TMAN False Feedback

[The Sceptical Chymist]

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the way that he writes, you need to stop being a baby and toughen up (as does everyone else who gets offended by words).

Agreed, and that's the first thing I thought when Cryptosparks opened up that thread trying to get TMAN banned.  TMAN adds a little flavor to the forum, even (or especially) when it's at the expense of someone's feelings.  As I said in the other thread, I don't exactly understand the service Cryptosparks is offering, but if he really is guaranteeing a return of 794% as bitmover said, that seems to be too good to be true--and we all know how many too-good-to-be-true schemes there have been in bitcoin land that ended up with a lot of penniless victims.

So Fruitsbasket is a single, apparent, satisfied customer of Cryptosparks.  That's one data point.  I'd love to hear of others.  Barring that, I'm inclined to believe that this trading bot (if that's what it is) is a scam--but I'd like to get answers to my request in TMAN's thread to explain what exactly Cryptosparks's business is.

[1714012092]

1714012092

[1714012092]

1714012092

[1714012092]

1714012092

[1714012092]

1714012092

[suchmoon]

False calculations, yet again another lie.

Funny how all those "supporters" are showing dust transactions at best, while CryptoSparks keeps boasting about a 900 BTC bankroll and a waiting list.

[The-One-Above-All]

False calculations, yet again another lie.

Funny how all those "supporters" are showing dust transactions at best, while CryptoSparks keeps boasting about a 900 BTC bankroll and a waiting list.

Funny how TMAN supporters are focusing on possible future financial dangers ( that are as yet unproven) but don't have any problem at all SUPPORTING proven scammers like tman and lauda on to default trust.

That is more funny for sure.

CLEAR SELF ADMITTED EVIDENCE THAT TMAN USES RED TRUST TO SILENCE THE TRUTH ABOUT HIS PAL LAUDAS SCAMMING

You can not red trust for fact based posts.

Can, have and will.

if you don't like it I suggest you petition all other DT-1 members to exclude me or if they feel that my tagging of you is not needed or accurate they will reach out to me like adults and have actual fluid conversations

so - Like it or fuck off back to your hole.


xxxx laters sexy pants

[TMAN]

hey fragile OP.. hows your investment going?

guess I was right and you were wrong you fucking idiot pajeet loving foreskin sucker.

[nutildah]

False calculations, yet again another lie.

Funny how all those "supporters" are showing dust transactions at best, while CryptoSparks keeps boasting about a 900 BTC bankroll and a waiting list.

Just for fun I checked in with the Telegram group and found this beauty:



which is obviously BS because most people are still sitting on a 30-50% loss since December. He didn't have any fantastic trades in December or January, yet his graph shows that he did. This is what trading looks like in actuality, since cryptosparks opened the API key for viewing in September:



Mind you, most people didn't get involved until Oct-Dec, which is why they are sitting on losses much greater than 16%. In short, the two pictures just don't match. The top one is pure manipulation, the bottom is the reality of the situation. He completely misrepresented his services, and these misrepresentations were vigorously defended by FruitBaskets... Negative tags are valid.

[andulolika]

Bla bla bla, TMAN member of laudas circlejerk group now also dedicates to make false flags and what now looks like desperated lies. They quite a butthurt group since they cannot leave red but a bit of yellow. It quite satisfactory to see anyone get to such a stupid measures.

[TECSHARE]

I am still not seeing how a negative rating or a flag is justified for some one speaking positively of anyone regardless of how fraudulent you think they might be. This is straight up guilt via association, the kind of legal standards they had in The Soviet Union.

[TMAN]

I am still not seeing how a negative rating or a flag is justified for some one speaking positively of anyone regardless of how fraudulent you think they might be. This is straight up guilt via association, the kind of legal standards they had in The Soviet Union.

so its alright for him to tag me as I was saying its all a scam?

[TECSHARE]

I am still not seeing how a negative rating or a flag is justified for some one speaking positively of anyone regardless of how fraudulent you think they might be. This is straight up guilt via association, the kind of legal standards they had in The Soviet Union.

so its alright for him to tag me as I was saying its all a scam?

"TMAN   2019-11-26   Reference   account trading punk, I do not trust this user - I also do not trust this user due to his very close relationship with CryptoSparks who I believe to be his alt account"

I see an unsubstantiated claim of it being his alt account, and guilt by association. So no.

[xolxol]

TMUM and her friends - its not an abuse because we are always right~ thats the only thing you need to know in this forum.

[TMAN]

~

with all the anal bleeding coming out of you how often do you need to change your tampons?

the guy is a fool who was promoting a bot offering 800% roi based on lies - he was shilling hard and denying cold hard facts.

he got tagged due to that, yes I was right everyone lost money on the bot. so whats your point?

my tags stand and OP owes me an apology you cuntwaffle

[andulolika]

I were surprised to see he's at the point of making false flags. That doesn't exempt you of promoting a scam, but anyhow seemingly his rating towards this kind of scam changes from people to people.

[FruitsBasket]

+1 for TECSHARE. He knows what he is talking about. I countered the negative trust because TMAN is making baseless accusations.

[DireWolfM14]

I am still not seeing how a negative rating or a flag is justified for some one speaking positively of anyone regardless of how fraudulent you think they might be. This is straight up guilt via association, the kind of legal standards they had in The Soviet Union.

He was promoting, vouching for, and defending a lying scammer.  I suspect hey may have been paid or had other financial incentives to promote the deceptive service.  Is it really that difficult to conceive why he was tagged and flagged?  

[FruitsBasket]

I am still not seeing how a negative rating or a flag is justified for some one speaking positively of anyone regardless of how fraudulent you think they might be. This is straight up guilt via association, the kind of legal standards they had in The Soviet Union.

He was promoting, vouching for, and defending a lying scammer.  I suspect hey may have been paid or had other financial incentives to promote the deceptive service.  Is it really that difficult to conceive why he was tagged and flagged?  

False.

[TMAN]

+1 for TECSHARE. He knows what he is talking about. I countered the negative trust because TMAN is making baseless accusations.

baseless? you fucking tardwankfucker.

hows your investment going?

don't you see that cryptosparks made up his backtest?

don't you see me tagging him and bringing it to light with the help of others prevented users losing funds?

I guess you are too deep in loses to see the light you fartburgler.

fuck it - keep it up and i will be forced to raise a flag against you for your continued support of an absolute obvious twatnozzle and for your support of the flag against me buy your other investor buddies.

fucking loser

[FruitsBasket]

+1 for TECSHARE. He knows what he is talking about. I countered the negative trust because TMAN is making baseless accusations.

baseless? you fucking tardwankfucker.

hows your investment going?

don't you see that cryptosparks made up his backtest?

don't you see me tagging him and bringing it to light with the help of others prevented users losing funds?

I guess you are too deep in loses to see the light you fartburgler.

fuck it - keep it up and i will be forced to raise a flag against you for your continued support of an absolute obvious twatnozzle and for your support of the flag against me buy your other investor buddies.

fucking loser

[TMAN]

Fucking idiot doesn’t even realise the age range to call someone a boomer. I’d have to be 60 years old.. although you only going to have 60c left in your pocket after your investment, the one you backed up and wanted others to invest in.. the losing proposition with lies.

The one where the bot owner even closed his own thread after a few losses..

Ok pajeet

Xxx

[TECSHARE]

+1 for TECSHARE. He knows what he is talking about. I countered the negative trust because TMAN is making baseless accusations.

baseless? you fucking tardwankfucker.

hows your investment going?

don't you see that cryptosparks made up his backtest?

don't you see me tagging him and bringing it to light with the help of others prevented users losing funds?

I guess you are too deep in loses to see the light you fartburgler.

fuck it - keep it up and i will be forced to raise a flag against you for your continued support of an absolute obvious twatnozzle and for your support of the flag against me buy your other investor buddies.

fucking loser

Go ahead. Do it. Show everyone how worthless your judgement is. Fuck off with your threats of using the trust system to silence people who disagree with you. Also I haven't supported any flags against you. Add lying on top of the threats.

[TMAN]

+1 for TECSHARE. He knows what he is talking about. I countered the negative trust because TMAN is making baseless accusations.

baseless? you fucking tardwankfucker.

hows your investment going?

don't you see that cryptosparks made up his backtest?

don't you see me tagging him and bringing it to light with the help of others prevented users losing funds?

I guess you are too deep in loses to see the light you fartburgler.

fuck it - keep it up and i will be forced to raise a flag against you for your continued support of an absolute obvious twatnozzle and for your support of the flag against me buy your other investor buddies.

fucking loser

Go ahead. Do it. Show everyone how worthless your judgement is. Fuck off with your threats of using the trust system to silence people who disagree with you. Also I haven't supported any flags against you. Add lying on top of the threats.

I wasn’t talking to you dickhead. Take the time to read, you are coming off more and more like TOAA you dickcheesesucker