Listed exchange matters

[letyouearn]

You are right, from one hand, but from the other one - the more people are sure in the project and take part in its bounty - the less you get as bounty hunter So, sometimes taking risk and taking part in unpopular bounties may lead you to huge winnings

[Perfect35]

Yes, the exchanges at the very top cadre in the crypto space perform  much better ad extent such performance to the coins listed on them alike. So, I won't be surprise if such exchanges are the choices of those who recognise and understand them. However, not every exchange that seems to be at the top give good outcome, but still fall along the way with effect on the coins on them.

[pamsugas]

of course,Large exchanges make a better effect but that is also not enough, it takes a good product so that the IEO coin can stay with its price. indeed, if a small exchange makes the price of the coin larger, fight in the bear market because there are not many investors in small exchangers.

[andika2018]

For every bounty hunters who are tired of new bounty projects that ends up been a total garbage after they are listed on exchange pls do find yourself some time and do research on past bounty projects because the Exchange they used for IEO matters alot, that exchange is where they will list after bounty ends, i haven't seen a bounty project that get listed on Kucoin and Gate that is not profitable, in terms of good volume or even 2x+

I have learnt a lesson here again, have you? top exchange matters especially in this bear market, look at all the bounties listed on p2pb2b, exmarket etc 

Exchangers where IEOs are held must have an effect on token sales. Large investors always choose to place their funds in large exchangers because they are related to reputation and trust. IEO organized by large exchangers is almost all successful in sales and also successful after the initial listing

[bobyhodob]

of course,Large exchanges make a better effect but that is also not enough, it takes a good product so that the IEO coin can stay with its price. indeed, if a small exchange makes the price of the coin larger, fight in the bear market because there are not many investors in small exchangers.

that's very logical
absolutely right, as good as any tokens if they are only listed on a small exchange it will be a waste of time and money because there are only robots and low buying and selling movements.
eventually they will give up and leave investors and tokens in the market until they are delist.

[setialovers]

Exchangers who are reputable and have a large volume will be preferred by investors. IEO organized by small exchangers might not be good in achieving targets but if the community is active in the market and the project is able to produce good products, I think that eventually large exchangers will be interested in listing even sometimes without listing fees

[jessyj48]

You are right, from one hand, but from the other one - the more people are sure in the project and take part in its bounty - the less you get as bounty hunter So, sometimes taking risk and taking part in unpopular bounties may lead you to huge winnings

You are right, i have learnt the lesson from few successful bounties this year, the reason why people are able to make huge profits from them is because low bounty hunters promoted the project, for example gowithmi bounty

[Pamadar]

Exchangers who are reputable and have a large volume will be preferred by investors. IEO organized by small exchangers might not be good in achieving targets but if the community is active in the market and the project is able to produce good products, I think that eventually large exchangers will be interested in listing even sometimes without listing fees

Even in a small start but the team are really aiming for success, the process will continue and the progress will be the turning point for big exchange to
cater and add the project inside their exchange. There's project who are more concern about progress and for better delivering of their product than thinking with adding to exchange and use the fund that they've collected. It's best to focus with continues progress and survive with the market trends
before thinking about additional listing exchange.

[aramine]

This is one of the major determinant of project success. Apart from having enticing business plan, good team and solid community, the token or coin must be listed on a reputable exchange with good volume for it to be able to maintain its stance in the market

[Webetcoins]

For every bounty hunters who are tired of new bounty projects that ends up been a total garbage after they are listed on exchange pls do find yourself some time and do research on past bounty projects because the Exchange they used for IEO matters alot, that exchange is where they will list after bounty ends, i haven't seen a bounty project that get listed on Kucoin and Gate that is not profitable, in terms of good volume or even 2x+

I have learnt a lesson here again, have you? top exchange matters especially in this bear market, look at all the bounties listed on p2pb2b, exmarket etc 

You passed the tokoin bounty, because they held an IEO on Kucoin and now even their tokens are listed there, I followed the bounty and got some tokoin, but if IEO is on P2PB2B, LATOKEN, VINDAX and others I will avoid it, because I know their exchanges are only manipulate trading volumes with bots and don't even have trading volumes, usually projects that hold IEO on small exchanges will be destroyed and difficult to be listed on large exchanges

With large or renowned exchanges, the thing is they never allow poor projects with to use their platform or name in any way. IEO is more or less like a contract between the exchange and project. Exchange audits the project extensively to make sure no signs of scams are present. Small exchanges care less about these things be cause they need money at the moment and want to increase their customer first.

[Aaroenz0r]

This is one of the major determinant of project success. Apart from having enticing business plan, good team and solid community, the token or coin must be listed on a reputable exchange with good volume for it to be able to maintain its stance in the market

This is not necessarily true. There are some projects that raise a lot of capital and list on a large exchange like Digifinex, Coinbene, .. but still don't want to develop community and the value of the token. This is one of the common cases of projects that pretend to be reputable and are actually a fraud project.
I will present evidence for you to consider. WPP token, Bitnautic token. This is one of the projects that tricked investors in a very sophisticated way. so we should not analyze a sketchy project when they plan to list it on large exchanges. Check out their roadmap and how to develop their projects.

[Free1bitco.in]

Exchangers who are reputable and have a large volume will be preferred by investors. IEO organized by small exchangers might not be good in achieving targets but if the community is active in the market and the project is able to produce good products, I think that eventually large exchangers will be interested in listing even sometimes without listing fees

Even in a small start but the team are really aiming for success, the process will continue and the progress will be the turning point for big exchange to
cater and add the project inside their exchange. There's project who are more concern about progress and for better delivering of their product than thinking with adding to exchange and use the fund that they've collected. It's best to focus with continues progress and survive with the market trends
before thinking about additional listing exchange.

however, it's a matter of product. although people are waiting for the IEO project in the popular market, but without a good product, the project will die. I once read the status of the Binance CEO, he said: "it's not a matter of money, it's a product quality problem". however, a good product will definitely have good development. for example like ETH, BNB, and other popular coins.
targeting the market is important, but the most important is the product.

[albrots]

IEO's success depends on the chosen Exchange. Usually if the project chooses an ordinary and not too popular Exchange, the project will be less interested and will end up in junk coins. this happens a lot now. New projects do have to work hard to achieve their goals so that many join and invest in the project.
Exchange like p2pb2b. Exmarket etc is one of the exchanges chosen by fake projects and small projects for slisting coins.

[ganeshramk]

Everybody is having their own lots of stories to say. Exchange listing is important. At the same all listing does not fetch good money for bounty hunters expecially. Lots of projects end up team selling the most tokens to dump as much as possible and run away.

[oktana]

IEO's success depends on the chosen Exchange. Usually if the project chooses an ordinary and not too popular Exchange, the project will be less interested and will end up in junk coins. this happens a lot now. New projects do have to work hard to achieve their goals so that many join and invest in the project.
Exchange like p2pb2b. Exmarket etc is one of the exchanges chosen by fake projects and small projects for slisting coins.

investors still believe only for large markets, several times I tried ieo on bittrex and hotbit, the results were quite disappointing, although both exchanges were very popular before binance appeared like a meteor. there must be proper procedures for the project and the exchange so that they protect each other's reputation, because trust only arises from a history of repeated sales success.

[Ajaone]

Yes, exchanges matters a lot because they're the lifeline of a project and no matter how good and credible a project is, no matter the team behind it, if it is not listed on a credible exchange, it will die slowly

[zhengqi]

Good exchanges are very important for the success of the project. And I believe that the project should strive to ensure that their coin is traded on well-known exchanges, because it contributes to its spread.

[Crypto5060]

Yes, it's very crucial to check the exchanges where ieo is being launched. A lot of not so popular exchanges end up being at a loss after listing unlike the more popular ones.

[Karto]

yeee, today top exchanges have cleary guidance how to be listed, and if projects are not listed there it means that there is a lack in credability 90% of the times

[albrots]

IEO's success depends on the chosen Exchange. Usually if the project chooses an ordinary and not too popular Exchange, the project will be less interested and will end up in junk coins. this happens a lot now. New projects do have to work hard to achieve their goals so that many join and invest in the project.
Exchange like p2pb2b. Exmarket etc is one of the exchanges chosen by fake projects and small projects for slisting coins.

investors still believe only for large markets, several times I tried ieo on bittrex and hotbit, the results were quite disappointing, although both exchanges were very popular before binance appeared like a meteor. there must be proper procedures for the project and the exchange so that they protect each other's reputation, because trust only arises from a history of repeated sales success.

Exchange Bittrex in my opinion still has good credibility, but for HotBit exchange I do not recommend it. lots of junk coins in hotbit. I have shitcoin on hotbit and cannot be sold. It seems that binary is only capable of making the IEO project a success for now. Just look at the success of the Harmony Project in Binance, even though the project emerged when the crypto market was in a bad condition, but many investors participated in harmony.