Listed exchange matters

[#Darren]

The reason of why the most bounty tokens are getting listed on shitty exchanges is that the teams are simply greedy. Nobody wants to pay large fees to get listed on a good exchange, when you can pay 0,1 BTC for exmarkets listing.

[barnes13]

As a bounty hunter i think it will be wiser to get info about the exchange a new bounty project plans to list or do their IEO to avoid wasting time in the end, cheap exchanges does nothing but cripple the life out of coins and tokens

Most of them have also started telling plans to list their tokens to some of the exchanges they choose, but what you need to pay attention to is not to be easily fooled by the sweet promises they made. It's too easy to say "soon" to every plan they have, right? So, don't easily believe if they don't have good management from all sides, you need to reveal the truth through the development they have done.

[Spider A4]

For every bounty hunters who are tired of new bounty projects that ends up been a total garbage after they are listed on exchange pls do find yourself some time and do research on past bounty projects because the Exchange they used for IEO matters alot, that exchange is where they will list after bounty ends, i haven't seen a bounty project that get listed on Kucoin and Gate that is not profitable, in terms of good volume or even 2x+

I have learnt a lesson here again, have you? top exchange matters especially in this bear market, look at all the bounties listed on p2pb2b, exmarket etc 

Definitely top exchange always matter in every project because it's a very important thing to grow the project. Kucoin is a exchange it's really high liquidity exchange but random projects can't reach this exchange even a few projects was their endorsement IEO. I never seen Gate.io launched any IEO project.
Now most of the IEO will go some several exchanges namely p2pb2b,Exrates,Latoken and Probit.

[DaMut]

The reason of why the most bounty tokens are getting listed on shitty exchanges is that the teams are simply greedy. Nobody wants to pay large fees to get listed on a good exchange, when you can pay 0,1 BTC for exmarkets listing.

Even there was a project that did not want to pay a single cent to list their token on the exchange, they claimed they will be listed on an exchange soon but asking us to vote their token to get listed on some random exchange. it is very hard to find a real project these days, these three months alone I could not find any good project that ran the IEO on good exchange.

[tabas]

You're right that the exchange matters. If it's being run by a very popular exchange then expect the wave of investors will come but if it's an exchange elsewhere that isn't really known, expect that project will turn out to be a failure afterward.
These exchanges has also their own way of choosing projects to have it on their list.

[dgkush]

Thank you I have been on KuKoin only for the past month and I use it to transfer some of my old coins into ETH while I work on my startup. I have two utility coins that I plan to list but currently spend time building infrastructure which I think most altcoin enthusiasts and entrepreneurs fail to work on. They spend to much time hypothesizing and writing their white papers. I do not have a white paper but I have 50 marketing domains and jewelry to back my coins as well as all of the other coins in my wallet which back my utility tokens like an exchange does!

[Goodvalony]

you are right on that. i still maintain that latoken exchange remains the worst exchange for IEOs and projects that have bounties. they never made any profitable sales. apart from harmony that sells on binance, Tokoin that sold out on kocoin and super zero on geto.io, i doubt if there is any other project that did bounty on any of these exchanges. Ferrum is another good one.

[SanZoldyck]

For every bounty hunters who are tired of new bounty projects that ends up been a total garbage after they are listed on exchange pls do find yourself some time and do research on past bounty projects because the Exchange they used for IEO matters alot, that exchange is where they will list after bounty ends, i haven't seen a bounty project that get listed on Kucoin and Gate that is not profitable, in terms of good volume or even 2x+

I have learnt a lesson here again, have you? top exchange matters especially in this bear market, look at all the bounties listed on p2pb2b, exmarket etc  

what about VidyCoin and the Tokoin project second that enter Exchange Kucoin and Gate, now to be listed on a large exchange is very difficult for those whose projects hold a bounty project, with the exception of IEO

[adjed]

I honestly don't see a lot of bounty of projects that would be holding IEOs gate and Kucoin exchanges, most bounty hunters just do not have a choice in the project's they participate in because it's mostly just a collection of terrible projects and you just have to select the one that has a prayer of surviving in this harsh market conditions, the IEO tokensale model is all but dead so there are not hundreds of them out there for us to choose from, bounty hunters are basically just trying to keep their heads down until things get better.

[DabsPoorVersion]

you are right on that. i still maintain that latoken exchange remains the worst exchange for IEOs and projects that have bounties. they never made any profitable sales. apart from harmony that sells on binance, Tokoin that sold out on kocoin and super zero on geto.io, i doubt if there is any other project that did bounty on any of these exchanges. Ferrum is another good one.

If you find it that way, you should expand your research of finding a good project. Maybe your ways of finding a good project is not effective, there are projects that you missed that's why you do noy know any other good projects that is currently or already succeeded on launching in the market.
There are still projects that is worth of our time, you just have to carefully find it and don't rush everything.

[TastyChillySauce00]

The reason of why the most bounty tokens are getting listed on shitty exchanges is that the teams are simply greedy. Nobody wants to pay large fees to get listed on a good exchange, when you can pay 0,1 BTC for exmarkets listing.

With popular exchanges comes great liquidity as the saying. It's all about money. Maybe you can think that paying popular exchange just for listing is a huge waste of money but then again, the coin that are listed on shit exchanges usually dying out within few months thus having a shorter life span.
Getting listed in popular exchanges you could also enjoy the benefit of publicity to thousands of people unlike in a low volume exchange where you are the subject of selling point to attract people but if both the project and exchanges are crappy who's gonna be attracted?
The price of getting listed into popular exchanges despite really expensive is quite relative to the project. If a project is raising huge amount of money it will be no problem but a little project will just dreaming of getting listed into Binance or many top exchanges.

[Samayuki]

Nothing is wrong with starting on small exchanges, big exchanges will drive a big hype on the project but what about other exchanges after? for example if a coin get listed on binance and later get listed on kucoin what difference will it bring? better to list on kucoin before binance

[blueteam09]

yes, it matters, absolutely!
list on the exchanges so bounty hunters (like me) could sell it, getting may after months of working.
( I'm really tired of being paid tokens that can't be sold.

[Katashi]

To be listed on top exchanges is a good thing but the most important thing for me is how good and useful the project is before I invest or promote it because I'm one of those people whose target is a long-term goal as I believe that it is more profitable just like Bitcoin today.

[10BTCaDay]

It's not about the exchange. Here is an example: MZG conducted IEO on the COINBENE exchange - it is a very strong exchange. they even conducted a token sale on MOONBASE - money is being collected on this site very quickly. but the token price was destroyed anyway.

[aemma]

Not just about bounty only, it hovers all around the project itself and the community. Tell me a community which will be happy when a project with successful public sale lists on a terrible exchange. So I think it comes down to the team knowing the right thing to do, it isn't a must to list on top exchanges first, but a project can list on a moderate exchange then growing from there.
So yes, the exchange a token is listed on matters.

[valuater]

since the beginning of the year until now I think it's true that bounty only contains unclear projects and yes, I was fooled by projects that list in the market are not clear like exmarket, pp2pb2b it's just that there is one bounty there that survived because he did a listing on Other exchanges and the results I can say is pretty good, even though the volume is very low, at the moment I am still trying my luck to find an IEO project that will list in a large market, but until now I have not found it.

[krb91]

I do agree that the exchange a projects lists on does go a long way in determining how beneficial it will be to investors and bounty-hunters. However, listing a project on exchanges like Gate and Kucoin that have a very healthy trading volume requires a substantial amount of resources which may not be available to the project.

[timmmers]

Exchange is a good fundamental for short term, but if you are HODLER, then you need to care more about the product, team, development activity and use case. And this is pretty hard, thats why bounty hunters immediately selling thier bounty tokens to prevent further loss.

[nekonyun]

small projects will not go into large exchanges, because these small projects do not have large costs to register on large exchanges, so if you want to support projects that will enter large exchanges you have to research the project capital, and find out how big the project investors