Red trust accounts wearing signature.....

[NeuroticFish]

new developers who don't have experience or don't have a lot of lunge in project promotion, always don't care about redstrust participants, because the most important thing for them is that many participants are involved and can attract other users. that is normal in ICO advertising, it is important that users are more selective if they want to join such a project. what else do they plan to register token on the Dcoin exchange? isn't the Dcoin exchange very shady?

And they will just lose money, because many will avoid projects advertised by red-trust users, thinking "if they allow scammers for advertising, what if they are also scammers?"

[Dart18]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

This had been happening for a long time.
Why the sudden brought up to this? 

It is the campaign managers take if he want to input it in the rules.
Mostly ICO's doesnt have much participants when it comes to signature campaigns.
Maybe that way they could add some more even though they are tagged with red. It doesn't mean though that the user is associated with them.
More like another help to advertise the campaign.

[lienfaye]

Nowadays the top priority of developers are how to advertise their project effectively with many bounty hunters to help them spread awareness.

Sometimes the manager are just following the team's condition when implementing the rules so its not always the manager's decision.

If you have doubt on those campaign accepting red trust account then simply dont join.

[alexsandria]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Is there any problem with that 'cause I don't think so. In the end they are still human, they can submit what the campaign may require as long as they passed the initial requirements. So, if there are no red trust issues on submitting an account requirement then they passed. The only thing that matter here is the appearance of the campaign itself 'cause they seemed as well not reliable.

[angrybirdy]

Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about.  They should, but they might now.  Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them.  I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties.  It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.

That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.

new developers who don't have experience or don't have a lot of lunge in project promotion, always don't care about redstrust participants, because the most important thing for them is that many participants are involved and can attract other users. that is normal in ICO advertising, it is important that users are more selective if they want to join such a project. what else do they plan to register token on the Dcoin exchange? isn't the Dcoin exchange very shady?

It is expected if the project's only goal is to get their project to be promoted and nothing else than that.
They do not limit their participants just to make their project reach every corner of this forum including social media sites.

I have found a review about Dcoin, and I think it is not a good exchange
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/as0f6y/never_use_dcoin_exchange_they_dont_let_you/

[aioc]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

It's in the option or prerogative of bounty manager, two reasons I could think of is, there are lack of promoters and they want as many members to participate in their bounty campaign, so they include even with those red trust bounty hunters to join, the second one is bounty managers also has red trust and  he has no issue with trust rating so they allow it.

[mrdeposit]

Some of these bounty owners might not even be aware of what the trust system is all about.  They should, but they might now.  Or even worse, they might not care as long as they can get as many members as possible to advertise for them.  I don't trust these project devs at all, but I would trust them even less (were that even possible) if they allow red trusted members to join their bounties.  It's bad business practice and the fact that they don't care makes me question how serious they are about their projects.

That's correct and that's why they should be contacted, the things explained and asked if this was intentional or a mistake.
I mean that there should be the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.

new developers who don't have experience or don't have a lot of lunge in project promotion, always don't care about red trust participants, because the most important thing for them is that many participants are involved and can attract other users. that is normal in ICO advertising, it is important that users are more selective if they want to join such a project. what else do they plan to register token on the Dcoin exchange? isn't the Dcoin exchange very shady?

You are right about recruiting more members, their goal is to find more hunter and to advertise their projects in a wide range. However, I do not think this has anything to do with new developers. The developers of most projects are already new in the crypto world. This depends on the bounty manager himself, and we should not look for any reason behind it.

[MUG1WARA]

I thought manager came from  team but I saw it was not, because if it came from the team didn't know about red trust but it all depends on rules made by the manager himself, maybe the manager wants to make a full promotion so that it doesn't ban red trust accounts

[OptimusPrime_3]

I think the rules is up to the team and bounty manager on who joins the bounty. If they allow any red trust account to join the bounty,I don't see anything wrong with that

[Menawi12]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Allowing a red trust member to participate in a bounty campaign doesn't mean the manager is bad. The Bounty manager only runs according to the instructions from the developer team and I think as long as this forum allows, I don't think this is a problem

[Cherylstar86]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Allowing a red trust member to participate in a bounty campaign doesn't mean the manager is bad. The Bounty manager only runs according to the instructions from the developer team and I think as long as this forum allows, I don't think this is a problem

Bounty managers are those trusted to endorse here and influential user here in crypto currency community. Also they just refer as per instructions of the owner of the project, having a meeting first and plan their protection maps and schedules so if they include red trust user it's up to them as for the good of the project.

[Zeke_23]

I thought manager came from  team but I saw it was not, because if it came from the team didn't know about red trust but it all depends on rules made by the manager himself, maybe the manager wants to make a full promotion so that it doesn't ban red trust accounts

On the said campaign, bounty manager is not part of the campaign, and rules are to be made according to the instruction of the developer, bounty managers just guide to make rules and handle the bounty campaign itself.
In this case, maybe the team and bounty manager have discussed it and they have agreed to allow red trust users to participate just to promote the project.

[Aying]

I thought manager came from  team but I saw it was not, because if it came from the team didn't know about red trust but it all depends on rules made by the manager himself, maybe the manager wants to make a full promotion so that it doesn't ban red trust accounts

Maybe, but for that rule given it still affect the project. negative feedback users are those who committed scam or promote scam projects. signature campaigns is a highest promotions in the forum and everyone are looking in it if that project run so good but with negative users and base on their feedback I didn't trust even the project. bounty managers are aware on it at first and give the project a proper criteria for users to see the project as trustworthy and intentional.

[Crypto5060]

It's strange because I always see bounties state categorically that no red trust member is allowed to wear their signature. If it's happening now, it has to be a case of incompetent bounty manager.

[Prompyboo]

It's strange because I always see bounties state categorically that no red trust member is allowed to wear their signature. If it's happening now, it has to be a case of incompetent bounty manager.

if I were a bounty manager, I would look for why a person received red trust before allowing him to participate in his campaign. if he is a cheater and was caught cheating in participating in a bounty campaign, then, of course, such a person should not be allowed to enter the project

[kayvie]

As long as there is no red trust restriction and not break the rules, I think it's OK. Because ICO is not very likely lately, The managers give looseness to allow for more participants to participate in the campaign, and its normal for me. And by allowing participants that had red trust To participate not mean the campaign are scam.

Yes, restrictions are coming from the bounty manager, it was the agreement of both part and if it is not prohibited, then it is fine.

Of course, allowing participants with red trust does not determine the legitimacy of a project.

It's strange because I always see bounties state categorically that no red trust member is allowed to wear their signature. If it's happening now, it has to be a case of incompetent bounty manager.

if I were a bounty manager, I would look for why a person received red trust before allowing him to participate in his campaign. if he is a cheater and was caught cheating in participating in a bounty campaign, then, of course, such a person should not be allowed to enter the project

If it is not the issue for the bounty manager in the first place, then there is no need to check for a participant with red trust.
Aside from cheating in the bounty campaign. I think it is a bounty manager's decision what he will do if he caught someone in the campaign.

[doomistake]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

Red trust means a lot of things, those who have red trust must either scammed someone, low quality posting, and other unforgivable act that is against the forum rules. In my opinion, bounty managers will not have a problem if they are going to let some people who have red trust as long as they didn't get that because of spamming, if they got it because they scammed someone, then it is not the problem at all cause he can't scam a project because he is the one who works for the project, and only the team could scam him.

On the other side, most of the bounty campaigns and managers doesn't allow red trust users to join their bounty, I guess it depends on who is managing the campaign or to the team but that doesn't mean that they are scam also.

[fuer44]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

it's still natural, there are even gifts that managers also trust in red, there is also success. so the red trust is not the main benchmark whether the project is a scam or not, in my opinion. then what if the manager doesn't have red trust but the project is a scam? Red trust is not the main issue in the prize, but a solid team is the main key.

[gwaposakon]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

I think allowing or disallowing participants with Red trust rating is a call of the bounty managers. Although it is important that bounty participants follow rules to sustain the bounty program and it is important that this restriction is stressed-out in the bounty instructions. 

[Zionatin]

Presently i detect that few bounties still allow red trust accounts to wear their signatures, i think this means the bounty project is been managed by bad bounty manager or what do you think? for example E3T bounty allows red trust account, is this normal ?

This had been happening for a long time.
Why the sudden brought up to this? 

It is the campaign managers take if he want to input it in the rules.
Mostly ICO's doesnt have much participants when it comes to signature campaigns.
Maybe that way they could add some more even though they are tagged with red. It doesn't mean though that the user is associated with them.
More like another help to advertise the campaign.

I don't know why this user brought this up either. It is almost like they are trying to look for trouble. I don't bother about trust unless it is for a scammer. So many people get red trust for such light things and they are never given the opportunity to reverse it and it is permanent and that is not very fair. I think trust should be wiped clean after a while but if you scam then it stays because that is a thief and a crime. But if it is for some people having quarrels then it doesn't matter. If you think this is what is important when choosing a project then you going to lose all your money.