Is There a Way for Craig to Prove that He is Not Faketoshi ?

[chaoscoinz]

I think that all that Craig wright would have to do in order to prove he was really Satoshi Nakamoto would be to sign from the original Bitcoin addresses that supposedly belonged to Satoshi. Or he could possibly log into Bitcoin-talk from Satoshi account. I really he could just move coins from Satoshi's original wallet proving he did in fact own the private keys, making him the original creator and founder of Bitcoin. I believe that many charlatans will begin to show up now more than ever.

[DabsPoorVersion]

I think that all that Craig wright would have to do in order to prove he was really Satoshi Nakamoto would be to sign from the original Bitcoin addresses that supposedly belonged to Satoshi. Or he could possibly log into Bitcoin-talk from Satoshi account. I really he could just move coins from Satoshi's original wallet proving he did in fact own the private keys, making him the original creator and founder of Bitcoin. I believe that many charlatans will begin to show up now more than ever.

Yes, sign message would be the other option, and also, that is a good idea, if he can sign in using his own acc here in this forum, and will announce whoever he was, then no more questions needed.

He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

I don't think that he is doing all this for the sake of bitcoin. But we can see it as his way to get his BSV more attracted than it has before.

[Genemind]

As for me, it will be hard for him to prove that he's the real Satoshi unless he'll show evidence like the original wallet address of Satoshi. If he has a lot of evidence, then he should have shown it from the beginning so he wouldn't ruin his reputation. It will surely be hard for him to prove anything if he's really lying.

[Astvile]

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

There is a way a strong way to prove that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto. Showing signed message it is if he can somehow show us and prove that he owns the wallet that belongs to the real Satoshi Nakamoto people will stop questioning his claim for sure if he show us that signed message. But no matter how many reasons he makes if he can't prove that proof he will remain as the Faketoshi.

[peter0425]

signing message through the address that contains millions of bitcoin. Logging in using satoshi account in this forum and many more and he can do none of them. He's just faketoshi and people should just ignore him. Although it's true that he's making a noise for bitcoin but rather a negative noise and it won't help the development of bitcoin market at all.

and that is the only thing that the whole crypto market is asking for him Sign a message for those addresses he presented lately in court for all of this to stop and prove he is the real Satoshi nakamoto but the sad thing?he cannot do because he is a Fake and will not be Satoshi forever.

[n0ne]

Satoshi is an active member of our forum. Through that itself he can prove the identity to the world. He can go active logging into the account and posting his claim. He need to understand the reality, just because having the mask doesn't mean he is the real person. Maybe the identity resembles the same, and not the mind that is the key for innovation.

[gabmen]

signing message through the address that contains millions of bitcoin. Logging in using satoshi account in this forum and many more and he can do none of them. He's just faketoshi and people should just ignore him. Although it's true that he's making a noise for bitcoin but rather a negative noise and it won't help the development of bitcoin market at all.

and that is the only thing that the whole crypto market is asking for him Sign a message for those addresses he presented lately in court for all of this to stop and prove he is the real Satoshi nakamoto but the sad thing?he cannot do because he is a Fake and will not be Satoshi forever.

If he's able to do any of that, he should've done so the first time head made the claim. Now even if he does, people still wouldn't believe him. Anyone who claims to be satoshi wouldn't have enough evidence to prove they are, it's as simple as that. These are only claims that can't be validated. Too many novelties in crypto to take any of them seriously.

[Darooghe]

I can't believe that issue is still being debated. stop making him famous. Of course he is not Satoshi. Craig stated that If he really isn't Satoshi, then the real Satoshi must have plagiarized his work. He is showing the ridiculousness of the claim through sarcasm. In other words, he must be Satoshi. Whether you believe it or not, it doesn't change the intent. Maybe he is just enjoying taking the part of a Joker or a Clown of crypto. a little overacting sometimes but for the sake of your sanity don't take him seriously.

[coin-investor]

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

The one who wrote the Bitcoin code and the one who originally own the Satoshi Nakamoto account in this forum is very much a different person from Wright, not to mention his refusal to open the wallet, and not supportive of Nakamoto's original work, so many things have set him apart from the real Nakamoto, and this is where his problem, he cannot convince people that he is the real one.

[Palider]

There are many ways in which Craig Wright can prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, and this is the signing message  on Satoshi's verified wallet. This is simple requirements that CW can't provide. 
Maybe if Craig Wright will prove this he will score big points here to prove her claim to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto!  

[LogitechMouse]

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

Signing a message is one way that he can prove that he is not Faketoshi. If he can do it then I and many people here will believe that he is really the creator of Bitcoin.
Another one is transferring a bit of the 1 Million Bitcoin to another address. This will be another proof that he has the access of the address who holds a million Bitcoin thus, proving that he really is Satoshi

Unfortunately, he can't do both of them. I saw an article a while ago and it is stated that he doesn't have the private keys to open the address who holds a million Bitcoin. Another fail from him again. As long as he doesn't have any access on it, he will be faketoshi until his last breath .

[Eclipse26]

To prove that he is not just like another faketoshi, he needs to prove that he is the real one. But you know what's hard in doing that? It's because we have already put in our mindset that he's not telling the truth and he's just making stupid noise. If he's the real Satoshi, why does he need to take so much time before proving his identity? Right now he can't prove that he's not a faketoshi because no one will believe him now after all those lies.

[robelneo]

There is really no shortcut that he can do but to get access to the wallet that was locked by the real Nakamoto, it was and it still is the demand of the community, this has been dragging for so long, so long that people have had enough and just accept that he is a fake one, I believe the real Nakamoto will be eager to prove that he is the creator of Bitcoin by doing what the community demanded.

[kryptqnick]

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

I don't think it's possible to ultimately prove it. But some things could be done.
1. Signing a message and accessing Satoshi's coins.
2. Proving the locations he and Satoshi's Bitcointalk account had.
3. Explaining things only the creator could explain (this one is hard because it's hard to determine whether there is such a thing).
I don't think he'll ever do that, regardless of whether he is an impostor or not. If he's an impostor, he'd be ruined, and if he's not, he might still lose popularity after the intrigue is over as well as face charges for tax evasion, illegal financial operations or something like that.

[imstillthebest]

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

to prove that he is a true satoshi in my opinion is simple, he only needs to prove by showing the original private key satoshi nakamoto, and if craig wright does have a private key then he must be able to also make transactions with that private key or sign cryptographic messages using a private key that the same so everyone can be sure that he is not a fake Satoshi. like Charlie Lee did when he proved that he was the creator of Litecoin.

but he did show some private keys on the past or not yet  ? if not  , then he isnt really the real satoshi that we are looking for    . the op is a fan of craig because he wish that craig was the real one   . craig make a lot of noise about bitcoin  ? but i think most of those noise were negative   . thats why there are some people that hates craig    . it really does matter if he will be satoshi or not due to his behavior but the real satoshi could be a good guy , that is for sure .

[darkangel11]

There are many ways but he was never able to produce a single piece of evidence.
The first strange thing about Craig is hy did he wait years to reveal himself and start claiming that he's Satoshi. If I'm not wrong Kleiman died in 2013 and in 2015 Wright started his "I'm Satoshi" campaign. Why wait so many years if it's really your project.
I think he smelled money and decided to scam everyone and claim what was unclaimed and make money on it. He begun to collect patents but nobody cared and suing everyone but now he got sued and they will bankrupt him.

If he had access to Satoshi's coins he'd have sold them years ago.

[Nadziratel]

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

It is very simple. He can post as satoshi. So we will follow him after that.

[angrybirdy]

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

to prove that he is a true satoshi in my opinion is simple, he only needs to prove by showing the original private key satoshi nakamoto, and if craig wright does have a private key then he must be able to also make transactions with that private key or sign cryptographic messages using a private key that the same so everyone can be sure that he is not a fake Satoshi. like Charlie Lee did when he proved that he was the creator of Litecoin.

but he did show some private keys on the past or not yet  ? if not  , then he isnt really the real satoshi that we are looking for    . the op is a fan of craig because he wish that craig was the real one   . craig make a lot of noise about bitcoin  ? but i think most of those noise were negative   . thats why there are some people that hates craig    . it really does matter if he will be satoshi or not due to his behavior but the real satoshi could be a good guy , that is for sure .

Still not. Not even a single evidence have been provided by him since the time he claimed to be satoshi nakamoto.

I think so, he might be one of the believers of CW, but it doesn't matter since CW already proven as a liar so many times. What CW's talks was just nonsense, all his prediction is far from reality and he is doing this to increase the popularity of his own coin.

[Artemis3]

I am wondering, If there is any other way that Craig can prove that he is not Faketoshi ?

 He could very easily prove that he is Romulus and sit on the Throne of the Rome to rule the whole Europe. He is very much charismatic. Only he need to change his temperament. In some way I like his idea. But he playing a big role. It does not mater if whether he is real Satoshi or not. He is doing his role to make noise for Bitcoin market development.

It is very simple. He can post as satoshi. So we will follow him after that.

No, he/she/they can't login before the admin unlocks the account, and he won't do that unless he gets proof, probably the signing everyone demands at the very least...

Of course Craig has failed to provide such a thing.

[enhu]

The first step to prove he is not faketoshi is to provide a sign message. Everyone knew there should be a sign message, he is aware of that as well.
CW is not doing any role to make noise for Bitcoin market but he act for his own forked coin BSV.  He even wants to destroy BTC and spread that BTC isn't what is was and his BSV is the real like Ver's claim.