Honestly I don't think Chainlink would be anywhere today if not for their huge exposure given by the major sites. Chainlink for example has been on the front page of Coindesk for months alongside BTC and ETH and XRP (weird, right?).
Guys like me can't tell the difference from one type of defi coin to another so we kinda see them all as to avoid:)
True, tons of meaningless "partnerships" has increased exposure towards the project. However don't see Chainlink actually used anywhere, lol.
Blocknet does have alot, its really curious that its not bigger, hmmm
in the end i think the majority of crypto users dont give a fuk, plain and simple.
They are here to make money, and how or why or what project does it with what tech, most dont care about all that
alot of people are also BTC maximalists, they only see alts as a way to make more BTC, so theres that too : /
in 20 years we will see what happens, tho imo, we should watch for the big places (the ones making the actual blockchain patents yearly) to bring services that make waves
will BTC just have all these features? or will a single alt do it? or many?
I agree with you, we need to move towards bigger things. We've been here and we've seen everything unfold, exactly what i see, even if i make a profit, people will still want more money than altcoins, the future of this market's top blockchain platforms will prevail, i think time will sift through the best. Blocknet, i think will have a role in building blockchain platforms to become stronger, and such projects will be the kind of ecosystems for different platforms.
Good point. Ethereums outage yesterday could have been avoided if the ETH network made use of Blocknet's own decentralized infura solution. I'm sure they could be integrated into metamask to make decentralized data available to their users.
