Cryptotalk campaign thread is a mirror echo of the yobit thread...

[examplens]

600 participants?!  Holy crap, I didn't realize there were that many but then again I never checked--and I'm not sure even where to check.

suchmoon is posting their statistics from time to time, and last time the total number of participants was 582 - 21 November. As can be seen, their numbers are constantly increasing, albeit at a much slower rate than before.
yahoo62278 is also banned many of them, at first glance it's probably a few hundred banned.

Is this a list of all users who are wearing Cryptotalk signature? I guess many of them are already banned but still not removed the signature.

The thread was actually locked by me to control the spam being posted in it by participants.

You locked them an excellent place for pumping post number, few hours after that, is created new "Unofficial" topic [Unofficial] CryptoTalk.Org & Yobit Panel BTCtalk Signature Campaign Discussion it is the inexhaustible theme for meaningless discussion.

[Welsh]

You locked them an excellent place for pumping post number, few hours after that, is created new "Unofficial" topic [Unofficial] CryptoTalk.Org & Yobit Panel BTCtalk Signature Campaign Discussion it is the inexhaustible theme for meaningless discussion.

We all know why that thread has been so popular too. Many of the users that have joined the signature campaign aren't that knowledgeable in cryptocurrencies so they tend to talk about what they know, and talking about the signature campaign which is paying them is what they all have in common. A lot of users in that thread have a signature from Cryptotalk.  It is just a way of carrying on discussion on something hugely subjective while also getting paid for it. Of course, there are legitimate discussions within the thread, but there's also a lot of regurgitated rubbish too.

[FIFA worldcup]

I have a simple question to ask from the crytotalk forum and yobit admins that what is the purpose of not refilling the wallets and also not stating the reasons ?  I do not know it the wallets be refilled or not but think in the yobit prospective, It will only damage the yobit reputation, nothing more.

You stop the wallet withdrawals, people start complaining, yobit and crytotalk fourm name is badly spoken and then suddenly they topup wallets , that will not restore their reputation. It seems that they have stopped the campaign and now getting free advertisements for as long as they can continue this.

[suchmoon]

Is this a list of all users who are wearing Cryptotalk signature? I guess many of them are already banned but still not removed the signature.

I excluded everyone who was in yahoo's ban list at the time.

[Theb]

my prediction is it may be a short delay until the payout wallet is filled (1 month or so total)...  but it will happen again.  
And the delay will increase....   maybe not the first time, but once the delay increases for the first time, it is almost certain to get longer thereafter.

This is just a prediction.

The problem here is they accept a lot of participants even though they know their balances are limited so they fail to pay them all out just in time for their balances to be refilled. If they only find a way to have a sustainable number of participants and not actually make their campaign open for all then I'm sure that this kinds of problem won't happen again. I know Yobit/Cryptotalk wants to boost their presence here in the forum that's why they want to have a lot of participants as much as possible but they should also consider that they are ruining their reputation every time that there are hiccups like this on how they handle things.

[aioc]

my prediction is it may be a short delay until the payout wallet is filled (1 month or so total)...  but it will happen again.  
And the delay will increase....   maybe not the first time, but once the delay increases for the first time, it is almost certain to get longer thereafter.

This is just a prediction.

The problem here is they accept a lot of participants even though they know their balances are limited so they fail to pay them all out just in time for their balances to be refilled. If they only find a way to have a sustainable number of participants and not actually make their campaign open for all then I'm sure that this kinds of problem won't happen again. I know Yobit/Cryptotalk wants to boost their presence here in the forum that's why they want to have a lot of participants as much as possible but they should also consider that they are ruining their reputation every time that there are hiccups like this on how they handle things.

Many are now transferring to a new campaign because they cannot transfer their earnings to their balance, so it means we will have lesser participants when they finally refill the wallet, its a test of patience now, it will take several weeks or even months before they refill it or they will not, the choice now is on the participants.

[JaredKaragen]

The whole reason the threads linked were closed is because of lack of payment, and no actual guarantee of payment in a rational/steady schedule.  This creates massive problems, and a whole pile of spam over something that should not be an issue.

The thread was actually locked by me to control the spam being posted in it by participants. Admins have been messaged twice now about payments and their wallet being filled.

No response so far. Participants are free to leave if they fear not being paid. I wish I could guarantee the payments but I have 0 control over it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188200.0 Here is the list of banned participants. 472 and counting. Quite a few of these users will be on the blacklist as well.

I feel for ya man.... and everyone else as well....   Yobit is very good at ignoring requests for a response.      You have definitely done a very good job thus far at keeping the participants in line.    I only created this thread here, mainly because from my understanding, its a serious topic that relates to the forum and in a place where the words on the table stay on the table.

Im glad others chimed in about the similar experience with the old sig campaign.    Its just too much like Deja Vu.

[Lucius]

I have a simple question to ask from the crytotalk forum and yobit admins that what is the purpose of not refilling the wallets and also not stating the reasons ?  I do not know it the wallets be refilled or not but think in the yobit prospective, It will only damage the yobit reputation, nothing more.

For those who have been on the forum for several years, YoBit has lost all its reputation a long time ago due to hundreds of scam reports. I doubt that this situation could compromise a reputation that was not there anyway. The model they chose is proven to be unsustainable for a long time, and all they had to do was limit the number of users to some reasonable number which with a maximum number of posts per week would be enough to keep the campaign running normally.

Personally, I would approach this situation to select the best members (max 50), set 50 posts max per week and send this proposal to YoBit. Although I sincerely doubt that they have any intention of doing things the way other campaigns do.

[JaredKaragen]

I have a simple question to ask from the crytotalk forum and yobit admins that what is the purpose of not refilling the wallets and also not stating the reasons ?  I do not know it the wallets be refilled or not but think in the yobit prospective, It will only damage the yobit reputation, nothing more.

For those who have been on the forum for several years, YoBit has lost all its reputation a long time ago due to hundreds of scam reports. I doubt that this situation could compromise a reputation that was not there anyway. The model they chose is proven to be unsustainable for a long time, and all they had to do was limit the number of users to some reasonable number which with a maximum number of posts per week would be enough to keep the campaign running normally.

Personally, I would approach this situation to select the best members (max 50), set 50 posts max per week and send this proposal to YoBit. Although I sincerely doubt that they have any intention of doing things the way other campaigns do.

99% in agreeance.

The 1% disagreeance would be the myriads of people saying yobit scammed them, when they themselves fell for a telegram/yobicode/deposit scam separate from the "official" yobit; or deposited something like ETC into an ETH account or some smart contract token into an ETH address... which they have never really ever done anything about historically.

Theres lots of record of this in the old ~300 page yobit thread i linked earlier....      Stories like poor chaps depositing 20 ETH into an ETC address... etc...  I feel for em.

[davis196]

The whole reason the threads linked were closed is because of lack of payment, and no actual guarantee of payment in a rational/steady schedule.  This creates massive problems, and a whole pile of spam over something that should not be an issue.

The thread was actually locked by me to control the spam being posted in it by participants. Admins have been messaged twice now about payments and their wallet being filled.

No response so far. Participants are free to leave if they fear not being paid. I wish I could guarantee the payments but I have 0 control over it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188200.0 Here is the list of banned participants. 472 and counting. Quite a few of these users will be on the blacklist as well.

I have sent you a DM about how to get out of your blacklist,but still no answer.
I'm not a spammer and I want to follow all the rules of every sig campaign I join.

[hosseinimr93]

Many are now transferring to a new campaign because they cannot transfer their earnings to their balance, so it means we will have lesser participants when they finally refill the wallet, its a test of patience now, it will take several weeks or even months before they refill it or they will not, the choice now is on the participants.

This is not the only reason many of users are now leaving Cryptotalk campaign. They reduced the maximum daily posts to 5. The maximum weekly income for a Senior member is now 0.0042. There are some other campaigns that pay more than this. Users no longer risk as there are better alternatives.

[yahoo62278]

The whole reason the threads linked were closed is because of lack of payment, and no actual guarantee of payment in a rational/steady schedule.  This creates massive problems, and a whole pile of spam over something that should not be an issue.

The thread was actually locked by me to control the spam being posted in it by participants. Admins have been messaged twice now about payments and their wallet being filled.

No response so far. Participants are free to leave if they fear not being paid. I wish I could guarantee the payments but I have 0 control over it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188200.0 Here is the list of banned participants. 472 and counting. Quite a few of these users will be on the blacklist as well.

I have sent you a DM about how to get out of your blacklist,but still no answer.
I'm not a spammer and I want to follow all the rules of every sig campaign I join.

Looking through your post history and on the 1st page it looks like you burstpost a ton. You will have to remain on the list for awhile.

[Findingnemo]

I have sent you a DM about how to get out of your blacklist,but still no answer.
I'm not a spammer and I want to follow all the rules of every sig campaign I join.

Take your time bro, No need any hurry but AFAIK you need to be active before asking for reconsideration about your blacklist removal. Just stick with the discussion and follow what has been told above to get rid of that list.