2 Dice Strategies that Might be Proven Helpful

[leowonderful]

Interesting. I'm not a big fan of dice since I just don't find it extremely interesting most of the time, but I do like taking looks at the strategies people devise for it, and I might try these out in the future. Haven't ever heard of the first one personally, though I've seen plenty of variations of the Martingale strategy over the years.

House edge is typically pretty high on most dice games and you'll end up losing money over time mathematically, but if you're gambling responsibly with the expectations that the chances that you hit a large win are small, then it's fine in my eyes.

[shoreno]

Interesting. I'm not a big fan of dice since I just don't find it extremely interesting most of the time,

yeah same here  . dice might be looks so boring but its simplicity makes it more really attractive to some  . many players can play this game so easily compare to to other crucial games   .

but I do like taking looks at the strategies people devise for it, and I might try these out in the future. Haven't ever heard of the first one personally, though I've seen plenty of variations of the Martingale strategy over the years.

true  . strategy and methods makes the dice game more stand out because dice games are so easy to make up a strategy with  while other game's tends to stick on iether auto or manual plays alone   .

im more familiar with martingale ( the clasic one ) but im too scared to try the others   .

[bering]

Those strategies really new for me and that's so detail because when i use martingale strategy then i using classic strategy which is the results will so predictable can makes my balance dry rapidly and patroli strategy also not too familiar for me but as this is dice and every rolls from it will be so unpredictable then i personally more prefer playing as usual and didn't use any methods to won it because very often the strategy won't works for me

[lienfaye]

I like dice game and often play it everytime im in the mood to gamble thus I will try and see if it works.

These strategies might help us to minimize losses but still there's no assurance, so if you're going to try this better to have less expectation.

Nevertheless there's no way to frequently win in gambling especially in dice, its more on luck.

[AjithBtc]

Those two strategies mentioned were something new. This can be experimented, but it won't assure to capitalize winning streaks. As an user stated it is the time that decides. When it comes to dice strategies gets to be effective if the user has got luck and for users with huge wallet balance. My plan is to give a try, but once in a day else emptying of wallet happens in no time.

[sheenshane]

Good advice OP and it looks like these tips more interesting and new strategies. I will try these strategies once I have extra money to deposit and play. So far I have been known in the dicing technique is using a martingale and also low chances of winning against the house edge and continue to bet. But it needs to have a huge fund in order to continue and cover losses and sustain even 30 consecutive losses in a row.

The fact is here, there is no assurance to always win in dice strategies to beat the odds. But there's nothing wrong if you try OP's tips mentioned and increase your chances of winning. After all, it is impossible to control your luck but you have the power to control it by using these strategies.

[stadus]

Good advice OP and it looks like these tips more interesting and new strategies. I will try these strategies once I have extra money to deposit and play. So far I have been known in the dicing technique is using a martingale and also low chances of winning against the house edge and continue to bet. But it needs to have a huge fund in order to continue and cover losses and sustain even 30 consecutive losses in a row.

it really needs a huge funds but never think that you will be unbeatable using the martingale technique as in dice, the roll is quick and losing 10 in a row or even 20 is possible, so you need to prepare for that mentally.

The fact is here, there is no assurance to always win in dice strategies to beat the odds. But there's nothing wrong if you try OP's tips mentioned and increase your chances of winning. After all, it is impossible to control your luck but you have the power to control it by using these strategies.

That's his strategy and it doesn't mean it will work to all of us, try using and share your experience, mind I have already shared since I already discover this strategy early in my gambling journey.

[adaseb]

Like the above posters have already clarified, since there is a house edge, when your bets go to infinity you will always go bust.

Basically the best way to gamble with dice is to do reverse martingale. So on a win you double your bet, wait until you got like 10 winners in a row and quit then. You don't double your bet on a loss just go back to base bet. This way if luck is on your side then 10 wins in a row should come quick.

And if your base bet is 100 sats, then 10 wins in a row is basically a 0.000512 BTC win so risking less than a penny and getting almost a $5 win. Seems like good risk rewards.

[ChrisPop]

"Might be helpful" - there is no strategy in the world that can make you profits on the long term as long as the house has that edge over you. As far as I see it, strategies can only make your account last longer by using more conservative stakes or they can blowout your account faster by risking more such as the martingale strategy, but that yet depends on the % of your bankroll you start playing with.

[Haunebu]

These strategies are well known op and I have been using them for a long period of time though I mostly ended up losing, but they are effective in the short term just like other strategies. However, the best strategies that I would recommend are:

- Yolo gambling(All in with every roll)
- Proportional gambling strategy
- Fixed stakes strategy

These 3 are much better when compared to what you suggested in my opinion.

[Ucy]

Concerning the Paroli strategy, has it ever worked for anyone consistently? By "work for anyone" I mean making a gambler regular profits? If no, then it's safe to say that the purpose of the strategy is to minimize lose (as you mentioned) and nothing more. Or minimize your lose while you gamble longer and increase your chance of winning big.

[semobo]

Strategies that are not proven to make the chances of winnings while betting will make the things more complicated so just let the things as it be and don't try too hard to win dice because it will backfire you when you go hard at it.

[DoublerHunter]

Paroli and Martingale strategies and almost the same, they all need a huge fund just to survive and cover losses if you can not win 3-5 times in a row you can not have profit to take. These strategies are very risky and you can not have any assurance that you will win on these strategies. Because in dice gambling it is pure of luck and no one controls it. Based on luck games will remain unpredictable, nevertheless, gamble with your own risk and set amount money that you can afford. Because there is no accurate result in strategies, it is better to have fun.

[janggernaut]

Concerning the Paroli strategy, has it ever worked for anyone consistently? By "work for anyone" I mean making a gambler regular profits? If no, then it's safe to say that the purpose of the strategy is to minimize lose (as you mentioned) and nothing more. Or minimize your lose while you gamble longer and increase your chance of winning big.

Obviously that strategy or even other strategy won't work for each person. If a person won from that strategy, doesn't mean the strategy will work too for others.
For second strategy, break even martiangle, it's very bad strategy since you only can only break even without getting any profit

[nakamura12]

The first strategy could also make you lose more especially greedy ones, i'm sure there are greedy people who will increase their bet for the fourth time that would only take your winnings from first three winning bets. Offensive strategies could also make people become more offensive when they bet.

[bhabygrim]

End of the day , no matter what strategy you implement , it will definitely bust.

Outcome of the previous bet doesn't carry forward to the next + the house edge + the max bet (in any case even if you have an infinite bankroll, you can't can't bet beyond the max to cover losses)

It all depends on the player knowing when to stop provided you don't bust in the first few rolls.

This is also what I think of, No matter what strategy we use if we don't know when to quit it would all be useless .
Most of the strategies only works for awhile so if you don't know how to handle your greed then no matter how much you win the house would only take it all back again.
Our real opponent in gambling isn't the house it is our own greed.

[shield132]

Do we really hang on house edge? I think this isn't something that you have to ignore and also I want to remind you that mathmatically every game is set to be profitable for casino on long term. Both strategy that you provided doesn't lessen risk of lose, maybe they can help you to play a little bit more time but if time is what you are looking for, just bet  0.00000001 btc and you will be ok.
Also if you are still looking to build new strategies or test current ones, you can use mydicebot's simulator to get result of what will happen on long term.

[Theb]

Do we really hang on house edge? I think this isn't something that you have to ignore and also I want to remind you that mathmatically every game is set to be profitable for casino on long term. Both strategy that you provided doesn't lessen risk of lose, maybe they can help you to play a little bit more time but if time is what you are looking for, just bet  0.00000001 btc and you will be ok.
Also if you are still looking to build new strategies or test current ones, you can use mydicebot's simulator to get result of what will happen on long term.

Well in a dice game you can be the one who can determine the risk involve in every bet you make. The more riskier you set the percentages on the more reward you will have but of course the more chances you will lose your bet. That's why I always stick with the house edge at least this has the chance to double my money even just like how any normal gambling casinos are. When it comes to strategy I really don't implement any not unless you count stopping while winning as a strategy my bets are always based on what I'm feeling and not based on some kind of pattern or order I need to do in every bet. This is gambling it should be fun and applying a strategy where there is really no guarantee of winning will just widen my loss if the strategy doesn't favor me during that time.

[nydiacaskey01]

That strategy may have worked on you or to a couple of readers, but its not going to work for everyone since we all have different gambling styles. One thing I learned about gambling is if you know a strategy, better keep it to yourself because if you share to another person and it didn't work, they might blame you on their loses.

[matchi2011]

The first strategy could also make you lose more especially greedy ones, i'm sure there are greedy people who will increase their bet for the fourth time that would only take your winnings from first three winning bets. Offensive strategies could also make people become more offensive when they bet.

Whatever strategy or system you have, if you can't control your greediness then the results will  be the same. Nothing new with those addicted gamblers that unable to change their attitudes. This two system can only be helpful to people who can take limitations with their gambling activities, as they can keep the bankroll open as long as they will follow whatever system they've take accordingly.