How i presently feel about bounties

[Byakuga]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

[Saisher]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I still like to promote projects that have good potential whether they are paying huge or small allocation, it still goes on how good the project is and how it managed to generate funding, I stopped looking on the bounty and only concentrate if the project will become successful in the market.

[Mpamaegbu]

I still like to promote projects that have good potential whether they are paying huge or small allocation, it still goes on how good the project is and how it managed to generate funding, I stopped looking on the bounty and only concentrate if the project will become successful in the market.

The truth remains that it's very difficult pinpointing these projects with potentials which eventually end up achieving the aims for which they're set up for. Most of these promising projects end up getting abandoned on the way and causing all who have hoped in them severe disappointment. Talking about the reward pool, I rather go for one with huge reward than one with a few tokens.

[Zeke_23]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

It is because they allocate rewards which is more realistic than promising hundreds of thousand dollars. It is more like they focus on the project than raising funds for themselves. These days, those kinds of projects is much better than projects with huge allocation, unlike before, scam projects is really limited and projects with huge allocation is still possible.

[cabron]

The team will have more motivation to develop the project well and list on exchange because they do have more tokens in the bags than those developers who distributed millions of tokens to the bounty hunters which probably the reason the team didn't scam. The price of the token gets dump still though.

[Beparanf]

The team will have more motivation to develop the project well and list on exchange because they do have more tokens in the bags than those developers who distributed millions of tokens to the bounty hunters which probably the reason the team didn't scam. The price of the token gets dump still though.

They both have pros and cons. And I still prefer to join if ever in bounties that have working product already even the allocation is low or high, as long as they have escrow they budget for bounty payments. While it's good that the supply is circulated all through out bounties, investors and team. Scam can always happen if the team really intend to do so.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Lucky if you found a good project that promise huge amount of rewards and considered as legit. Ive been a hunter and try many type of campaign and to tell you Ive experienced promoting huge and small bounty rewards. You have a point but sometime there are good rewards also but you need to do a thorough research. Try to focus on those Manager that has high reputation and if they set a budget and its big I'm sure its more legit.

[Ken_terrance]

Either the project have potential or not bounty hunters will dump anyways and use the money to buy other old coins, my point is it doesn't matter, it depends on what you want, if you want to hold bounty rewards then look very deeply but if you want to dump then go for any bounty with low allocation

[tabas]

If that's what you think with those bounty projects and you have seen a result with it through experimentation by joining a bounty with that allocation, do it.
The days when most bounties that were giving thousands worth of tokens in dollars with their stakes are now gone and you just have to move on guys.

[watergold]

If that's what you think, then do it to promote the bounty with a small allocation, but it's also not certain whether to pay or not because there is no guarantee in my opinion.
Indeed, it is difficult for us to distinguish between bounties that really pay us, so if I will take my own actions because I have my own judgment about the bounty.

[Ucy]

I do not remember exactly how the allocation thing works. Been a bit long I participated in a bounty, but your observation sounds reasonable, because not all that glitter is Gold. Many creators of bounties tend to hype or exaggerate things to attract "hunters".
I think you made an important observation, whether true or not I don't know... Others should probably research into it to see if it's a fact or not, they could benefit from it as well, if it does really work

[samuraijin]

I think it makes more sense than they write hundreds of thousands of dollars on their threads, usually they do it to get more bounty hunters while they don't know where they get the money to pay bounty hunters, if it's still in the tens of thousands of dollars for the market which is not bullish yet I think it's very reasonable for now and I feel they continue to pay even a little, but I see again there are not many bounty hunters at this time like the previous year, does that indicate everything is over, not many successful projects

[o48o]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

That low allocation is based on total supply of tokens, not the number of given tokens. And you also want to pay attention on how they are they distributing non-ico promotional or bounty tokens because some advisors will dump them as well. It doesn't matter if you get paid if 10% of total supply is now free tokens dumping sell pressure on the markets.

[kayvie]

Lucky if you found a good project that promise huge amount of rewards and considered as legit. Ive been a hunter and try many type of campaign and to tell you Ive experienced promoting huge and small bounty rewards. You have a point but sometime there are good rewards also but you need to do a thorough research. Try to focus on those Manager that has high reputation and if they set a budget and its big I'm sure its more legit.

Nowadays even if you find thoroughly the result will be the same. Projects that looks to be legit turns out to be a scam. Small or big rewards , you are luck if it pays you, also, not all small paying projects are really paying. Remember, there are 90% scam projects in the entire crypto world.

Another thing, participating in projects handled by a reputable manager can be the way, since they won't accept a project that will ruin their reputation.
 

[thesmallgod]

It seem you still have little experience in bounty hunting. Amount of bounty allocation no longer determine the payment success of a bounty. There are many ways now in which project dev cheat hunters. Apart from project that turn to scam, irrespective of the amount allocated. My experience has shown that some dev will end up frustrating hunters in order to give up pursuing their reward. Jinbi, Subaj etc are few of those that have done that with the hunters.

[bonyaserg]

Personally, I am very careful about projects since many projects do not collect the required amount and then simply disappear. Or it happens that they collect the necessary amount and then change the conditions for issuing remuneration. And they make such conditions so that it is not possible to receive their awards. And there are such projects where the conditions are very simple and the rewards are paid according to the conditions and it is very pleasant to work with such projects even though the rewards will be the most minimal.

[oktana]

it's not always about allocation, we also have to look at it from the perspective of whether investors are interested in the project.

if it never fails in distribution, but the coin is only worth 5-7 $ after you promote it for months and finally the project dies, then the conclusion will remain the same, or worst is you only get a token distribution without value, quality is never related with marketing allocation.

[freedomgo]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

It's your choice, normally projects that are confident they will succeed would only allocate a little amount no the bounty reward, if you get paid then go for it as that is what matters a lot now since most of the bounties are not profitable yet.

[gabbie2010]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

It unfortunate that bounty hunters look down on projects that allocate small rewards forgetting the fact that majority of projects with higher rewards don't usually pay and ended up as scam in most cases,  a proverb says ".A Bird in the Hand is Worth Two in the Bush"  I once participated in two similar high reward allocation projects that ended up without any payment.

[btcdie]

Anything excessive is actually just nonsense. Even at the bounty, lately the bounty with the least allocation has paid the bounty hunter to the maximum. I think everything depends on the project. if the project has potential, a little or a lot of allocation to the bounty will be paid according to what has been set. actually the allocation of the total supply is too large for the bounty hunter, this is also a threat to a project if later it is listed on the exchange, the average bounty hunter will dump.

[kolonel_x]

I will not see from the bounty view with a small allocation, but I will see how they develop in marketing and the products they run.
even today the bounty is difficult to guess in any case and maybe good luck in choosing a bounty, the core never give up to join the bounty but we will find the best bounty if you search seriously.

[Thomas-s]

I’ll tell you that the large rewards that the team promises for payments in the bounty campaign are usually a sign of scammers. I have not seen a single project that allocated a large budget for the bounty campaign, and then they clearly paid money and in general, such projects were not successful at all, or after such payments, tokens were 100 times cheaper than the project team promised. now I choose projects with real amounts for reward

[zhekinsp]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

It make sense to pick the project which has reality in rewards rather than projects allocated millions of tokens for their bounty hunters but the bounties should not be picked on the allocation it should be based on project and how much chance they got succeed in the crypto space.

[xZork]

The problem here is not whether the project will pay hunters $ 30,000 or $ 30,000. Even projects that pay $ 30,000 to bounty hunters may fail or they simply won't pay.
Before participating in a bonus project I often researched the bonus manager, project development team, products, media sites. Just research the projects carefully, you will limit the chance of being cheated.

[VDraci]

Let's use what happened last year for example, i was promoting veil bounty project because its already trading on exchange and at that time few good bounties we're out but because veil has low allocation and its trading i just looked away, mind you the other bounties did well, got listed and paid good reward, i earned too low reward from veil project

[key4co.in]

It's not about promoting only projects with small allocations considering the fact that they most likely won't disappoint, that's not even the case in all scenarios. Sometimes low allocation bounties still fail. Best bounties to promote are those organized by reputable Bounty managers and escrow payment already made, knowing fully well that the funds have been released to the manager. Also, I prefer to do bounties when the coin is already trading and when I consider the project reliable after my due diligence.

[boltz]

I'm sometimes glad that we're still having bounties and that some of them are really enjoyable to post about them and you might be true that when it comes to altcoin bounties is better for the pool size to not be over the limit so they won't be able to pay the hunters. Also I said this many times, don't join into a bounty if they don't have separate funds for paying the hunters at the end of it so in this way you will avoid getting scammed by some bounty programs.

[masterrex]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Even the low budget bounty campaign has no guarantee to be successfully distributed after the bounty campaign was finished. But i agree that most of those low budget bounty campaigns will pay bounty hunters as soon as the campaign was done, i also notice that most of today's bounty campaigns is implementing a participants base, pool budgeting meaning if the expected participation was not reach, they automatically slashed the bounty budget into half. btw! lets face the truth that today's bounty campaign are not profitable anymore.

[HabiebRiziq]

Lucky if you found a good project that promise huge amount of rewards and considered as legit. Ive been a hunter and try many type of campaign and to tell you Ive experienced promoting huge and small bounty rewards. You have a point but sometime there are good rewards also but you need to do a thorough research. Try to focus on those Manager that has high reputation and if they set a budget and its big I'm sure its more legit.

Nowadays even if you find thoroughly the result will be the same. Projects that looks to be legit turns out to be a scam. Small or big rewards , you are luck if it pays you, also, not all small paying projects are really paying. Remember, there are 90% scam projects in the entire crypto world.

Another thing, participating in projects handled by a reputable manager can be the way, since they won't accept a project that will ruin their reputation.
 

Participating in a bounty project based on the manager who handles it is usually used by several people to judge or many people believe that the project brought by a reputable manager is a good project. But, for me personally this does not mean that the project will be able to run well and can give us an advantage because we know that lately many tokens that we get from the bounty actually just become rubbish and have no value in the wallet.

[o.ogurlu]

The many bounty campaign, which has high reward amounts, has also been successfully distributed payments in the past. So i don't think the problem is about the amount of the reward. I think the important thing is the team members of the project. If the project team wants to make their bounty payments, they can somehow provide it regardless of the amount of the prize.

[sazonk]

very lucky if on this day can find a bounty project that really pays dearly, but unfortunately it is very difficult to find, so that it can find projects that have paid for ordinary fees are also very good. Regarding the allocation of rewards, in my opinion this is relatively ordinary, the most important thing and of course what can make the boutny hunters happy is, after the distribution of rewards that is the availability of the token / reward coins on the market / can be sold within a short period of time waiting. And at this time I was very careful in following the bounty program, because I was very often disappointed, the work was quite solid but paid less satisfying let alone after the distribution until the coins entered the exchanger for very long.

[biddicoin]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

as far I know, if bounty cant reach softcap, they wont pay bounty hunter. even the project wont go and must bring back money to investor
so, it is not relatable with low and high allocation in bounty.

I think, why some people choose low allocation, bcz most high allocation bounty is just a lying
they lie bounty hunter by high allocation to promote their project. it works bcz many bounty hunters dont know that they are lied by dev.

[AbuBhakar]

I will not see from the bounty view with a small allocation, but I will see how they develop in marketing and the products they run.
even today the bounty is difficult to guess in any case and maybe good luck in choosing a bounty, the core never give up to join the bounty but we will find the best bounty if you search seriously.

It's just a matter of searching now, but all we need Is a campaign that will truly pay. There are many campaigns that didn't paid their hunters some offers high allocation and some are low but still both not paid. It will be better if they will put a weekly basis payment not after the campaign or project succeed as many works were wasted in this rules.

[leyton11]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

yeah, it's quite reasonable. Because the pool pool of bounty projects is over 1m $ then we should reconsider. because they only offer great rewards to entice bounty hunters and try to take advantage of the labor of others. then exit scam and the investors lost money, bounty hunters took effort. It's best to choose bounties for tokens already listed on the exchange, it's safer.

[agentx44]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Way back, bounties were paying people properly regardless of how high the allocation is. But when the number of bounties started to grow rapidly, scams showed up, or if it's not a scam, it will not pay you at the right time and make you wait for a very long time which is very inconvenient for us, bounty hunters. If only we can get back to those times when we can still earn lots of profits from joining bounties and we do not need to carefully look through each bounties before we can find the right one that can make us benefit much.

[angrybirdy]

I do agree, I participated in many bounty campaigns before, and some of them have a high allocation for bounties but they are not paying. Unlike in some of my bounty campaigns which has a low allocation, they pay even if it is not enough, at least they don't scam their participants.

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

yeah, it's quite reasonable. Because the pool pool of bounty projects is over 1m $ then we should reconsider. because they only offer great rewards to entice bounty hunters and try to take advantage of the labor of others. then exit scam and the investors lost money, bounty hunters took effort. It's best to choose bounties for tokens already listed on the exchange, it's safer.

They offer great rewards to get more bounty hunters to promote their projects. This is an unimaginable reward and we should realize that this kind of reward is hard to collect during ico. This is part of their strategy and it is irritating to see how they just use bounty hunters then leaving without any payment.

[inanilujimi]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

What is the point of you being paid but the project is not running ??
What we are looking for is working on the bounty and getting the most out of what we have already poured out.

[No One]

Now the trend is like crypto projects offer a hefty amount of bounty pool for bounty hunters just in a bid to attract many bounty hunters. But in fact, they fail to collect required funds to support their ideas and end up in a trap. Why there is a need to do so? If your projects are genuine and with innovative idea, and clear road map, your projects can collect enough funds and are sure to get a success.

[Amel]

Lucky if you found a good project that promise huge amount of rewards and considered as legit. Ive been a hunter and try many type of campaign and to tell you Ive experienced promoting huge and small bounty rewards. You have a point but sometime there are good rewards also but you need to do a thorough research. Try to focus on those Manager that has high reputation and if they set a budget and its big I'm sure its more legit.

Nowadays even if you find thoroughly the result will be the same. Projects that looks to be legit turns out to be a scam. Small or big rewards , you are luck if it pays you, also, not all small paying projects are really paying. Remember, there are 90% scam projects in the entire crypto world.

Another thing, participating in projects handled by a reputable manager can be the way, since they won't accept a project that will ruin their reputation.
 

But sometimes they are also deceived by scammers, yeah, but at least it can also be analyzed more deeply. Just like you, I am also looking for a project managed by a reputable bounty manager and on the other hand I am also considering more in the project before joining. One of them is a partner of the project, if the project has a good partner or well-known company then it can be said that the project is quite good.

[Palider]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I think even this bounty that paid low allocation for bounty campaign are not good to join because price of this in exchange will become  dump. That's why our effort on promoting this will be waste and not worth it.

Its better to join in bounty campaign that paid bitcoin and other altcoin that already listed in market because this is sure rewards and worth our effort.

[Fatunad]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

That doesn't always be the case good projects cannot be determined on how much their allocated funds for the bounty to run for several weeks or months. You will only know how successful one project when its all said and done and all were being paid as promised. To make it short bounty hunting is like a gambling in a casino you will never know the outcome but only have one goal to get the reward.

[Divinespark]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

In 2019 most bounty have very low budget, because the bear market makes many projects face many difficulties in calling for investment. But for such a low budget but there are still many projects that fail and become scams, I do not understand why they scam bounty with such small amount and lose the reputation of the project. It is best to make bounty with escrow, which would be a great option for bounty hunters to receive their reward. But I do not guarantee their project can be listed in exchange and have liquidity because that is a completely different story

[nickenburg]

You need to really watch out, with what bounty you choose.
In the last years there have been a lot of good looking projects only for them to fail and never hear from them again.
And then you devided a lot of your time to them, for nothing.

Something like Current looked really promising had good advisors, and people working on the project, only for them to announce that they wont release current until the market was doing better again.
That was back after the 20000$ bubble so it made sense otherwise the price would only go down in the last 3 years.
But then now they only offer a airdrop and the bounty is gone, and you had to signup at a website pay 7 dollar in Ethereum to even recieve it.

And there where more projects that just exit scammed, So really research the coin you are gonna invest your time in!  

[qomariah95]

Now it is indeed difficult to find projects that can really pay bounty participants. Sometimes even those who have a low allocation, who can pay bounty hunters. Now for my example, I participated in the Tachyon Protocol project. The allocation in this project is $13k, it is low but they are already in exchange and that means when getting the tokens. We have got the results we are working on.

[Vishnu.Reang]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Hmm.. even with the smaller projects, there is no guarantee that the bounty will be paid on time. I am someone who has participated in dozens of bounty campaigns in the past. From what I have seen, when the ICO market is in a healthy state, most of the bounties (irrespective of their size) would be paying the rewards honestly. But when the conditions are not good, the bounty hunters are left high and dry.

[DDante]

While OP cares more about bounty allocation i prefer to join and promote every bounty projects that have real use case, if i am ever going to get huge profits from bounties its up to me, i suggest people should do the same to maximize their rewards

[bamboylee]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

It is better to look at the project itself rather than how they advertise themselves. They can have a small or large promotional allocation but if the project itself is not investment-worthy, it will fail. It is better if it already has a working project or at least this

[...]bounty projects that have real use case, [...]

[Xardasim]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Although I certainly don't think so, it usually is. Because those who allocate fewer amounts as bounty reward are often serious in their business. Instead of cheating on bounty hunters, they pay for their work by request better quality work. Besides, if they scam, what they're gonna lose is more than they're gonna earn.

[gwaposakon]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

You have a point. Reading your post made me realized that lately, the bounties that I am also joining are low budgeted ones. But what great about it that they do actually distribute rewards. Though not that much but at least you get the rewards right away. I hope the large budgeted bounties would follow also in really keeping up with their promise to give hunters their rightful rewards.

[Hypnosis00]

It doesn't matter if the reward is either small or big, the most important is we can feel the sincerity of the team and would like to get listed on exchanges. The common failures that most bounties suffer are to get listed to legit and reputable exchanges. No wonder that investors will never get interested in them cause in the first place, they don't care about their project.

[StephenieDuong]

I dont think bounty projects with low allocation will surely pay for hunters, but i know that those kind projects will more seriously with everything. Those project will pay more attention to their bounty campaign because they want to build a new community for their projects and firstly, they do not want to mess with bounty hunters.

[BitDane]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I won't bother looking at project that have low allocation for bounty hunters.  Remember bounty hunters are the front runner of a campaign.  They attract investors through their advertisements so they should not undermine the effort of every bounty hunter and so the bounty hunter should take pride of their work and at least know their worth. with $50k divided by more than thousands of participants and be done by several months, how much do you think is your payment per month once the bounty is done let alone it takes several months for these projects to pay bounty hunters.

[Leonardo7]

These days a good project with low allocation will be better to promote than having a heavy allocation only to flop after listing or to deny some participants reward due to some new rules and restrictions. Any project paying in stable coin usually will have a very small allocation.

[Chainsmokers]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

as far I know, if bounty cant reach softcap, they wont pay bounty hunter. even the project wont go and must bring back money to investor
so, it is not relatable with low and high allocation in bounty.

I think, why some people choose low allocation, bcz most high allocation bounty is just a lying
they lie bounty hunter by high allocation to promote their project. it works bcz many bounty hunters dont know that they are lied by dev.

Yes, I also agree with what you said, as far as I know when a project cannot reach its softcap the project cannot continue and must return the amount of money invested by investors and if you find a project that still pays you even though the softcap is not achieved, I feel you are a lucky person. And for the allocation of funds themselves, indeed, often large allocations are made only to attract bounty hunters to be interested in participating in the project.

[onyek16M]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

i am starting to think better to promote bounty will paid with bitcoin or altcoins that really have value in the market. it exactly paid for week or month than bounty paid with token its mean an ico. because ico or projects with allocation it not worth it anymore
all bounty hunter same feel like you, fact is bounty not legits anymore

[iamsange]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Honestly, although not much bounty that i joined, usually amount of value is depends on ICO price right? And they pay bounty hunters with their tokens. I think about payment, maybe a lot of project will think twice if not want to pay bounty hunters because their project will be considered to be scam project. But in case it is not delay or because not reach softcap.

[elisabetheva]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

What you say is one thing that is always disappointed with the bounty project, so looking for the most important low allocations can certainly be paid. It seems now that Bounty often pays, but it is very disappointing what is obtained, aka sometimes it has no value. this situation is indeed happening and cannot be avoided and requires time to recover.

[ven7net]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

It's hard to say which is better and which projects are better. Now there is such a situation that most of all new crypto projects all have a large percentage of risk. To understand a good project or not, you need to participate in it until the very end, and only then you can understand whether it is scam or not. So it doesn’t make much difference how much they allocate to a company, of course, big rewards come out no longer trust, but even those where they donate a little money also manage to make it so that you just can’t get these earned pennies. Personally, I try to choose projects more carefully for participation and, based on the results, see what happens.

[cryp24x]

It is still a fact that we really don't know how to identify good projects that will succeed. What we know now are those projects that give a good presentation with their whitepaper and good impression of their team towards the bounty hunters at first. I guess now that we are on bear season, scammers are now lessen because some project teams with good intentions remain and not working just for the money or profit.

[killerfrost]

Bounty scam does not depend on their budget. The reason for bounty scam is because they cannot succeed in IEO or ICO, and their token doesn't have any value in this market. And if they distribute it, we can not sell the token anywhere. It is best to look for the bounty that has been listed at the exchange and participate.

[Sterbens]

The soft cap reached bounty campaigns also stuck in the bear market and there is no concrete exit, unfortunately. I also suggest joining the low bounty allocations campings due to the incapability of the team to distribute the rewards for campaign participants.

At least if they have reached softcap then they have little funds to advance their project and enter into the exchange the capital from softcap may be exhausted because of and inadequate.
Now for the bounties, they are worried because the tokens that they produce from the bounties will not be long in the market because of the limited funds, so the bounties prefer to sell cheaply than they have to hold and no value.

[TheICE007]

Well I go for projects with potentials before promoting, also I look at the reward pool, the reward pool make bounty hunters to really give their promotion  unlike those with little reward,that Discourages most of them, but I believe  we should really go for projects with potentials before considering rewards

[sayaya17]

Bounty projects with low allocations are indeed more realistic than bounty projects with large allocations. But if it indeed a project with a large allocation of good potential it is also better to follow, because not all projects with large allocations are dubious. There are also many projects with small but doubtful allocations. For now we just follow and choose projects that are roughly good and pay.

[mcnocon2]

I think allocation is not the key to look after, it doesnt matter whether it have a small or huge allocation if they will pay then they will pay, if not then not. What I'm pointing out is that we always should promote the real or true projects despite of its allocation. We can earn from that even though its small, its better than a scam.

[sisule]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

This our problem when promoting whit ICO project investment not reach soft cap and we have miss payment from their bounties campaign, we can't complaint to bounty campaign manager and ICO project because they don't have money for distributing payment to bounty participants, it usually happen when bounty campaign participants not receive payment because the ICOs project failed.

[Landak]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Well, sometimes the small bounty allocation is not necessarily successful. I mean, it's true that it's paid but if it's never been listed on the market or if it has a market, but the price of the coin is very low, it means it's all useless. I admit that the lower the allocation the greater the opportunity to be paid, but we must also look at the potential of the project, whether promising or very doubtful.
A good bounty usually has a limit of participants who can join and the total allocation and stakes will not change until the campaign is finished. meaning they (the project team) stick to the rules and commitments when the promotion is made.

[Dhoe]

Bounty scam does not depend on their budget. The reason for bounty scam is because they cannot succeed in IEO or ICO, and their token doesn't have any value in this market. And if they distribute it, we can not sell the token anywhere. It is best to look for the bounty that has been listed at the exchange and participate.

But sometimes Bounty which displays a lot of budget is just to lure investors and Bounty Hunter, Not real. I agree with what the OP said. Lately, I have seen Bounty, which provides a small budget, always pays Bounty Hunters, even they only get a few dollars.

[valuater]

agree the low allocation of bounty, sometimes the reward is according to what they say for example the price of token is 0.1 $ and it turns out after listing on exchange the price is close to 0.1 $ maybe 0.08-0.09 $, but bounty like this sometimes is annoying. when too many participants join and they use "Stake" system, maybe participants will really only get penuts.

[Silberman]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I have never being a bounty hunter but what you say seems to make sense, however we must recognize that bounty hunters are having a hard time because icos are having a hard time and even if at some point people trusted in ieos that trust is evaporating itself really quickly as well, so there is no way to solve this unless investors put money in icos and that does not seem to be very likely taking into account that no one is going to invest in those bad projects again after they have been scammed once.

[tianglistrik]

I think allocation is not the key to look after, it doesnt matter whether it have a small or huge allocation if they will pay then they will pay, if not then not. What I'm pointing out is that we always should promote the real or true projects despite of its allocation. We can earn from that even though its small, its better than a scam.

but actually allocations are important too, you should think about your expenses and also estimate the results that will be obtained. so at least we are looking for an adequate allocation according to your own estimates, and certainly looking for projects that can pay and can potentially have long term.

[diazepam666]

There is nothing to speak about bounties now because people are not at all looking and care about bounty programs since the number of scammers raised in the marketplace.
I never like to turn towards the bounties unless and until big managers taking charge it.

[owengtam09]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I still like to promote those projects that have good potential whether they are paying a small amount or big. For sure they will pay us rather than those that are no assurance. I also like projects those who have long term projects so I can accumulate my earnings.

[Xxmodded]

Bounty scam does not depend on their budget. The reason for bounty scam is because they cannot succeed in IEO or ICO, and their token doesn't have any value in this market. And if they distribute it, we can not sell the token anywhere. It is best to look for the bounty that has been listed at the exchange and participate.

But sometimes Bounty which displays a lot of budget is just to lure investors and Bounty Hunter, Not real. I agree with what the OP said. Lately, I have seen Bounty, which provides a small budget, always pays Bounty Hunters, even they only get a few dollars.

A lot of budget look interested for joining but I prefer with how much their coin sold of private sale, I'm not tempted when looking a lot of budget for bounty reward allocated but coin looks not interested by investor, we must working without get reward because after one month promoting and their coin not reach soft cap we miss payment and received reward with a lot of budget reward bounty campaign.

[ubercool]

If project will not be able to reach even soft cap then what is the use of those coins? They can't even start the project if they don't get to the soft cap. Rather than that, you should try on a bigger project where you can at least get something.

[mobilestrike]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Many projects who are sincere with their project and who know that they will continue to work for their project and will make it the best project then they do not worry for the bounty payment that it will harm them on exchanges as they know that sooner their price will rise to the skies. Only those projects deny the payment to the bounty hunters who do not have hope that their project will survive or who feel greed and want to grab even the bounty hunter payment.

[Mulann2]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

well you maybe right, because if you look at it most project who gives big allocation for their bounty pool often find it hard to pay such amount to hunters when bounty is over, they come up with the excuse of protecting the investors because hunters will dump and it ill affect price,
but shouldn't they have put this into consideration in the first place? while making promises you don't intend to keep?

[kram31]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I dont think so, it is really not about the budget! it is about the project and it's team.
There were some who promised small amounts but turned out to be a scam also or failed.
We should deeper on the team and its project before joining.

[AjithBtc]

agree the low allocation of bounty, sometimes the reward is according to what they say for example the price of token is 0.1 $ and it turns out after listing on exchange the price is close to 0.1 $ maybe 0.08-0.09 $, but bounty like this sometimes is annoying. when too many participants join and they use "Stake" system, maybe participants will really only get penuts.

Low allocation or the staking doesn't cause anything negative over the market of the respective token. Myself have participated in different bounties and have earned a large number of tokens, and this was truly worth during the entire market reaching ath values. Further there is no big growth, opportunity missed is missed that too is a problem with it.

[Cheatbtt]

That is not so bad than not being paid at all, but in fact it is the same that most ICO projects today, whether low or high allocations are not guaranteed. and annoyed if paid but tokens cannot be traded on the market, some are paid but the allocation is reduced and not in accordance with the promise in their bounty statement.

[bitcoin-shark]

it is not said, let's say there is a higher chance that the bounty hunters will pay if the percentages allocated to the bounties are reasonable, but as the bounty managers always say in the rules, the rules can be changed at any time by the project team or by the same manager, it happened to me more than once that at the end of the bounties kyc is required or the tokens distributed are only a tenth of what was promised at the beginning so there is in no way certainty of being rewarded for our work...

[gensol]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

That's right not only does low allocation campaigns pay hunters, these projects sometimes thrive more on exchange than those campaigns with huge payment allocation. I prefer to promote projects listed on an exchange by so doing I know what I get at the end of the campaign with the token market value

[adzino]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Low allocation of 30k to 50k what? 30k to 50k users? Or are you talking about 30k to 50k altcoins or fiat USD? It is really confusing to understand what you are trying to say over here. If you are saying that project fails to pay bounty hunters because the could not meet the "soft cap", then it is their own fault. They shouldn't be relying on the softcap (investors money) to pay off the bounty hunters, instead they should be paying off their own pockets. Or they can say that they will pay a certain percentage of the money raised to the user to avoid any confusion among the bounty hunters.

[xiboothrezi]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Let's try to understand one by one, if the project is good, the allocation is small, the bounty participants are many and not limited, so the rewards are getting smaller when using the stake system. The next problem, if the project is good, the allocation is large, participants are limited, but the distribution is divided into 12 months, or reward locked for many months, isn't the drama?
So, what I want to say is we must have a strong mentality and heart, because the bounty is full of drama, right now. Dwyor Do this with pleasure, do analysis before joining and understand the risks, remember that disappointment comes from excessive expectations.

[swivel1983@gmail.com]

You should understand that the number of coins to distribute does not matter for the success of the project. Of course, if a team offers a huge amount to bounty hunters, then this should be alarming. But the bounty of the company it is better to choose another way.

[Fallenkeith2019]

hmm I like bounties, but they can be tough to do sometimes but often rewarding

[Rcoinmoon]

I just found out that there are many legit bounties but the issue is that most hunters are just greedy, they keep it to their self and run it with multiple accounts.

[stephanirain]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I still like to promote projects that have good potential whether they are paying huge or small allocation, it still goes on how good the project is and how it managed to generate funding, I stopped looking on the bounty and only concentrate if the project will become successful in the market.

This is a conflict between compensation and passion for this facet of crypto industry. Some people don't get it or got confused about it. It can be all in the matter of opinion of the hunter though some really made a good point to why you should really support a project. Furthermore, the findings of a project does not absolutely guarantees that it will succeed but it is one of the possible factors.

[qtronix]

You're right. Those projects that offer huge amounts for distribution are bad projects. Everyone thinks it's good that they will get more profit, but no one thinks that because of such a large percentage of coins, they will just be worth a penny.

[vintages]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

This still does not guarantee the possibility of getting good gains when you sell the coin after listed not guarantee that the coin will stay around for a while and not dumped. Nor even make it as the top coins.
As more ICOs enter the market, more bounty are becoming scams. The little you can do is to get managed by a reputable bounty manager or use service that collect the tokens before bounty task. But the truth still remains that claiming bounties is a pure waste of time.

[Twinkledoe]

I don't agree with the OP, so if the project doesn't meet their soft cap, then even if you are receiving your bounty rewards, it will be worthless and useless. You are just collecting worthless coins or tokens for nothing. Because most projects that haven't met their soft cap, they are usually abandoned or shelved. So how can you exchange your bounty rewards into something of value?

[letyouearn]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I see, you prefer small but guaranteed earnings here
This is the way that fits to some people who don't want to risk. But I prefer taking some risks and get a chance of earning a lot sometimes.

[Bonwin]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

There are definitely bounties with low allocations, but you cannot still guarantee that they will all end well, despite how low they might be. Also, bounty campaigns of such type, just because of that notion that people have, just as you have also repeated, makes a lot of participants to join and then flooding it. this leads to an eventual reduction in reward, which sometimes cannot even be traded conveniently on exchange.

[hahay]

Low and high allocation does not provide something that will make you get a good profit in the end. Even though you are credited, but as far as I experience coins still don't get a good impact when the coins start trading. So in this case to still know in advance about what products they are developing and whether the product has good prospects when in the market, that is what should be considered more than if you only look at the allocation of funds there.

[denasha92]

i prefer to do some bounties that paid with btc or eth. they always legit if they use escrow. but the problem is they never accept some member which their rank is below full member/Sr. member.   

[Zemomtum]

Bounty seems to be a job for nothing now as most of the projects failed to pay after the campaign. Gone are those days you get some cool dollars in bounties. Few are even legit as most of them are scam shit. One can always engage in one that are pre-funded but that does not guarantee it will have value

[tenakha]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Obviously, the amount allocated for the bounty should not be an indication of whether we should join it. But I also agree with you partly because I have spent a long time in this sector. The bounties that meet the criteria everyone wants to participate in often allocate less. However be careful of this, good projects allocate less amount for bounty, but not all projects that allocate less amount are good.

[pixie85]

I just found out that there are many legit bounties but the issue is that most hunters are just greedy, they keep it to their self and run it with multiple accounts.

That's true and people also don't fight devs who scam bounty hunters. Both sides are guilty.

If you guys weren't greedy and checked the project before joining you'd have higher chances of earning money.

Also if you as a group went to all the forums and left negative reviews of the coin that doesn't pay you'd at least damage their reputation and make it not worth the money for them.

[karanggatak]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

yes i think you are right op a project that does not promise high payments to the bounty hunter i think it is an honest project. because they focus on project development. and always do your research thoroughly before joining the project. because scammers are also getting smarter we must also be more careful in choosing projects.

[fortunecrypto]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

If that what you think then go for it, but I would like to remind you, the potential of the project is still what matters and no the rewards it's not even a factor to know if the project has potential, after researching about the project, then go for allocation but should be last one.

[janggernaut]

Bounty seems to be a job for nothing now as most of the projects failed to pay after the campaign. Gone are those days you get some cool dollars in bounties. Few are even legit as most of them are scam shit. One can always engage in one that are pre-funded but that does not guarantee it will have value

Doing bounty is like gambling right now. You can't sure whether you will get paid or not. If you are lucky, you can earn huge amount, if you aren't lucky, you won't get paid or get paid for small amount only. I also don't know what's the reason there are still many people who joined in altcoin bounty as they are only wasting their time

[smyslov]

Bounty seems to be a job for nothing now as most of the projects failed to pay after the campaign. Gone are those days you get some cool dollars in bounties. Few are even legit as most of them are scam shit. One can always engage in one that are pre-funded but that does not guarantee it will have value

Doing bounty is like gambling right now. You can't sure whether you will get paid or not. If you are lucky, you can earn huge amount, if you aren't lucky, you won't get paid or get paid for small amount only. I also don't know what's the reason there are still many people who joined in altcoin bounty as they are only wasting their time

Where can they join when there are no bounty projects now that pays via Bitcoin or Ethereum, there are bounty campaigns that does that but they have low rank rank and they cannot participate in a signature campaign, so they don't have choice but to try their luck and see if they are lucky in the end, unfortunately with gambling you will know right away if you are lucky with bounty  campaign, you'll have to wait from 2 months to over a year.

[shoreno]

Bounty seems to be a job for nothing now as most of the projects failed to pay after the campaign. Gone are those days you get some cool dollars in bounties. Few are even legit as most of them are scam shit. One can always engage in one that are pre-funded but that does not guarantee it will have value

Doing bounty is like gambling right now. You can't sure whether you will get paid or not. If you are lucky, you can earn huge amount, if you aren't lucky, you won't get paid or get paid for small amount only. I also don't know what's the reason there are still many people who joined in altcoin bounty as they are only wasting their time

Where can they join when there are no bounty projects now that pays via Bitcoin or Ethereum, there are bounty campaigns that does that but they have low rank rank and they cannot participate in a signature campaign, so they don't have choice but to try their luck and see if they are lucky in the end, unfortunately with gambling you will know right away if you are lucky with bounty  campaign, you'll have to wait from 2 months to over a year.

so your comparing gambling with bounty ? gambling because joining on a bounty is risky . ilt pay or not but it does not require any cents while on gambling you usually deposit to start playing  . its true that most bounty accept low rank so low rank users ended up joining this way but instead of wasting time promoting for free , why can they just use that time to work thier account or to level up thier account so that they can be able to join legit campaings that pays in btc  .

[pallang]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

sometimes even low allocation campaigns cannot pay thier bounty  participants. So it doesnt depends on allocation its about  the project legitimacy . And the hardest part is picking the best bounty project.

[marcous]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I still like to promote projects that have good potential whether they are paying huge or small allocation, it still goes on how good the project is and how it managed to generate funding, I stopped looking on the bounty and only concentrate if the project will become successful in the market.

I'm sure all hunters want to promote potential projects. but the problem is we never know the end of the project whether it is really potential / not. because the achievement of softcap does not guarantee the project has the potential to be a good project. It must be remembered that since 2018 many projects have reached softcap and even hardcap, but until now they have not been list on the market or have been registered on the market but there is no volume at all. it's sad, isn't it? maybe an IEO project can be an option but have to first analyze where the project is doing IEO. no problem with small allocations if IEO is done on the top exchange.

[Hypnosis00]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

sometimes even low allocation campaigns cannot pay thier bounty  participants. So it doesnt depends on allocation its about  the project legitimacy . And the hardest part is picking the best bounty project.

That is a big challenge for bounty hunters. Quite hard to pick among a hundred of bounties runs today that will surely pay in the end. Because even reputable and known BM has also been struggling to manage bounties, in fact, they are also a victim of running bounty campaign but it turns into a scam and doesn't even get paid for their services.

[aioc]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

The good old days are really gone and I experienced those good old days when only one good bounty campaign can fetch you thousands of dollars worth of their token and you can trade it right away on the exchange because listed on exchange back then was easy and affordable, you cannot say that today anymore.

[ultrloa]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

The good old days are really gone and I experienced those good old days when only one good bounty campaign can fetch you thousands of dollars worth of their token and you can trade it right away on the exchange because listed on exchange back then was easy and affordable, you cannot say that today anymore.

Although there are so many scam campaigns these days still we shouldn't lose our hopes since crypto still alive and for sure there are new players will come to adopt the blockchain and maybe one of them in future will give the bounty hunters a decent profit again but for now we should not rely on this and better to have another option to earn.

[kodtycoon]

If project will not be able to reach even soft cap then what is the use of those coins? They can't even start the project if they don't get to the soft cap. Rather than that, you should try on a bigger project where you can at least get something.

right, soft cap is an achievement that is at least mandatory for every project to get funding, if they do not get the funds then they will not be able to continue the project which means the project has failed and therefore at least we often find many of the bounty programs extending the promotion period only to get more funds so that their projects can grow better

[wavug]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I agree with your opinion, bounty hunters are going through difficult times at the moment, some of them are switching to bounties with lower bounty pool but with a fixed number of participants, someone has already switched to such bounties, and there are people who still do almost every single bounty to accumulate a large amount of tokens in the hope of a future bull market

[Oilacris]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

The good old days are really gone and I experienced those good old days when only one good bounty campaign can fetch you thousands of dollars worth of their token and you can trade it right away on the exchange because listed on exchange back then was easy and affordable, you cannot say that today anymore.

Although there are so many scam campaigns these days still we shouldn't lose our hopes since crypto still alive and for sure there are new players will come to adopt the blockchain and maybe one of them in future will give the bounty hunters a decent profit again but for now we should not rely on this and better to have another option to earn.

Relying on bounties fully would really not be a good idea because we know the current condition of the market when it comes to success.

It isnt totally dead yet there are still some projects do succeed but as a hunter finding these good projects wont really be that easy.
For people out there who do make bounty, if you do have that extra time to deal with bounties then its your choice but making
this as your main priority then it wont be a sustainable thing.

[coin-investor]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I wonder where did you get that analysis and that thinking, no way I will consider allocation as a means to find out if the project will distribute their funds to bounty rewards allocation, it's still on the developers and who's managing the campaign that matters.
Small or huge allocation is not the priority but if the team can really the goods that matters.

[Silberman]

That is not so bad than not being paid at all, but in fact it is the same that most ICO projects today, whether low or high allocations are not guaranteed. and annoyed if paid but tokens cannot be traded on the market, some are paid but the allocation is reduced and not in accordance with the promise in their bounty statement.

And this is the biggest problem of all, bounty hunters are at complete mercy of the developers of those new coins, there have been many instances in which people have complained about what it is happening and they just get banned from the campaign which is completely unjust if you ask me and when this happens to a bounty hunter over and over again then it is completely understandable that he gives up on bounties and that seems like a wise decision to me.

[Ken_terrance]

Quality projects are very hard to see nowadays i think what matter most is the quality of bounty projects, if you can't find any don't bother but crypto is unpredictable, sometimes low rating bounty projects can bring huge profits you never expected

[Doranile432]

Its hard to see quality bounty projects now unless they are listed on exchanges like Emirex bounty and PGpay token, we should spend our time with other ways that can fetch us money than depending entirely on bounties because good reliable projects will only show up once in a Blue Moon from now on

[TanakabZX]

Bounty managers are my first target because few of them cares more about their reputations and they don't dare promote scam projects, remember that legit projects can fail, apart from this you are good with good bounty managers

[Mighty_crypt]

New bounty projects of today can't be rely on even when they reach hardcap successfully they can be very dissapointing in terms of not paying participants or even changing bounty rules after bounty ends, few ones even forced KYC on hunters when it has no KYC before

[Silberman]

New bounty projects of today can't be rely on even when they reach hardcap successfully they can be very dissapointing in terms of not paying participants or even changing bounty rules after bounty ends, few ones even forced KYC on hunters when it has no KYC before

And that is one of the things that really makes me uncomfortable with the whole situation with bounty hunters, bounty hunters are the ones that make a project a success by letting the community know that there is a new good project that is being developed and in which you may like to invest but even when they reach the amount of money that they need in order to begin the project the developers decide that they want to steal the bounty hunters by implementing KYC policies that they explicitly said will not be implemented.