Red trust accounts wearing signature.....

[Greatchu]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

[DabsPoorVersion]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

I saw E3T requirements and it is not stated that users with red trust cannot participate.
Their rules are simple. As long as they don't prohibit users with red trust to participate, users with red trust can participate as long as they want.
It is not against the rules. Rules are to be made by bounty managers, I don't know the campaign manager so I can't say if he is a bad or a good manager.

It is normal as long as they allow users with red trust to participate.

Requirements:

• Only user with the rank of Member and above can join the campaign.
• The Signature should be kept until the end of the Campaign, removing the signature
  before that time will result in a disqualification.
• During this period, you must make a minimum of 5 Posts per Week and 1 Post per week in the Announcement Thread .
• Posts must be useful and constructive to be counted. Posts that are off-topic, or simply made
  with the intention of raising post count will be disqualified.
• A post must have a minimum length of 80 Characters to be counted.
• Keep your signature on until the spreadsheet is updated with your final post count,
  removing it before post count will result in not be accepted.

[OasisDre]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Its bounty manager's call for that, once the bounty rules doesn't say users with red trust can't join bounty then no problem at all, red trust users promoting the bounty is legit

[NeuroticFish]

I find the red trust rule is good, it gives less opportunities to the wrongdoers. And most businesses don't want their name associated with red-trust people.
But indeed, the rules are made by the business owners together with the campaign manager.
In that case, I think that best is to ask the campaign manager or, even better, the business owner (if it's active on btctalk), because it may be just a mistake / forgotten rule.

[Javi_Anibarro]

It is not about the manager of the bounty but the rules. If the company decides to allow everybody to participate in the bounty. The manager has no right to prevent them from joining the campaign. It is very normal because we have seen many projects did it before, of course, it would be best for the company to add a new rule to prevent the negative trust people from joining the campaign.

[angrybirdy]

Maybe they still consider it as sake of promotion so many will participate, especially now that bounty hunters prefer to earn with weekly of BTC. Many are no longer attracted in staking bounties since it takes time and not guaranteed. Maybe managers can limit it depending on the number of trust issues or on what it pertains in those account with red if tagged as scammer due to trade or not and explain to developer why it is needed to not accept.

Maybe this is the primary reason, just to focus on the promotion of the project, they disregard and give an opportunity for users with a red tag to participate in their project. They most likely that desperate to expand the reach of their project just to increase their promotion rate and get enough investors for the sake of the success of the project.

[kolonel_x]

There are still a number of bounty managers that allow members who are hit by red trust to participate in the promotion of the project, for me it is no problem as long as the observant manager of each account with red trust because it could be used again fraudulently in multiple accounts.

[Serco]

It is not about the manager of the bounty but the rules. If the company decides to allow everybody to participate in the bounty. The manager has no right to prevent them from joining the campaign. It is very normal because we have seen many projects did it before, of course, it would be best for the company to add a new rule to prevent the negative trust people from joining the campaign.

bounty managers should give suggestion to developers team about red trust participants.it will influence project image to their investor in my opinion and also projects quality  looks have low quality.if we look in this forum,many good managers didn't allow red member,and most of project have good quality.we could see many refference in past campaigns.

[rosezionjohn]

@Greatchu if you have an issue with the bounty manager allowing tagged users for previously cheating campaigns, it is best to bring the issue to the project team. Usually, they just give 100% authority to the campaign manager since they hired him for the job in the first place but it's possible that they may intervene if they found out that the bounty manager could be damaging their project by allowing red-tagged bounty hunters.

• During this period, you must make a minimum of 5 Posts per Week and 1 Post per week in the Announcement Thread .

I wonder what the mods thinks of this particular bounty rule. Doesn't this fall under incentivized posting?

[Asuspawer09]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

I saw E3T requirements and it is not stated that users with red trust cannot participate.
Their rules are simple. As long as they don't prohibit users with red trust to participate, users with red trust can participate as long as they want.
It is not against the rules. Rules are to be made by bounty managers, I don't know the campaign manager so I can't say if he is a bad or a good manager.

It is normal as long as they allow users with red trust to participate.

Requirements:

• Only user with the rank of Member and above can join the campaign.
• The Signature should be kept until the end of the Campaign, removing the signature
  before that time will result in a disqualification.
• During this period, you must make a minimum of 5 Posts per Week and 1 Post per week in the Announcement Thread .
• Posts must be useful and constructive to be counted. Posts that are off-topic, or simply made
  with the intention of raising post count will be disqualified.
• A post must have a minimum length of 80 Characters to be counted.
• Keep your signature on until the spreadsheet is updated with your final post count,
  removing it before post count will result in not be accepted.

In my opinion, it is really a big downside on an account that has a red trust because a lot of signature campaign only allow account that have a great profile or doesn't have a red trust in their account. In my opinion the bounty manager is the one that is going to decides if red trust account should be accepted in the signature campaign or not but pretty much today it is now standard that your account should not have a red trust or else it will not be accepted in the signature campaign because it is not trusted anymore by the campaign manager.

[Xardasim]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Participation of red trust forum members in any campaign is normal. It's usually emphasized why and by whom red trust is given. This doesn't mean that the bounty manager is bad, it is just a little issues mentioned by someone for member are not a problem.

[tsaroz]

There were instance of bounty managers accepting red trust members as exception in the past specially during the trust war among DT members. But as most of the retaliatory trust of that time are gone, almost none of the legit project accepts a red trusted members.
Everyone can use a signature whether they are on the campaign or not and though using a red trust member to advertise doesn't necessarily mean the project is a scam but it would certainly create an negative impact on the viewers.

[cudora]

Why should it be the fault of a bounty manager or generally bad? Depending on trust, there can be accounts that were "stolen" and those that "cheated forum members". In my opinion those two definitions are completely different and I have nothing against the first one.

[tk808]

If you believe something is off, or not being enforced, then do not participate in said campaign. 95% of the time, you'll be wasting your time. These cryptos are dead-on-arrival, are crypto get-rich-schemes that prey on most of low quality and money-hungry B-hunters.

[valuater]

In the past, there were many who received and now there are only a few bounty managers who still maintain the rules, but I think if someone reprimands or advises them, I think this will disappear, it is strange to me if there are bounty managers who allow this.

[Pearls Before Swine]

I find the red trust rule is good, it gives less opportunities to the wrongdoers. And most businesses don't want their name associated with red-trust people.

Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about.  They should, but they might now.  Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them.  I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties.  It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.

[arimamib]

it is the policy of the manager and each manager and also the project developer because they have their own criteria. but keep in mind that not all projects accept red trusts, take good care of your account by not making mistakes in the forum because trust is important in this forum besides the ranking of the forum

[liuqi]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Why not bro lets everyone have the signature and lets everyone promote the projects. We only distinguish the market of crypto promotion in Bitcoin talk but actually everyone can wear the signature doesn't have any problem.
I suggest the bounty managers to accept even the negative trust members when there posting a legit posts with good quality. Let's everyone earn and stay peace.

[crairezx20]

Why not bro lets everyone have the signature and lets everyone promote the projects. We only distinguish the market of crypto promotion in Bitcoin talk but actually everyone can wear the signature doesn't have any problem.
I suggest the bounty managers to accept even the negative trust members when there posting a legit posts with good quality. Let's everyone earn and stay peace.

Not good if they have negative trust feedback and the feedback said he is scammer do you still wanted to help them?
I don't like scammer to stay wearing signature and earn from them this should not be tolerated if they received negatively as scammer they should not welcome here on the forum.

I have many bad experienced on them even here on altcoin bounties we help them but in the end they turn into scam then sooner they will join in some campaign where they can earn few bucks that they can use again to buy a website and use for scamming purposes.

[akmal1984]

Actually it can't be said that a bad manager also has a signature that accepts a red trust account. Maybe because now fewer participants are participating in the signature project so there are managers who take the policy to accept red trust accounts.
But it is better if the red trust account is not accepted as a participant.