No matter how successful a bounty project is......

[minairia3]

Thats a problem with some campaign they dont limit the participants that can joined. Yes I also participate with some projects and earned few tokens due to massive participants. That's why some prefer btc payment but spammers cannot joined this kind of campaign.

If I were you I would pick a campaign category that has few participants so you can maximize the budget for that campaign for example blog and youtube. Dont join social campaign cause its really a massive participants that joined there.

[Obito]

That's the reality and that is how it really works. In addition the bounty itself that sets the rules and the range of how many participants could participate. It is not in the end of the partcipants who needs to adjust for the project but the project who needs to adjust for the participant for the sake of decent salary, well, the rules are the thing that the participant where they need to comply.

[danherbias07]

That is if there will be a lot who will be joining it.
But I dont see that anymore.
Mostly, they are joining telegram campaigns just for the airdrop or they could be at social media campaigns like twitter and facebook.
Also, some of them are group of people and so does they take a chunk of that percentage.
You should pick the best without much participants then maybe you could get lucky.

[PuertoLibre]

Hmm, the calculation of bounty reward is not possible unless you have the all required data for putting the blank spaces on the formulary. The different bounty campaigns have various allocations and some bounty campaigns even don't give the full bounty allocation in case of low participation level. Bounty hunters are supposed to learn these choices and they have to make their own research for bounty and project.

[Byakuga]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

In fact what is happening right now is true, but in my opinion it's not really a problem we only get a little payment because many people are participating, at least I am happy not to get caught up and promote the scammer project. from the point of view of someone participating in a bounty project, there are those who only look at the total budget, allocation, and how good or influential it is. so it's different.

But keep in mind too, you get only $10 from the bounty, but try to look at the next 1-5 months. $10 could change to $100 or more.

You are right, if your reward is too low for you just keep for a while at least we are still in bear market, who knows what tomorrow will bring? altcoins are already down to all time low so 10$ token can turn 3 to 4 figure

[samuraijin]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

but you also have a calculator to calculate the price of their ICO and IEO, when listed on the stock market they fall -1000% below the usual price, not only because of the wrong calculation and the number of participants is too much, I see participants and bounty hunters are slightly reduced because it is indeed many projects are not feasible

[Genemind]

Bounty hunters also play a vital role in the success of a certain project and to be honest, participants now are choosing to join famous projects because they would want to have an assurance of being paid in time so we can't blame them. Every project should set a limit for participants and they should set rules for every bounty hunter to follow. Things will depend on how bounty hunters and managers would work together for the success of a project.

[StephenJH]

Bounty hunters are the biggest victims of scam projects and they need to be rewarded if the soft cap is not reached. Some projects have a clear rules and they never delay the bounty payments while other bounty campaigns don't give a attention right after the successful token sale. Bounty hunters need a solid project with a future perspective and the bounty allocation shouldn't exceed the budget of what team can afford.

[AbuBhakar]

Bounty hunters are the biggest victims of scam projects and they need to be rewarded if the soft cap is not reached. Some projects have a clear rules and they never delay the bounty payments while other bounty campaigns don't give a attention right after the successful token sale. Bounty hunters need a solid project with a future perspective and the bounty allocation shouldn't exceed the budget of what team can afford.

Bounty hunters should put standard o joining bounties, like payment within a week or fixed payment in BTC/ETH/XRP
If bounty hunters keep doing what bounty projects like , like too much monthly extension and additional tasks to receive rewards they should just put their effort learning trading and finding other ways to earn to gain capital in trading other than bounties.

[kceekcee]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

Likewise I would say
Do not be deceived by large amount of participants

In bounty today; a lot of people would register to join the bounty
But only few will complete the tasks

Yours is to dyor and decide the type of hunter to be

[viananda2525]

Bounty hunters are the biggest victims of scam projects and they need to be rewarded if the soft cap is not reached. Some projects have a clear rules and they never delay the bounty payments while other bounty campaigns don't give a attention right after the successful token sale. Bounty hunters need a solid project with a future perspective and the bounty allocation shouldn't exceed the budget of what team can afford.

Bounty hunters should put standard o joining bounties, like payment within a week or fixed payment in BTC/ETH/XRP
If bounty hunters keep doing what bounty projects like , like too much monthly extension and additional tasks to receive rewards they should just put their effort learning trading and finding other ways to earn to gain capital in trading other than bounties.

thats right dude, although Bounty paid us with their token atleast we have to predict much much money we will accept when it finished. And also we have to predict its price too when trader in market , so when Bounty distributed we will face reward that dumped. Our work will be worthless if we dont do this ,...its very insane when we give our effort in several months but finally we just received couple dollars only. Better to siwch our effort in learning trading till we could dari profits consistantly.

[target]

Less people right now are joining bounty campaigns, the more projects right now are going to become scam since they are not going to get the softcap funds. Bounty hunters right now might have to decide to stop and wait for the market to have an uptrend or if there is a good project that doesn't ask funds but pure promotions only, I think thats the best to join than the ones asking for softcap. This will help us from getting scammed.

[Golftech]

Bounty hunters also play a vital role in the success of a certain project and to be honest, participants now are choosing to join famous projects because they would want to have an assurance of being paid in time so we can't blame them. Every project should set a limit for participants and they should set rules for every bounty hunter to follow. Things will depend on how bounty hunters and managers would work together for the success of a project.

It surely do, it's depends from how the team works and how the management will take good care of the projects, both sides have it's own role to help the project to be  well advertise and earned many investors. Though a lots of scamming lately and bounty hunters not being paid, some get much lesser and others are not getting anything. They can't complain but to continue searching Hoping for luck to comes up and get a better shares.

[Kersh768]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

This is more likely to happen especially if there's no cap with the number of participants in the bounty project. The team would be forced to divide or disseminate the pool rewards into the total number of participants. But as participants we cannot complain to them to cut the number of people to join the project since their main goal is to promote the project so the more would be better to spread the popularity of a particular project.

[cepot9]

Now many bounty campaigns have started which limits participants to join, so this is not too much of a problem for me because with this we rely on perseverance at work. And the problem is because the low income is in addition to the price of the token that comes in at a much lower exchange, maybe because the participant joined the campaign using an account that entered a low tier and that made them earn a little income

[mole0815]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

Normally, you can calculate well in advance and estimate how high the payouts are.
But if the token will ever reach ICO level and if it will be paid out at all can be found on another paper.
Therefore you should never count with bounty rewards fixed but look at it if it takes a good end as a bonus.
Runs on the side while you are active in the forum. And exactly so it should be

[Bezobraznike]

   There are many bounties around, and each of them have their own program. In any time you can speak with managers of bounty,
or with admins in their official telegram group and tell them about your concerns.
   I participated in great bounties, where I got paid nicely in tokens that worth couple thousand dollars. I participated in bounties
that didn't pay me in the end. I blame just myself for making a mistake. But I can't predict anything, my researching have limits,
I am not an expert, therefore I make more mistakes then others, but you don't hear me complaining.

[the rise]

I disagree with you, because if bounty was well structured and offered good rewards and the token price was around the ICO price, it is a great bounty programme where you could have earned solid dividends.

Imbalance of the process makes your presumption difficult to become a fact for current trend campaigns. in the past, whatever number of participants joined was directly proportional to the ICO target achieved, because most investors also came from campaign participants as well. the current average coin price is much lower than the ICO, and I think campaign participants are also fewer because many disagree with Kyc's terms.

[anjiitem]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

Yes, it is true that the bounty campaign does not provide a limit on the number of people who can participate in eating if the project is successful and there are a lot of people participating in it, so the rewards can be said to be small because they have to be shared with that many people, in contrast to some campaigns that provide the number limits for people who participate so we can count or estimate the amount we can get later.

[barnes13]

Absolutely true!! This is one of the biggest points that many bounty participants don't notice. They are too hasty in choosing so they forget that important point, and worse they sometimes even blame others for this. I myself prefer to participate in bounty campaigns that limit participants, so the rewards distributed will be valuable for each qualified participant.