How i presently feel about bounties

[Sterbens]

The soft cap reached bounty campaigns also stuck in the bear market and there is no concrete exit, unfortunately. I also suggest joining the low bounty allocations campings due to the incapability of the team to distribute the rewards for campaign participants.

At least if they have reached softcap then they have little funds to advance their project and enter into the exchange the capital from softcap may be exhausted because of and inadequate.
Now for the bounties, they are worried because the tokens that they produce from the bounties will not be long in the market because of the limited funds, so the bounties prefer to sell cheaply than they have to hold and no value.

[TheICE007]

Well I go for projects with potentials before promoting, also I look at the reward pool, the reward pool make bounty hunters to really give their promotion  unlike those with little reward,that Discourages most of them, but I believe  we should really go for projects with potentials before considering rewards

[sayaya17]

Bounty projects with low allocations are indeed more realistic than bounty projects with large allocations. But if it indeed a project with a large allocation of good potential it is also better to follow, because not all projects with large allocations are dubious. There are also many projects with small but doubtful allocations. For now we just follow and choose projects that are roughly good and pay.

[mcnocon2]

I think allocation is not the key to look after, it doesnt matter whether it have a small or huge allocation if they will pay then they will pay, if not then not. What I'm pointing out is that we always should promote the real or true projects despite of its allocation. We can earn from that even though its small, its better than a scam.

[sisule]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

This our problem when promoting whit ICO project investment not reach soft cap and we have miss payment from their bounties campaign, we can't complaint to bounty campaign manager and ICO project because they don't have money for distributing payment to bounty participants, it usually happen when bounty campaign participants not receive payment because the ICOs project failed.

[Landak]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Well, sometimes the small bounty allocation is not necessarily successful. I mean, it's true that it's paid but if it's never been listed on the market or if it has a market, but the price of the coin is very low, it means it's all useless. I admit that the lower the allocation the greater the opportunity to be paid, but we must also look at the potential of the project, whether promising or very doubtful.
A good bounty usually has a limit of participants who can join and the total allocation and stakes will not change until the campaign is finished. meaning they (the project team) stick to the rules and commitments when the promotion is made.

[Dhoe]

Bounty scam does not depend on their budget. The reason for bounty scam is because they cannot succeed in IEO or ICO, and their token doesn't have any value in this market. And if they distribute it, we can not sell the token anywhere. It is best to look for the bounty that has been listed at the exchange and participate.

But sometimes Bounty which displays a lot of budget is just to lure investors and Bounty Hunter, Not real. I agree with what the OP said. Lately, I have seen Bounty, which provides a small budget, always pays Bounty Hunters, even they only get a few dollars.

[valuater]

agree the low allocation of bounty, sometimes the reward is according to what they say for example the price of token is 0.1 $ and it turns out after listing on exchange the price is close to 0.1 $ maybe 0.08-0.09 $, but bounty like this sometimes is annoying. when too many participants join and they use "Stake" system, maybe participants will really only get penuts.

[Silberman]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I have never being a bounty hunter but what you say seems to make sense, however we must recognize that bounty hunters are having a hard time because icos are having a hard time and even if at some point people trusted in ieos that trust is evaporating itself really quickly as well, so there is no way to solve this unless investors put money in icos and that does not seem to be very likely taking into account that no one is going to invest in those bad projects again after they have been scammed once.

[tianglistrik]

I think allocation is not the key to look after, it doesnt matter whether it have a small or huge allocation if they will pay then they will pay, if not then not. What I'm pointing out is that we always should promote the real or true projects despite of its allocation. We can earn from that even though its small, its better than a scam.

but actually allocations are important too, you should think about your expenses and also estimate the results that will be obtained. so at least we are looking for an adequate allocation according to your own estimates, and certainly looking for projects that can pay and can potentially have long term.

[diazepam666]

There is nothing to speak about bounties now because people are not at all looking and care about bounty programs since the number of scammers raised in the marketplace.
I never like to turn towards the bounties unless and until big managers taking charge it.

[owengtam09]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I still like to promote those projects that have good potential whether they are paying a small amount or big. For sure they will pay us rather than those that are no assurance. I also like projects those who have long term projects so I can accumulate my earnings.

[Xxmodded]

Bounty scam does not depend on their budget. The reason for bounty scam is because they cannot succeed in IEO or ICO, and their token doesn't have any value in this market. And if they distribute it, we can not sell the token anywhere. It is best to look for the bounty that has been listed at the exchange and participate.

But sometimes Bounty which displays a lot of budget is just to lure investors and Bounty Hunter, Not real. I agree with what the OP said. Lately, I have seen Bounty, which provides a small budget, always pays Bounty Hunters, even they only get a few dollars.

A lot of budget look interested for joining but I prefer with how much their coin sold of private sale, I'm not tempted when looking a lot of budget for bounty reward allocated but coin looks not interested by investor, we must working without get reward because after one month promoting and their coin not reach soft cap we miss payment and received reward with a lot of budget reward bounty campaign.

[ubercool]

If project will not be able to reach even soft cap then what is the use of those coins? They can't even start the project if they don't get to the soft cap. Rather than that, you should try on a bigger project where you can at least get something.

[mobilestrike]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

Many projects who are sincere with their project and who know that they will continue to work for their project and will make it the best project then they do not worry for the bounty payment that it will harm them on exchanges as they know that sooner their price will rise to the skies. Only those projects deny the payment to the bounty hunters who do not have hope that their project will survive or who feel greed and want to grab even the bounty hunter payment.

[Mulann2]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

well you maybe right, because if you look at it most project who gives big allocation for their bounty pool often find it hard to pay such amount to hunters when bounty is over, they come up with the excuse of protecting the investors because hunters will dump and it ill affect price,
but shouldn't they have put this into consideration in the first place? while making promises you don't intend to keep?

[kram31]

I'm starting to think its better to promote bounty projects with low allocation like 30k to 50k because they never failed to pay hunters, even if these projects find it hard to met softcap it will be easy to pay bounty rewards, this might be because of bear market but gone are those day of thousands dollar worth bounty rewards unless new wave of market movement takes place

I dont think so, it is really not about the budget! it is about the project and it's team.
There were some who promised small amounts but turned out to be a scam also or failed.
We should deeper on the team and its project before joining.

[AjithBtc]

agree the low allocation of bounty, sometimes the reward is according to what they say for example the price of token is 0.1 $ and it turns out after listing on exchange the price is close to 0.1 $ maybe 0.08-0.09 $, but bounty like this sometimes is annoying. when too many participants join and they use "Stake" system, maybe participants will really only get penuts.

Low allocation or the staking doesn't cause anything negative over the market of the respective token. Myself have participated in different bounties and have earned a large number of tokens, and this was truly worth during the entire market reaching ath values. Further there is no big growth, opportunity missed is missed that too is a problem with it.

[Cheatbtt]

That is not so bad than not being paid at all, but in fact it is the same that most ICO projects today, whether low or high allocations are not guaranteed. and annoyed if paid but tokens cannot be traded on the market, some are paid but the allocation is reduced and not in accordance with the promise in their bounty statement.

[bitcoin-shark]

it is not said, let's say there is a higher chance that the bounty hunters will pay if the percentages allocated to the bounties are reasonable, but as the bounty managers always say in the rules, the rules can be changed at any time by the project team or by the same manager, it happened to me more than once that at the end of the bounties kyc is required or the tokens distributed are only a tenth of what was promised at the beginning so there is in no way certainty of being rewarded for our work...