FEAR OF DUMPING

[Furryball]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

Many new projects are built to make gains off them by the teams, forget the ideas or benefits of using them, serious teams will never worry about price dump because they belief in themselves and the project gradual production, teams that are not serious are the ones who worries about price dump

[1714969372]

1714969372

[1714969372]

1714969372

[1714969372]

1714969372

[FireBallex]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

Have you seen where by the project teams are the ones doing the dumping themselves? the truth is 90percent of new projects are money hungry, they are here for the gains and while people hold their tokens they have already dump what they have

[Kotone]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

This is not appropriate. ICO or new project, tend to raise fund and give value to their tokens. Meaning they dont have much fund for development thats why they seeking help on the public. If they will pay btc or eth, then its good but not all project can afford or have deep pocket for this. Sometime when the project is good they can do this, but the conflict there is thr payment for hunters got delayed and resulted to complain. But hunters should already know this is the consequence of every campaign that should bear.

[SvonioneFromMangoCoinz]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

That only happens to good projects because they know that their tokens are not shit. Many projects paying with their tokens mean that they are not really confident in the future of the project and they just want to take away the assets of many investors. This is something I learned after participating in a series of failed projects and they blame the market! meanwhile they did not develop token or marketing projects after completing the call.

[lienfaye]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

They are delaying the distribution due to fear of dumping, whats important for them is to secure their earnings and do not care about the hunters.

Paying using their tokens are also their way to promote it and its beneficial for them and if ever the project fail it wont hurt them much since they pay using their worthless tokens. Unlike if they pay using popular coins which is expensive and needed a huge budget to be able to run their bounties.

[confreslamp]

This is the biggest mistake of all projects. They are not doing a buyback process, every single project that bought their tokens back from hunters have stabilised their price and never had a dump to fight with.

[DevilSlayer]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

They are delaying the distribution due to fear of dumping, whats important for them is to secure their earnings and do not care about the hunters.

Paying using their tokens are also their way to promote it and its beneficial for them and if ever the project fail it wont hurt them much since they pay using their worthless tokens. Unlike if they pay using popular coins which is expensive and needed a huge budget to be able to run their bounties.

That's true, most of the IEOs and ICOs are delaying their tokens because they are afraid that their coin will dumped. They do not have any more strategy and that's why they keeping their coin and they keep reasoning about it. Projects that dumped easily have no good foundation and that's why it price can be easily crashed.

[bysmf2000]

That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

I think not all bounty hunter make  a dump. allocation for bounty hunter approximate 1-2%. We must think who keeping a large amount the token?

[naikturun]

and what if after listing the market conditions down, there are actually a lot of factors that influence other than hunters, if they make a decision when the red market is like betting on something that is uncertain.

[Dart18]

2 percent is the amount which is mostly given for the whole bounty campaign.
I doubt the market of their coin will really react in just that kind of amount.
It is not true.
It is their buyers who does sell.
If they see profit with how much they bought (including the bonuses) then I am sure they will sell it without even a little doubt.

[Pamadar]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

They are delaying the distribution due to fear of dumping, whats important for them is to secure their earnings and do not care about the hunters.

Paying using their tokens are also their way to promote it and its beneficial for them and if ever the project fail it wont hurt them much since they pay using their worthless tokens. Unlike if they pay using popular coins which is expensive and needed a huge budget to be able to run their bounties.

It's just another reasoning from the developers, the amount of bounty rewards can't dumped the entire value of the project if the team is really responsible, they are just delaying the process to make a blaming games, the timing of distributions will take place once the dumping is ready so investors and traders will see that the hunters are part of those reasons why the value is getting dumped.

[Landak]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

His fear might be because the total allocation for the bounty is too large while the price is not too high. If it is entered in the market and dumped by the bounty hunter, the original price cannot be held back for long, quickly the token value will become worthless when the price drops too far, the project team want to do a buyback, in fact, the action will be useless because it will continue to be dumped by bounty hunter. if indeed the project team does not want that to happen the solution is actually reducing the bounty allocation, payment with other options such as paid with bitcoin or ethereum in my opinion is not the right option.

[andika2018]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

Some projects have indeed delayed payments to bounty hunters to avoid dumping in the market. I think this strategy is legitimate because usually it is listed in the bounty rule and to protect the interests of investors. But hunters should not need to be afraid if the project is prospective and has good potential

[saba1256]

The payment in ETH or BTC is not easy for bounty hunters because projects create tokens in Ethereum blockchain that is almost $10 cost and you can create your token as you required and the collect ETH or BTC after token sale but they don't want to pay in ETH or BTC due to budget tokens for bounty and most of the projects don't care about dumping and if you joined good projects that are not affected by dumping.

[fuer44]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

yes, besides being easy in payment, there is no reason for dumping after the distribution of tokens to bounty hunters, because those accepted by bounty hunters are etherum or bitcoin, not their tokens. That's a very good idea, friend.

[Beparanf]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

yes, besides being easy in payment, there is no reason for dumping after the distribution of tokens to bounty hunters, because those accepted by bounty hunters are etherum or bitcoin, not their tokens. That's a very good idea, friend.

Some projects don't have enough budget yet at the start that's why they prefer to use their own token. But if they will have enough sources or do advance crowdfunding thru seminars before conducting bounties they might be able to pay their hunters with btc. Bounty hunting should be in bitcoin and eth now to avoid their coins dump as well a guarantee for bounty hunters to be paid.

[cabron]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

Paying BTC mean suicide for them worse than paying tokens they made. Unless they are very sure the project will succeed, they can pay BTC or give option to the bounty hunter whether they wanna accept btc or the tokens.

Teams who paid tokens afraid of listing their tokens when the tokens are distributed already this is why they won't distribute the tokens to the bounty hunters until investors have all dumped and they have all dumped too. After it, the project might be die already.

[Lantind]

This is the biggest mistake of all projects. They are not doing a buyback process, every single project that bought their tokens back from hunters have stabilised their price and never had a dump to fight with.

If we analyze it is indeed a mistake made by the project team, but it is also very logical because the team makes the project to be interested and bought by others, not making a project for them to buy themselves, so many teams do not buy back on their tokens, although that is very good for preventing dumping.

[boltz]

Well they should be aware of this before they announce the bounty program if they're afraid of the dumping and they should have a buyback solution for the coins instead of creating a dump to scare some investors to dump their coins too. Another solution to this would be to release the bounty coins in schedule rounds for a period of 2 months and in this way hunters would not create a panic among the project investors and holders and besides this not all the hunters are dumping their coins after they get them.

[Coltpython]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

They will never do this because they do not place much value on their own native tokens. The irony of it is that investors dump project tokens more than hunters. Hunters only want to get paid for weeks of work while investors want to recoup their money with high profits at that. This is why investors will rather dump hard because they have more to lose.