Looking for a Developer To Take Over a Dead Project

[Hallmader]

If I just may add, we're still in the bear market, so it doesn't make sense to revived a dead project because investors is very hesitant to invest on any project right now.

So if you have plans then I would wait till the market is in a bullish trend before restoring your project. And I'm sure no one will take that big risk today because of the current market situations.

This is also my thought but I think this will not be done in a month or two. This will probably take a longer time. Perhaps by the time the team has already did the revival and the launching is ready, the market has already recovered.

However, it does not sound wise to me to revive a dead project. The investors must have some bad memories or traumatic experiences with that project.

[dimonstration]

Why there's a poll if it is different from your title and question? I think it makes no sense if you will pass on the burden to another developer that will take over a dead project. It's already dead and there's no way for it to make it alive again. Just leave it alone and let it be declared to be a dead project. Would you mind to tell everyone here what project is that? I'm not interested but let's see if it's completely dying.

Yes,We should know at least the detail of what this project is about since if it's a potential one there can be a twist they can put to attract investors or another version they can upgrade if they still have wide idea ahead. Taking over is not the solution. It's the creative and useful idea that should be focused too if they don't want the project to be completely dead.

[Kupid002]

If I just may add, we're still in the bear market, so it doesn't make sense to revived a dead project because investors is very hesitant to invest on any project right now.

So if you have plans then I would wait till the market is in a bullish trend before restoring your project. And I'm sure no one will take that big risk today because of the current market situations.

This is  possible ive been seen many abandoned project that gain popularity and increase its price after the change of ownership and make a new roadmap and a new plan on a project. The result will be base not from the old coins that going to be dead but from how they can manage and make it alive again and have a community to support the project.

[robelneo]

If I just may add, we're still in the bear market, so it doesn't make sense to revived a dead project because investors is very hesitant to invest on any project right now.

So if you have plans then I would wait till the market is in a bullish trend before restoring your project. And I'm sure no one will take that big risk today because of the current market situations.

This is also my thought but I think this will not be done in a month or two. This will probably take a longer time. Perhaps by the time the team has already did the revival and the launching is ready, the market has already recovered.

However, it does not sound wise to me to revive a dead project. The investors must have some bad memories or traumatic experiences with that project.

It still depends on the kind of project, not all coin can be revived, there are coins that are destined to be a shitcoin and better be off as dead, you cannot revive a coin that works like a pump and dump coins or a coin that has similar projects that are already on top of the market, it will have a hard time and the competition will kill it, OP should at least give us a hint on what kind of coin that he wants to revive or transfer ownership.

[marcous]

Dead project is not to be taken over easily I guess, moreover it is not too clear about the information you mean. Dead projects tend to give a negative impression which will be better if you make a new project that is more inspiring and attracts Investors. Because creating, building and developing projects in the crypto world requires great trust especially with investors.

[mrquackquack]

Wow thanks to everyone and their replies, I didn't know it was going to be such a good turn out. Anyways i thought about starting a new project but none the less i will probably opt out of it at this point in time so i may gain some more experience. None the less there are lots of projects that need attention with good active communities and some already on viable exchanges i think it would be easier actually to revive an old project than to start a new one. Just to throw a name out there I don't know if anyone remembers Drip Coin endorsed by musicians etc etc that coin had lots of hype with credible technology and now its seemingly dead. These are the type of projects that i think would still have a fighting chance if the community or a dedicated team works on them.

[tippytoes]

Wow thanks to everyone and their replies, I didn't know it was going to be such a good turn out. Anyways i thought about starting a new project but none the less i will probably opt out of it at this point in time so i may gain some more experience. None the less there are lots of projects that need attention with good active communities and some already on viable exchanges i think it would be easier actually to revive an old project than to start a new one. Just to throw a name out there I don't know if anyone remembers Drip Coin endorsed by musicians etc etc that coin had lots of hype with credible technology and now its seemingly dead. These are the type of projects that i think would still have a fighting chance if the community or a dedicated team works on them.

Are you talking about this? Or can you give at least a link of that project in particular?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3710056.0

https://www.complex.com/music/2018/03/lil-uzi-vert-influence-leads-to-new-cryptocurrency

By the way, in case someone contacted you for possible collab, are you going to contact the original dev to revive their dying project and takeover? What is it in store for the new dev? I believe it is very hard to revive a new one, it is dying because no one is interested to that coin anymore.

[htsy585]

Wow thanks to everyone and their replies, I didn't know it was going to be such a good turn out. Anyways i thought about starting a new project but none the less i will probably opt out of it at this point in time so i may gain some more experience. None the less there are lots of projects that need attention with good active communities and some already on viable exchanges i think it would be easier actually to revive an old project than to start a new one. Just to throw a name out there I don't know if anyone remembers Drip Coin endorsed by musicians etc etc that coin had lots of hype with credible technology and now its seemingly dead. These are the type of projects that i think would still have a fighting chance if the community or a dedicated team works on them.

I like your modesty and approach and I wished I could help but sadly there's hardly no or little market for dead proje ts because firstly, creating smart contracts is now cheap and basically the needed tech too. Secondly, you will put in almost same effort in marketing and branding so why not expend that effort entirely on a new project (the dev would think)

[Kingairdrop]

Hello I'm looking for someone to takeover a dead/dying project please send me a message so we may discuss further thanks.

I dont see any point in raising back a dead project. If you have good ideas and you fill you have got what it takes to break the shackles of the crypto sphere holding down new projects then i see no reason why you dont create the project from afresh, new investors, new developers, new community. Everything should be done afresh and not trying to raise the dead.

[StonerStanley]

Dead projet is dead.
People who want to bring it alive are those who bought too much of the coins and then want to sell it back.

[auntyjmary]

This advertisement of the OP does not really make complete sense. Maybe you need to specify with further and better explanation on what you need to be done for the project if you are really serious about what you want a developer to help you with. Also check the service section of the forum and post the advert there

[legendster]

Instead of taking over you can create your own project with whoever you plan on hiring and then create a token swap program.
Much easier, gets much more attention than reviving a dead project, where the repositories may or may not be available.

Post this in the project development section and send me the link, if it is interesting, I could help you with connections.

Good luck

[iGotSpots]

Message me details

[batang_bitcoin]

Why there's a poll if it is different from your title and question? I think it makes no sense if you will pass on the burden to another developer that will take over a dead project. It's already dead and there's no way for it to make it alive again. Just leave it alone and let it be declared to be a dead project. Would you mind to tell everyone here what project is that? I'm not interested but let's see if it's completely dying.

Yes,We should know at least the detail of what this project is about since if it's a potential one there can be a twist they can put to attract investors or another version they can upgrade if they still have wide idea ahead. Taking over is not the solution. It's the creative and useful idea that should be focused too if they don't want the project to be completely dead.

Well, Op has already answered and given out the name of that project. And he also answered why he wants to take over a project rather than starting out.

These are the type of projects that i think would still have a fighting chance if the community or a dedicated team works on them.

But you will never know unless you try team, I think the past team of it did their best but it isn't just enough.

[Ziskinberg]

lol... people will assume that is already dead because of the thread title, just change it to dying project since you stated its not dead already.
At this stage, we can really see some of the coins that are dying due to the market condition, but if developers left the project for good then its hard to revive that project, ... anyway, I like to know about this project, if you could shoot me a PM would appreciate it as I can help you forward this to my friends.

[LbtalkL]

Not a good plan, waking a dead or dying project is like a suicide, no one will be interested on it, unless this project is unique but I guess its not that why it is dying cause it very common and its like a duplicate. Why not just start a fresh one and make sure everything is transparent, team is visible not fake, unique projects and has a good plans.

[Oceat]

I hope you are not gonna pay workers with that dead projects coin/token, anyway imo it would rather be good idea to start a fresh a project.

Sounds so simple yet it is complicated actually since making a good project require some actual process until the end or what they call it as the white paper. Gathering/finding members who knows in what field they are good at like the programmer. I think it would be better if they change something on that dead/dying project to avoid plagiarizing the whole idea of the creator.

[VSYNC_]

Provide more details about you project so that people can assess without needing the msg OP

[mrquackquack]

If interested in taking over a dead/dying project please send me a personal message on here, please be a developer, coder or have some experience in crypto, exchanges, discord, twitter etc etc. I would send some messages but none the less alot of you don't accept messages from noobs. Thanks again.

[albrots]

Taking over a project that is dead and has no interest is very difficult, it is difficult to develop it again. But it depends on the innovation of the project being developed too. You must explain why the project can fail.