token supply

[zhekinsp]

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

 

You are talking about unsold tokens get burned? It is actually good if that token is going to be listed on exchanges because it will help to reduce the total supply and better price value based on ratio of demand and total supply.

[1715040998]

1715040998

[1715040998]

1715040998

[1715040998]

1715040998

[JC btc]

I agree with the op, if you are going to burn some tokens along the way, why creating so much in the first place, sometimes i get discourage with projects that have such huge supply with no actual use case, i think this is a point of proper consideration by the project team before creating any amount of token, btc with just 21 million supply still often get affected when a whale decided to dump his holdings,
there is no point to create huge supply then decide to burn some to help the price.

I think, this is all part of their marketing strategy. The easiest way to attract an investors interest is to make them have the vision of growing their investment by burning some of the tokens, you know, the lower the supply, the higher the demand.

Yeah, but I don't think something happening unless it is Bitcoin wherein we have seen it's potential, it's not burning but the demand increases everyday and for me it is fine and a good strategy if they will have a token burn for as long as they are doing their best to develop and constantly doing marketing to make the price grow.

[mrdeposit]

burned tokens = the project most likely trying to manipulate people into buying to manipulate price
a coin should not be burned - ever
i dont see any valid reason to do that really

You think wrong about it. Have you ever heard about demand and supply? What if the total supply decreases? Can you imagine what would happen if the %10 of btc was burned? Or consider the supply of gold in the world. Click the link to fully understand about crypto burning: https://masterthecrypto.com/coin-burning-what-is-coin-burn/

[Coltpython]

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

[DabsPoorVersion]

I agree with the op, if you are going to burn some tokens along the way, why creating so much in the first place, sometimes i get discourage with projects that have such huge supply with no actual use case, i think this is a point of proper consideration by the project team before creating any amount of token, btc with just 21 million supply still often get affected when a whale decided to dump his holdings,
there is no point to create huge supply then decide to burn some to help the price.

I think, this is all part of their marketing strategy. The easiest way to attract an investors interest is to make them have the vision of growing their investment by burning some of the tokens, you know, the lower the supply, the higher the demand.

Yeah, but I don't think something happening unless it is Bitcoin wherein we have seen it's potential, it's not burning but the demand increases everyday and for me it is fine and a good strategy if they will have a token burn for as long as they are doing their best to develop and constantly doing marketing to make the price grow.

It is indeed a good strategy, however, this is the only progress they can made then after that, nothing will follow. Most previous ico's have this kind of feature. But most of them actually end up dying without even making progress in the market.

[tiang_tower]

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

However, I see a big influence on the curio project which has a very low token supply, at the moment the price of the token cur is almost as high as $ 1 in the market, so the influence on the supply of tokens is still there, even though the role is more interested in the market.

[Dart18]

Yes, they wont start making small supply just like bitcoin.
It will be damn expensive for every token that will be bought. I will ignore that of course.
I will just stick with bitcoin if ever it had the same number of supply.

The idea of having so much token and then a sudden hype comes out.
That is what investors will run for to buy in a blink. Yeah, the foolish ones.  

[monineklutak]

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

However, I see a big influence on the curio project which has a very low token supply, at the moment the price of the token cur is almost as high as $ 1 in the market, so the influence on the supply of tokens is still there, even though the role is more interested in the market.

usually if a project or coin that has a total supply of a small price of a coin or token can be expensive, but for Curio under $ 1, I don't know why, maybe because there is only a small circulation supply in the market

[Natalim]

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

 

They'll only burn it to attract investors because it will apply the supply and demand, now if the project will become successful a lesser supply would mean a greater price it will become, so investors will try to investor when there's token burn because that' what they speculate will happen.

[aioc]

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

However, I see a big influence on the curio project which has a very low token supply, at the moment the price of the token cur is almost as high as $ 1 in the market, so the influence on the supply of tokens is still there, even though the role is more interested in the market.

Small or huge supply, the bottom line is will the community support the coin and what's it's usage for the community and does it has a platform people can use if there is none, then it's a shitcoin whether it supplies is as huge as 1 billion or as low as 1 million, it's not the main concern of the investors.

[damar09]

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

However, I see a big influence on the curio project which has a very low token supply, at the moment the price of the token cur is almost as high as $ 1 in the market, so the influence on the supply of tokens is still there, even though the role is more interested in the market.

Small or huge supply, the bottom line is will the community support the coin and what's it's usage for the community and does it has a platform people can use if there is none, then it's a shitcoin whether it supplies is as huge as 1 billion or as low as 1 million, it's not the main concern of the investors.

regarding the amount of large or small supply, between 1 billion and even trillions of supplies, and as low as only 1 million, actually influences investors, because it shows how a project is going well or not, and in my opinion a supply with a maximum between 21m-50m will more profitable than supplies above 1 trillion. Because the coins / tokens that have a reasonable supply, the developer will focus more on marketing the coins. And the circulation will be more maintained.

[Xxmodded]

I hate with developer where allocated token supply look very much for their team advice than how much token supply for investor, how come to make price keep higher if the developer always sell their coin and supply on market always up but never give effect to make coin keep higher price, we faced bad time after listing on exchange market and developer or advice team sell with bigger amount.

[FairUser]

I dislike projects that have a huge token supply. It is ridiculous to me. However, I do not think that token supply still influences the performance of any crypto coin like it did around 2017

They create tokens with a large supply because it will help the token's price to be lower when starting to list at exchanges. And after a long period of operation the price will increase easily if the project works well and there are products. Think about it, if they create tokens with low supply, the price of that token will certainly be very high and no investor will dare to risk buying new altcoins at such high prices. All this is their business strategy

[BeManga]

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

 

its not really a good idea a lot of coins already make similar to that in the past
and there will be a large sell wall in 1 satoshi and it will almost impossible to sell your coin

[Kersh768]

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

 

I agree. It doesn't make sense why there are projects that creates a very large token supply during a bounty which literally makes it a big project at a first glance due to a massive token supply and a large percentage provided for the campaign allocation to be distributed to participants which includes bounty hunters as well as potential investors. For me, it becomes a trick or strategy to attract bounty hunters getting into their project because it seems to promising and attractive being rewarded by large amount of token after the campaign. But it is not working like that because a massive amount which is not distributed as a reward or the remains from the recent token sale is being burned due to the reason that they are the excess tokens that seems to be unused. After thorough observation, it doesn't really matter how much token you have because the price still do matters that most since no matter how massive amount you have if the price is being dumped right after getting listed, it will still be a low income for you.

[damar09]

sometimes I think if you look at the amount of token supply in such a large amount that trillions and trillions after the project runs several months or years, the token will be burned, what for if you make tokens with a large supply, but will be burned, ...?

 

When mostly large number of token supply projects worthless after listing than team try to reduce token supply the only way of burn.

Azbit burn 10 billion tokens because their token price low 20x from IEO price i think so they decide to burn.
NPXSXEM, NPXS burned several billions of tokens a couple of times. Total supply is highly affected in coin value.

maybe you can see how they travel between NPXS and XDCE they have a large inventory, but there are differences between these two tokens, where NPXS makes additional supplies aimed at giving existence to the crypto world, and making NPXSEM, but after that NPXS experiences a decrease in the price drastic, and for XDCE I found a price increase, maybe this is a small example where a large token supply / increase supply to make it bigger, it will really make the price go down

[gensol]

Burning tokens comes as an after measure to scale token price more. Some project don't have good token metrics they don't base their supply on any substantial thing they claim the world has over a billion population when mass adoption sets in the supply will be effective.

[cutesgirl]

Token supply is become my first checking with some altcoin before investing with IEO, ICO and trading with altcoin listed on market. When getting have much supply coin I will think with price on IEO and ICO matching or not with how much their supply and price selling during ICO and IEO, if looking with higher price but supply very much I think is not good investment way.

[isaac_clarke22]

It just encourages a lot of investors to buy many tokens. It's like a trick to their eyes that it will surely be an expensive coin in the future, but it turns out it is the opposite. In fact, these project with overwhelmingly high supplies but shit value are quite common actually.

[nekonyun]

burning tokens has an effect on tokens making the price of tokens go up because a lot of the total supply of tokens increasingly makes the price of tokens cheap