Real use cases that can't go wrong

[mirgo1791]

the service from developer gives with extensive as clients might collects with spares on excessive as appealing risks on exchange and gains with benefit as works on finance as the deliverance of developer with reference of offers on release for public of audience with the field of business as the dedication.

[1715143089]

1715143089

[1715143089]

1715143089

[1715143089]

1715143089

[BartS]

Real use case is different from real use case, some are good and some are not, every one keeps talking about their own understanding of real use case, if you ask rich men where they get their money from 80% and above will say real estate and businesses , now how about a real estate investment where you can only invest using an utility token? this is a 100% valid real use case on my watch, they can't  go wrong, do your own research and if you have another example of high rated real use case do not hesitate to drop, thanks

There have been many coins like what you are describing in the past and it does not matter if they have a real use case what it matters is if the coin is going to be actually used for its purpose.

And I do not see it why anyone will use an utility token for this when they can use fiat and if they want to use a cryptocurrency they can always use bitcoin which is the coin that is universally accepted in this market, so this is a good idea but it will fail as all the projects that came before it.

[Drai]

I cannot remember how many ICO projects I saw back in 2018 whose aim was to do exactly that, some of them were altestate, Brickblock and a lot of others and I am not sure if they ever amounted to anything worthwhile, atleast I haven't been hearing news about how major apartments were tokenised and owned by several people on the blockchain and the amazing things is that there are still more and more projects popping up daily that are claiming that they would do the exact same thing and it's such a wonder that people are still showing interest in them at all.

[tsaroz]

The real use case would be integrating crypto with system. A general purpose crypto can be used for buying or selling anything but a use specific crypto would be required to get a service or product. Consider a bus network that can be paid only through tokens. No one would trouble buying those token unless they get some privilege whether in price of facility. Integrating payment on blockchain would make it easier for the company to track statistics of use and money spent. These data can be used to upgrade the service.

[tinyteapot]

Real use case is different from real use case, some are good and some are not, every one keeps talking about their own understanding of real use case, if you ask rich men where they get their money from 80% and above will say real estate and businesses , now how about a real estate investment where you can only invest using an utility token? this is a 100% valid real use case on my watch, they can't  go wrong, do your own research and if you have another example of high rated real use case do not hesitate to drop, thanks

Real use case requires real users before it can truly establish itself as a real use case.
Real estate investment is great and investors have a very low chances of loosing their money but the interest of the crypto community often shift from longer investment projects to a short and quick returns on investment, this in my on thought normally lead to acceptance of any project.

[Firefoxx]

Anything that would bring growth in blockchain especially privacy and method of eliminating fake projects, fake IEOs, fake ICO, means investors can earn profits without being cheated. Anything that will enhance security and ensures privacy is fully adopted. What brings food on the table can never go wrong.

[Burogh]

Real use case is different from real use case, some are good and some are not, every one keeps talking about their own understanding of real use case, if you ask rich men where they get their money from 80% and above will say real estate and businesses , now how about a real estate investment where you can only invest using an utility token? this is a 100% valid real use case on my watch, they can't  go wrong, do your own research and if you have another example of high rated real use case do not hesitate to drop, thanks

A token for a property can mean a security token because it is backed up by an asset. Tokenisasi is a new thing and I think it will continue to grow not only as a utility token because with security tokens, every company can easily issue global bonds

[jcarlo]

Real use case is different from real use case, some are good and some are not, every one keeps talking about their own understanding of real use case, if you ask rich men where they get their money from 80% and above will say real estate and businesses , now how about a real estate investment where you can only invest using an utility token? this is a 100% valid real use case on my watch, they can't  go wrong, do your own research and if you have another example of high rated real use case do not hesitate to drop, thanks

I don't think there are many projects that work on property business. If the property sector is in tokenisasi, I think it will be more interesting especially if the project has assets and has a partnership with a well-known property company.

[Dart18]

On your watch? And what is it?
Try to name one if you are advertising something.
Maybe something like what others do, an article. But please keep it short.

Real estate had been the booming industry ever since the population is getting higher.
People need shelter and they need land first to build that shelter.
Me, if I have the chance then I would really invest there. But here in crypto, I will never ever invest in an ICO or something else that is about real estate.

[xiboothrezi]

if you ask rich men where they get their money from 80% and above will say real estate and businesses , now how about a real estate investment where you can only invest using an utility token? this is a 100% valid real use case on my watch, they can't  go wrong, do your own research and if you have another example of high rated real use case do not hesitate to drop, thanks

If you include quantity, it is better accompanied by evidence and relevant sources so that your statement can be verified. Because I see many members questioning the truth.
Whatever it is, realistic and real-use projects that are able to provide tangible evidence of progress that has been achieved are a good signal to attract more investors.

snip---

Real estate had been the booming industry ever since the population is getting higher.
People need shelter and they need land first to build that shelter.
Me, if I have the chance then I would really invest there. But here in crypto, I will never ever invest in an ICO or something else that is about real estate.

Many doubted that real estate was adopted with blockchain and ICO, because many failed and stopped, so it is natural for you to choose like that. However, there is one successful project related to real estate that I have participated in, Atlant. Indeed, overall it looks more promising than similar projects.

[Katashi]

If you look at the prices of other real estate blockchain projects, the crypto community seems to have little interest on this market.
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/iht-real-estate-protocol/
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/real/

They might have a valid real use case as you claim but if the market doesn't agree, there must be something wrong.

In my own opinion tokenization and blockchain technology is a huge improvement in the real estate industry but due to the complexity of rules and regulations in property investment, crypto investors are still doubtful in this kind of project. Real estate platforms are still in the stage of maturing just like other projects so it will take some years before we see some progress but for me, it's not a bad idea to invest in real estate projects because they have a big potential.

[zhengqi]

Of course, there are a lot of cases of real use of crypto, but I am far from them. I have not used crypto for any purpose other than trading. This is very cool, but so far the use of crypto in real life is not very common, it should take time for crypto to become commonplace.

[OneCoinMan]

I used cryptocurrency to pay my phone bill and also saw a cafe when I was in Europe where I could pay with bitcoin, but I did not use this opportunity because I did not have a password from my wallet with me. This was the only time. But the tokens that are stamped on the blockchain eth have never met, although in white papers they write about a bunch of possibilities to use the token in real life. As it turned out so far, it looks like only a hoax.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Real use case is different from real use case

Oh, that makes sense.

What exactly you are trying to establish? Is it a promotion of an utility token which invests in real estate?

I think this guy is off his rocker or doesn't know how to write in english or has brain damage to some extent.  Could be a bot as well.

Sounds confusing to me! since it was repeatedly mention (*Real use case is different from real use case) whats your point about it?

And it's confirmed, op is a dip shit.  If he's trying to link cryptocurrency with real estate somehow, he is doing a piss poor job of it, and there aren't many examples I know of where crypto has been used to buy property.  Yes there are a few but it isn't common.  But I'm sure op is long gone from this thread and won't be back to clarify what the hell he's talking about.

[pobeditelvezde]

Real use case is different from real use case, some are good and some are not, every one keeps talking about their own understanding of real use case, if you ask rich men where they get their money from 80% and above will say real estate and businesses , now how about a real estate investment where you can only invest using an utility token? this is a 100% valid real use case on my watch, they can't  go wrong, do your own research and if you have another example of high rated real use case do not hesitate to drop, thanks

Some time ago I also thought that investing in real estate is a profitable type of investments. Nope, it is not true at all. There are some reasons why so. I can enumerate several reasons. First of all real estate is not a liquid asset that means you cannot buy/sell an asset in a simple way. Professionals know that the market of real estate may be in a downtrend or stagnation and in that case you can sell your assets only with a big discount what is not good for you. You probably must be informed that real estate is a passive asset which generates a negative cash flow (taxes, payments, maintenance and so on).
What about me, I do not buy real estate unless a particular asset costs a ridiculous small price.  

[Shallow]

Real use case is different from real use case, some are good and some are not, every one keeps talking about their own understanding of real use case, if you ask rich men where they get their money from 80% and above will say real estate and businesses , now how about a real estate investment where you can only invest using an utility token? this is a 100% valid real use case on my watch, they can't  go wrong, do your own research and if you have another example of high rated real use case do not hesitate to drop, thanks

Actually you sites a good example of an investment which will give good long term rewards; real estate is one of them. But I tend to believe this happens in the outside because coming to the crypto space, I have seen many real estate blockchain platforms which either operated for a short time and die off and didn't even enter the crypto market. This shows that the right knowledge is yet to be gotten on how to correlate blockchain with real estate. Of course real estate in the blockchain space will be a good use case if there are developers or team willing to pilot it.

[fudster]

Seem a centralize idea to me. how's that you can only use the token for that real estate investing purpose?

Maybe this is where the blockchain is going to end after all. Centralization. Most of the ideas for blockchain projects seem explored already and had turned scam in the past. Use case won't matter if its centralized, it can be taken down one day and your money will be gone.

[dataispower]

Real use case is different from real use case, some are good and some are not, every one keeps talking about their own understanding of real use case, if you ask rich men where they get their money from 80% and above will say real estate and businesses , now how about a real estate investment where you can only invest using an utility token? this is a 100% valid real use case on my watch, they can't  go wrong, do your own research and if you have another example of high rated real use case do not hesitate to drop, thanks

Your introduction is somehow self contradictory "real use case is different from real use case" but I believe you imply that some use cases are better than others or some use cases are more valid. Talking about a utility token used in real estate, that's a good use case per say,  some good uses cases include;  being accepted exclusively for an online shopping mall, tokens which represent equity shares, tokens used for medical bills or as payment for target adverts etc.

[leowonderful]

It's also a good idea to always keep in mind the use-case isn't the only thing that matters with a project either. There's been plenty of projects over the years where a good idea was present but various details in the execution were wrong and led to things never working out, or more commonly projects that just weren't original at all.

This particular use case the OP mentioned just does not make sense to me either; there are already ways to use existing crypto to buy property such as with Bitcoin or Ethereum, and those larger coins do the job perfectly well without any major disadvantages over a coin or token designed solely for the purpose of being used for real estate at the moment in my eyes.

[starblocks]

Not many cryptocurrencies actually have any "real world use cases" and are designed just to profit the project's creators for developing a token that has no real world value in terms of adoption so when you invest make sure you're investing in the kinds of assets that will last long term as these will likely benefit you the most