Your thoughts about Greta Thunberg

[fabiola!]

she knows what she is doing  , i at her age didnt know anything except going to school , she is a courageous girl protesting for better world to leave in future  , global warming should be controlled before it gets out of control

[1714952787]

1714952787

[1714952787]

1714952787

[Mustopasson]

I'm very agree about her campaign to reduce climate change, but i think she is need learn to know more about world needed, like produce and distribution.

I think, she will change her mindset in the future

[Juggy777]

she knows what she is doing  , i at her age didnt know anything except going to school , she is a courageous girl protesting for better world to leave in future  , global warming should be controlled before it gets out of control

@fabiola! she’s definitely from the future sent back to warn the humans about the destruction we’re going to bring on ourselves if we don’t take global warming seriously. I’ll second that at her age all I cared was about my sleep, never did I even once bothered to see what global warming was and what are it’s effect.

[franky1]

in my honest opinion she is just finger pointing and doing viral meme frowny faces.
she is not really packing a punch that actually strikes her opponents

the paris agreement is too flimsy and has too many clauses and appears as if by 2050 all a country has to do is say ''oops sorry'

[BADecker]

Greta for president... NOT!     

[coins4commies]

For some strange reason, she is not protesting China too.

Greta, Go To China And Protest About Climate Change To The World’s Biggest Emitter

...China produces 29% of the world’s CO2, a share that is rising. Their stated goal is to continue their growth in emissions through 2030. China burns half the world’s coal
...
The absence of criticism of China implicitly accepts that they should be allowed room to increase emissions in order to raise living standards....

I wish the China myth would just go away.  They have 1/5th of the world's population.  I've even heard some people complain about India which is even more absurd.  People in India barely have water and you're asking them to cut back.  


They have very little work to do relative to countries like the US.  Keep in mind this graphic also leaves out Russa, a lot of the small Northern European countries, American-style Asian countries, and gulf states that are all among the highest emitters in the world.

[iluvbitcoins]

I agree we can't observe the total emissions, it's important to view it per capita.
We can't expect countries with a billion people to have the same emissions as countries with a 100 million.
Still, however, I don't see how this temperature rise correlates with any human activity.
The ice mass was significanlty lesser thousands of years ago then it is now.

[BADecker]

I agree we can't observe the total emissions, it's important to view it per capita.
We can't expect countries with a billion people to have the same emissions as countries with a 100 million.
Still, however, I don't see how this temperature rise correlates with any human activity.
The ice mass was significanlty lesser thousands of years ago then it is now.

Right! That's why we find mammoths, etc., frozen in the ice of Siberia. GT is being duped (or paid) into talking like she is.

[guy369]

She's sponsored by Soros and is a massive hypocrite.

[ðºÞæ]

 "Product of the Year"

[franky1]

I agree we can't observe the total emissions, it's important to view it per capita.
We can't expect countries with a billion people to have the same emissions as countries with a 100 million.
Still, however, I don't see how this temperature rise correlates with any human activity.
The ice mass was significanlty lesser thousands of years ago then it is now.

climate does not care about how many people are affected. its about the land mass that freezes or heats up. whether people are standing on it or not

if anything emissions should be measure per square mile to then work out which country is causing the most environmental damage(lung health)
same goes for the water cycle. how much rainful per area needs to be measured and ways to increase it in area's and ofcourse to make it snow more in the north/south pole to replenish the STANDARD summer melts

[TwitchySeal]

I agree we can't observe the total emissions, it's important to view it per capita.
We can't expect countries with a billion people to have the same emissions as countries with a 100 million.
Still, however, I don't see how this temperature rise correlates with any human activity.
The ice mass was significanlty lesser thousands of years ago then it is now.

Nasa does a pretty good job of breaking down what's going on with climate change and why they think it's extremely likely that humans are playing a significant role.  They also directly address your point about the ice mass thousands of years ago.   

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

[coins4commies]

lol evidence won't work here

[Spendulus]

I agree we can't observe the total emissions, it's important to view it per capita.
We can't expect countries with a billion people to have the same emissions as countries with a 100 million.
Still, however, I don't see how this temperature rise correlates with any human activity.
The ice mass was significanlty lesser thousands of years ago then it is now.

Nasa does a pretty good job of breaking down what's going on with climate change...

No, they don't. They know as little as anyone else.

All the CERTAINTIES are in the minds of TRUE BELIEVERS.

[gabmen]

I agree we can't observe the total emissions, it's important to view it per capita.
We can't expect countries with a billion people to have the same emissions as countries with a 100 million.
Still, however, I don't see how this temperature rise correlates with any human activity.
The ice mass was significanlty lesser thousands of years ago then it is now.

Nasa does a pretty good job of breaking down what's going on with climate change...

No, they don't. They know as little as anyone else.

All the CERTAINTIES are in the minds of TRUE BELIEVERS.

Well one thing's sure now. That stunt of hers, or whoever placed here in that position, got her Time's person of the year award. That should get her and the people behind her more attention for what they're advocating, which in should be climate change. Though there's a lot of things I'd prefer that she be doing at that age than going up against adults and big corporations. Hands down for the piercing eyes that looked really determined, though.

[Vispilio]

The fact that a clueless child manipulated for dark political agendas can now be elected "person of the year" is proof enough that mainstream media has even gone lower than rock bottom to the macabre underground realms of black propaganda  ,

and intelligent people should be extremely discerning and critical about where they get their information & education these days...

[zorgo.games]

Obviously, there are two camps concerning global warming: believers and non-believers. Both camps have their convictions and support from science. I think that in either case, it's good to raise this issue on a global level. It's better to have clean air and water, it's better to leave fossils underground and use clean sources of energy, etc. So whoever brings these topics to light is doing a good thing. So Greta Thunberg has my support although I don't like the way she does things    

[franky1]

Nasa does a pretty good job of breaking down what's going on with climate change and why they think it's extremely likely that humans are playing a significant role.  They also directly address your point about the ice mass thousands of years ago.   

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

so nasa had balloons with atmospheric sensors 100,000 to 800,000 years ago to know what was actually in the stratesphere(above cloud layer)
.. nope
well they could have built time travel and just not admitting it.. but i doubt it

they only know what was POSSIBLY in the tropisphere (below cloud level) where RAIN and gravity pulls elements to the ground which then dont re-evaporate and thus left to settle.
thus they disregard water amounts. disregard oxygen and other things.

heck the change from 1850-1960 results are they done icecore drills for the pre 1960 numbers and then done tree ring studies and more recent technology sensor studies.
but the funny part is the technology sensor studies have number manipulated. they even admit such by knowing no day is equal due to rain and humidity so they tweak the numbers to try and make it a straight comparison to a standard sunny day even on rainy days.

so dont take the results as true accurate results of reality

[Spendulus]

I agree we can't observe the total emissions, it's important to view it per capita.
We can't expect countries with a billion people to have the same emissions as countries with a 100 million.
Still, however, I don't see how this temperature rise correlates with any human activity.
The ice mass was significanlty lesser thousands of years ago then it is now.

Nasa does a pretty good job of breaking down what's going on with climate change...

No, they don't. They know as little as anyone else.

All the CERTAINTIES are in the minds of TRUE BELIEVERS.

Well one thing's sure now. That stunt of hers, or whoever placed here in that position, got her Time's person of the year award. That should get her and the people behind her more attention for what they're advocating, which in should be climate change. Though there's a lot of things I'd prefer that she be doing at that age than going up against adults and big corporations. Hands down for the piercing eyes that looked really determined, though.

I learned an interesting fact today. The Time Person of the Year is decided by One Person.

[coins4commies]

Everyone knows that there is cyclic climate change on timescales that are orders of magnitude greater than the one we are talking about right now.  It doesn't really matter what things were like that long ago.  What matters most is whats happening, how it will affect us humans living today, and what we are going to do about it.

Bringing up the reliability of historic data is a red herring.  It would be like, in the midst of the plague, bringing up the fact that people have always died from infections.