Bounty problem and solution

[Mighty_crypt]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

[1715269199]

1715269199

[1715269199]

1715269199

[1715269199]

1715269199

[siupang2]

If I own the project I won't agree statement like this. They want to promote massively without spending more money. So without limitation they will got massive participant with the same amount of money. Profit? Yes profit for owner not for us. Remember they create bounty program for promoting product not for make us rich.

[DaMut]

I would like to have a higher payout but bear it in your mind, the advertisers will not agree because they want visibility not generosity.
they do not care how much money the bounty hunters will get, what they care about is how to promote their project and get attention from the investors.

[Kvalentine]

If I own the project I won't agree statement like this. They want to promote massively without spending more money. So without limitation they will got massive participant with the same amount of money. Profit? Yes profit for owner not for us. Remember they create bounty program for promoting product not for make us rich.

Hm, you have a point, too many bounty hunters promoting a bounty project will benefits the team more than bounty hunters themselves, whether they spam or not its not a problem for project teams, i kinda get you but its really not healthy for thousands of bounty hunters to share a pool of 40k to 100k, if that should be the case i expected the team to add more to the bounty pool

[ven7net]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

I don’t think that there are many participants in the bounty companies now, most likely there are many fake accounts that try to impersonate real people. Again, if you think that the number of people plays a role in the amount of earnings, then you are mistaken. The fact is that the projects themselves are most often the organizers of the drain of the price of their tokens or coins, and they try to shift the responsibility to the participants of the bounty. You look at what percentage is allocated to the bounty of the company, it is from 1% to 10%. How can such a quantity of cryptocurrency lower its price when entering the exchanges? No way, unless someone else is pushing the price down. So the problems of the bounty companies are not in their participants and not in their quantity.

[zhekinsp]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

But projects want more exposure without increasing reward pool so they introduced stake based rewards so more participants more exposure but the same money from the bounty team.If bounty managers put restrictions then project bounties will be managed by the team itself.

[Winscosinally]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

But projects want more exposure without increasing reward pool so they introduced stake based rewards so more participants more exposure but the same money from the bounty team.If bounty managers put restrictions then project bounties will be managed by the team itself.

More exposure more money, that is the way it should be, what OP should have written in his/her post is bounties with low allocation should always have limited participants, let the work fits the reward, some bounties will even add more weeks without extra rewards

[Samayuki]

Investing in crypto is risky and you have to know the risks before jumping in, its same thing with bounties as well, the only difference here is you aren't investing any money so bounties have risks as well like your time and energy might all go in vain, whatever happens after or before bounty ends is always part of the risks, just get used to it

[o.ogurlu]

The more participants in the bounty campaign meaning is the more information and news about that project are shared. Therefore, setting a participant limit is unfortunately not helpful for those projects. And i don't think that the participant limit will prevent the scammers too much. It's the bounty manager's responsibility to eliminate the scammers. The manager needs to check each participant in the spreadsheets and good bounty managers are already doing checks all participants.

[clickerz]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

But projects want more exposure without increasing reward pool so they introduced stake based rewards so more participants more exposure but the same money from the bounty team.If bounty managers put restrictions then project bounties will be managed by the team itself.

If you have a project, you need exposure. The more people joining the project, the more reach and exposure you had as long as you have the budget. The problem here is how do you detect and scam project. If the problems here is spamming, we have forum patrol also here. Setting limitations to project I think is like limiting the project's potential too.

[Rodeo02]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

Having more advertisers is favorable to project owner so ithink this things will not work.
I mean more users join in thier bounty means more exposure about the project and that what they need to get investors invest in thier project . So they will not doung this because it will help them to get more funds.

[Bossfidelity]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

There's no doubt in saying that the more the participants in a bounty campaign, the lesser the reward. This is logical based on the amount allocated to the different campaign. When the bounty manager gives stringent conditions for participation in the bounty, it reduces the participants and increases the reward which could be received by individuals. This could be easily seen in many bounty where the reward is in Bitcoin. Most of the signature campaign are only for higher level members, this would no doubt reduce the issue of spamming.

[asriloni]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

That will not solved anything as the projects need to do massive advertisement to spread the word to attract a lot of buyers and investors. Remember about just because you give a limitation to the campaign doesn't mean that will bring you a high payout to the participants because that depends on the allocation that already allocated to the campaign and how much the price after it's traded on the exchange site.
I disagreed about that because there is a lot of things need to be considered before you can decide that.
You can add more allocation when you wanna give a good payout to the hunters but remember more people will much better.

[OneCoinMan]

I think that it would not be bad for an independent expert to be created on the form who will check all created bounty topics and those that in his opinion are fraudulent, let him delete it. And it would also be nice if each project would take something more serious about identity verification, so that unscrupulous program participants could not participate in several accounts at once.

[anjiitem]

If I own the project I won't agree statement like this. They want to promote massively without spending more money. So without limitation they will got massive participant with the same amount of money. Profit? Yes profit for owner not for us. Remember they create bounty program for promoting product not for make us rich.

Yes it is true, the fact is that many projects do not limit the number of people who can participate in it because they can get many people to be able to promote their projects and I think this is a very good and beneficial thing for them because more and more people are promoting projects the higher the chance of getting investors to invest and use the funds to develop their projects.

[satgoldan]

I think that it would not be bad for an independent expert to be created on the form who will check all created bounty topics and those that in his opinion are fraudulent, let him delete it. And it would also be nice if each project would take something more serious about identity verification, so that unscrupulous program participants could not participate in several accounts at once.

I believe that what you listed is not all workaround, the first of course yes, it would be very cool but, accordingly, users who do not know how to choose projects would start participating in good projects, thereby taking profits from those who have long been in this system. And on the account of the second punk, I do not agree with you, because it’s stupid, the project will not get any worse from the fact that the same person reposted in two of his tweeters, but simply gives the smarter participant more money.

[mobilestrike]

RESTRICTIONS AND LIMITATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN A BOUNTY CAMPAIGN EQUAL TO HIGHER PAYOUTS

I think its time that bounty managers should start putting limitations on new bounty projects to avoid spams, the problem in this space today apart from scam projects is this forum is flooded with spammers and too many bounty hunters which makes reward unfair for hunters, what do you think? Agreed or disagreed? drop your points below

A number of bounty hunters are using bots and their social media accounts are empty and have followed and subscribed each other increasing their followers which do not make any benefit to the projects. The managers have to take care of this issue. The other issue is from the projects which fail because of the developers mistake in this solution they have to ensure to pay in BTC in case of failure.

[best123]

To me i don't think restriction is the solution. Some that will qualify will still spam the thread or group. Penalty/punishment should be the best solution. If you caught spamming or its like; you will be punish.

[Byakuga]

Thousands of people's account is more than enough to spread the words about a particular project on social media, it will make sense if there is some limited participants like OP said, many are using bots to gain followers on twitter and facebook that is why you will see twitter spreadsheet overcrowded, the fact is it doesn't help at all

[batiry]

I think the author of a topic exaggerates the problem. Bounties now often do not recruit the right number of bounty hunters.Therefore, I assume that limiting the number of participants is not relevant now.