They are abusing their power.

[The-Devil]

Some people in this forum are abusing their power. They do whatever they want with me. It can never be accepted. After repeatedly telling them, they continue to attack me personally.

@marlboroza @ morvillz7z gave me negative feedback and @Quickseller create a flag in my account. They have no strong evidence against me. They are only giving me negative feedback based on their own estimates. Isn't it an abuse of power?

The Trouble Begins here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215242.msg53533405#msg53533405

Please check this thread and judge it correctly. The context here was about giving extra merit. But they failed to give me the right answer and started attacking me personally and everyone started catching my mistake and posting publicly.

I am a man and a man can make mistakes. But they talk like they've never done anything wrong in their whole life. I've told them many times that I apologize if I make a mistake. But they continue to attack me. If you check the thread then you will understand. Without any solid proof, they continue to accuse me.

I'm asking for a fair trial.

Local rules:
@marlboroza
@ morvillz7z
@Quickseller
are not allowed to post here.

[1714100156]

1714100156

[1714100156]

1714100156

[1714100156]

1714100156

[1714100156]

1714100156

[1714100156]

1714100156

[dragonvslinux]

I'm asking for a fair trial.

Local rules:
@marlboroza
@ morvillz7z
@Quickseller
are not allowed to post here.

If you're looking for a fair trial, you'd need to change your local rules .

[TMAN]

can I have my merits back please sir!

[Bitcoin SV]

can I have my merits back please sir!

you should be banned. merit beggaring is violation of forum rules

[The-Devil]

can I have my merits back please sir!

Truly if there is a system for merit back then I would definitely refund your merit. Because of this merit, I was forced to write this post today.
You say, if someone gives me merit, is there anything wrong with me? have I something to do here?

[TMAN]

can I have my merits back please sir!

Truly if there is a system for merit back then I would definitely refund your merit. Because of this merit, I was forced to write this post today.
You say, if someone gives me merit, is there anything wrong with me? have I something to do here?

I was only joshing, I am not getting involved in this one, I seriously thought you were a decent poster who deserved recognition. I only saw your profile as you were on the list of newbies in a thread here.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I am a man and a man can make mistakes. But they talk like they've never done anything wrong in their whole life. I've told them many times that I apologize if I make a mistake. But they continue to attack me.

If I'm understanding this situation correctly, you plagiarized some content through a text spinner...?  If that's accurate, you'll probably get permabanned and all of this negative trust and flagging will be moot.  

And yes, we've all made mistakes before, some more serious than others, but that doesn't mean any of us can't call BS when we see it.  By that logic, anyone is free to do anything with no consequences whatsoever.  The world just doesn't function that way.

Because of this merit, I was forced to write this post today.

That's not what all this is about, it it?  Because TMAN explained why he gave you 50 merits for that post, and the explanation seemed reasonable to me, and he's not abusing the merit system by doing what he did.  Lazy, maybe.  But there was no abuse IMO. 

[The-Devil]

If I'm understanding this situation correctly, you plagiarized some content through a text spinner...?  If that's accurate, you'll probably get permabanned and all of this negative trust and flagging will be moot.

Some of my posts coincide with an article by coincidence. I noticed it myself later. But it's not intentional. I didn't really do any plagiarism. 

That's not what all this is about, it it?  Because TMAN explained why he gave you 50 merits for that post, and the explanation seemed reasonable to me, and he's not abusing the merit system by doing what he did.  Lazy, maybe.  But there was no abuse IMO. 

Yes, I agree there was no merit abuse here. I mentioned it in that thread too. @TMAN made no mistake here.
But some people could not accept it. @TMAN is a respected person. So they didn't dare say something to @TMAN
So they started attacking me. Everyone attacks the weak people like me. Hailing me without any valid evidence.

[tmfp]

Some of my posts coincide with an article by coincidence.

 

[TMAN]

So they didn't dare say something to @TMAN

because I did fork all wrong, sure I was a little lazy just dropping 50 on that post, but if I hadn't this wouldn't of come out!

you shouldn't copy pasta and there is always a punishment for copy pasta pajeets! 50 less merits in circulation but one less copy pasta when you get banned!

[Lauda]

Simplified for support: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1208;support. Tagged as well. Add me to the list of abuse please.  Much appreciated.

[Quickseller]

I think the evidence is pretty clear that you are involved in serious merit abuse and merit farming, I strongly suspect among other newbie accounts. The evidence can speak for itself. This goes way beyond giving a few merit you received via the merit airdrop to yourself(/your “friend”). You were likely using an alt to ask a question in very poor English, and immediately use a text spinner to give an answer to the question to get merit.

[The-One-Above-All]

And ys, we've all made mistakes before, some more serious than others, but that doesn't mean any of us can't call BS when we see it.  By that logic, anyone is free to do anything with no consequences whatsoever.  The world just doesn't function that way.

NO that is not how it works. You want punishment for WRONG DOING. Then ALL wrong doing must be evaluated and the correct and consistent punishment must be given.

Else that means you are pushing for a  2 tier system that will always be WRONG.

A rapist, murdering, armed robber, peado , does not get to claim that guy stealing 1 cent candies MUST BE PUNISHED without themselves being punished in a fair and sensible way. Even worse that rapist mudering armed robber peado does not get to give the punishment out as judge and jury whilst loving the fact they are paid to push this double standards crap. That is extreme example but just so we are clear one is accepted generally as worse than the other.

I think though in this case if there are multiple counts of different "guides" being presented that are clear copy and paste with zero references WITH financial intent then yes a sig ban and merits stripped off.  BUT after we punish the proven scammers here and they get it first.    


They scammers, can point OUT wrong doing, but should not be screaming for what they think is the correct punishment whilst not being willing to discuss their own punishment.

Would be good to see the ORIGINAL guides and his guides so we can see how it really is.

Lauda giving out red to anyone is a joke. Same for his cronies/supporters.

These people should really have NO POWER to abuse. There needs to be a drill down on this "plagiarism" and sensible punishment depending on the intentions and consistency over time.  Let's sort it out right after those with scamming post histories start commenting on their own suitable punishments.


Were not all these HE MUST BE BANNED AND RED TAGGED pals with chibitchity or whatever and begging for him to be reinstated to this forum AFTER he admitted he did it for financial gain??? have they slapped him with red and flags yet?? DOUBLE STANDARDS>
YES OR NO??

The intent should be key here but both can get a sig ban, won't hurt to remind them. Sigs are the problem here anyway.

[zorrobek]

I think the evidence is pretty clear that you are involved in serious merit abuse and merit farming, I strongly suspect among other newbie accounts. The evidence can speak for itself. This goes way beyond giving a few merit you received via the merit airdrop to yourself(/your “friend”). You were likely using an alt to ask a question in very poor English, and immediately use a text spinner to give an answer to the question to get merit.

This account is not allowed to post here, it clearly says in rules:

Local rules:
@marlboroza
@ morvillz7z
@Quickseller
are not allowed to post here.

However, nothing except account names is stated in local rules. Actually, it is very stupid local rule, even if you say "account "X" is not allowed do post here someone might easily create new account and post anyway. It could apply to alt accounts but OP has to write it in local rules.

Some of my posts coincide with an article by coincidence. I noticed it myself later. But it's not intentional. I didn't really do any plagiarism.

Nah, admin created merit system because of YOU and then you tricked system with some plagiarist spin shit and there are some accounts and some other stuff.

[dkbit98]

Some people in this forum are abusing their power....

Local rules:
@marlboroza
@ morvillz7z
@Quickseller
are not allowed to post here.

What 'power' are you talking about?
Is this some super-natural power, and now you think you also have 'power' to stop them posting here  

League of Extraordinary Bitcoinalk Members

[The-One-Above-All]

I think the evidence is pretty clear that you are involved in serious merit abuse and merit farming, I strongly suspect among other newbie accounts. The evidence can speak for itself. This goes way beyond giving a few merit you received via the merit airdrop to yourself(/your “friend”). You were likely using an alt to ask a question in very poor English, and immediately use a text spinner to give an answer to the question to get merit.

This account is not allowed to post here, it clearly says in rules:

Local rules:
@marlboroza
@ morvillz7z
@Quickseller
are not allowed to post here.

However, nothing except account names is stated in local rules. Actually, it is very stupid local rule, even if you say "account "X" is not allowed do post here someone might easily create new account and post anyway. It could apply to alt accounts but OP has to write it in local rules.

Some of my posts coincide with an article by coincidence. I noticed it myself later. But it's not intentional. I didn't really do any plagiarism.

Nah, admin created merit system because of YOU and then you tricked system with some plagiarist spin shit and there are some accounts and some other stuff.

Just because it says no moronbozo does not mean you can swap to your alt zorrobeck?? wtf -  I know we dont have the video evidence you requested but nobody else seems to require that to make concrete judgements.

anyway rather than chastising others please make an on topic point.

There is abuse or not? what are your thoughts and detailed explanations. We say there is abuse in the form of double standards, what do you say??
Also we restate they scammers should not have these powers in the first place.

[Quickseller]

I think the evidence is pretty clear that you are involved in serious merit abuse and merit farming, I strongly suspect among other newbie accounts. The evidence can speak for itself. This goes way beyond giving a few merit you received via the merit airdrop to yourself(/your “friend”). You were likely using an alt to ask a question in very poor English, and immediately use a text spinner to give an answer to the question to get merit.

This account is not allowed to post here, it clearly says in rules:

Local rules:
@marlboroza
@ morvillz7z
@Quickseller
are not allowed to post here.

However, nothing except account names is stated in local rules. Actually, it is very stupid local rule, even if you say "account "X" is not allowed do post here someone might easily create new account and post anyway. It could apply to alt accounts but OP has to write it in local rules.

Some of my posts coincide with an article by coincidence. I noticed it myself later. But it's not intentional. I didn't really do any plagiarism.

Nah, admin created merit system because of YOU and then you tricked system with some plagiarist spin shit and there are some accounts and some other stuff.

I am responding to a complaint about me and as a result any local rule prohibiting my posting won’t be enforced. The same tends to be true regarding ban evasion rules when someone is banned and responding to a scam accusation (or even to make one).

Sadly, I suspect that as a result of this, merit will flow much less freely to newer users.

[marlboroza]

I am responding to a complaint about me and as a result any local rule prohibiting my posting won’t be enforced.

Right..

Just because it says no moronbozo does not mean you can swap to your alt zorrobeck??

Please quote where it says "no moronbozo" and that account zorrobeck is not allowed to post here. Stop shitposting.

please make an on topic point.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5215242.msg53533405#msg53533405

Please check this thread and judge it correctly.

Please read post before spamming nonsense.

~
you tricked system with some plagiarist spin shit and there are some accounts and some other stuff.

[actmyname]

To be so insecure where you won't create a platform for others to defend themselves (i.e. your local rule) but where you accuse others of misconduct and overexerting their 'power'...By the way, the local rule will most likely not be enforced. If you really want to block their replies, you could create a self-moderated thread... but that probably won't stop anything.

Here's my objective stance:

There is no fucking way that you can have the same structure as an article within 8 minutes of the thread being posted without having prepared it beforehand.

This post:

There is a huge difference between a cryptocurrency coin and Token. Both crypto coins and Token are cryptocurrencies. But Still, there are differences.

Those cryptocurrencies that have their own blockchain are called cryptocurrency coins. Such as Bitcoin, Lite Coin, Ethereum, etc. I mean, A cryptocurrency coin uses its own blockchain to perform its functions. Cryptocurrency coins are like real money. You will be able to use crypto coins as real money even though the crypto coin is not a physical coin. It has the store value and the exchange value.

And Token is a Digital Asset. Token has no blockchain of its own. Token uses another's blockchain to perform its functions. That is, Token executes transactions using someone else's blockchain. Such as Basic Attention Token, ZRX token, etc. However, most tokens use Ethereum blockchain. The token that uses the Ethereum blockchain is called the ERC 20 token.

A token is a digital form of an asset. This is not a coin. A token can not be used on all occasions. But crypto coins can be used everywhere. The acceptance of cryptocurrency coin is very high. On the other hand, Token's acceptance is very low. So these are the differences.

It's also incredibly nonsensical. Almost looks ML-generated with the repetition of the words.

For example, what in the hell does this sentence mean? "It has the store value and the exchange value."

[The-One-Above-All]

To be so insecure where you won't create a platform for others to defend themselves (i.e. your local rule) but where you accuse others of misconduct and overexerting their 'power'...By the way, the local rule will most likely not be enforced. If you really want to block their replies, you could create a self-moderated thread... but that probably won't stop anything.

Here's my objective stance:

There is no fucking way that you can have the same structure as an article within 8 minutes of the thread being posted without having prepared it beforehand.

This post:

There is a huge difference between a cryptocurrency coin and Token. Both crypto coins and Token are cryptocurrencies. But Still, there are differences.

Those cryptocurrencies that have their own blockchain are called cryptocurrency coins. Such as Bitcoin, Lite Coin, Ethereum, etc. I mean, A cryptocurrency coin uses its own blockchain to perform its functions. Cryptocurrency coins are like real money. You will be able to use crypto coins as real money even though the crypto coin is not a physical coin. It has the store value and the exchange value.

And Token is a Digital Asset. Token has no blockchain of its own. Token uses another's blockchain to perform its functions. That is, Token executes transactions using someone else's blockchain. Such as Basic Attention Token, ZRX token, etc. However, most tokens use Ethereum blockchain. The token that uses the Ethereum blockchain is called the ERC 20 token.

A token is a digital form of an asset. This is not a coin. A token can not be used on all occasions. But crypto coins can be used everywhere. The acceptance of cryptocurrency coin is very high. On the other hand, Token's acceptance is very low. So these are the differences.

It's also incredibly nonsensical. Almost looks ML-generated with the repetition of the words.

For example, what in the hell does this sentence mean? "It has the store value and the exchange value."

I am not disputing your point around the 8 mins. Although it is conceivable possible. The points being made are very basic and actually correct in terms of the coins having their own blockchain and tokens primarily using eth. The other parts regarding spending/trading not so sure.

I think that sentence means (having read the passages above) that it can be spent in a store or traded at an exchange ... possibly??