Red trust accounts wearing signature.....

[Ararbermas]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

if your joining bounty campaign with negative trust BM check the profile first where the feedback came from and what are their references,  what i mean if its true or not because for your information there are some user making false accusations with other BM.  So don't judge them if you have no such information why they owned negative trust. In fact owner of the project will not let bm with negative trust to handle it if it's true that they are not trustworthy member of btt, unless if the BM is the real owner of the scam project . Lol

[Edraket31]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Uhm, it's not that common for bounty managers accepting red trust users. But some are okay with them. It might be the rules made from bounty manager and the project team themselves. Although some also not accept red trust users since they want a healthty bounty participants to not spamming the forum and all. But it doesnt change the overall bounty. But I do think that bounty manager needs to give them a fair warning. As to not spamming, using alt accounts etc.

I don't see any reason no to accept them too, we should give chance for as long as they are just using 1 account in one campaign, as long as they are not scammers, so it will be fine at all. Giving chance to everybody should be a must here, we are one big family, let's give chance to correct each other, once he committed crime or he did the same thing again then that's the time not to give chance at all.

[DeathProxy]

Red trust wearing signature code is soley at the discretion of the bounty manger.  Some manager will specifically emphasise on the rule that Bitcointalk account with red trust are not allowed to wear signature code and participate in his bounty while some managers permits red trusted Bitcointalk accounts to participate,  so in all the bounty manager has the final say of whether to allow red trust account participate in the bounty or not. Some bounty managers also take out time to verify the cause of the red trust before allowing such participants to participate in the bounty campaign

[Aabcde]

We cannot say that a bad bounty manager is the one who gives access to red trust owners to be able to join the campaign.
It could be that the red trust is better at promoting a campaign than you. I think a bounty manager like this always thinks positively which he believes that the possibility is always there even in negative things. And that is not a mistake.

[ameliana]

in my opinion a valid project and the responsible manager will not accept account participants with a red trust and vice versa for the project also will not accept managers with a red trust. and if other than that, you can redefine the meaning of the red trust account.

[o48o]

Maybe they E3T bounty is pretty new because they might be more or less breaking btct rules as well:

• During this period, you must make a minimum of 5 Posts per Week and 1 Post per week in the Announcement Thread .

In this specific quote they are breaking the rules of btctalk as they seem to link on their own ann thread and want to users to post there.
here's the rule they are breaking: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2559282.0

[JeotQ]

Red trust accounts can still promote bounty projects if the project teams allow them, it should be on the bounty rules and regulation if red trust account is allowed or not.

[lousie9]

Generally a truly legitimate project will prohibit users with red credentials, but the example of the project you mentioned, I saw in the rules about their project mentioned that (there is no ban on red trust accounts). so I think this is normal and allowed by their project.

[Avirunes]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

That means that they are eager to get mass promotion even if it is done by someone who is quite not trusted or have scammed someone earlier. There are many but some of the managers also allow them if some feedbacks are given due personal issues or spat which is not the correct use of trust system.

[Ridwan Fauzi]

There are several types about negative trust, such as scammer, default loan, the user who has a lot of alternative account and the last account buyer. If there is a bounty campaign which promoted by scammer I just think that the end of the projret will end up being scam too.

It should be pay attention by bounty manager of this forum, because the risk that will be faced when they try to allow negative account that I mentioned above will be difficult to attract an investor. So, I can be disagree if there is bounty campaign which allow negative trust account being a promoter.

And I just believe, the trusted bounty manager won't be ever to allow negative trust account become his participant, because they will know its affect. Also, it seem like the developer of the project should give a requirement for their participant, because it will give many affect to the development of the project in the future. You can imagine how the affect it is.

[freedomgo]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think?

They literally don't care about their participants, they just want to get more members for more exposure.

Most of the signature campaign does not accept accounts with red tag but there are still some who are accepting and I think its up to the investors now on how to decide as for sure if the company allows these members to be in the campaign, they have already evaluated that and might see some possible good result for allowing.

for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

It's not unusual as well, some campaigns accepts red trust participants, some does not and that's normal.

[mamahdedeh]

not always bad projects allow red trusts to participate. like moozicore, where red trusts can participate in a signature campaign, and in the end their sales are good, judging from the current rate, the price on the exchange is quite satisfactory for bounty hunters, even though on November 14th the new tokens are unlocked

[Sacramentus]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

because a certain bounty allows hunters with red trust to join the bounty doesn't make the manager bad. The bounty has its rules and if the rule didn't state that, then there is nothing wrong with that

[Insomnia family]

each project has its own rules, if the rules of a project do not mention the prohibition of red trust means they allow participants of the red trust as well. and I see in the E3T project spreadsheet there are many users with red trust, but you need to know that not all projects or managers are bad if they accept red trust participants.

[lighpulsar07]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Well since the trust flags are now introduced negative feedbacks are now just feedbacks so, some managers like yahoo himself are accepting participants with negative trust  in signature campaign except in cryptotalk campaign which negative trust aren't allowed to join. if you want to join in signature campaign you have let the manager reviews your profile and let them decide if you are accepted or not.

[stadus]

You must be new in bounty hunting my friend, this is normal here, some bounty managers allow negative accounts to promote their project and that's not against the forum rules, its their discretion and its their rules.

[Ccscopst]

in my opinion it's normal, as long as the project team allows participants the red trust won't be a big problem. unless the project team bans it it will be a big problem.

[NeuroticFish]

Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about.  They should, but they might now.  Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them.  I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties.  It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.

That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.

[Ccscopst]

Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about.  They should, but they might now.  Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them.  I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties.  It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.

That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.

new developers who don't have experience or don't have a lot of lunge in project promotion, always don't care about redstrust participants, because the most important thing for them is that many participants are involved and can attract other users. that is normal in ICO advertising, it is important that users are more selective if they want to join such a project. what else do they plan to register token on the Dcoin exchange? isn't the Dcoin exchange very shady?

[Wysi]

I think they are more interested in the promotion and don't bother have much restriction or quality of posts and it's quite obvious that the project might or might not be successful as they are not bothered about the basic requirement for the participants. It's time for the other bounty managers and owners to buckle up and have stringent rules if they don't want people to think their project as scam.