Come on bud, do you really think I am someone untrustworthy overall, if yes it makes your sense of judgement very weak and I even don't trust your judgement from it.
It's clearly seen as your attempt to put more oil in the drama, nice move.
I admitted I don't have unknown alts here.
I am not willing to post anything for anyone with money, that's just one of the misleading statement in the feedback by Lauda.
I am not involved in account farming, it's hard to maintain one account around here.
Yes, the ICO pumping seems right, but as I said in the other thread, it was my early days mistake on the forum, even apologized for it and never did it again.
I am not a lier. Yes I lied first about not getting incentive to post but agreed later on the same thread.
I am not untrustworthy and never scammed anyone, again it is like buliding your own story and misleading in itself.
So now, if you are satisfied with your grudge, stop trying to witch hunt me because, one of my view doesn't match yours about the feedback
here. I was out of that thread already.
Except hacker wasn't a newbie, if you can please read that thread again OMG eddie13, what are you are writing here?
It seems?
He took money to bump ICOs and some scams and write fake reviews and lied about it when he was asked...
"today"!
What the fuck happened with this place?
I was newbie while getting engaged in this, I have said and explained this around dozens of times in the thread and even in PMs to many.
Anyways, if some users are never upon accepting apology around here, I don't think we are buliding a constrictive place overall. Yes, I could publicly and loudly say I find it hard to see people forgiving around here.
If he is still lying "today" about whatever then that is very disappointing to me as I had hoped he was turning things around..
I don't exactly follow his posts though and you obviously do a much better job of keeping an eye on him than I..
I was disappointed to find these things out about him halfway through this thread..
I and others didn't think it was right to tag someone for sending a merit but it turns out their were other concerns brought up that he should be tagged for..
I am not lying about it, I agreed to you in the same thread about I being involved in it. Nowhere else, I have tried to lie about it around.
Don't you think what you are claming as worthy of tag is also non-repeatable mistake from my side.
after engaging with the OP on and off the past few weeks I have concluded he is not to be trusted at all. There will of course be those that will find him trustworthy and that is a great thing to have varying views across the board.
I don't know what made you conclude that am not to be trusted, I am totally against your judgement if you don't have any specific cases of me scamming funds from someone. This show's the flawed judgment of yours about me.
I believe OP got answer to his question, so perhaps to lock this not-about-lauda thread?
Locking this thread for now.
If someone wants to rant about me, create a new thread.