Sorry to insist but your inquiries are non substantial to the project, we're going to run 3 AMAs, I suggest you to join those at this point.
I haven't avoided any question and if you keep reiterating that I think you're trying to FUD.
In regards to our dApps, those also will be public on Github.
If you are interested in the vision of the project, in the decentralized business, in the governance, the vision for integration, be my guest.
If you try to give public advice about the company and not the project, furthermore criticizing the lack of disclosure of HBDV price, where the price is in plain sight and doesn't even require research to be seen.
You clearly didn't read the whitepaper neither you browsed efficiently this very thread, but you give advice about Hybridverse, without giving yourself not even an hour to DYOR.
Anyone looking at your website can judge themselves and decide if they want to rely on your advice.
[/quote]
Thank you for the compliments.
Again, if there's any lesson you should learn here, transparency goes far in crypto. It's both the judge and executioner for startups. Transparency with finances is especially important, who the majority holders are, what the agreement lockups are and etc. None which is stated, only ever briefly mentioned. Token prices go for who's invested as well, not just public prices or the vague fantasies of (top 30-exchanges). Concurrently, you're not even sure what's in your own whitepaper, because the token economy instead mentioned in the whitepaper, it's listed only by graphical format in your medium post. Another red flag and cause for alert.
Universities do not necessarily equate to accountability or ability to execute in blockchain or crypto industry, in which you're probably well aware of. But I appreciate those tidbits of information in regards to the NDAs you've signed, but a lot of unanswered questions still remain.
Concurrently, i advise you to re-read through much of the information you've put out and tie up the several loose and cliff-hangers left, all through the documentations, technical accountability and more.
Unfortunately, you've gone off on several tangents here and haven't answered the initial question, the remark was why this is labeled as an IPO and why you've initially led down the path of misleading individuals. If it's that difficult to come to full understood answer, then my best wishes go out to your investors, your team and yourself; sincerely.
[/quote]
We have just communicated that in case of the IPO remark you've made (term we used as many other projects used on this board and is quite unsubstantial argue over this, thinking is some sort of misleading technique meanwhile is just a terminology argument you're making instead of making more relevant questions). I've just pointed out that if there will be HBDV left from the IPO those units will be sold during an eventual IEO which is under agreement, and as you should know, exchanges don't allow to disclose names.
Once again I want to say, that the one who started off this wrong is you, because there's clearly a conflict of interest as you tried to sell me your services which I didn't accept, so you started FUD 1 hour after you contacted me (because you've seen I didn't answer you).
To back the fact that his opinion can't be trusted (if the lack of credentials aren't enough) due to a conflict of interest:
I rarely see so many buzzwords in a single inquiry.
I didn't pay attention to your proposal because it was unsubstantial full of buzzwords and unprofessional (you proclaim yourself as "crypto guru" but I don't see any publication or relevant material backing your expertise, not to mention your twitter profile, which looks very lacking and inorganic, also why did you say that your services have very low price without even knowing what your potential client wanted?), another advice, when you make a business proposal to a company, don't contact the CEO on Telegram, but instead utilize official channels, is more professional as the Project is not made by 1 person only but by a board.
Sorry if I'm being harsh but I can't stand who provides biased "advices". And I don't like who has opinions based on interests, you should separate intellectual honesty from business.
These factors show a lack of integrity on your end because you've took the slippery slope here by doing what you did.
I am very open to constructive critique and material for improving the project.
However given your conflict of interest and the lack of credentials is you that's not credible, your questions showed that also. You're trying to sell marketing services with a 1 man team and 3 pages website.
Because your questions are either not backed by research or either biased because you literally made a business proposal to me, before starting the FUD. Additionally you didn't make any actual question about the technology, so yes, I hope this "conversation" ends here, until the time you make the adequate research and start making questions about blockchain technology.
Hybridverse proposes an innovative way for blockchain integration and business decentralization, there are a lot of smart things you could've asked.
I wish you the best too with your cteadvisor.com service
You've picked one that speaks his mind buddy. Again no hard feelings, you're welcome to follow our development, for everything else you claim, there's plenty of evidence debunking such claims. Let's finish this please.
PS: if you have any actual proposal that is more than growth hacking or "marketing services" send me a DM and I would give it a read.
Steve
HybriDroid enters in action for
Airdrop & Bounty Program.
Twitter challenge & Telegram challenge for users.
Editor challenge & Youtube challenge for content creators.
4 challenges, 35 days, let the hunt begin.
How to Participate:Engage with
HybriDroid on telegram
