Epstein Murdered According to Pathologist

[TECSHARE]

Stop confusing the Bitcoin Forum with your beloved 8chan, incel.

How big is your loli collection? I mean in terms of gigabytes?

Did anyone hear something? I couldn't hear anything over the overwhelming din of totalitarians justifying silencing free speech by accusing those that support it as being "the other" and less than the general population therefore justifying persecution of them. Never mind, it was probably just a fart in the wind.

[1714605267]

1714605267

[TECSHARE]

INB4 some one else points out the irony in some one accusing people who want to expose pedophiles as having child porn in lieu of an argument.

[Mometaskers]

They've already filed cases against the guards on duty at the time of the "suicide". We just don't know how far these so called investigations would go.

I don't know if the psychologist that removed him from suicide watch would also be implicated for anything. Last I heard the guards were arrested for falsificating inmate counts as well as "conspiracy".

The only plausible reason for a man in Epstein's business not to have a dead-man's switch is that he was not high enough in the cabal to be allowed to have one, and that he was minded pretty carefully to make sure he didn't do his own thing.  G. Maxwell might have been able to manage him to that degree, but it seems kind of doubtful to me.

Yes, either he was prevented from setting up his own switch or he indeed have one but it was not triggered coz he's still alive. Everyone seem to have theories whether he's dead or alive but what most agree with was there was no suicide.

[Carlton Banks]

Last I heard the guards were arrested for falsificating inmate counts as well as "conspiracy".

shit, did you really just use the word 'conspiracy' correctly, and in the correct context? I'd give you a merit, but it'd be like giving merits for shitting into the bowl and not all over the toilet seat

The only plausible reason for a man in Epstein's business not to have a dead-man's switch is that he was not high enough in the cabal to be allowed to have one, and that he was minded pretty carefully to make sure he didn't do his own thing.  G. Maxwell might have been able to manage him to that degree, but it seems kind of doubtful to me.

Yes, either he was prevented from setting up his own switch or he indeed have one but it was not triggered coz he's still alive. Everyone seem to have theories whether he's dead or alive but what most agree with was there was no suicide.

we will likely never find out if something like that is true, so why bother speculating?

this line of thinking is what gives a bad name to discussing criminality in government. If the official government story sounds like bullshit, speculating about fantasy scenarios as if they are true only helps the real people who really did something provably wrong. it's too easy to say "oh, and I suppose Elvis is alive and living in Belize, right?" if you start talking about things that Have. No. Evidence To. Back. It.

[tvbcof]

The only plausible reason for a man in Epstein's business not to have a dead-man's switch is that he was not high enough in the cabal to be allowed to have one, and that he was minded pretty carefully to make sure he didn't do his own thing.  G. Maxwell might have been able to manage him to that degree, but it seems kind of doubtful to me.

Yes, either he was prevented from setting up his own switch or he indeed have one but it was not triggered coz he's still alive. Everyone seem to have theories whether he's dead or alive but what most agree with was there was no suicide.

we will likely never find out if something like that is true, so why bother speculating?

this line of thinking is what gives a bad name to discussing criminality in government. If the official government story sounds like bullshit, speculating about fantasy scenarios as if they are true only helps the real people who really did something provably wrong. it's too easy to say "oh, and I suppose Elvis is alive and living in Belize, right?" if you start talking about things that Have. No. Evidence To. Back. It.

We have no hope of ever 'finding out' if we are conditioned to never engage in any speculation...and especially if the speculation conflicts with the storyline in a way that could threaten TPTB.  I'm sure that this is no accident.

There is no evidence that Epstein is dead as far as I can see.

How can you justify taking the word of people who have been repeatedly proven to be chronic liars and have a vested interest in their side of the story being accepted?

It seems to me that you are pretty much glued to the idea that we should follow 'standard convention' and assume that what the mainstream media, FBI, etc, say is be default true unless proven otherwise.  It also seems to me that you are terrified of being labeled a 'conspiracy theorist' or branded with some such label.  I see no rationality in either of these management and control devices and I think they have done great harm to our country.  Probably terminal harm...which is part of the reason I split.

I also see you not only falling for but actively promoting what I would term the 'flat earth psyop'.  That is to say, attaching perfectly valid doubts to a ridiculous thing invented for the purpose of degrading said doubts.  That's disappointing to me.

[Carlton Banks]

It seems to me that you are pretty much glued to the idea that we should follow 'standard convention' and assume that what the mainstream media, FBI, etc, say is be default true unless proven otherwise.  It also seems to me that you are terrified of being labeled a 'conspiracy theorist' or branded with some such label.

I'm just defending against the double speak redefining of the word "conspiracy", which is perfectly legitimate seeing as it's being used to stigmatize people who have good argument about possible (and definite) corruption in governments

I also see you not only falling for but actively promoting what I would term the 'flat earth psyop'.  That is to say, attaching perfectly valid doubts to a ridiculous thing invented for the purpose of degrading said doubts.  

yeeeeah, you're confusing me with someone else, or you're crazy, or god knows what

link to me promoting flat earth, or stfu

[tvbcof]

It seems to me that you are pretty much glued to the idea that we should follow 'standard convention' and assume that what the mainstream media, FBI, etc, say is be default true unless proven otherwise.  It also seems to me that you are terrified of being labeled a 'conspiracy theorist' or branded with some such label.

I'm just defending against the double speak redefining of the word "conspiracy", which is perfectly legitimate seeing as it's being used to stigmatize people who have good argument about possible (and definite) corruption in governments

I also see you not only falling for but actively promoting what I would term the 'flat earth psyop'.  That is to say, attaching perfectly valid doubts to a ridiculous thing invented for the purpose of degrading said doubts.  

yeeeeah, you're confusing me with someone else, or you're crazy, or god knows what

link to me promoting flat earth, or stfu

My mistake somewhat.  Elvis = Flat Earth.  You didn't use the method, but you did express a palpable fear of it being used on you, and used it as an excuse to STFU about non-certified-kosher idea explorations (such as that maybe Epstein remains among the living.)  You may do so as you please.  I'll continue to analyze observations which might be used to test the details of a given 'consensus or 'majority report' for potential flaws.  More importantly, I'll continue to discuss the ideas, in public, with people who are not wetting themselves at the thought that they might be derided, shamed, humiliated, cut out of the herd, etc.  Instilling these feelings in the target is certainly part of the psy-op.

[Carlton Banks]

well, I agree that Epstein is "Schroedinger's Pedo": no-one in the general public is going to know if he's dead or alive until truly credible evidence appears. That means the box hasn't been opened, so lay off the speculation until you actually know anything that your most recent bottle of Jim Bean didn't tell you


and as well; I fully do not care if he's dead or alive, it would be the least important (or interesting) fact about this story if it was confirmed one way or the other



Edit you also didn't even read my first post

The pathologist making this claim (Epstein didn't kill himself) has form for being involved in many high profile autopsies and coroners reports, and making questionable/controverial public judgements on them (i.e. Eric Garner recently, as well as Congressional hearings regarding the JFK autopsy). That's me disbelieving the regular reporting, if that needs any more spelling out.

what does it mean? we can only guess. it might be a bluff, this pathologist's involvement is bound to raise eyebrows everywhere, so he might be telling the truth out of strategy. We're taking it all on trust, we can't get access to the body (even if possible, I'd be more concerned if anyone really cared that much to try it, let them play games, there're more important issues to spend time on from my perspective)

[tvbcof]

well, I agree that Epstein is "Schroedinger's Pedo": no-one in the general public is going to know if he's dead or alive until truly credible evidence appears. That means the box hasn't been opened, so lay off the speculation until you actually know anything that your most recent bottle of Jim Bean didn't tell you

and as well; I fully do not care if he's dead or alive, it would be the least important (or interesting) fact about this story if it was confirmed one way or the other

Lol!

Edit you also didn't even read my first post

The pathologist making this claim (Epstein didn't kill himself) has form for being involved in many high profile autopsies and coroners reports, and making questionable/controverial public judgements on them (i.e. Eric Garner recently, as well as Congressional hearings regarding the JFK autopsy). That's me disbelieving the regular reporting, if that needs any more spelling out.

what does it mean? we can only guess. it might be a bluff, this pathologist's involvement is bound to raise eyebrows everywhere, so he might be telling the truth out of strategy. We're taking it all on trust, we can't get access to the body (even if possible, I'd be more concerned if anyone really cared that much to try it, let them play games, there're more important issues to spend time on from my perspective)

I skimmed it enough to see that you mentioned the controversial pathologist.

Somewhere above is a post I did stating that if I were running a psy-op to cover for a person of Epstein's stature and the potential damage he could do, I'd have all kinds of 'controversial' things crawling out of the woodwork.  This is to create an information overload which make it so people throw up their hands and walk away rather than simplifying and applying some normal logic.

In my engineering, the unifying these 'controversial' issues would be that Epstein is certainly dead.  The only debate would be on how he got that way.  And 'enemies' would fight over this issue to their heart's content since it doesn't matter much.

In my engineering, the peeps would discouraged in multiple ways of stepping off the reservation and entertaining any 'conspiracy theories'.  They are free to argue about whether it was a suicide or homicide until the cows come home, and doing so would be encouraged by various media properties controlled by 'my people.'

Again, if I see anything solid to indicate that Epstein sleeps with the fishes, I'll entertain the notion.  Absent that, which is the current state, I assume he is probably doing fine in 'retirement and is probably just working a different job.