JuSt a wish

[kissme09]

If indeed the project deserves of course the market-class binance will consider it, just that we know 90% of the ICO/IEO now aims only to pump and dump most of them are garbage, so no wonder fee listings remain stable even though the market conditions are down, they try to keep their exchange good name.

but basically it is difficult to be registered in Binance, they do an internal selection. plus projects that are unable to pass the registration stage. but if a project is able to develop slowly they will surely grow and one day it can be registered.

Binance is very serious and they don't trade what they have built for years for money. They choose very carefully to ensure long-term development projects and to protect investors' money. Binance is currently the most prestigious exchange in the world.

[crazy-pilot]

The owners of these large exchanges do not want to help develop new projects, they want to make money. You must understand this. Unfortunately this is how it works.

[doomloop]

This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?

And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?

Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects

As far as I know, the CEO of Binance only wants to collaborate with projects that according to themselves have a good reputation, not solely how much they have to pay for listing in the Binance market.
I think it's good to filter out any projects that might have a bad reputation.

Crypto exchanges can not ignore the fact that listing projects that would turn out to be scams will harm their reputation too and this way they might end up losing trust of their customers. Binance also cant afford it. It has full right to look into the project that wants to make a contract. There must be many other factors that exchanges take into account. Let the CEO do his work because he knows his job far better than anyone of us.

[valuater]

for bination launchpad itself, I think it is easy, it's just that to register there requires a large amount of funds and I think all projects can actually go in there as long as they have funds, maybe an audit or something like that will be ignored if the funds they provide as fees for registering so much , btw this is just in my opinion maybe this could be wrong.

[auntyjmary]

You may see it as being harsh or cruel on the part of the big exchanges to charge high fees for listing new projects especially those that conduct IEOs. It is important to understand that the exchanges also have their reputation to protect and not just quantity of coins to be listed. If things are made flexible on binance and co, some projects would just take advantage of the situation and create more mess.

[JahriMeayer]

It is not just a matter of cost to enter a large exchange, a large exchange also has a project requirement that can enter a large exchange, because if a large exchange does not have a project requirement to enter a large exchange if there is a problem in the project, the large exchange will affected by this problematic project can make the reputation of a large exchange down

[InwardContour]

You may see it as being harsh or cruel on the part of the big exchanges to charge high fees for listing new projects especially those that conduct IEOs. It is important to understand that the exchanges also have their reputation to protect and not just quantity of coins to be listed. If things are made flexible on binance and co, some projects would just take advantage of the situation and create more mess.

Putting ridiculous listing fee doesn't necessarily increase reputation of exchanges, they can do thorough research as usual  before agreeing to list even with fair listing fees. Decentralized exchanges like IDEX which claim to list for free usually do proper research and follow up on it, hence if there are deviations from listing terms, they immediately delist the token without prior notice. I think these big exchanges ain't helping matters when it comes to listing fees, I'm not saying it should be very low so that any "Tom or Jerry" can list, I'm just in the opinion that the fee should be avergage to help and encourage good startups.

[Free1bitco.in]

I also hope that there are so many projects that do sales in popular markets. Well, if not this year, I hope it will happen next year. but, as far as I know, to do a list or IEO on a popular market has several conditions, and these conditions are quite difficult to accept. like binance, it looks like binance only accepts projects that truly provide benefits, and also high potential. This is not just a matter of payment for the list, but also the quality of the project.

[Mammothcoin]

Although it seems as a valid argument, it doesn't work that way.  You're basically asking institutions to lower their standards so as to accommodate projects that can't level up.  I believe as an exchange,  having a standard is very important, regardless of market conditions.  Yet again,  we're dealing with 'if'.

[Mike Mayor]

I don't think it is nessasery for projects to be on "top exchanges" they can go on quieter ones. If they are good they will survive and be just fine. Where you sell the tokens doesn't determine the quality of the project in any way. Don't be fooled into thinking these exchanges only host good coins and tokens.

Although it seems as a valid argument, it doesn't work that way.  You're basically asking institutions to lower their standards so as to accommodate projects that can't level up.  I believe as an exchange,  having a standard is very important, regardless of market conditions.  Yet again,  we're dealing with 'if'.

What has price got to do with standard though?

[sapnu]

I also hope that there are so many projects that do sales in popular markets. Well, if not this year, I hope it will happen next year. but, as far as I know, to do a list or IEO on a popular market has several conditions, and these conditions are quite difficult to accept. like binance, it looks like binance only accepts projects that truly provide benefits, and also high potential. This is not just a matter of payment for the list, but also the quality of the project.

We are all hoping that the market will go well again just like what happened last two years ago, reaching every cryptocurrency to its highest peak in terms of value and making everyone literally making profit because at that time almost all of projects that are being produced is going successful because at that time since the price of every cryptocurrency is on a high value there are actually lots of investors investing their money to a project to support. As a bounty hunter at that time, I can say that I can make a profit doing my tasks by promoting a particular project by wearing their signature. I hope that it can happen again.

[jacafbiz]

This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?

And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?

Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects

I don't think you are making sense with this post. What brought us to this state we are, that people are not willing to invest into tokens again is the high velocity of ICOs in 2017. What you are suggesting is that exchange should just allow any project to list on their platform. If that is what you want you can go to Binance DEX and raise money through IDO, lets see if people would invest in your project

[Oceat]

This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?

And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?

Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects

The more projects that being made the more the demand for those projects to get listed on big exchanges. Of course, if you have a good reputation and a bigger name where would be the people to buy those projects? That's why exchanges nowadays are making their demand for these overflowing projects that wanted to get listed on their reputable exchange. It is all about the money and exchanges are taking advantage of it.

[Ifezanku]

Capitalists have taken over crypto space and they don't care much about projects with team that has no money. The listing fee on top exchanges is huge and only few projects can afford to pay it. There is a need for support for new projects but the already established platforms careless about new ones

[CalliBabe]

It is conductive for them to be selected on projects that can be listed on their exchange and also a high fees to list on there. They also restrict it to ieo for example in binance is usually you'll need to completed kyc and you hold bnb to participate in the ieo not sure but that's what i know

[nutriagrigia]

This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?

And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?

Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects

I don't think you are making sense with this post. What brought us to this state we are, that people are not willing to invest into tokens again is the high velocity of ICOs in 2017. What you are suggesting is that exchange should just allow any project to list on their platform. If that is what you want you can go to Binance DEX and raise money through IDO, lets see if people would invest in your project

Of course, they won’t. obviously this is a very bad idea so that projects can be placed on any exchange. Each project must be something in order to get on a large exchange. A project has to deserve a listing on a good exchange

[letyouearn]

The more famous exchange we are talking about the more fees you should pay. Binance fees are astronomical I think
If we are talking about IEOs I think there is a BTC fee and a % from the collected funds.

[Zionatin]

It is not completely necessary to list your tokens on one of those well known exchanges. They are known for charging crazy fees anyway. I think if a project starts on a smaller or lesser-known exchange it is ok.
They can build up their own rep and the exchanges rep together. I don't believe just because an exchange is big that we must just trust them.

[Sacramentus]

When you say new projects, do you mean projects that has real uses or some useless project that has nothing to offer? If a project is out for business,  it should have hackers and angel investors to to make it easy for them to be on top exchanges

[judeafante]

This is just if, new projects are finding it hard to list on top exchanges because of listing funds but since market is not in a good season why is top exchange listing fee still that high? Top exchanges are not making it easy for new projects to list on their exchanges or am i missing some good information?

And about binance IEO is there anyone on here who can tell me more about them? i mean if a project like eminer can conduct IEO on binance why can't others? is there some kind of agreement like taking IEO fundraising fee after IEO is successful?

Damn i wish new projects can just have their chances as well, now that bitcoin is losing its value things are getting more harder for new projects

They are the top exchanges, they only want the best one and big projects that are supported by big exchanges in the market, they believe if the project is a good one many investors will invest in it during the crowdfunding, and they will have a fund allocated for it.