AMD Ryzen 9 🖥️ 3900x RandomX mining benchmarks

[Metroid]

considering monero is the only popular coin that can be mined using the cpu, no wonder why so many cpus were added to the network.

[1714095419]

1714095419

[1714095419]

1714095419

[1714095419]

1714095419

[1714095419]

1714095419

[thefix]

I was able to get the hash rate up up to 9300 h/s on a threadripper 1950x with a small jump in memory speeds up from 3200 to 3333 with stock cpu settings. The heat generated even with the cpu fan running full blast seems a bit much, so I will probably run with less cores until I can get it to and acceptable level.

[BoredAlchemist]

you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.

The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)

here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol

3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.

Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.

[anatolikostis]

you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.

The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)

here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol

3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.

Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.

nice attempt to hide real scam site behind a link get-monero - but NO (cookies has been deleted)!  
Who do you think you are and why do you shy to link an original site (scam alert or not)?

[BoredAlchemist]

you guys should check out this new pool http://get-monero.org if you do not mind using my affiliate link or check out RagerX.lol if you do.

The out of the box hashrate for RagerX is 11500 (about 1000H/s faster) without any tweaks. (with tweaks should be faster)

here is the tele for the pool https://t.me/ragerxlol

3.5% pool fee but the new pool miner combo is 10% faster then all current mining software so you are still 6.5% up on every other miner.

Also the more friends you get to mine the more rewards you will also get paid out from the pool fee.

nice attempt to hide real scam site behind a link get-monero - but NO (cookies has been deleted)!  
Who do you think you are and why do you shy to link an original site (scam alert or not)?

http://get-monero.org is what i'm using as a shortner for my affiliate link for the mining pool the link is ragerX.lol which i also provided for people who do not wish to use my affiliate.


so what are you on about or do you believe no one can code a better pool or mining software then what is currently available?

[sech1]

I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).

[mineshop.eu]

randomX has been a bust so far , i cant see this many cpu farms active , botnets or fpgas , back to square O

About 600 MH was added to the network...thats like 40k 3900x. I would say half the new hash is from existing systems mining monero since they can, so 10-20k "new" systems in farms is not that much considering 100s of thousands of ASICs on other networks.

I think it is so high cause most of the miners have CPU which are sitting idle, so it makes sence even to put on a celeron which does no harm to earn extra few cents. Still ROI is better then mining any other coin with GPU.

[toptek12]

I got a R 9 3900x up to 13.15 KH temp at 66c mining rx,it did out of the box with 3200 speed memory 11 KH so i bought some 3600 memory because of something i saw on YouTube, I'm sure i can get it up to 14 kh easy once i get a better cooler.
I also have a r 7 2700 up to 4.71 kh due to memory limits, I have some 3600 speed sticks coming.
i also have a r7 1700 that does about the same as the r7 2700

and a r7 3700x i haven't really booted up yet the motherboard board and memory is due in today.

I plan to buy another 3900x and 3950x once the 3950 are in stock .

[agente]

I plan to buy another 3900x and 3950x once the 3950 are in stock .

Why?  For 1 dollar per day?

[thefix]

I finally ended up going down to a 3 GHZ clock speed on the threadripper 1950x cpu with 3400 ram speed and a gtx 1060 sitting idle. The cpu temp sits around 62-63c with a Noctua U14S and 3 low power draw case fans to make sure I have decent airflow. I am getting 8444 h/s with this setup while drawing about 185 watts at the wall and keeping temps at an acceptable level. This is not a profitable setup but it is the most efficient setup for a hobby miner with a threadripper they want to play around with and not overheat.

[BoredAlchemist]

I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).

well as your the xmrrig dev and are prob optimising your miner for your own equipment its not really a fair comparison is it?

[sech1]

I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).

well as your the xmrrig dev and are prob optimising your miner for your own equipment its not really a fair comparison is it?

I've seen comparisons where xmrig ran without large pages or where tester was recording a video on the same pc while testing xmrig's hashrate, now this is what I call unfair My equipment is pretty standard, I just make sure everything is tested in perfect conditions - properly tuned, no background programs eating CPU, updates and unneeded Windows services turned off etc. I need this to easily reproduce the same hashrate at every test - it's hard to tell if some change in the code improves hashrate +0.1% or makes it worse -0.1% without this kind of stability.

[joblo]

I tested this RagerX yesterday and it was slower than XMRig on my R7 3700X. 8200 h/s RagerX vs 8450 h/s XMRig (all stock 3700X with tuned memory).

well as your the xmrrig dev and are prob optimising your miner for your own equipment its not really a fair comparison is it?

I've seen comparisons where xmrig ran without large pages or where tester was recording a video on the same pc while testing xmrig's hashrate, now this is what I call unfair My equipment is pretty standard, I just make sure everything is tested in perfect conditions - properly tuned, no background programs eating CPU, updates and unneeded Windows services turned off etc. I need this to easily reproduce the same hashrate at every test - it's hard to tell if some change in the code improves hashrate +0.1% or makes it worse -0.1% without this kind of stability.

"According to the devs..."

Why does CMB publish this kind of crap without any attempt to verify the outrageous claims.

Any miner that locks you into their ecosystem is to be avoided. There's no telling what kind of malware
might be buried in their OS.

No one is going to magically come up with a new faster implementation. There is strong competition between
xmrig & xmr-stak, not to mention Tevador's reference implementation. I doubt there is much room for improvement.

[sech1]

Can anyone proficient in Linux try this RandomX boost guide?

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/

I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.

[thefix]

Can anyone proficient in Linux try this RandomX boost guide?

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/

I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.

What kind of power draw are you getting with this setup, I imagine its something north of 150+ watts for the cpu give or take 10 watts.

[sech1]

Can anyone proficient in Linux try this RandomX boost guide?

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/

I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.

What kind of power draw are you getting with this setup, I imagine its something north of 150+ watts for the cpu give or take 10 watts.

Right now it's 9614 h/s and 156 W @ the wall (51 W when idle), so CPU itself is drawing 105W. I haven't tried to optimize it yet and I have Vega 64 idling in that PC too, so it's not very efficient.

[thefix]

Can anyone proficient in Linux try this RandomX boost guide?

https://www.reddit.com/r/MoneroMining/comments/e962fu/9526_hs_on_ryzen_7_3700x_xmrig_520_1gb_pages_msr/

I was able to get +5% on my R7 3700X, I think 9526 h/s is a record for this CPU now.

What kind of power draw are you getting with this setup, I imagine its something north of 150+ watts for the cpu give or take 10 watts.

Right now it's 9614 h/s and 156 W @ the wall (51 W when idle), so CPU itself is drawing 105W. I haven't tried to optimize it yet and I have Vega 64 idling in that PC too, so it's not very efficient.

This setup got me to 8880 h/s from my original 8444 h/s on a 3ghz threadripper and dropped the power draw by about 9-10 watts going from 185 to 175-176 at the wall. I am sure I could get it to 10000+ h/s but that would take water and a much larger power draw. Pretty happy with this gain and drop in power consumption

[mineshop.eu]

guys who where telling me that 2 memory sticks will be cap, and there wont be any speed increase if i add more memory where wrong. Ading 2 more sticks to my current system increased my performance by 10% without any over-clocks. Video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeVhjAfgMqw&t

[sech1]

guys who where telling me that 2 memory sticks will be cap, and there wont be any speed increase if i add more memory where wrong. Ading 2 more sticks to my current system increased my performance by 10% without any over-clocks. Video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeVhjAfgMqw&t

Yes, the theory is that having more independent memory ranks is better for RandomX. Two dual-rank sticks are better than two single-rank sticks, 4 same-rank sticks are better than 2 same-rank sticks. But more sticks and dual-rank sticks usually mean worse timings, so speedup is not guaranteed.

[thefix]

guys who where telling me that 2 memory sticks will be cap, and there wont be any speed increase if i add more memory where wrong. Ading 2 more sticks to my current system increased my performance by 10% without any over-clocks. Video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeVhjAfgMqw&t

That is an interesting find, I would not have thought that anything other than dual channel memory or quad channel memory(in a system that supports it) would have an impact the hash rate. It makes me wonder if populating all the memory channels in a threadripper system would have similar results. I do not think the gains are enough to warrant the extra memory, but it would be a fun experiment just for the sake of science.

I like your build in the video, the MSI cards look pretty sweet