I don't think that she is gold digger. Before she was well known actress with good career and she was earning good money already.
I just dom't like how news media have double standards for Kate and Meghan. They always trying to find something negative about Meghan, while they are praising Kate in every step. I think it's possible that relationship between Harry, Meghan and remaining Royal Family wasn't really good and it might be one of reasons of this decision.
she was rich. she was an actress
Well known actress that mostly took small roles in TV series. For instance, she did one episode of CSI.
It's estimated that she had $5 million before the marriage while Harry had 25. 5 million for a whole career is not much. This industry usually pays this much in a single year if you are really doing movies, not episodes in TV dramas. To give you a perspective, Emma Stone made 26 million in 1 year. Scarlett Johansson got 35 million just for the last Avengers movie.
I think she's an opportunity digger, not a gold digger. I reckon she'll be the one who winds up making vastly more money but she certainly used him as a springboard.
I agree that an opportunist suits her better.
I don't think many foreigners really get the attitude the British public have towards the royals. We expect them to lord it up when the occasion calls for it, but the rest of the time we don't want them rubbing our faces in it or hear what they think about anything. William is the epitome of that. He's done regular jobs and flies coach on his holidays. He also keeps his gob shut.
I had a good look over the royal train when it was parked up at my local station once. The decor was from a 1970s doctor's waiting room. Most of the time royals are sat in drab rooms not saying much.
Ms. Markle is the polar opposite of that. It's not a bad thing, just a diametrically opposed thing.
Watch that -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrrC3HkJMzM the amount of hair flicking, coy poses and being all modern and stuff would have the queen beating the shit out of you if you recorded that as a working royal.
The only thing I find surprising about it is why all parties didn't realise there was a total lack of compatibility that could never be bridged. They should've gone full civilian from the off.
Meghan acts like a typical US celebrity with her poses and fake smiles. The way she touches her jewelry while talking, to make you look at it, the way she walks and sits... I'd expect that from a teenager or a girl in a club, not "her royal highness".
as for what killed diana(harrys mum) was not the driver stupidly hitting a pillar.. it was media stalking and harrassing her and forced the driver into hitting a pillar.
no offense but you seems to be very judgemental without really doing any research.
you definetly have no clue as to what occured to diana and you shamefully trying to ignore the media harrassment angle.. seems kind of weird to defend media
The media pushed the car out of the road and made it go twice the speed limit (100km/h on the limit of 50). That's a great story. They were taking pictures, you don't die from it.
Do you even drive? The driver is always responsible for his car and the safety of his passengers, especially if the crash occurs on an open road, he is speeding and hits a concrete block the size of a bus. Also, the passengers weren't wearing seat belts.
