BOMBSHELL: ABC News Killed Epstein-Clinton Story, Says Anchor In Hot Mic Video

[TECSHARE]

Cool story bro. One of those pictures doesn't even have Epstein in it, and another one is a known (horrible) photoshop, but don't let that stop you from confirming your bias.

the one you said was without epstein is was actually a 2 part picture of the same party ORGANISED BY EPSTEIN which trump was there. like i said look at the clothes and room decor..
here
https://youtu.be/tm6T4_Tm_ho

the other pic was more of a hint to trumps inappropriateness with his daughter. not the overlay of epstein
can you not remember the stuff trump said about his own daughter
just a few examples
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EPEkk6qWkg

still wanna deny that trump had little social connection to epstein? even after the (first) video link i just shown shows otherwise.
ok more pics of them together


and also quotes in 2002 from trump
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges.
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone.
“He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

15 year friendship and talking about how he knows epstein likes the younger girls and videos of them socialising together
.. if you want to pretend it was just strictly business and nothing social and how trump didnt know anything about epsteins prefrences. then you might be as ditsy as the cheerleaders trump and epstein danced with

Your fetish for Trump is frankly kind of repulsive. You are the kind of person who would probably get off having him shit on your chest or something.

I have known my postman for 15 years. I am sure he is a great guy too. That doesn't make us close friends or mean we hang out all the time. Don't speak for me. I said they had "very little social contact" not the gibberish you are regurgitating from your fantasies. You might also call that quote about young girls Trump calling him out and warning people, but that doesn't serve your pedo daughter fucking slander narrative does it? Of course not.

If they were such great pals why did he bar Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago resort after he was exposed? Why was he so willing to hand over information to investigators looking into him?

"Edwards: The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009 when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people, that I want to talk to them, is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let’s just talk.  I’ll give you as much time as you want.  I’ll tell you what you need to know, and was very helpful, in the information that he gave, and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information. That checked out and that helped us and we didn’t have to take a deposition of him in 2009."

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80

Clinton on the other hand has been on "The Lolita Express" at least 26 times according to records, but same diff right?

[franky1]

i have no fetish for trump. im calling him out because he the current president and he is currently a world power player, not some 'one time famous' guy 20 years ago.. who doesnt matter anymore

but you seem to be defending trump and trying to make him out as a good guy that just happen to have a few bad friends, and saying trump has no clue to the social proclivities of his friends. and pretending trump has a healthy respect for female sexuality, by pretending trump never said gross stuff about his own daughter

makes me believe you are the one with the trump fetish.

also to note the video of him partying with epstein was a broadcast from an american tv news show NBC. so this topic about pretending news about epstein is 'new' 2015+ is solely and illogically untrue

epstein had known parties with young girls, he was even convicted in 2008 for crimes against kids
he also was the cause of UK royal prince andrew and Fergi's divorce due you andrews sexual acts that epstein was part of

so its all been public info since the 90's+

im just guessing her but i should just ask you straight:
are you angry at me for pointing things out about trump.
are you angry that you thought it was limited to just clinton
are you angry that what you thought was new, wasnt new
are you angry that fox news didnt report it first as they seem like certain populations favourite news outlet
are you angry that you didnt find the news broadcasts of 1992,2008 quotes from 2002. and its now hard for you to realise you been following the wrong path

[TECSHARE]

~

There is a brown stain on your chest. You might want to take care of that.

[franky1]

gotta laugh at your trump supporter loyalty, but trying to say those calling him out are the trump fetishes
funnier part is how the interview video you linked actually counters your narrative
1. lawyer contacted trump due to having connections - proof trump involved
2. lawyer is happy to drop legal proceedings for a price 'settled for undisclosed amount' - lawyer happy to be bribed to keep quiet
3. trump gave evidence which helped go against epstein - proof trump knew something
4. trump wasnt deposed(financial handshakes) and distanced himself(personally) from epstein only after lawyers got involved.. not as soon as learning about epsteins proclivities a decade earlier

if you make one more post defending trump. then you might as well just war a trump loyalist shirt

also that video proves epstein stuff was going on more than just 2-3 years ago. thus making this topic about a bombshell redundant
again its all been public info for decades

[TECSHARE]

gotta laugh at your trump supporter loyalty, but trying to say those calling him out are the trump fetishes
funnier part is how the interview video you linked actually counters your narrative
1. lawyer contacted trump due to having connections - proof trump involved
2. lawyer is happy to drop legal proceedings for a price 'settled for undisclosed amount' - lawyer happy to be bribed to keep quiet
3. trump gave evidence which helped go against epstein - proof trump knew something
4. trump wasnt deposed(financial handshakes) and distanced himself(personally) from epstein only after lawyers got involved.. not as soon as learning about epsteins proclivities a decade earlier

if you make one more post defending trump. then you might as well just war a trump loyalist shirt

also that video proves epstein stuff was going on more than just 2-3 years ago. thus making this topic about a bombshell redundant
again its all been public info for decades

Trump wipes his ass with toilet paper. You know who else wiped their ass with toilet paper?

HITLER

Proof Trump was involved with Hitler.



You know who knew something about Hitler?

TRUMP

Proof Trump knew about the concentration camps in WW2 and was complicit.

You should seek treatment for Trump Derangement Syndrome, letting people shit on your chest is not hygienic.

[franky1]

i think its time you stopped taking drugs now.
firstly your defending trump like he is your pop idol.. then in the same breath trying to hide your loyalty by saying anyone that links him to bad stuff is his fan

sorry but your 'cover up' to hide your obsession makes no sense to a sober person.

the only reason why he is mentioned is because clinton is old old news and not a relevant person today. but trump is in the white house right now meaning his actions are relevant as they can affect people.

but your denial of trumps grotesque quotes about his own daughter and other women and even how he has been seen for 15 years having social parties with epstein and cheer leaders and such. just shows how ignorant you are to see the evidence and prfer to be blind to it to defend trump

you said little social intraction and

sorry but blind loyalty is not contagious people wont become trump fans and follow your lead

and people can see your loyalty even if you try to hide it
its just a shame that you dont see it because it looks like you will end up just defending him as if your life depends on it.
you said 'Trump had a minor business relationship with Epstein that fell through, had very little social contact with him,'
i debunked the minor business relationship as theres proof everywhere it was more then a decade of refriendship
i debunked the lack of social contact again via the proof of their interactions lasting over a decade

the only thing i could possibly think you meant was a game of word play
'trump had a minor business relationship'
'trump had a 'underage child' business relationship. meaning he was manager of a child sex trafficking ring alongside epstein..
is that the hint you are trying to suggest?

[TECSHARE]

i think its time you stopped taking drugs now.
firstly your defending trump like he is your pop idol.. then in the same breath trying to hide your loyalty by saying anyone that links him to bad stuff is his fan

sorry but your 'cover up' to hide your obsession makes no sense to a sober person.

the only reason why he is mentioned is because clinton is old old news and not a relevant person today. but trump is in the white house right now meaning his actions are relevant as they can affect people.

but your denial of trumps grotesque quotes about his own daughter and other women and even how he has been seen for 15 years having social parties with epstein and cheer leaders and such. just shows how ignorant you are to see the evidence and prfer to be blind to it to defend trump

you said little social intraction and

sorry but blind loyalty is not contagious people wont become trump fans and follow your lead

and people can see your loyalty even if you try to hide it
its just a shame that you dont see it because it looks like you will end up just defending him as if your life depends on it.
you said 'Trump had a minor business relationship with Epstein that fell through, had very little social contact with him,'
i debunked the minor business relationship as theres proof everywhere it was more then a decade of refriendship
i debunked the lack of social contact again via the proof of their interactions lasting over a decade

the only thing i could possibly think you meant was a game of word play
'trump had a minor business relationship'
'trump had a 'underage child' business relationship. meaning he was manager of a child sex trafficking ring alongside epstein..
is that the hint you are trying to suggest?

You aren't linking him to anything. All of your assertions require assumptions, interpretations, and other conclusions generally unsupported by evidence. You winge on about blind loyalty to distract people from your own evident blind hatred. The difference between you and me is I am asking for evidence, you are manufacturing it via interpretation. The relationship between Bill Clinton and Epstein is not equivalent to the relationship between Trump and Epstein, and the assertion that it is is disingenuous and based in your need to have Trump shit on your chest because it is the only way you know to make the pain go away.

[franky1]

you said 'Trump had a minor business relationship with Epstein that fell through, had very little social contact with him,'
i debunked the minor business relationship as theres proof everywhere it was more then a decade of friendship
i debunked the lack of social contact again via the proof of their interactions lasting over a decade

its not an assumption. theres photos and videos that show there was more than
'minor business relationship, very little social contact'

sorry but the videos and photos and quotes and eye witnesses prove more than your lack of evidence of the opposite

anyway back to my original point. this topic is void on content.. as the 'story' has been in the public domain for decades. the only thing this topic is about is how someone got fired to releasing a video.. but the content of the video is not a 'bombshell'

[BADecker]

^^^ Talk, talk, talk. Can't even show a pic, or even a link.

[TECSHARE]

^^^ Talk, talk, talk. Can't even show a pic, or even a link.

He's got Photoshop.

[franky1]

^^^ Talk, talk, talk. Can't even show a pic, or even a link.

He's got Photoshop.

i see you both still ignoring the video footage from ncb in 1992
it really must be silent in your world of head in the sand living

[franky1]

even funnier is techshares own link

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80

at 6:50 it shows that one of epsteins victims who was not even 18 was at mar a lago
who owned mar a lago
trump

its funny how tecshare tried to use a link to defend trump. but the link actually reveals trumps involvement

[TECSHARE]

even funnier is techshares own link

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80

at 6:50 it shows that one of epsteins victims who was not even 18 was at mar a lago
who owned mar a lago
trump

its funny how tecshare tried to use a link to defend trump. but the link actually reveals trumps involvement

That's not funny. What is funny is the pile of shit on your chest.

If they were such great pals why did he bar Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago resort after he was exposed?

Its almost like I already addressed this and Trump banned him from Mar-a-Lago once he found out...

You keep imagineering Trump crimes while the real evidence against Epstein and the Clinton's stacks up to the sky. Maybe some one will buy your pathetic attempts to distract from it.

[franky1]

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80

at 6:50 it shows that one of epsteins victims who was not even 18 was at mar a lago
who owned mar a lago
trump

That's not funny. What is funny is the pule of shit on your chest.

If they were such great pals why did he bar Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago resort after he was exposed?

Its almost like I already addressed this and Trump banned him from Mar-a-Lago once he found out...

You keep imagineering Trump crimes while the real evidence against Epstein and the Clinton's stacks up to the sky. Maybe some one will buy your pathetic attempts to distract from it.
[/quote]

1. the video YOU linked both says that trump invited underage girls to his parties to meet epstein. and how trump knew of epsteins proclivities YEARS before it went to court. and how trump only "banned him from mar-a-lago AFTER IT STARTED TO CAUSE LEGAL ISSUES

2. trump knew about it in the 90's and millenia but didnt distance himself untill AFTER the lawyers started calling trump.
thats not finding out about epstein coz the lawyers said trump provided good info that helped the case
also was the quotes from trump praising epstein for his proclivities
what he then did was just try to distancing himself from being tied to any legal issues AFTER THE FACT. once it started getting dicey with lawyers phone calls

do you not even bother to listen to the video. or just found a website that said it was a trump defence and you blindly accepted a websites summary and linked the video without checking it out

[TECSHARE]

1. the video YOU linked both says that trump invited underage girls to his parties to meet epstein. and how trump knew of epsteins proclivities YEARS before it went to court. and how trump only "banned him from mar-a-lago AFTER IT STARTED TO CAUSE LEGAL ISSUES

2. trump knew about it in the 90's and millenia but didnt distance himself untill AFTER the lawyers started calling trump.
thats not finding out about epstein coz the lawyers said trump provided good info that helped the case
also was the quotes from trump praising epstein for his proclivities
what he then did was just try to distancing himself from being tied to any legal issues AFTER THE FACT. once it started getting dicey with lawyers phone calls

do you not even bother to listen to the video. or just found a website that said it was a trump defence and you blindly accepted a websites summary and linked the video without checking it out

1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote. Also, tell me how is it you came to be aware what happened in Trumps mind, and how exactly you expect to prove this?

2. Once again, with those psychic abilities being able to know what is in the minds of others you should be working for Mrs. Cleo making the big bucks instead of wasting your time here. Most people would call a claim to know what a person knew and intended at a certain point in time in the past without substantiation a flimsy premise, but you have those special ESP powers, so that doesn't apply here.

[franky1]

1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote.

even funnier is techshares own link

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80

at 6:50 it shows that one of epsteins victims who was not even 18 was at mar a lago
who owned mar a lago
trump

1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote. Also, tell me how is it you came to be aware what happened in Trumps mind, and how exactly you expect to prove this?

and also quotes in 2002 from trump
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges.
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone.
“He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

oh and yes i quoted your quotes of you quoting my quotes where i quoted the sources. that way you cant keep playing ignorant because you quoted me giving you the information. thus obviously you cannot pretend to have never seen the sources before
P.S trump banned epstein in 2008. yt was quoting him in 2002 as someone that liked young girls.
trump was partying with epstein and had under 18's attending the party. (virginia roberts)

[TECSHARE]

1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote.

even funnier is techshares own link

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80

at 6:50 it shows that one of epsteins victims who was not even 18 was at mar a lago
who owned mar a lago
trump

1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote. Also, tell me how is it you came to be aware what happened in Trumps mind, and how exactly you expect to prove this?

and also quotes in 2002 from trump
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges.
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,” Trump booms from a speakerphone.
“He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

oh and yes i quoted your quotes of you quoting my quotes where i quoted the sources. that way you cant keep playing ignorant because you quoted me giving you the information. thus obviously you cannot pretend to have never seen the sources before
P.S trump banned epstein in 2008. yt was quoting him in 2002 as someone that liked young girls.
trump was partying with epstein and had under 18's attending the party. (virginia roberts)

You also quoted yourself as my quote. Don't do that, I don't want your words ever confused for mine.

See that's interesting speaking of quotes...

1. the video YOU linked both says that trump invited underage girls to his parties to meet epstein. and how trump knew of epsteins proclivities YEARS before it went to court. and how trump only "banned him from mar-a-lago AFTER IT STARTED TO CAUSE LEGAL ISSUES

They said no such thing in the video, I was just making sure there wasn't some like ultrasonic frequency speech hidden in the clip or something. This is a great example of the kind of bullshit you call evidence along with your Photoshop job. Your interpretations and assumptions are not evidence, that is called fantasy.

[franky1]

1. the video YOU linked both says that trump invited underage girls to his parties to meet epstein. and how trump knew of epsteins proclivities YEARS before it went to court. and how trump only "banned him from mar-a-lago AFTER IT STARTED TO CAUSE LEGAL ISSUES

They said no such thing in the video, I was just making sure there wasn't some like ultrasonic frequency speech hidden in the clip or something. This is a great example of the kind of bullshit you call evidence along with your Photoshop job. Your interpretations and assumptions are not evidence, that is called fantasy.

a. mar a lago was trumps house
meaniing he set the guest list.

b. the video of the lawyer said that trump had info that helped the case against epstein

c. the video with the lawyer was talking about virginia roberts who was raped at 17 meaning that to be introduced to epstein shw had to be younger than 17.. (thats how time flows.. intro, then assault)
its logic.. atleast review the evidence and dont review how deep you can stick head in the sand

[BADecker]

^^^ And you have proof of this how?!     

[franky1]

^^^ And you have proof of this how?!     

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

here ill paste it several times.. just incase you still ignore it even after it being in several posts already
https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/

https://youtu.be/Yqb59n69Z80
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/