Useless projects!

[Paulinerims]

You can check Icodrops or just follow the project by their roadmap. write down the millestones of projects you are interested in and check in time if they achived them. There are a lot of projects that are self-funded and moving slowly then ico's but more efficient (newscrypto.io for example)

[1714238640]

1714238640

[1714238640]

1714238640

[naikturun]

maybe you can see icodrop, because they make a list of projects that have got a soft cap when running ieo, ico, but I don't know if they also make a list of projects that continue to grow I mean continue to observe the movement of the project.
because there are many fake sites that provide false information.

[BeManga]

Hello, I would like to know which projects have really achieved their goals after an ICO/IEO/ITO. Is there a page or statistics about it?

as of now I still don't see any website similar to what you are looking for
usually, you can only see the development of the token within their website or telegram and blog they post it if they achieved something

[anjiitem]

If the project weren't supported by a good amount of people in the community, you can it useless project and might not even need to be tokenized to use blockchain.  There are plenty of them in the market which is why they don't have value after its listed in one exchange.

The only reason why it got funds during the ICO is that the investors wants to profit being an early buyers and dumping right from the start is their plan.

Projects that do not get the support of many people and do not develop projects that are delivered in the end will only become worthless when listed in exchange. And it's true that investors decide to invest early because they want to get a bigger profit or they can buy at a cheap price in the beginning and can get bonuses and profits.

[Cnut237]

It's certainly very hard to keep track of what proportion of projects fail. And those that do fail do so at different stages - some don't manage to hit softcap at ICO, so fail before they've even really started. As for those who do manage to launch the project, but then the price tanks when it hits the exchanges - how do we know if these have failed or not? Generally volumes for newly traded coins are very low, and aren't always representative of the true value of the project. It can be hard to distinguish between those that are failing, and those where development is progressing well behind the scenes and beyond the public eye.

[joinfree]

It's pretty simple mate, just take a look at their roadmap and see to what extent they have accomplished the individuals targets on it. Also, you can look on coinmarketcap to see if at it is being traded then you can compare its total marketcap as well as the daily 24 hour volume. Consider other successful partnerships that it might have gained as a result of its progress. These are some of the factors that i believe you need to consider when looking at the progress of any ICO/IEO.

[ashmodeus]

well, like your subject thread, mostly becoming useless projects!
no hope , even IEO from big exchange also can be useless investement right now.
but , although we know mostly becoming useless , people still dare to create new project everyday.
it sucks btw .

[aTriz]

Hello, I would like to know which projects have really achieved their goals after an ICO/IEO/ITO. Is there a page or statistics about it?

I read that Ethereum was first project to do an ICO. i was not into crypto that time.
but I remember Lisk ICO and Lisk project is very successful. then there is ARK which is also a DPOS like Lisk and it's also very successful. then Binance ICO which was held in 2017 and Binance is very successful as you can see. and then PundiX (iv'e worekd for them).
actually the list is kinda long. most projects got failed or runaway. but some did very well.

[nutriagrigia]

well, like your subject thread, mostly becoming useless projects!
no hope , even IEO from big exchange also can be useless investement right now.
but , although we know mostly becoming useless , people still dare to create new project everyday.
it sucks btw .

even projects that listed on Binance after IEO are now failing. I see that this is just a pump and a dumping scheme. Project lists on Binance  - grow in the price - immediately fall in price. after what the Binance does we have to stop trusting this exchange.

[comchien]

It is difficult to know exactly 100% whether the projects have achieved their goals by ICO or IEO, but they can tell us when they succeed, and the websites are just a reference to the achievement of Maybe, but for the development project to achieve its goal during this time, it will be difficult.

[joseyphil82]

It's really hard to keep a track of it as most of the projects just disappears after getting some funds from ICO or else just fails to survive post ICO. I don't think we will ever see a list of successful projects unless we start our over research as one cannot rely on ranking sites anymore as a proof about project's outcome.

I agree with him.
Although I have one in my mind and that is PundiX.
Do not look at the price of the coin but instead look at how far they have reach their goals.
There is a staking method if you exchange your NPXS to FX and I am still staking up until now.

Maybe we could contribute here one by one but there is no such thing as a list like Wysi said.

Pundix is a really tempting coin for those who cares much about real use case only, I know many will prefer coins that will bring quick profits but honestly without bull run pundix might not grow higher for a while, same as HOT and Tron

[jessyj48]

It's pretty simple mate, just take a look at their roadmap and see to what extent they have accomplished the individuals targets on it. Also, you can look on coinmarketcap to see if at it is being traded then you can compare its total marketcap as well as the daily 24 hour volume. Consider other successful partnerships that it might have gained as a result of its progress. These are some of the factors that i believe you need to consider when looking at the progress of any ICO/IEO.

You can't judge a project total market cap and 24hours trading volume because few successful projects I knew started very worse in terms of trading volume on exchanges and gradually in time good volume start showing up

[CjMapope]

Hello, I would like to know which projects have really achieved their goals after an ICO/IEO/ITO. Is there a page or statistics about it?

you can check cmc for that man, theres a thing on the side that shows "ROI%"
90% of projects did not ROI (yet) for their investors, but you have to remember that wasent the point. the point is money for the devs
look at VBK, had Trex IEO, devs raised 20 million$, now the token is garbo, never even got close to ROI for buyers, ut the devs dont care, as they have 20 mil$
thats crypto now sadly. nothing but cash grabs. stick to mother BTC lol

[Divinespark]

Hello, I would like to know which projects have really achieved their goals after an ICO/IEO/ITO. Is there a page or statistics about it?

I have never seen a project fulfill their goals after the end of IEO or ICO. Even projects listed at major exchanges like Matic, FET, Celer ... are collapsing. It can be said that 2019 is a failed year for new projects, I hope by 2020 they will improve the situation and not die like the projects in 2017 and 2018.

[daglordjames]

If the project weren't supported by a good amount of people in the community, you can it useless project and might not even need to be tokenized to use blockchain.  There are plenty of them in the market which is why they don't have value after its listed in one exchange.

The only reason why it got funds during the ICO is that the investors wants to profit being an early buyers and dumping right from the start is their plan.

I think some projects that have a lot of people supporting them and still left them in the air.

[totoy4741]

It's really hard to keep a track of it as most of the projects just disappears after getting some funds from ICO or else just fails to survive post ICO. I don't think we will ever see a list of successful projects unless we start our over research as one cannot rely on ranking sites anymore as a proof about project's outcome.

I agree with him.
Although I have one in my mind and that is PundiX.
Do not look at the price of the coin but instead look at how far they have reach their goals.
There is a staking method if you exchange your NPXS to FX and I am still staking up until now.

Maybe we could contribute here one by one but there is no such thing as a list like Wysi said.

PundiX is is not as good as it was. The price of their tokens has been dropping consistently and I don't think they are making any progress. There are some projects I know I actually joined their bpunty campaign that are now making any progress such as BCNEX,Tokoin, One Token,(which is bow featured in Binance Staikng program etc.) There maybe thousands of projects that failed to make their names but still there are some decent ones that are making any progress.

[btcdie]

well, like your subject thread, mostly becoming useless projects!
no hope , even IEO from big exchange also can be useless investement right now.
but , although we know mostly becoming useless , people still dare to create new project everyday.
it sucks btw .

even projects that listed on Binance after IEO are now failing. I see that this is just a pump and a dumping scheme. Project lists on Binance  - grow in the price - immediately fall in price. after what the Binance does we have to stop trusting this exchange.

No, binance is still good and they prioritize reputation, the IEO project is indeed some people consider professional frauds, even I think so too. the job of the exchange is only to launch a crowdfunding event and check the project must run properly. the IEO project is very doubtful, because right now it tends to be filled with manipulation and allocation of tokens that don't make sense to me. but for binance exchange I believe, and definitely prioritize the comfort of investors and projects, very different from other exchanges. So in full, don't see which exchanges will launch the project, but look about the project and do more important research.

[ije07]

related to this problem, I think most of the projects before and after ICO, STO, & IEO ended, they have no further developments regarding the project. this is a fact that most of the current projects are very bad, a lot of project fraud, project funding is taken, there are also projects that stop because they fail to reach the target, the product does not develop properly, many developers leave & no longer care about the project.

[pantek talacuik]

related to this problem, I think most of the projects before and after ICO, STO, & IEO ended, they have no further developments regarding the project. this is a fact that most of the current projects are very bad, a lot of project fraud, project funding is taken, there are also projects that stop because they fail to reach the target, the product does not develop properly, many developers leave & no longer care about the project.

Don't always think bad things now but I'm sad when all this ends to see things go according to everyone's expectations again. It seems very difficult for a project to continue to grow.

[Arkann]

Apart from fraudulent projects, then all the same, useless projects appear on the market, because quite a lot of new ideas appear not only every year, but almost every month and there is competition over the ways to invest in a particular project.  The whole problem is that the developers are not working hard on their project, but, first of all, they aim to earn as much money as possible, attracting more investors.  The situation today has already changed and differs from 2016, and the most important thing to understand is that only an interesting and sought-after project can attract more investment funds, and if this idea and especially the final product will be appreciated in society, then the high price of a coin on cryptocurrency exchanges  provided.