Open letter to bounty managers

[goaldigger]

Even the bounty manager now rules with 15 posts a week that are all average, well-known managers also do the same thing, but participants must post constructively so as not to be considered spam, but what I know spam is done by small members.

It must come first on every user here in this forum, and we cannot blame the campaign manager if there are so many spammers who are just working for the seek of their weekly payment. Asking for a 25post a week is normal on a campaign, and if you can’t do that then don’t participate so you wont have any problem. I’m ok with this rules because i spend more time here to work and to learn at the same time.

[kaneki007]

I think to post 10-13 per week is enough for the participants because most bounty managers apply that rules. I remember when there was a bounty campaign that only posted a minimum of 50 posts during the campaign and there were many participants who joined

[Gotumoot]

1. Its not every time we will have something to contribute on.
Most times i come on here i only see old posts that i have no interest in at all but due to meeting up with required bounty posts i will be forced to complete them, some posts are so useless or repetitive that you won't want to say a thing

You have applied to the signature campaign so you have to comply with their demands so you can earn a stake every week. And if you can't do that you won't have to wear a signature and no bounty manager will adjust you.

2. This is another way to reduce spammers, few bounty managers i knew of will only request 7 to 10 posts per week which i feel its more than enough, moreover we have too many scam projects in this space already so not every bounty projects have guarantee

It does not help to reduce spammers. Because spammers will not disappear and they will continue to do so.

[Pecunia non olet]

Bounty managers you are responsible for flooding this forum with too many posts, either good or spamming, why? because its ridiculous saying bounty hunters must post 15 posts per week

1. Its not every time we will have something to contribute on.
Most times i come on here i only see old posts that i have no interest in at all but due to meeting up with required bounty posts i will be forced to complete them, some posts are so useless or repetitive that you won't want to say a thing

2. This is another way to reduce spammers, few bounty managers i knew of will only request 7 to 10 posts per week which i feel its more than enough, moreover we have too many scam projects in this space already so not every bounty projects have guarantee

Bounty managers please try to adjust

You are not enough reputable to write them any message, they will not care about you.
And secondly, bounty managers in most cases are not the person who really decides about the terms and rules.

[fuer44]

Bounty managers you are responsible for flooding this forum with too many posts, either good or spamming, why? because its ridiculous saying bounty hunters must post 15 posts per week

1. Its not every time we will have something to contribute on.
Most times i come on here i only see old posts that i have no interest in at all but due to meeting up with required bounty posts i will be forced to complete them, some posts are so useless or repetitive that you won't want to say a thing

2. This is another way to reduce spammers, few bounty managers i knew of will only request 7 to 10 posts per week which i feel its more than enough, moreover we have too many scam projects in this space already so not every bounty projects have guarantee

Bounty managers please try to adjust

I think the goal of managers is to charge a certain number of posts each week, aiming to flood this forum with their signatures so that there are investors who are interested in putting funds into their projects. that makes sense, because the purpose of the bounty signature is to introduce their project to the inhabitants of this forum, be it investors or traders, or ordinary people who enter this forum. Their calculation is, the number of participants who took part in the bounty signature, then the post that was required to them in this forum, so that their significance continued to be seen. it will make it easier for the team to promote their project. it's just that participants should not be spam, and must post a quality so that it does not become as you said earlier.

[Byakuga]

I think to post 10-13 per week is enough for the participants because most bounty managers apply that rules. I remember when there was a bounty campaign that only posted a minimum of 50 posts during the campaign and there were many participants who joined

If requested posts by BM or project team is too low then its really not going to help the project, the reason why we bounty hunters are needed is to create much awareness so any posts requirement should be fulfilled without complains

[joshy23]

I think to post 10-13 per week is enough for the participants because most bounty managers apply that rules. I remember when there was a bounty campaign that only posted a minimum of 50 posts during the campaign and there were many participants who joined

If requested posts by BM or project team is too low then its really not going to help the project, the reason why we bounty hunters are needed is to create much awareness so any posts requirement should be fulfilled without complains

The rights of the team to demand from bounty hunters to help them reaching more people to invest and support the project. This kind of task
attracts investors once the bounty participants interact with more members using the the bounty campaign codes. It shouldn't be an issue
since the rules has been stated and those interested participants can join or pass out for campaign.

[jets567]

OP has a point though the post count does not for bounty manager to decide but for the project owners itself, unless the manager have strict rules regarding post count which he/she relay to the team owners. 10 post per week is good but I don't have any problems with 15 post either, as a bounty hunter we should also adjust to this kind of rules since we are getting rewarded for our work.

[Beparanf]

OP has a point though the post count does not for bounty manager to decide but for the project owners itself, unless the manager have strict rules regarding post count which he/she relay to the team owners. 10 post per week is good but I don't have any problems with 15 post either, as a bounty hunter we should also adjust to this kind of rules since we are getting rewarded for our work.

Besides we have options to either join or not, I remember before there are bounties that require 20-30 post a day, though the payment is quite big before than now and many discussions can be a topic, I'm just telling if we think that project is worth joining and spending time to post 10 or 16 post then join and just follow rules posted by the bounty manager which is approved and maybe idea of the team developers.

[crypto_fan_boy]

I don't like it either. The way those projects like to be promoted is all about spamming twitter, facebook, linkedin, telegram or this forum with posts and stuff nobody reads or if somebody does, then it is most probably just a few people who are genuinely interested in new ICOs. But let's be honest, most of those projects are so bad, they won't see the light of a real market or they will fail to bring their product to the market as they promised.

[electronicash]

bounty managers meant to advertise his project to the world as much as possible they may want a hundred post a day to make it the signature gets noticed and will be clicked by people that landed here in the forum not just by searching google. they wanted exposure. lucky for you they only ask 15 some were asking 20 posts if i remember.  if you are a participant, that means you agreed to the condition before you join.

[LbtalkL]

On Bitcoin payment signature usually, they require a minimum post of 15 to 25 to qualify for the week.  Bounty managers on services are really strict they only accept an applicant with earned merits with quality post it will help both projects for promotions and the forum. It's not really spamming if you are contributing.
Signatures on bounties board usually have 10 post requirements to get stakes and they are not strict even with no merit they accept applicants and some manager's concerns are only post count, not the quality I think that's spamming.

[#Darren]

I agree, because sometimes I see bounties that require between 15 and 25 posts per week to be eligible for rewards. In my opinion it is silly, especially nowadays, where 90 percent of all bounties cannot even manage to collect their soft cap.

[Hamphser]

Bounty managers you are responsible for flooding this forum with too many posts, either good or spamming, why? because its ridiculous saying bounty hunters must post 15 posts per week

1. Its not every time we will have something to contribute on.
Most times i come on here i only see old posts that i have no interest in at all but due to meeting up with required bounty posts i will be forced to complete them, some posts are so useless or repetitive that you won't want to say a thing

2. This is another way to reduce spammers, few bounty managers i knew of will only request 7 to 10 posts per week which i feel its more than enough, moreover we have too many scam projects in this space already so not every bounty projects have guarantee

Bounty managers please try to adjust

What's wrong with having a maximum of 15 posts per week? You should be lucky to only post with that minimum or maximum post. If you were on a signature campaign i don't think you will last for a week if your perspective is just like that. And how would the bounty manager be able to pay you if you don't want to make a post?

Do you even know what's the purpose of posting and having a required number of post?

A reputable bounty manager know how to handle those shit poster and what's the rules they implement you just have to follow it because they know how to do their work. Not all managers though but some.

[Aabcde]

If you are concerned about the number of posts that appear because of chasing the target of a bounty, I think the admin also understands this, if it is considered spam will definitely be banned by them. Do you consider the admin incompetent? I think it's only natural if someone raises a thread that has been 3 months have passed. If you exceed this limit may be an exception. Because it could also be interesting to comment on someone, not merely wanting to pursue a post. This world will not always be what you want it to be, so get used to it.

[cotton ball]

Bounty managers you are responsible for flooding this forum with too many posts, either good or spamming, why? because its ridiculous saying bounty hunters must post 15 posts per week

1. Its not every time we will have something to contribute on.
Most times i come on here i only see old posts that i have no interest in at all but due to meeting up with required bounty posts i will be forced to complete them, some posts are so useless or repetitive that you won't want to say a thing

2. This is another way to reduce spammers, few bounty managers i knew of will only request 7 to 10 posts per week which i feel its more than enough, moreover we have too many scam projects in this space already so not every bounty projects have guarantee

Bounty managers please try to adjust

Do you have dreaming with bounty campaign have worth now with pass many kinds bounty less reward and delay distributing? I less hope can reach success with bounty campaign at the future because many ICO not success raise hard cap and raise higher price after listing, investor re think when investing with ICO project at next time.

[Winscosinally]

If 15posts is way too much for you just find other projects that you can handle, i myself is getting tired of scam bounty projects and good new projects are having hard time to raise funds successfully, i hope that next year 2020 will be different for bounty hunters

[sujonali1819]

Yes, 15 post that means 2 posts per day is not too high to my end as well as for the maximum members I think. And 20-25 posts are moderate. But asking minimum more than 25 posts and pay per post maximum 40-60 posts per week is really helps to increase spams.

On the other hand owners will not pay people for nothing. They also need get enough feedbacks from the community.

[yahoo62278]

I'm curious if the OP is referring to all managers as "bounty Managers" or if he/she is talking strictly about bounty campaigns? I know for a fact that most companies I manage campaigns for are not going to lower the post count per week to 15 or less and pay users 50-150$ in bitcoin per week.

They may consider splitting people into 2 groups or something, where group 1 would be required to do 10 or so posts per week for 1 amount, and group 2  would be required to do 20+ posts per week for a higher amount of bitcoin per week. I just don't see them lowering the minimums and paying the same amount of money though.

As far as just bounty campaigns go, being as a lot of those users are going to post in the altcoin boards and clutter the hell out of those boards, I could see advocating for lowered weekly minimums for bounty campaigns.

There is a 3rd option here though. You can always go get an actual job and not worry about having to post a weekly minimum on here.

[Olaphash]

Making 15 posts a week is not hard as you think if you spend enough time here you would see good topics.  I checked your post history and I see that all of your posts are mostly in altcoin section which is known for spams.
Do you think Chip Mixer participants are performing magic by doing 50 posts per week? NO. They contribute best posts on this forum. If you want discussion that would interest you, visit sections like Project development, Bitcoin Discussion, Beginners & Help.
Bounty managers job is to create rules, it's up to you to accept it.