DT everyone? @TECSHARE

[marlboroza]

DT is slowly filling with scammers, hacked accounts, inactive users...
Sooner or later everyone will become DT.

2 examples:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=398379
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101763

What's the point of such system?  
I forget to update topic with more accounts: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118173.msg52406482#msg52406482, so doing it now.

[cryptohunter]

It has been full of proven liars, proven trust abusers and proven sneaky greedy sig spamming sock puppet racist trolls and those implicated in extortion and other shady stuff for ages. Not to mention the rest of DT condone and sanction their actions. Those 2 you highlight are likely snow white in comparison.

Don't worry about it, I'm taking care of it. Just taking some time... I'm on vacation. The swamp will be drained eventually.

Want evidence to substantiate my post just ask me to provide.

[TECSHARE]

Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.

I just excluded them both, that's why.

If you want to present a compelling argument as to why we should be keeping known scammers on DT, I'd be happy to revise my ratings. Perhaps you could also explain why you are including two inactive accounts whose only feedback left is a positive to yourself:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=179952
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92735

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.

Doesn't seem like they should be, and if you disagree I'd say your judgement is skewed by your rage against the current DT list.  To me, Leo did the responsible  thing. 

Cryptohunter is again blowing smoke, and the only thing he's going to drain is the precious time of anyone who bothers to read his moronic tirades. 

[Thule]

DT is slowly filling with scammers, hacked accounts, inactive users...
Sooner or later everyone will become DT.

2 examples:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=398379
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101763

What's the point of such system?  

How about current DT members who aren't even a single year on that board but try to tell you how the forum runs.

[cryptohunter]

Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.

Doesn't seem like they should be, and if you disagree I'd say your judgement is skewed by your rage against the current DT list.  To me, Leo did the responsible  thing.  

Cryptohunter is again blowing smoke, and the only thing he's going to drain is the precious time of anyone who bothers to read his moronic tirades.  

Haha which you just did you dumb fool. You have to be the most stupid person on this board. I bet you don't have me on ignore and read all of my posts but prefer to hide away.


Okay since we are issuing challenges here ...why don't you and leo both give detailed explanations why.

1. you include proven liars
2. you include proven trust abusers
3. you include proven sneaky and greedy financially motivated racist trolling shit posters who hide behind puppet accounts

obviously 3 is for leo only hehe (or are you including yourself from Huge Black Womans account? )

I mean that is just for a start, let me get to the "how did you come to know for sure that the extortion attempt was just under cover agents at work?" let's work through that again in public to see how you are so sure it was not a real extortion attempt?

Let me know if you are willing to engage in debate over this or not. I am hoping that you will be open to this debate because I have been wanting to have it in public for quite some time now.

This is a topic about the validity of DT members so this post is on topic and fully relevant.

I'm going to guess I don't hear back from these couple of low functioning dirt bags. No debate

[TECSHARE]

Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.

I just excluded them both, that's why.

If you want to present a compelling argument as to why we should be keeping known scammers on DT, I'd be happy to revise my ratings. Perhaps you could also explain why you are including two inactive accounts whose only feedback left is a positive to yourself:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=179952
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92735

Sure about that? They were on my trust lists for a long time and I was not aware of any of this so I removed them. Funny how you and Pharmie are aching for more conflict.
Speaking of that, interesting timing to exclude me isn't it The Pharmacist? I guess you just didn't find me untrustworthy until I was back on DT1. Amazing coincidence. I guess that is what I get for removing you from my exclusions.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Speaking of that, interesting timing to exclude me isn't it The Pharmacist?

It might be funny to you, but it was overdue.  I think you have lousy judgement when it comes to matters of the trust system, which is why you were booted off DT the first time you were on it.

[o_e_l_e_o]

They were on my trust lists for a long time and I was not aware of any of this so I removed them. Funny how you and Pharmie are aching for more conflict.

I can assure you the last thing I am looking for is conflict. Thank you for addressing the situation.

[cryptohunter]

They were on my trust lists for a long time and I was not aware of any of this so I removed them. Funny how you and Pharmie are aching for more conflict.

I can assure you the last thing I am looking for is conflict. Thank you for addressing the situation.

No the last thing you are looking for is a truthful debate. You are terrified of entering one with me. If not come and have one here now with me?

Yes or No?

See above for the details of what I want to discuss with you so that you can address my valid concerns regarding your DT selections.

[TECSHARE]

They were on my trust lists for a long time and I was not aware of any of this so I removed them. Funny how you and Pharmie are aching for more conflict.

I can assure you the last thing I am looking for is conflict. Thank you for addressing the situation.

I addressed the situation long before you rolled in to take credit for it.

Speaking of that, interesting timing to exclude me isn't it The Pharmacist?

It might be funny to you, but it was overdue.  I think you have lousy judgement when it comes to matters of the trust system, which is why you were booted off DT the first time you were on it.

Funny as in suspect, not as in entertaining. You are a little puppet desperate for approval from the trust overlords. Just admit it. I don't buy that you suddenly decided just now you don't approve of my judgement. Me resolving a disagreement with another member to put me back on DT1 was too much of a win for me for you and your little stalker buddies to tolerate without a reply wasn't it? After all you have to maintain the illusion that my efforts are demonstrating no progress now don't you? I had removed you from my exclusions because I though you were beginning to demonstrate that in spite of disagreeing with people you were able to put logic above emotion. I guess I was wrong.

[coinlocket$]

DT is slowly filling with scammers, hacked accounts, inactive users...
Sooner or later everyone will become DT.

2 examples:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=398379
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101763

What's the point of such system? 

Even with the old DT we got a redtrusted on DT2 the list is here, I don't remember who is was but I'm 99.9% sure about it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5080581.0

[cryptohunter]

DT is slowly filling with scammers, hacked accounts, inactive users...
Sooner or later everyone will become DT.

2 examples:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=398379
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101763

What's the point of such system?  

Even with the old DT we got a redtrusted on DT2 the list is here, I don't remember who is was but I'm 99.9% sure about it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5080581.0

Red trusted now (by DT) = the good guys... catch up dude this is 2019 now.

[DireWolfM14]

I can assure you the last thing I am looking for is conflict. Thank you for addressing the situation.

No the last thing you are looking for is a truthful debate. You are terrified of entering one with me. If not come and have one here now with me?

Yes or No?

See above for the details of what I want to discuss with you so that you can address my valid concerns regarding your DT selections.

First; Nobody is even talking to you.
Second; Your idea of "truth" and "facts" is exactly the opposite of what the rest of the world accepts as the meanings of those words.
Third; if you knew how to debate you wouldn't be constantly resorting to insults.

Come to grips with the FACT that it's not all about you. 

[cryptohunter]

I can assure you the last thing I am looking for is conflict. Thank you for addressing the situation.

No the last thing you are looking for is a truthful debate. You are terrified of entering one with me. If not come and have one here now with me?

Yes or No?

See above for the details of what I want to discuss with you so that you can address my valid concerns regarding your DT selections.

First; Nobody is even talking to you.
Second; Your idea of "truth" and "facts" is exactly the opposite of what the rest of the world accepts as the meanings of those words.
Third; if you knew how to debate you wouldn't be constantly resorting to insults.

Come to grips with the FACT that it's not all about you.  

Oh no Dire poster wolf boy is here to demonstrate how not to debate whilst spamming his sig. But it will be better than having nobody to debate with.....well a bit better I hope. Then again.... If not there is a dog tied to a post here and even that can differentiate reality from fantasy. I'll ask their opinion if wolf boy here collapses before we get started.

So let's start....

Which of the facts that I call facts in this post do you object to being classed as facts?

I am glad at least you will debate with me now

Let's take it one step at a time.

How about the FACT  the pharmacist is a greedy sneaky racist sig spamming sock puppet trying to milk the board for every drop of btc dust he can get ?  do you dispute this is a fact?

Yes or no? if so explain. We will move to the other points I have stated are facts above before we get to the extortion/under cover agents debate)

edit - errr wolf boy?? are you still here wolf boy?? this debate is very one sided so far.

Ah so just some false accusations then off you run. Good boy, back to your masters. No merits snacks for that failure I'm afraid.  You just basically confirmed they are scumbags and you will run from those facts too. I expect you'll get a firm beating with the slipper again, and no bone tonight for you. haha

[marlboroza]

Miss. Show Hide you sound like a broken record. Again! 2 3 5 times in this thread!

Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.

I wonder what is the reason for that.

Sure about that? They were on my trust lists for a long time and I was not aware of any of this so I removed them.

Talking about DT system on daily basis but doesn't know that they have scammers in trust list  

If it is worth to mention, I didn't know it was you until few minutes ago, as I didn't check who had them in their trust list. I noticed erwin45hacked on Quickseller's trust wall yesterday and xetsr on Game-Protect's trust wall earlier today.

[mikeywith]

These incidents are expected to happen after the new DT system was implemented , but look at the bright side, go here  > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=93.0

randomly check 5-10 profiles, the majority of them are scammers who are tagged (ONLY) by the NEW  DT members.

with all the flaws, the current system is doing pretty good, the old limited list was not good enough, you can't expect a handful of members to efficiently tag thousands of scammers , but the larger the DT list grows the more we can fight scammers, indeed we will see more abuse but thanks to the voting system, the list is "supposed" to stay clean and accurate one way or the other.

[cryptohunter]

Talking about DT system on daily basis but doesn't know that they have scammers in trust list

That rules most of DT out, so that is nothing to worry about. They are fully aware they have untrustworthy scum in their lists. They are proud of being able to have them there and there is nothing the non merit cycling board can do about it. oh well.

I mean you can't get on DT without having them in your list can you? well, not if you want to stay there?


@mikey

that is great news indeed so we can play whack a mole with more hammers and everything becomes a nail eventually.
meanwhile free speech is crushed and those crushing it get to self enrich to the max with the competition they permit only.

better to sort the cause rather than keep adding hammers that are grossly inaccurate or deliberately so.

[TECSHARE]

Miss. Show Hide you sound like a broken record. Again! 2 3 5 times in this thread!

Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.

I wonder what is the reason for that.

Sure about that? They were on my trust lists for a long time and I was not aware of any of this so I removed them.

Talking about DT system on daily basis but doesn't know that they have scammers in trust list  

If it is worth to mention, I didn't know it was you until few minutes ago, as I didn't check who had them in their trust list. I noticed erwin45hacked on Quickseller's trust wall yesterday and xetsr on Game-Protect's trust wall earlier today.

That happens some times when you have been around almost a decade. Occasionally people get their account hacked. Also I was on the DT1 for oh like 10 hours since 2014 before it was brought to my attention so, I would say that is pretty quick response time.