According to Nick Szabo “Bitcoin Could Survive Nuclear War”

[AutomaticTrade254]

All the transaction history of Bitcoin is all the way back to the genesis block. It’s more than 9000 copies located over 90 counties. Do you think it sounds much? 

[kryptqnick]

I think that it could physically survive, but not in the form that would matter. In the case of a Nuclear War, there's a good chance of the Internet going down, and with it all of the major communications and the vast majority of transactions. Bitcoins on cold wallets could survive, and if some people use satellites to connect with each other, perhaps a very weak network would still be out there. But most importantly, Bitcoin would die in terms of its value. In the case of a Nuclear War, the top priority would be to survive, and some numbers and symbols certainly would not help with that task.

[bL4nkcode]

Not that technically knowledgeable about it for of getting it way back to genisis block, but the fact that even a single node/copy of blockchain can save it on nuclear war for being exterminate. It even has a copy on some satellite on outer space.

[squatter]

All the transaction history of Bitcoin is all the way back to the genesis block. It’s more than 9000 copies located over 90 counties. Do you think it sounds much? 

Bitcoin is incredibly redundant, so yes, it would likely survive a nuclear war.

There are plenty of apocalyptic scenarios where the electric grid fails, though. In those cases, Bitcoin is as good as dead. In a world without stable electrical grids, tangible (non-digital) assets become much more useful.

[Carlton Banks]

There are plenty of apocalyptic scenarios where the electric grid fails, though. In those cases, Bitcoin is as good as dead. In a world without stable electrical grids, tangible (non-digital) assets become much more useful.

well, the irony there is that a previous over-dependence on electrical grids would in such scenarios incentivize decentralized/localized electricity (and computer networks). Once an economy recovered, Bitcoin or some reboot/reconceptualization of it would be easy & quick to establish.

The irony being, that the part where the economy falls to pieces might not happen if sufficient take-up of local electricity and meshnets happened before such a catastrophe. Inertia, ignorance/apathy and "prepper" stigma are currently holding that back. But the tech for both is pretty good. Then, the de-civilization part may not happen, and Bitcoin could continue.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Nuclear war?  Man, if there's an actual nuclear war breaking out between countries who have a full armament, there's no way bitcoin is going to mean much afterward.  Even if a country doesn't get hit directly, the resultant nuclear winter would make the world a barren wasteland, and the survivors would become savages...again.

Not to mention that there would likely be an airborne EMP nuke detonated first, if not solely.  Our delicate power grids are extremely vulnerable and there's been a lot of talk about terrorists and nuclear world powers threatening to target them.  If that were to happen, forget about computers and the internet and certainly about bitcoin.  I'm hoping another nuke never explodes anywhere at any time.  It took decades for the cold war fear to go away, and the feeling these days is almost like that.

[hatshepsut93]

Yeah, Bitcoin can survive, but it will be useless until people rebuild the Internet, which may or may not take a long time. In worst case, people won't value it much after electrical grid and the Internet was restored, because everyone will be thinking about the Nuclear War 2.0, and everyone will remember how Bitcoin instantly became useless.

But to me "nuclear war ready" is somewhere at the bottom of my priorities when it comes to money. Nuclear scenario for Bitcoin is just like quantum computers - if it suddenly happens, we'll have much bigger problems than worrying about our coins.

[pixie85]

I see a flaw in this theory. A real nuclear war will probably wipe out life on Earth. Who is going to use Bitcoin? Rats and cockroaches maybe?

Even if it's not an all out war it will probably disrupt communications and destroy internet lines. Without good internet coverage how are we going to trade? You're going to have to travel 100km to a place where there's Internet connection to trade with your neighbour?

[Velkro]

I think that it could physically survive, but not in the form that would matter. In the case of a Nuclear War, there's a good chance of the Internet going down,

I don't think internet would be affected by much. Even if there would be period of bad connection/main network cable cut, it would be fixed.
Its communication not only for civilians but also military and spy agencies (one of many).
If there would be total blackout, bitcoin wouldn't be anyone problem, banks would fail to operate also, gold would be king then and guns.
But this is fantasy, this will not happen.

[minersday]

You guys are getting everything about Bitcoin wrong. How possible is Bitcoin gonna survive nuclear war when it is a digital currency which operates with the help of the internet? What if the internet is shutdown during a nuclear war, how will you be able to make transactions since internet is a basic requirement to make a Bitcoin transaction?  Personally, I don't really think the assumptions made by Nick Szabo regarding Bitcoin survive nuclear war doesn't really make sense to me. He does not have any reasonable argument to back his claims.

[tsaroz]

As mentioned above, lack of internet could lead to delayed transaction and hence unusable blockchain but if you still have an active internet which could even be possible as we have seen internet has been a priority of war struck zones, a nuclear war may boost bitcoin use. Bitcoin is the stability in chaos. We have seen it's use increase in troublesome condition like in Venezuela and Zimbabwe. And also when countries are isolated economically like Iran and Russia.

[Carlton Banks]

I see a flaw in this theory. A real nuclear war will probably wipe out life on Earth. Who is going to use Bitcoin? Rats and cockroaches maybe?

well it's equally obvious that the caveat to this scenario is "assuming there are human survivors"

Even if it's not an all out war it will probably disrupt communications and destroy internet lines. Without good internet coverage how are we going to trade?

well, assuming there are survivors (), it'd be unlikely that all internet infrastructure would have been destroyed, but of course communications lines are typical targets of all-out war. And optic cables already handle the main routing of today's internet that wouldn't be affected by nuclear fallout out EMP. The electronics that send and process the signals wouldn't survive, but the cabling would be intact and functional.

Having at least some long-distance fibre cables with fried electronics wouldn't be such a terrible starting point. All that's needed is to try to come up with a way of reproducing or mimicking the dead electronics (which would be otherwise preserved in the same physical state as when it still worked).

[Blawpaw]

yeah right. if there ever is a Total Nuclear war I don't think Humans will survive. Even the ones who survive would have their days counted. The Bitcoin network would be completely shut as there would be no miners left the process transactions. So, Bitcoin would become useless. Even if the Bitcoin network survived I don't think there will be humans for long to use it.  

[ene1980]

All the transaction history of Bitcoin is all the way back to the genesis block. It’s more than 9000 copies located over 90 counties. Do you think it sounds much?  

That is a fact and that is the power of decentralization as all the copies are stored around the globe and it will survive a nuclear war.

yeah right. if there ever is a Total Nuclear war I don't think Humans will survive. Even the ones who survive would have their days counted. The Bitcoin network would be completely shut as there would be no miners left the process transactions. So, Bitcoin would become useless. Even if the Bitcoin network survived I don't think there will be humans for long to use it.  

The communication sector will be partially affected but i do not think that the entire system will get affected even during a nuclear war as the entire blockchain data will be stored somewhere and even in a worst case scenario.

[Gyfts]

The data of the Bitcoin network is well stored but that doesn't mean the medium of Bitcoin transactions is going to available after a nuclear war. At the bare minimum, you're going to need an internet connection to relay the transactions over the network. No doubt after a nuclear war the infrastructure to relay Bitcoin transactions are going to be decimated. Just because the network data persists does not mean the network will survive. It's an internet currency, do we really expect anything different?

[jseverson]

You guys are getting everything about Bitcoin wrong. How possible is Bitcoin gonna survive nuclear war when it is a digital currency which operates with the help of the internet?

It's going to survive in a sense that a few copies of the blockchain will inevitably be retained, and that it can still be used like nothing happened afterwards. Granted, its survival might not mean shit depending on the scale of the nuclear war, but it showcases Bitcoin's resiliency nonetheless.

But yeah, if a nuclear war does break out, Bitcoin will probably be the least of our concerns. There are studies which suggest that even a small nuclear war could have catastrophic ecological impact.

[Eugenar]

It has the potential to survive, but the real essence of suriving it will not be upon the structure and performance of bitcoin, but through the people who will continue utilizing it after a nuclear war. More of, they will prefer to transact using material things such as gold, silver, or other goods that could be traded when time comes that a war could stop the internet services. It depends, if people will still continue using crypto after all.

[hello_good_sir]

All the transaction history of Bitcoin is all the way back to the genesis block. It’s more than 9000 copies located over 90 counties. Do you think it sounds much? 

There are people who hold all the transaction history of bitcoin is like a huge hard drive or something, and a lot of people store the entire blockchain on their devices, so it would survive, sure, although it's more so surviving as a relic.

Because it wouldn't be able to be used. If something catastrophic happened, we aren't going to end up seeing a lot of people using bitcoin, the internet and a lot of useless technology would be abandoned and there would be a focus on a lot of more essential items.

[pooya87]

survival is not about someone somewhere storing the blockchain (aka the history) on an offline computer!
survival for something such as bitcoin is continuation of block generation and a healthy number of nodes spread across the globe.
of course it depends on the scale of such a war, would it be a single nuke dropped in a small country or will it be a global nuclear war between the big countries that already have a huge nuclear arsenal?! in my opinion a nuclear war is going to be global even if it starts with a small one, others would join in to wipe out the rogue country who launched the attack to protect themselves. a global nuclear war that could not only take lives but a lot of the infrastructures could easily mean wiping out computers, electrical grid and the internet itself. there is no bitcoin left in that scenario to want to survive!

[ranochigo]

As long as someone has a copy of the Bitcoin source code, they can continue to run a node and continue to maintain the network.

It is possible to wipe out the blockchain however. If there isn't anyone keeping a copy of the blockchain secure (from nuclear attacks and to protect it against possible EMP blast), the blockchain could be wiped out. If that happens, all of the transaction history would be gone and Bitcoin would start again from square one. If the blockchain archive lags behind the network by X blocks, the transactions after that would be gone too.