More abuse by TECSHARE NSFW reee(sponse)

[TECSHARE]

Yep, that one rating that is potentially objectionable over a year, THAT is the true crime!

Very fitting with your bullshit from another thread, so perhaps a good time to move it here instead of derailing that one.

you never actually substantiated anything.

Just because you think you're smarter than everyone else doesn't mean that your trust farming attempts with the Turks and retaliatory trust ratings are not obvious. And attempts to add scammers to DT2.

And here's what happens when someone substantiates those things. It's only one rating. It's only one farmed inclusion. It's only one scammer. You're such a pathetic weasel, it'd be almost funny if people weren't getting fooled by your incessant rage-against-the-machine yapping.

You sure are visibly spiteful today. So far you can read my mind, building trust over 8 years of trading is "trust farming" because you declare it so. I asked before but you never quoted, what retaliatory ratings? The one left for the hacked Koshgel account that flipped out because he didn't like what I had to say in the Politics section and decided that was a good use of the trust system? I remember the original Koshgel, that isn't him.

Rage-against-the-machine? Ok boomer.

[1714817319]

1714817319

[1714817319]

1714817319

[marlboroza]

It's only one rating. It's only one farmed inclusion. It's only one scammer.

It's only one hacked account in trust network. It's only one banned account in trust network. It's only one scum selfvouching tipster in trust network. "So what's your point?"
@TECSHARE, it is not that I quoted posts 4 times already and you quoted it 3 times and yet you missed it, if something is not understandable in my question, I will maybe hire professional translator to translate it to English, but I think it is understandable. If you don't mind to reply:

FAILURE to red tag them means you are corrupt and pushing double standards there can be no denial of this.

Point me accounts which are shilling for X10 and I will tag them.

You see how this kind of stuff just fuels itself? Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated? Well then I will just start getting more excessive to make it more equally abusive! Funny the campaign managers share no responsibility here but random users picked out of retribution or arbitrarily tagged, that will change things!

I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam

Would you like more or less scams here?

[xolxol]

I like the way you typed the word "abuse" sarcastic like you havent abused the system for years,you must be ashamed with yourself for being a supporter of Lauda's gang.

[suchmoon]

You sure are visibly spiteful today. So far you can read my mind, building trust over 8 years of trading is "trust farming" because you declare it so. I asked before but you never quoted, what retaliatory ratings? The one left for the hacked Koshgel account that flipped out because he didn't like what I had to say in the Politics section and decided that was a good use of the trust system? I remember the original Koshgel, that isn't him.

8 years LOL

You didn't even know that you need 10 users to include you until I told you.

But please do go ahead and explain how adding Quickseller to your trust list is totally normal in TECSHARE's alternative universe.

[TECSHARE]

You sure are visibly spiteful today. So far you can read my mind, building trust over 8 years of trading is "trust farming" because you declare it so. I asked before but you never quoted, what retaliatory ratings? The one left for the hacked Koshgel account that flipped out because he didn't like what I had to say in the Politics section and decided that was a good use of the trust system? I remember the original Koshgel, that isn't him.

8 years LOL

You didn't even know that you need 10 users to include you until I told you.

But please do go ahead and explain how adding Quickseller to your trust list is totally normal in TECSHARE's alternative universe.

You know what that reminds me of? That time you pulled that live flamingo out of your ass. You know how I know it happened? I can imagine it therefore it happened.

[marlboroza]

You sure are visibly spiteful today. So far you can read my mind, building trust over 8 years of trading is "trust farming" because you declare it so. I asked before but you never quoted, what retaliatory ratings? The one left for the hacked Koshgel account that flipped out because he didn't like what I had to say in the Politics section and decided that was a good use of the trust system? I remember the original Koshgel, that isn't him.

~

Bold part. Account has already been tagged a year and a half before TECSHARE's negative:



So account Koshgel didn't like what TECSHARE said, placed him -ve and TECSHARE decided it is best to find some dirt (because retaliatory feedback won't look nice), find something users are normally tagged for and retaliate:



I don't see any other explanation why TECSHARE would do this a year and a half after account has been tagged left and right, so back to this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214377.msg53520292#msg53520292 and his mental gymnastic then.


Speaking of

And attempts to add scammers to DT2.

TECSHARE has loong history of including shady accounts to his trust network (and doing nothing unless it is pointed or doing nothing after it was pointed):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118173.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118173.msg52406482#msg52406482
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182672.0

...and, abusing trust system https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182530.msg52385837#msg52385837



@TECSHARE, can you please answer this:

I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam

Would you like more or less scams here?

[nutildah]

You sure are visibly spiteful today. So far you can read my mind, building trust over 8 years of trading is "trust farming" because you declare it so. I asked before but you never quoted, what retaliatory ratings? The one left for the hacked Koshgel account that flipped out because he didn't like what I had to say in the Politics section and decided that was a good use of the trust system? I remember the original Koshgel, that isn't him.

8 years LOL

You didn't even know that you need 10 users to include you until I told you.

But please do go ahead and explain how adding Quickseller to your trust list is totally normal in TECSHARE's alternative universe.

You know what that reminds me of? That time you pulled that live flamingo out of your ass. You know how I know it happened? I can imagine it therefore it happened.

(should I tell him? OK, I'm just going to tell him)

PrimeNumber7 is an alt of Quickseller. You have Quickseller distrusted and PN7 trusted. Which is funny. It was an inside joke, until now. You never traded with PN7, he only has left 3 ratings which were all neutral, he didn't add you to his trust list -- is the reason why you may have decided to include him this one?

anyone the resident clowns exclude I immediately find interest in.

Because PN7 had long been excluded by suchmoon and foxpup when you decided to include him, and lo and behold, the same week you added PN7 you also added by rallier, who is also excluded by suchmoon and foxpup.

I wonder which other questionable members, scammers, or their alts you have added to your trust list in an attempt to spite the resident clowns...

Oh, well we can start with:

- hacker1001101001 (he may well be a decent guy with a shady past, but had a blank trust list up until last week; pretty weird for you to include him for reasons other than spite)

- 3meek (distrusted by the Russian section moderator and several senior Russian members, but what do they know)

Long story short: you've been using the trust system to satisfy your personal grudges and ended up including Quickseller as a result of it. Further proof you belong nowhere near DT.

[hacker1001101001]

- hacker1001101001 (he may well be a decent guy with a shady past, but had a blank trust list up until last week; pretty weird for you to include him for reasons other than spite)

You are just making up things.

He has included me in the trust list pretty much from when mine one was blank, nothing was out of spite.

On the opposite I think you excluded me from your trust list out of spite. The only reason I got until was, that I am a reformed shitposter, still don't expect a better one.

Nice pinging about my shady past. I took your advice already of eating criticism.

[marlboroza]

nothing was out of spite.

How do you know this? Ok, lets say this is true and you are correct, tell me one good reason why TECSHARE would make this account DT? Not out of spite?

I remember the original Koshgel, that isn't him.

I wonder which other questionable members, scammers, or their alts you have added to your trust list in an attempt to spite the resident clowns...

Good question. While reading previous post, I just figured that I forget to say something about bold part above:

@TECHARE why do you have hacked account in your trust list? This one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18021 - http://loyce.club/trust/2019-09-07_Sat_06.07h/18021.html

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-01-04_Sat_06.10h/18021.html



Probably if account don't do this:

he didn't like what I had to say in the Politics section and decided that was a good use of the trust system?

It is OK then.

[nutildah]

- hacker1001101001 (he may well be a decent guy with a shady past, but had a blank trust list up until last week; pretty weird for you to include him for reasons other than spite)

You are just making up things.

He has included me in the trust list pretty much from when mine one was blank, nothing was out of spite.

Why do you think he included you? I think its specifically because I excluded you, which happened before his inclusion.

Not addressing the off-topic parts of your reply.

[eddie13]

PrimeNumber7 is an alt of Quickseller.

How do we know this?

[suchmoon]

PrimeNumber7 is an alt of Quickseller.

How do we know this?

Ask him.

[The-One-Above-All]

You sure are visibly spiteful today. So far you can read my mind, building trust over 8 years of trading is "trust farming" because you declare it so. I asked before but you never quoted, what retaliatory ratings? The one left for the hacked Koshgel account that flipped out because he didn't like what I had to say in the Politics section and decided that was a good use of the trust system? I remember the original Koshgel, that isn't him.

8 years LOL

You didn't even know that you need 10 users to include you until I told you.

But please do go ahead and explain how adding Quickseller to your trust list is totally normal in TECSHARE's alternative universe.

You know what that reminds me of? That time you pulled that live flamingo out of your ass. You know how I know it happened? I can imagine it therefore it happened.

(should I tell him? OK, I'm just going to tell him)

PrimeNumber7 is an alt of Quickseller. You have Quickseller distrusted and PN7 trusted. Which is funny. It was an inside joke, until now. You never traded with PN7, he only has left 3 ratings which were all neutral, he didn't add you to his trust list -- is the reason why you may have decided to include him this one?

anyone the resident clowns exclude I immediately find interest in.

Because PN7 had long been excluded by suchmoon and foxpup when you decided to include him, and lo and behold, the same week you added PN7 you also added by rallier, who is also excluded by suchmoon and foxpup.

I wonder which other questionable members, scammers, or their alts you have added to your trust list in an attempt to spite the resident clowns...

Oh, well we can start with:

- hacker1001101001 (he may well be a decent guy with a shady past, but had a blank trust list up until last week; pretty weird for you to include him for reasons other than spite)

- 3meek (distrusted by the Russian section moderator and several senior Russian members, but what do they know)

Long story short: you've been using the trust system to satisfy your personal grudges and ended up including Quickseller as a result of it. Further proof you belong nowhere near DT.

where is the PROOF PN7 = QS??

where is the PROOF QS is any more dangerous  than Nutildah?? who has admitted that they will willingly scam facilitate other members for 0.3btc AND THEN DELETE THE EVIDENCE if they can, or lauda or tman ??

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0

I would like to see a comparison between QS if pn7 is even QS, lauda, tman and nutildah and have a big debate on who is clearly more dangerous and desperate to scam.

I note that moronbozo is STILL quoting this version of TROLL that the forum has CLEARLY demonstrated  is NOT their version of trolling since that would be IMPOSSIBLE to police. They prefer to use the definition of trolling as those that consistently present as true information that is conclusively debunked nonsense.

QS to me looks MORE trustworthy than nutildah, lauda tman and most of their double standards scammer supporting pals. How can they be here lecturing on this ??

Moronbozo's initial post is such a mess, the central point other than he has been fisted too much by lauda and can't stop spraying his shit everywhere is a waste of time since we mostly already knew that too much anal fisting creates these kind of symptoms by watching it happen in real time to other members here.

Moronbozo finds it very difficult to form structured thoughts that others can follow so we should not be too upset by this. I think he is best to continue his research into the theory of people "spamming words" here on the  forum. I think he is on to something there.

Moronbozo clearly trust abused TS because he is either lauda from laudas moronic gene pool of scamming scum who is previously given red trust for completely stupid reasons. I think he knows he can not control his retarded urges hence why he probably requested to be removed from DT.

Moronbozos claims in the initial post... as usual look moronic.

[TECSHARE]

These threads are better than those old "Choose Your Own Adventure" books.



You have been some busy beavers. Basically what you are saying is because I don't spend way too much time digging into other people's business and obsessively know every little detail of every account like you do I am complicit? This is yet another one one of many narratives you constantly attempt to leverage against me. The red arrows are I nice touch too BTW, I don't know if we could have found it without the red arrows.

[marlboroza]

The red arrows are I nice touch too BTW, I don't know if we could have found it without the red arrows.

It is not my fault that you think 2019. was 6 years ago.

Anyway:

FAILURE to red tag them means you are corrupt and pushing double standards there can be no denial of this.

Point me accounts which are shilling for X10 and I will tag them.

You see how this kind of stuff just fuels itself? Oh it is excessive and selective how people are rated? Well then I will just start getting more excessive to make it more equally abusive! Funny the campaign managers share no responsibility here but random users picked out of retribution or arbitrarily tagged, that will change things!

I have time to tag some scam shills and cryptohunter said that he will find them and I will tag them. I have some strange feeling that you would like others to close their eyes and not warn people that someone or something is scam

Would you like more or less scams here?

[suchmoon]

Basically what you are saying is because I don't spend way too much time digging into other people's business and obsessively know every little detail of every account like you do I am complicit?

One might think that adding people to one's trust list would require some due diligence but if you're happy having the same person included and excluded at the same time it's up to you. Hopefully more DT1 members will see that your woefully flawed judgement is not fit for DT and exclude you.

[TECSHARE]

Basically what you are saying is because I don't spend way too much time digging into other people's business and obsessively know every little detail of every account like you do I am complicit?

One might think that adding people to one's trust list would require some due diligence but if you're happy having the same person included and excluded at the same time it's up to you. Hopefully more DT1 members will see that your woefully flawed judgement is not fit for DT and exclude you.

All everyone is seeing is every time I say something critical of the inhabitants of a certain DT clown car, a tent is pitched, clown music plays, and a circus is conducted. As I have said last time you tried to do this, if you have a problem with my inclusions you could PM me about it, but this is all about conducting an act for public consumption. This is exactly the type of anal retentive subjugation the forums members should be free from.

[suchmoon]

All everyone is seeing is every time I say something critical of the inhabitants of a certain DT clown car, a tent is pitched, clown music plays, and a circus is conducted. As I have said last time you tried to do this, if you have a problem with my inclusions you could PM me about it, but this is all about conducting an act for public consumption. This is exactly the type of anal retentive subjugation the forums members should be free from.

You're missing the point. If you need this kind of hand-holding via PM then you're not fit for DT. You're supposed to use your trust list any way you see fit and other users are supposed to evaluate your judgement based on that, not to coach you. If this DT1 thing is too hard you can always ask theymos to blacklist you and you won't have to worry anymore.

Besides it's very likely that you'd be just as belligerent if anyone (particularly someone you dislike) tried to PM you about something like this. Your inability to be wrong is legendary.

[TECSHARE]

You're missing the point. If you need this kind of hand-holding via PM then you're not fit for DT. You're supposed to use your trust list any way you see fit and other users are supposed to evaluate your judgement based on that, not to coach you. If this DT1 thing is too hard you can always ask theymos to blacklist you and you won't have to worry anymore.

Besides it's very likely that you'd be just as belligerent if anyone (particularly someone you dislike) tried to PM you about something like this. Your inability to be wrong is legendary.

Is that the point? Because to me it sounds like the point is during your deep dive through my toilet looking for stray peanuts, you couldn't find any crimes so you had to manufacture some. This is not about my trust inclusions, this is about putting on a show and manufacturing narratives. Still I prefer the books.

[suchmoon]

Is that the point? Because to me it sounds like the point is during your deep dive through my toilet looking for stray peanuts, you couldn't find any crimes so you had to manufacture some. This is not about my trust inclusions, this is about putting on a show and manufacturing narratives. Still I prefer the books.

Again, whatever you need to say to paint yourself as infallible is fine with me and I would never expect you to say that you fucked up, or even to e.g address your Quick-schizo-inclusion instead of deflecting. You've proven so many times that you're incapable of handling unpleasant facts like an adult - nothing new here. All that is part of your profile that makes you unsuitable for DT.

Not sure how I or anyone could "manufacture" your inclusions of banned users, scammers, etc but if you don't think that's a problem then you're welcome to keep them in your trust list.