.

[Cheesus]

This is not the first time when a project offers a new sale system but it won't accept widely until a big exchange or project supports it. We have seen some other sale method in this year, the IEO method works because Binance, Huobi, Gateio, oKex supported it. I realize that IMO has such unique and potential ideas, I did their bounty too and I hope after IEO, people will follow this new and catchy sale system.

[Twinkledoe]

I think this is a good update, because every year there are always developments and finally a new system is created which will certainly be more profitable for investors and projects. So I will wait for IMO to become popular next year

Probably the reason why they are creating too many systems from time to time is to update the existing system yet, make a name for it so people could recognize it different from the way it is before. But in fact, it is their strategy to take ownership of a new trend in the market. But for me, for them to be successful in implementing IMO, is if it has really a good capabilities to offer for the people to benefit from it.

Exactly! No matter what strategy they are coming up with as long as they don't have massive benefit to even ordinary users, in the end, they will not be successful in this new scheme. Long term goal is to have good adoption from the community, because without actual usage in the market, the project is basically heading to its grave.

[DaMut]

Wow another way of raising funds, Initial Model Offering. From ICO to IEO, STO to IMO, the way of collecting funds to support a crypto project has gone through. I do not believe these ways of raising funds. What I believe is the honest and credible project. If a crypto project is honest, it can raise funds enough to support its idea regardless of ICO, IEO, STO or IMO.

honesty can not solve the funding issue, what the investor needs are a unique idea and high return of investment. even a legit project could not afford to meet their softcap this year because of lack of demand from the investors.

[killerfrost]

This is not the first time when a project offers a new sale system but it won't accept widely until a big exchange or project supports it. We have seen some other sale method in this year, the IEO method works because Binance, Huobi, Gateio, oKex supported it. I realize that IMO has such unique and potential ideas, I did their bounty too and I hope after IEO, people will follow this new and catchy sale system.

I am not interested in new ways of calling for capital, because no matter what, after listing in the exchange, its price will be panic sell. I only care about the price of the token after being listed, and how can they keep the token price stable in the long run to help investors on their project get profit. And for now IEO is enough and I believe it will work well over the next few years along with the top exchanges, IMO really nothing too different from the current IEO

[Mulann2]

A new kind of fundraising again? I think it will not succeed just as IEO had before. IEOs successfully launched because there are many people who hate ICO tried to invest with IEO projects. They thought that it will change the aspects of fundraising yet it is not. The existence of IMO right now will not be popular because there are still people who have interest for both ieo and ico.

Snip~

~

You said it. 100% ICO cannot be blamed. The method of raising funds is not what you should be judging a project on. There will always be investors in projects if the projects are good. I don't see why this user thinks the method of raising funds determines the outcome of the project. Bounty hunters are normally a bit dumb. IT is great to want to earn but you should be earning from a good project. The project should be so good that you don't dump because you believe it will increase in value.

Lol! Bounty hunters are normally a bit dumb" coming from a member who has the qualification to participate in cryptotalk signature am not surprise, i mean since you are in a btc campaign you feel rest of hunters are dumb to be campaigning for non btc paying campaigns, and i suppose you know how to detect a good and honest project.

[Cheesus]

This is not the first time when a project offers a new sale system but it won't accept widely until a big exchange or project supports it. We have seen some other sale method in this year, the IEO method works because Binance, Huobi, Gateio, oKex supported it. I realize that IMO has such unique and potential ideas, I did their bounty too and I hope after IEO, people will follow this new and catchy sale system.

I am not interested in new ways of calling for capital, because no matter what, after listing in the exchange, its price will be panic sell. I only care about the price of the token after being listed, and how can they keep the token price stable in the long run to help investors on their project get profit. And for now IEO is enough and I believe it will work well over the next few years along with the top exchanges, IMO really nothing too different from the current IEO

IEO is enough for me too and I have no interest to invest in IMO projects but yet I believe IMO is different from IEO and they are offering something new. If you ever see the IMO app and how it works, you will feel good because the idea and the tech behind it is very cool, though most of their ongoing sale projects are unknown. I think we need to welcome unique ideas in crypto, let's see what IMO can do for the crypto world in 2020.

[mdzahed134]

Its a very brilliant idea and those who said they can't see the difference between IMO and IEO have not do research on IMO very well, this idea will sure solve few IEO problems, lets wait and see

A lot of difference between IEO and IMO. Every presale token ongoing in daily but you can set alarm when token sell start it’s very fantastic. IEO is going slowly and investors boring this method. In that case, IMO platform is trying different thing to attract new investors. Every single IMO presale token listed only IMO exchange within few days after token sell. I hope most of the people’s support it.                      

[Ezravdb]

I just heard IMO, I have never heard of projects that raise funds through IMO. for now Investors still choose to join IEO. IEO is still profitable and there are no cases experienced by investors regarding fraud on IEO. I support IMO.  I hope that everyone's support for IMO can continue.